Guest guest Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:41:34 -0600 S Cindy Sheehan Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize Certainly a WONDERFUL nomination, and one that I would support WHOLEHEARTEDLY!!! post ---------------- The Norwegian Nobel Committee Drammensveien 19 NO-0255 OSLO Norway <> January 31, 2006 <> To the esteemed committee members: Please kindly consider my nomination of Cindy Sheehan for the Nobel Peace Prize. <> Cindy Sheehan lost her son Casey on April 4, 2004. She could have buried her rage and grief with her son, or expressed it in destructive ways, but instead she decided to transmute these feelings into a positive drive for justice. <> Cindy gained international attention in August of 2005 when she traveled to President Bush's home in Crawford, Texas to request an in-person meeting. She intended to ask the President a question: " What was the noble cause for which my son died? " She camped out in front of Mr. Bush's home, awaiting an answer. Eventually, thousands joined her at " Camp Casey, " and she earned the support of millions more. Cindy's action was spontaneous and heartfelt. She did not plan to end up on the cover of the most popular weekly news magazines or at the center of media attention, but she did. Sheehan's quest for truth and justice started a national dialogue. In doing so, she proved that the dedication of a single individual can change the dynamic of world events. <> Up until that moment, the US anti-war movement was stalled, for lack of direction and will. Cindy Sheehan was the right person, at the right time, with the right level of commitment. Because she is the mother of a fallen soldier, she was capable of " bridging the psychological gap " with Americans of all political stripes. Conservative military families who would otherwise not seriously question whether war is an effective way to address US security concerns have started asking that question. The outcry of a bereaved mother gives them a dignified way to climb down from their support of the US military-industrial complex. <> <> Certainly, some military supporters have no interest at all in climbing down from their position, and we cannot expect this to happen overnight. After all, it took 20 years for the racist Alabama Governor George Wallace, who famously stood in the doorway of a segregated University to block the admission of African-American students in the 1960s, to admit his error and apologize. Even if such conversions take time and effort, Sheehan's efforts to reach out to those with whom she most adamantly disagrees shows she is entering the realm of nonviolence that Nobel laureate Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. modeled. Cindy Sheehan has made a serious effort to reach out even to individual and large groups of counter-protestors, who not only support the war, but also in some cases seek to humiliate herself and her supporters. For example, according to a UC Berkeley Peace and Conflict Studies student who was an eyewitness to the event, " A veteran came to Camp Casey on the weekend in his uniform, marched up to her with all the cameras looking on and showed a sign to her indicating that he was a veteran, that he thought what she was doing was wrong, and that he supported the commander in chief. Cindy simply took his hand and led him away from the cameras, then embraced him for several minutes while talking (inaudibly) to him. After several minutes he began to hug her back. He wound up apologizing and telling her that he felt sorry about Casey and that he would support her, and that if [he] had died, then his mother would be out in Crawford too. It was a very beautiful moment in humanity. " In another instance of Sheehan's desire to bridge the chasm, according to Scott Galindez of truthout.org, on August 29, 2005 " There was a candle light vigil honoring troops who have died in Iraq. The counter protesters came across the street and joined the vigilers at Camp Casey. They shared the flag and prayed together for the families on both sides who have lost loved ones in the war. They are now singing and holding candles together. This is a testament to the power of this movement. " <> more recently, On September 24, 2005, Cindy Sheehan performed what could be the most patriotic act any citizen can against a government's immoral actions: civil disobedience. She and others, citing their constitutional right to meet with governmental representatives to redress wrongs, attempted to enter the White House and meet with President Bush. They were promptly arrested. Both Gandhi and King agreed that " unearned suffering is redemptive " and " non-cooperation with evil is as much an obligation as cooperation with good. " Cindy is taking the unearned suffering of her son's death and transforming it into concrete, redemptive action. <> Cindy Sheehan deserves the Nobel Peace Prize because she has modeled courage and personal determination, and has inspired her fellow citizens to believe that if our dedication is deep enough, we can end the illegal and immoral occupation of Iraq and move our society closer to a culture of peace. Sincerely, <>Prof. Michael N. Nagler Founder, Peace and Conflict Studies Program Prof. Emeritus, Classics and Comparative Literature <>author, " The Search for a Nonviolent Future " <>University of California, Berkeley 101 Stephens Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-2306 <>mnagler +1 510 642 4101 -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.