Guest guest Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 Lack of $43 Improvement Left Young Woman in Alabama a Widow Gary Skinner of Graysville, Alabama was an avid fisherman with a love for music, says his wife Angela. But on July 28, 2005, Angela lost her 48-year-old husband in a rollover accident when his 1999 Ford Ranger blew a tire, causing Gary to lose control of the vehicle. As Gary's car rolled over, the roof crushed in on him, causing a fatal head injury. Now public internal documents show that the auto industry knew as early as 1966 that their roof design was so weak that in rollover accidents it crushed occupants to death. Ford could have fixed this defect for as little as $43.13, says Public Citizen. Instead, they chose to hide this information and continue selling dangerous vehicles. On the Hill Now, a power grab by an unelected federal agency could eliminate the ability of any family in a similar situation as Mrs. Skinner to hold an automobile manufacturer accountable for ignoring safety. That agency—the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)—was specifically directed by Congress in the Transportation Equity Act of 2005 to increase the strength of a vehicle's roof, making passengers better protected if their vehicle rolls over during an accident. Instead, NHTSA proposed a rule that makes only minimal changes to the current standard and goes a huge step further to prevent lawsuits against manufacturers who ignore their own safety researchers in order to save money. NHTSA's decision to ignore their Congressional mandate has prompted bipartisan congressional opposition to portions of the rule and puts Americans' health and safety at further risk. 10,000: Number of people who die in rollover accidents annually. 13-44: Number of lives the proposed NHTSA rule will save annually, according to NHTSA's own estimates. Agencies' Rules Quietly Enable Tort Reform Washington Post, September 27, 2005 " On Aug. 19, NHTSA issued a long-awaited proposal to improve the strength of vehicle roofs, which have been known to cave in during rollovers, causing serious injuries and fatalities. Auto-safety groups denounced the proposal as weak and predicted it would do little to save lives. The proposal is an update of a 1971 standard. More troubling to safety groups was a provision that would, in effect, make it more difficult for consumers to sue auto companies for defective roofs... " ________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.