GM Contamination Accelerating No Co-Existence Possible

[Guest guest]

S

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:01:56 -0800 (PST)

GM Contamination Accelerating No Co-Existence Possible

 

 

 

http://www.i- sis.org.uk/GMCANCEP.php

 

 

 

The Institute of Science in Society

Science Society Sustainability http://www.i-sis.org.uk

General Enquiries sam Website/Mailing List

press-release ISIS Director m.w.ho@i- sis.org.uk

 

This article can be found on the I-SIS website at

http://www.i- sis.org.uk/GMCANCEP.php

 

 

 

 

 

ISIS Press Release 16/12/05

 

 

GM Contamination Accelerating No Co-Existence Possible

 

 

Untried and untested GM crops are out of the bottle even in

the UK where no GM crops are commercially grown. Rhea Gala

 

A fully referenced version of this article is posted on ISIS members'

website. Details here

 

GM crops, the vast majority engineered for just two traits

- herbicide tolerance and Bt pesticide, or stacked with both

- have been released on five continents for up to nine years,

causing widespread contamination of food, feed, seed

and the environment across the globe.

 

Genetically modified DNA from any part of a GM plant can

enter the environment unobserved, for example, through

- pollen transfer to a conventional crop, through

- seed dispersal or plant decomposition

and persistence in soil ecology.

The toxins encoded in the DNA also - Kill Wildlife and

- contaminate soil and water, as do herbicides such as

- glyphosate and

- glufosinate ammonium that are an essential component

of the herbicide tolerant crop system.

 

Outcrossing between a GM crop plant and a wild relative

and over dependence of the GM crop on herbicides to which

the crop is tolerant, are causing a wave of " superweeds "

to emerge in the US and elsewhere; the UK has reported

a potential candidate earlier this year.

 

UK's herbicide tolerant weed hybrids

 

The UK government reported genetically modified herbicide tolerant

(GMHT) hybrid weed seedlings at field trial sites earlier this year.

One was a cross between Bayer's GMHT oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and

its distant relative the common arable weed, charlock (Sinapis

arvensis), and two were hybrids of Brassica napus and B. rapa.

 

The findings, which were not announced, were nevertheless

widely reported and somewhat exaggerated in the press [1]

because many politicians and government scientists had repeatedly

downplayed the possibility of GM gene transfer to wild relatives, the

emergence of GM superweeds, or any other adverse effects of GM crops.

 

For example, in 2000 the EU Environment agency concluded, " There

appears to be general agreement that natural gene flow is not likely

to occur between B. napus and S. arvensis " .

 

The EU has an industry-sponsored forward plan for `coexistence' in

European countries for GM, conventional and organic crops to 2025

( " Beware the New Biotech Eurovision " SiS 24).

 

The report to DEFRA from the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology,

Dorset, found that [2], " The commercial growing of genetically

modified, herbicide- tolerant oilseed rape is seen to result in the

potential for the inserted gene to escape from the crop and become

incorporated in the genomes of one or more related wild crucifer

species, potentially giving a competitive advantage to the recipients. "

 

The " virtually impossible " already happened

 

The emergence of two GMHT B. napus and B. rapa hybrids

was inevitable as B. rapa is a parent of the commercial variety B.

napus and spontaneous hybrids are well known to occur.

Although the two plants generally do not share the same distribution,

B. rapa may be overlooked because of its similarity to feral oilseed

rape. The finding of these hybrids and the GMHT charlock hybrid show

that the difficulties of coexistence between GM and conventional crops

will be insuperable. Despite that, the authors still concluded,

" The risks of transfer of herbicide tolerance to wild relatives of

oilseed rape appear to be minimal. "

 

But Dr Brian Johnson, an ecological geneticist and head

of the Biotech Advisory Unit at English Nature, said that

the Charlock Superweed would be fertile through its pollen

to neighbouring plants [1]; and that charlock seeds can

remain in the soil for 20 to 30 years before they germinate.

 

Huge problems of cross- contamination and herbicide resistance have

arisen in countries like Canada and the US (see for example " GM sugar

beet turned sour " , SiS 25; " Roundup Ready sudden death " , SiS28).

 

Herbicide tolerant volunteers

 

Herbicide tolerant volunteers were found in the two years following

the Farm Scale Evaluations, and they tend to persist, requiring

control with toxic herbicides other than glufosinate ammonium.

 

The authors thought that volunteers may pose a greater

risk for gene flow of the bar gene into the environment,

than hybridization with wild relatives, especially if

the same gene construct is introduced into other crop species.

They also pointed out that these problems " highlight implications for

the EU threshold limits of GM content in oilseed rape crops set at 0.1

percent, 0.3 percent and 0.9 percent for organic seed, certified seed

and food & feed, respectively " [2].

 

GM contamination lasts at least 15 years in soil

 

The BRIGHT report [3] on a study in the UK begun in 1998

with funding from Monsanto, Bayer CropScience, BASF,

and Agrovista UK Ltd, among others, tried to underplay

problems to wildlife from GM crops; but found that when

HTGM sugar beet followed HTGM winter oilseed rape,

additional herbicides were needed to control volunteer rape.

 

There were also problems with crossbreeding between

herbicide tolerant varieties of rape, producing seeds

resistant to more than one herbicide, and making management

of minimal herbicide regimes very tricky even for experienced

practitioners.

 

The authors of BRIGHT have since looked further into

the problem of persistence of GM seeds in seedbanks

in a new study on the population dynamics of volunteer rape, Brassica

napus, comparing two GMHT winter oilseed rape

cultivars and two conventional cultivars [4].

 

They found that seed remaining in the field after harvest averaged 3

575 seeds per square metre but ranged from less than 2 000 up to more

than 10 000 seeds.

There was a rapid decline in seed number during the first few months

after harvest; a mean loss of 60 percent of seeds thought to be

removed by wildlife.

But in subsequent seasons, the seedbank declined much more slowly at

four of the five sites, at about 20 percent per year.

The models predicted a 95 percent seed loss after approximately nine

years, resulting in nearly 200 seeds per square metre, which would

give rise to at least two HT rape volunteers nine years after the

original crop was sown. This predicts the emergence of an average of

one plant per square metre after 15 years.

 

Although there was no difference between the four cultivars

in either the number of seeds shed at harvest or in their subsequent

persistence, the importance of the persistence of GM rape seeds,

simply in the context of the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops is a

clear cause for concern.

The researchers concluded that the density of more than two volunteers

per square metre would exceed the European Union threshold of 0.9

percent adventitious presence of GM seeds in a non-GM crop, if the

subsequent crop were conventional.

 

These results come in the same week as DEFRA's report showing that the

harmful effects on wildlife from GMHT crops in the

Farm Scale Evaluations (see " GM crop fails final test " SiS 26) persist

for at least two years [5]. Results showed that weed seedbanks

following GMHT spring oilseed rape were significantly lower than

following conventional crops over this period as was the case with

winter oilseed rape [6].

Seedbanks following GMHT beet were also smaller providing empirical

evidence for longer-term effects of GMHT cropping on farmland

biodiversity [5]. Seedbanks for GMHT maize were higher than

conventional, mostly probably due to the use of the now banned

herbicide atrazine on the conventional crop.

 

Illegal contamination with GM material

 

These cases of environmental contamination with GM material

have been detected in the UK where there is as yet no

commercial planting of GM crops; emphasising that contamination

in countries such as Canada, the US and Argentina - where GM

monocultures are becoming, or are already the norm –is far more

extensive ( " Soya disaster in Latin America " , SiS28).

 

Though hardly reported in the mainstream press, well over 60 incidents

of illegal or unlabelled GM contamination have been documented in 27

countries on five continents; eight of which occurred in the UK.

And those are only the recorded incidents [7].

The worst single contamination incident was of StarLink Maize,

a GM variety approved only for animal feed which entered

the human food chain in seven countries, the US, Canada,

Egypt, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Japan and South Korea.

 

Moreover GM DNA is in the European human food chain via GM

animal feed ( " DNA in food and feed " SiS 23), but milk

and meat are not labelled as such, and are considered safe

by the UK Food Standards Agency.

 

Recent GM contamination in Europe

 

UK Member of Parliament Michael Meacher recently condemned

seven years of secrecy over GM food and feed safety [8].

" On the seventh anniversary of the first disclosure of scientific

concern about GM food safety I am supporting calls for freedom of

access to the data used by the Government to approve GM foods. "

Meacher said, " Since the issue is the launching of GM products into

the nation's food supply that have never been independently tested,

this is a public scandal of huge proportions. "

 

Next year the EU will decide how member countries will draft

`coexistence laws' for GM, conventional and organic crops to be grown

together. But at a conference in Bologna, Italy, in September,

experts maintained such `co-existence' to be biologically impossible.

Angelika Hilbeck of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich

said that [9], " [trying to prevent GMO contamination] starts with the

seeds; you want to make sure you get uncontaminated seeds.

This is the origin of everything, from there on the contamination

multiplies. For example, in Canada it is hardly possible to get

GM-free canola seeds. "

 

News emerged in October about Monsanto's massive illegal

GM contamination of Romania. The country has the largest

GM cultivated landscape in Europe; officially half the

140 000 hectares of soya planted in 2005 is registered to be GM.

However, according to representatives of farmers' associations and

even biotech giant Monsanto's former Romanian manager,

up to 90 percent of soya is GM. The core of the problem

is due to genetically engineered crops contaminating

the traditional cultures, as well as the illegal selling

of GM soya seeds. GM potatoes and plums were also found [10].

 

Greenpeace protesters stopped the 125 000 tonne bulk-carrier Étoile's

huge consignment of GM animal feed from the US from being unloaded in

Bristol.

The feed was destined for British dairy cows to produce milk for the

UK's biggest supermarkets. Sainsbury's, Tesco, Asda, Waitrose and

Morrisons all sell own-brand milk from cows fed on American GM feed.

The GM varieties were banned in Europe, but were found by expert

laboratory analysts in samples taken from ships over the last two years.

 

Campaigners believe that only strict rules with liability regulations

applied by governments can stop the unauthorised spread of GM seeds

and products, which seems to be increasingly out of control all around

the world.

Doreen Stabinsky of Greenpeace International says,

" If states do not act and set strict rules now GM crops will

further contaminate lands, seeds and food around the world. "

 

But no Government or international agency has established

a public record of contamination incidents or other problems

associated with GM crops. GeneWatch UK and Greenpeace International

are launching the first on-line register of genetically modified

contamination incidents.

The on-line, searchable web site gives details of all

the known cases of GM contamination of food, feed,

seed and wild plants that have taken place worldwide [11].

 

---------------------

This article can be found on the I-SIS website at

http://www.i- sis.org.uk/GMCANCEP.php

 

If you like this original article from the Institute

of Science in Society, and would like to continue receiving articles

of this calibre, please consider making a donation

or purchase on our website. ISIS is an independent,

not-for-profit organisation dedicated to providing critical public

information on cutting edge science, and to promoting social

accountability and ecological sustainability in science.

If you would prefer to receive future mailings as plain text please

let us know.

 

The Institute of Science in Society, PO Box 32097, London NW1 OXR

telephone: [44 1994 231623] [44 20 8452 2729] [44 20 7272 5636]

 

General Enquiries sam -

Website/Mailing List

press-release -

ISIS Director m.w.ho@i- sis.org.uk

 

MATERIAL ON THIS SITE MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT EXPLICIT

PERMISSION. FOR PERMISSION, PLEASE CONTACT enquiries@i- sis.org.uk