Guest guest Posted November 6, 2005 Report Share Posted November 6, 2005 SSRI-Research@ Sat, 5 Nov 2005 23:03:41 -0500 [sSRI-Research] Virginia Tech Forum: Controversies Over Antidepressants_Nov 10 Virginia Tech Forum: Controversies Over Antidepressants_Nov 10 ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION (AHRP) Promoting Openness, Full Disclosure, and Accountability www.ahrp.org FYI On Prozac: Debating the New Technologies of Mind A public debate / discussion hosted at Virginia Tech will adress the controversies surrounding the largely inappropriate use of antidepressant and other mind altering drugs This promises to be an intelligent, critical discussion. Unlike the one sided infomercials that have in recent years replaced all semblance of a free exchange of ideas. Mental health professionals at academic and community forums are resentations but one point of view by psychiatrists with unacknowledged, direct financial conflicts of interest. The presentations by psychophyarmacologists and federal and state mental health officials rely on scripts written by Pharma PR firms. Recently when experts who are critical of the unsubstantiated claims made about antidepressants, antipsychotics, and the other mind altering drugs that are currently widely prescribed from cradle to grave--without any evidence that the drugs improved people's lives--the psychiatry department at these universities boycotted the spealkers. Robert Whitaker, author of the prize winning, seminal book, Mad in America was boycotted by Harvard Dept. of Psychiatry. Similarly, the Department of Psychiatry at Columbia University boycotted a presentation by the internationally acknowledged expert psychiatrist / psychopharmacologist, Dr. David Healy, whose research and analysis of the concealed clinical trial data, brought to public light the suicide risks of Prozac and the other SSRI antidepressants, and brought to light the utter lack of science behind the antidepression bandwagon. In sharp contrast to these major universities, Virginia Tech invites the public to attend a controversial subject. Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav 212-595-8974 veracare On Prozac: Debating the New Technologies of Mind " DANGER: These drugs may offer pseudo-solutions to real problems " The quip above succinctly describes how controversial antidepressants have become in our day. Yet equally, the arrival of the new generation of 'psychoanalgesics " -psychic painkillers-has been celebrated as a breakthrough in the treatment of depression and other psychological afflictions. An odd thirty years after the first approved use of antidepressants, a new class of drugs, the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), have appeared on the market. The first of these became known by its brand name-Prozac©. Since then the word " Prozac " has come to be used as a placeholder in a slew of publications-Listening to Prozac, Prozac Backlash, and Prozac Nation, to mention a few. In our forum, " On Prozac, " we use the brand name in that general sense: as a stand-in for the current generation of SSRIs, and other related new drugs, created to treat psychological problems by altering what is regarded as their physical substrate-brain chemsitry. The rates at which these antidepressants are prescribed has exploded. In the United States alone, antidepressants use tripled in the 1990s. The National Center for Health Statistics reported that in 2002, for example, over 38 visit per 100 women involved these drugs-nearly double the rate in 1996. Roughly seven percent of the adult population is currently on an antidepressant. Even more controversially, more and more children and adolescents are now consuming these drugs. And the conditions fo which they are consumed have also exploded-beyond depression, to incude social anxiety, stress, and premenstrual syndrome among others. The rapid adoption of antidepressants in our time-which surprised even pharmaceutical companies-has outpaced efforts to carry on pubic deliberation aout the consequences and desirabiity of this massive change in the way our society treats emotional distress. Concerns persist regarding the efficacy of these medications, the ethics of pharmaceutical treatments, harmful side-effects, and the plausability and consequences of treating depression as a disease of biochemical origin. The 2005 forum, " On Prozac, " will take place on Thursday, November 10. The aim of our forum is to encourage public discussion of this significant modern-day development. The panel members, which feature a range of recognized authorities on various aspects of antidepressants, will address ethical, medical, social, philosophical, and environmental dimensions of antidepressant use. A series of background and follow-up sessions will fill in with up-to-date materials and allow for audience participation. Session topics include history of antidepressants, the viability of clinicl trials, how antidepressants are represented in the popular culture, and alternative perspectives on what many regard as an epidemic-depression. Project Founder: Doris T. Zallen Project Directors: Crist & Daniel Breslau Research Associates: Brandiff Caron and Benjamin Sovacool For more information, contact the Choices and Challenges Project Science and Technology in Society Virgina Tech, Mail Code: 0247 Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 Phone: 540 231-6476 Fax: 540 231-7013 Email: choices Forum to address controversies over antidepressants 04 Nov 2005 Choices and Challenges at Virginia Tech will hold a public forum entitled " On Prozac: Debating the New Technologies of Mind, " a day-long series of panels and discussions to be held on Nov. 10 in the Graduate Life Center at Donaldson Brown. This forum is open to the public at no charge. In 1987, a new class of antidepressant medications, the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) appeared on the market, promising a cleaner, more effective treatment for depression, with greatly reduced side-effects. The first of these drugs, fluoxetene, better known by its trade name, Prozac, has become emblematic of the explosion in their use. In the United States, antidepressant use tripled in the 1990s. Roughly seven percent of the adult population is currently on an antidepressant. Even more controversially, these drugs are now prescribed to more and more children and adolescents. The rapid adoption of these " technologies of mind " has not allowed for adequate public deliberation of their benefits and consequences. The Choices and Challenges forum is designed to provide a forum for such discussion. " The routine use of these medications creates the illusion that their safety and efficacy are known quantities, " says Daniel Breslau, an associate professor in the Department of Science and Technology in Society in the College of Liberal Arts and Human Sciences, and a co-coordinator of the forum. " And beyond the question of their effectiveness, these drugs raise broad and urgent questions about the causes of emotional distress, how to define emotional and mental well-being, and the relation of mind to the brain's physiology. " To be informed consumers of mental health services, and informed participants in policy debates, the public needs to hear and engage with a wide variety of perspectives, including those of ethicists, historians, and philosophers of mind. " Before treating the epidemic of depression as strictly a problem of brain chemistry, we need to explore social and ecological causes as well. That is one important aim of our forum, " said Crist, an associate professor in the Department of Science and Technology in Society and Choices and Challenges co-coordinator. The forum's main panel will feature a range of recognized authorities on various aspects of antidepressants, and will address ethical, medical, social, philosophical, and environmental dimensions of antidepressant use. The main panel discussion will take place at 11 a.m. Moderated by Joseph C. Pitt, head of the philosophy department at Virginia Tech, panelists include: -- Samuel Barondes, director of the Center for Neurobiology and Psychiatry at the University of California at San Francisco and author of " Better than Prozac: Creating the Next Generation of Psychiatric Drugs. " -- Joseph Glenmullen, clinical instructor in psychiatry at the Harvard Medical School and author of " Prozac Backlash " and " The Antidepressant Solution. " -- Valerie Hardcastle, chair of the Department of Science and Technology in Society at Virginia Tech, and author of " The Myth of Pain. " -- David Kidner, associate Fellow for the British Psychological Society and author of " Nature and Psyche. " -- E. Haavi Morreim, ethicist and professor in the College of Medicine at the University of Tennessee and author of " Holding Health Care Accountable: Law and the New Medical Marketplace. " A series of background and follow-up sessions, beginning at 8 a.m., will fill in with up-to-date materials and allow for audience participation. Session topics include history of antidepressants, the viability of clinical trials, how antidepressants are represented in the popular culture, and alternative perspectives on what many regard as an epidemic--depression. In conjunction with the Choices and Challenges Forum, the Theater Arts department will present a performance piece, Life on the Pharm, written and conceptualized by Brandiff Caron and Ann Kilkelly, professor in the department of Interdisciplinary Studies. The piece, to be performed on Nov. 9-11 in 30 Pamplin Hall at 8 p.m. each night, will involve the audience in an interactive exploration of issues around depression and its treatment with pharmaceuticals. The Choices and Challenges Project was founded in 1985, and has presented annual forums on issues of public concern involving science and technology. For more information, visit the website at choicesandchallenges.sts.vt.edu. Jean Elliott elliottj Virginia Tech vtnews.vt.edu http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/images/blanktab.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.