Prof. Jones Tallks To Arctic Beacon On WTC Demo

[Guest guest]

http://www.rense.com/general68/advice.htm

 

Prof. Jones Tallks To Arctic Beacon On WTC Demo

 

By Greg Szymanski

11-12-5

 

 

Advised in for Whirlwind 9/11 Ride, after Claiming WTC Was a

Controlled Demolition

Prim, proper and Republican-looking BYU professor crosses into

uncharted 9/11 truth waters. Bush attack dogs lurking around every

corner. Watch your back, professor!

 

The story of the day in the 9/11 truth world is the prim, proper and

conservative-looking BYU physics professor, coming out of the closet

with a 19 page report about how the WTC buildings, defying laws of

gravity, most likely collapsed due to " pre-positioned explosives. "

 

Professor Steven A. Jones' highly-provocative and scientifically

researched report, concluded the government's jet fuel theory was

inconceivable due the nature of the freefall of the buildings, the

towers falling in a matter of seconds within their own footprints

exactly like a controlled demolition.

 

Jones' story first appeared Friday in the Salt Lake City Deseret

Morning News and was quickly circulated throughout the country on the

internet. And, apparently expecting a barrage of callers, emails and

faxes, Jones seems to have cut-off communications with the rest of the

outside world, instead letting his 19 page report do the talking for him.

 

Numerous calls to the number listed on his resume were met Friday by a

strange sounding busy signal and emails requesting an interview sent

to jonesse were returned undeliverable.

 

Perhaps the good professor wants his privacy or perhaps he has been

overwhelmed with calls and emails. But let's just say good luck since

now he's nothing but " media meat " to slice up every which way by those

on both sides of the hotly contested 9/11 truth issue.

 

However, on Saturday Professor Jones telephoned the Arctic Beacon,

saying he is more than willing to tell everyone why he believes the

WTC came down from a controlled demolition and why he is urging the

American people to insist authorities open up a fresh investigation.

 

" I came to the conclusion after several months of serious

investigation and after conferring with people like David Ray Griffin

and others, " said Jones today from his home in Utah, sounding like a

very sincere, honest and forthright person, wanting to get to the e

truth about 9/11.

 

" My paper has been accepted for publication and surprisingly I have

been met with a lot of encouragement and support from my colleagues at

BYU. There have been, of course, emails calling me nuts and crazy but

that's to be expected. "

 

However, for practical purposes and to help Professor Jones adjust,

let's just say his quiet Utah world has ended forever with his

decision to essentially tell the world the government is lying about

9/11. Of course, that's not what he said specifically, but that's how

it will be interpreted, especially by the administration's

hyper-sensitive attitude towards those in academia who have questioned

the official 9/11 story.

 

" I just believe we should get at the truth and open up another

investigation. What finally tipped the scales for me was the way in

which Building 7 collapsed, " said Jones, who admitted coming from a

conservative background.

 

Although he stops short of saying exactly who pulled the demolition

plug on the towers, the insinuation is there that it was an inside

government job, his statements being enough to ignite a fury of

retaliation from the Bush administration attacks dogs if reaction to

past statement made by others like Jones is any indication.

 

And if history proves right, Jones is now in for a world-wind 9/11

ride, a ride like he's never experienced before. So professor be

prepared to strap yourself very tight to your office chair since those

on both sides of the 9/11 issue are going to be pulling and tugging at

you, pulling hard in very different and opposite directions.

 

Professor, be prepared to first be hounded by the 9/11 truth seekers,

who are going to try top use your every word to bolster their position

that Bush and his cronies killed 3,000 on the morning of 9/11.

Interviews from radio stations, news outlets and underground

television stations will come by the thousands as you have now, for

the time being, become the 9/11 truth movement's new poster child,

replacing the likes of former Bush administration official, Morgan

Reynolds, and other conservatives who came out of the closet attacking

Bush for bringing about 9/11.

 

The Arctic Beacon was one of the first to interview Reynolds and his

statements about the 9/11 being a government inside job, the story

being literally picked up round the world. Then came former Reagan

Treasury Secretary, Paul Craig Roberts, making similar statements

while bashing Bush on the Iraqi War as well, causing equally as big of

stir as Reynolds.

 

And all bets are off as to how hard the Bush attack dogs will come

down Jones, who will be viewed as hitting Bush below the belt from a

strongly conservative stronghold like BYU and Utah.

 

So, it's really only a matter of time before he is somehow discredited

for his views and only a matter of time before the Bushies pull out of

their hats five, ten or fifteen other physic's professors who totally

disagree with him, as endless scientific debates will automatically

take center stage for awhile like the many debates on the same issue

have transpired in the past.

 

And what will be accomplished? Well, in reality Jones will probably

get frustrated of the constant harassment and soon slip back into

academia. The Bush administration will try to hasten that move and

uncover whatever dirt on him available to discredit his character

while, at the same time, checking to see what type of government

contracts can be withheld from BYU in order to get Jones to shut up.

 

And, in the end the great scientific debate over 9/11 will continue as

the real culprits in Washington like Daddy and Baby Bush, Clinton,

Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rice. Wolfowitz, Pearle, Rove and the other crooks

continue to walk hand in hand by the banks of the Potomac, smoking

cigars and laughing all the way to the bank.

 

But for the sake of discourse, it's rather interesting to note the

innocence, almost schoolboy attitude exhibited by Professor Jones, as

to why he finally decided to go public about 9/11. First he said he

was inspired by a clairvoyant who had a near death experience, warning

others " if you think the WTC came down just due to fire, you have a

lot of surprises ahead of you. "

 

He then was quoted as saying " at which point everyone around me (at

the speech) started applauding. " Even though this is a rather amusing

tale, Jones should be prepared for some near death experiences of his

own, since crossing the line with Daddy Bush is sometimes hazardous to

one's health.

 

Also, Jones should be prepared to be forever classified by the Bushies

as " a crazy clairvoyant nut " as he made his first mistake by giving

the administration this type of ammunition to use against him, being

too honest and too naïve -- two big mistakes he will come to regret

when looking back on the whole story

 

Next Jones makes a second statement about his 9/11 reawakening in the

Deseret Morning News, again indicating he has no idea what kind of

corrupt government world he is entering. Although a good idea, he said

he would like the government to turn over 6,899 photographs and 6,977

segments of video footage for " independent scrutiny " now being

conveniently held out of sight and out of mind by the government.

 

Fat chance! All that can be said is good luck since most serious

investigators and truth seekers to date can't even get their hands on

one video, let alone 12,000, an example being from the gas station

across the street from the Pentagon, a video which is being held by

the FBI that most likely could show an airliner never struck the Pentagon.

 

Besides the 12,000 pictures and tapes, Jones is also asking the

government to turn over a piece of molten steel from the core of the

towers for his independent investigation, again perhaps not

understanding FEMA shipped the steel right after 9/11 out of the

country to China in an obvious obstruction of justice criminal violation.

 

Good luck again to Jones if he can get a piece of WTC steel, but it

should be remembered for four long years thousands before him have

tried and failed, obviously proving we have a cover-up of massive

proportions.

 

Even though Jones means well and his heart is in the right place, he

is going to have a rude awakening when he tries to get anything, even

a cup of coffee and a roll, from anyone close to the government after

what he has said. It's basically the gloves off, professor, so get

used to the controversy as perhaps the old saying " be careful what you

ask for as you just might get it " may aptly apply here.

 

But regarding his 9/11 conclusions, it's important to note they are

bolstered by what he says are many eye-witnesses who have come

forward, saying they heard, felt and experienced explosions in the

sublevels of the towers just prior to the airliners striking at the

top floors.

 

Jones is correct in his conclusions since the Arctic Beacon has been

one of the first to conduct interviews with many of those

eye-witnesses, including a North Tower survivor named Felipe Sanchez,

who experienced third degree burns from the powerful basement

explosions, resulting in a six month hospital stay before he finally

recovered.

 

Jones should be told that 9/11 Commission as well as everybody else in

high places, including the major television and newspaper outlets,

have all categorically censored all the eye-witnesses, shutting up

anyone who can finger the government liars and verify a controlled

demolition took place, thus revealing the true nature of the corrupt

media owners protecting the equally corrupt government officials.

 

However, in all fairness, Jones' thoughts should be heard and added to

the words of many other 9/11 truth seekers who have come spoken before

him. In the article written by Elaine Jarvik of the Deseret Morning

News, the following points are highlighted from his 9,000 word article

claiming the towers and Building 7 were most likely brought down by a

controlled demolition:

 

* The three buildings collapsed nearly symmetrically, falling down

into their footprints, a phenomenon associated with " controlled

demolition " - and even then it's very difficult, he says. " Why would

terrorists undertake straight-down collapses of WTC-7 and the Towers

when 'toppling over' falls would require much less work and would do

much more damage in downtown Manhattan? " Jones asks. " And where would

they obtain the necessary skills and access to the buildings for a

symmetrical implosion anyway? The 'symmetry data' emphasized here,

along with other data, provide strong evidence for an 'inside' job. "

 

* No steel-frame building, before or after the WTC buildings, has ever

collapsed due to fire. But explosives can effectively sever steel

columns, he says.

 

* WTC 7, which was not hit by hijacked planes, collapsed in 6.6

seconds, just .6 of a second longer than it would take an object

dropped from the roof to hit the ground. " Where is the delay that must

be expected due to conservation of momentum, one of the foundational

laws of physics? " he asks. " That is, as upper-falling floors strike

lower floors - and intact steel support columns - the fall must be

significantly impeded by the impacted mass. . . . How do the upper

floors fall so quickly, then, and still conserve momentum in the

collapsing buildings? " The paradox, he says, " is easily resolved by

the explosive demolition hypothesis, whereby explosives quickly

removed lower-floor material, including steel support columns, and

allow near free-fall-speed collapses. " These observations were not

analyzed by FEMA, NIST nor the 9/11 Commission, he says.

 

* With non-explosive-caused collapse there would typically be a piling

up of shattering concrete. But most of the material in the towers was

converted to flour-like powder while the buildings were falling, he

says. " How can we understand this strange behavior, without

explosives? Remarkable, amazing - and demanding scrutiny since the

U.S. government-funded reports failed to analyze this phenomenon. "

 

* Horizontal puffs of smoke, known as squibs, were observed proceeding

up the side the building, a phenomenon common when pre-positioned

explosives are used to demolish buildings, he says.

 

* Steel supports were " partly evaporated, " but it would require

temperatures near 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit to evaporate steel - and

neither office materials nor diesel fuel can generate temperatures

that hot. Fires caused by jet fuel from the hijacked planes lasted at

most a few minutes, and office material fires would burn out within

about 20 minutes in any given location, he says.

 

* Molten metal found in the debris of the World Trade Center may have

been the result of a high-temperature reaction of a commonly used

explosive such as thermite, he says. Buildings not felled by

explosives " have insufficient directed energy to result in melting of

large quantities of metal, " Jones says.

 

* Multiple loud explosions in rapid sequence were reported by numerous

observers in and near the towers, and these explosions occurred far

below the region where the planes struck, he says.

 

Greg Szymanski is an independent investigative journalist and his

articles can been seen at

http://www.LewisNews.com. He also writes for American Free Press

http://www.AmericanFreePress.net and has his own site

http://www.arcticbeacon.com .