Senate GOP screws veterans again

[Guest guest]

" Zepp " <zepp

Thu, 09 Feb 2006 07:38:26 -0800

[Zepps_News] Senate GOP screws veterans again

 

 

 

Senate Republicans Screw Veterans Again

BobGeiger.com, February 7, 2006

 

http://bobgeiger.blogspot.com/2006/02/senate-republicans-screw-veterans.html

 

What in the world is Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist going to do

with those wacky Democrats?

 

Don't they understand that war is supposed to make America's richest

people more wealthy and not actually make them sacrifice for the war

effort?

 

Despite Senate Democrats spending much of 2005 getting shot down by

the GOP majority as they attempted to secure funding for active

military, Veterans and first responders, Senators Christopher Dodd

(D-CT) and Jack Reed (D-RI) decided to take another kick at the can

last week.

 

Dodd proposed S.AMDT.2735, which was intended to " …support the health

needs of our veterans and military personnel and reduce the deficit by

making tax rates fairer for all Americans. " In short, the measure

proposed additional funding to shore up the failing infrastructures at

Veterans hospitals all over the country and was cosponsored by eight

other Democrats including John Kerry (D-MA) and Barbara Boxer (D-CA).

 

" We know last year that over 100,000 Iraqi veterans returned home. Yet

the administration's fiscal year 2006 budget for the VA was only

prepared to handle 23,000 veterans, " said Dodd in arguing for his

amendment. " There are shortfalls in every state across the country.

There are shortfalls in private facilities as well as public ones.

This amendment is for us finally to say let's do something for these

people. "

 

The American Legion agreed with Dodd, writing a letter for formal

introduction into the record supporting the Democratic amendment.

" Your amendment acknowledges the need for adequate funding to ensure

our nation's veterans receive the healthcare and other benefits to

which they are entitled, " said Steven Robertson, of The American Legion.

 

So what's the big problem with Dodd's legislation? It asks for a minor

rollback in the capital gains tax cuts the Bush administration has

given to the richest one-fifth of one percent of Americans – or those

who, in 2007 and 2008, will receive yet further capital gains and

dividends tax reductions.

 

" If you think we ought to do something on behalf of our veterans, then

we ought to have the courage to pay for it, " said Dodd. " You have to

make choices. A modest reduction in the capital gains and dividends

tax reduction for 2 years, coming from less than one-fifth of 1

percent of the population making over $1 million a year is very little

to ask for. "

 

Apparently it was too much to ask, as the amendment went down by a

vote of 53-44, with only one Republican (Lincoln Chafee) voting for

the funding and one Democrat (Ben Nelson) voting against. Good Lord,

can we just stop this charade and do a straight-up trade across the

aisle – Chafee for Nelson – and get it over with?

 

And here's the real kicker: With the Iraq War currently ringing up a

price tag in the $230 billion to $300 billion range– depending on

whose numbers you go with – how much do you think Dodd's bill was

asking for over five years? A little under $7 billion to help care for

the Veterans that will result from what may ultimately be a $500

billion war.

 

Daniel Akaka (D-HI), one of the amendment's cosponsors, told his

Senate colleagues that this funding simply acknowledges the reality of

Vets needing help when returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan and

that it will avoid the emergency funding that has been necessary

lately due to the GOP's stinginess with our war wounded.

 

" This amendment we offer today allows the VA to provide care for

returning troops--without displacing those veterans currently using

the system, " said Akaka. " Let us never forget the budget disaster last

year.

 

Early in the year, we knew VA was not making ends meet. The

administration, however, took months to come to that realization. And

just last week, the President signed a declaration of emergency

funding for $1.2 billion for fiscal year 2006. "

 

The other kick in the teeth for America's Veterans came in the form of

Republicans also rejecting S.AMDT.2737. Sponsored by Senator Reed, the

amendment also sought a rollback in capital gains tax cuts -- but this

time to purchase much-needed equipment for troops serving in the

Middle East.

 

" We have the responsibility to be responsible, not only give the

troops what they need but pay for it so we do not increase the

deficit, " argued Reed on the Senate floor. " I hope we respond by

supporting my amendment which takes care of the troops but does so in

a responsible way by providing the resources to pay for this necessary

equipment. "

 

" This equipment is not new equipment, it is not transformational, it

is the equipment they need. I commanded a paratrooper company in the

82nd Airborne Division. I can tell you the worst thing for morale is

to have soldiers with poor and inadequate equipment. We owe it to them. "

 

Reed's legislation was also killed by the GOP leadership by a vote of

53-44.

 

Do you ever wonder, as I do, how many Republican Senators have

" Support the Troops " magnets on their cars?

 

 

 

--

" Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government

talking about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court

order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about

chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order

before we do so "

-George W. Bush, April 20, 2004

 

Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!

Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.

 

http://www.zeppscommentaries.com

For news feed, http:////zepps_news

For essays (please contribute!) http://zepps_essays