High-Ranking Military Officers And Airline Pilots Agree Flt 175

[Guest guest]

A

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:16:30 -0500

High-Ranking Military Officers And Airline Pilots Agree Flt 175

 

 

 

http://www.rense.com

 

 

 

High-Ranking Military Officers And Airline Pilots Agree Flt 175 Did

Not Hit WTC South Tower

 

By Dave vonKleist

 

The Power Hour

12-15-5

 

 

 

Startling new revelations about the 9/11 attacks were recently

released on The Power Hour radio program. Col. George Nelson USAF

(ret.), who has 30 years of experience identifying aircraft and

aircraft parts stated, " The plane that hit the south tower on 9/11 was

not United Airlines (UA) flight 175 " . After reviewing numerous video

clips and photographs of the 9/11 attacks, he concluded, " That was not

a commercial airliner. The planes were substituted. "

 

( www.thepowerhour.com/news2/replay_aug8_2005.htm )

 

This shocking conclusion is also being echoed by other military

officers and commercial airline pilots.

 

Glen Standish, an airline pilot for over 20 years stated, " The plane

seen in various video clips of the attack could not have been UA

flight 175, due to the extra equipment that appears to be attached to

the bottom of the fuselage " . A mysterious " flash " is also seen in the

clips that indicate possible incendiary events took place before the

planes entered the towers.

 

Nila Sagadevin, a seasoned airline pilot of over 20 years, examined

photos of the engine that was found at the Trade Center site. He

stated, " The engine found at the Trade Center was a CFM-56, which is

not utilized on a Boeing 767 " , confirming that the south tower was not

hit by flight 175, but by another plane that had taken its place.

 

Maj. Gen. Albert Stubblebine, US Army (ret.), an expert in photo

analysis, reviewed the photos taken at the Pentagon before the

collapse and concluded, " The plane does not fit in that hole! "

indicating that the damage was inconsistent with a 757 strike.

 

This explosive information not only brings into question the official

story of the September 11th attacks, but also the real motives behind

the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the War on Terror, the beneficiaries

of government contracts, and the resulting legislation like the USA

Patriot Act that was passed without review by Congress after the 9/11

attacks.

 

Because an increasing number of military personnel, civilian pilots,

physicists, educators and law enforcement officials are now

questioning the official story of hijackers responsible for the

attacks on September 11th , 2001, there is a call for the re-opening

of an investigation into the 911 attacks. ( http://www.reopen911.org )

 

The video clips and photographs examined are included in the

controversial documentary, " 911 In Plane Site " a Power Hour production.

( http://www.911inplanesite.com )

 

 

The Power Hour

 

www.thepowerhour.com

 

Joyce Riley & Dave vonKleist

 

 

 

http://www.rense.com

[Guest guest]

I have a question about the newer findings about the attacks on 9-11. If what

they are saying now is that flight 175 did not hit the tower, and there was a

" Substitute " plane involved. What happened to Flt 175 and its Passengers? Did

they vanish into thin air? They shurely did not transfer planes in mid air!

Has anyone ever addressed this question? If so Post the link.

 

Teacher