Mercury: The Unsuspected Killer Part 1 of 2

[Guest guest]

Mercury: The Unsuspected Killer Part 1 of 2

 

10/28/05 Author: Greg Ciola & John Moore Source: Crusador

 

*CRUSADOR EXCLUSIVE* © 2005

www.HealthLiesExposed.com

 

MERCURY: The Unsuspected Killer!

 

CRUSADOR Interviews John Moore, A Leading Mercury/Dental Health

Researcher Who Exposes The Hidden Dangers Of The 2nd Most

Toxic Material Known To Man

 

In 1987 John Moore almost died from mercury poisoning caused by the

dental fillings he had in his mouth. Although his health had been

going downhill gradually for over five years, in 1987 he reached a

low point where he was so weak and tired he could barely get out of

bed. His brain was so foggy he could barely concentrate, let alone

read. His short-term memory was lapsing and he had unexplainable

irritability and bouts of explosive anger. Not knowing what to do

and where to turn John had pretty much given up hope. After meeting

some doctors involved in alternative dentistry that specialize in

mercury toxicity and its link to disease, John discovered that

mercury poisoning was the primary cause of his health problems.

 

When John began to detoxify the mercury from his body and remove all

the mercury fillings from his teeth, his health problems disappeared

virtually overnight. Seventeen years later John Moore is still alive

and, most importantly, full of vibrant health. After discovering

that mercury had decimated his health and after seeing his health

improve by detoxifying it from his body, John became a full time

mercury/dental health researcher. He now spends all of his time

assisting others on how to avoid this toxic poison and he shows

people some of the things that can be done if they've been damaged.

John has taught classes to dental and health professionals for three

years, often to 100 persons per session. Our in-depth interview this

month will go a long way in educating our readers about the highly

dangerous side effects this toxic metal has associated with it.

 

Greg: John, why don't you start by giving our readers a brief

history of your background and tell us how you got interested in the

subject of mercury toxicity.

 

John: I spent 15 years of my life working at the Boeing Company as

an industrial engineer. I had a fairly large crew working for me –

about 35 people. We were primarily in the forecasting business at

the time during the build-up on the 737's, 747's and so forth at the

Boeing complex in Renton. I worked at Plant 2 in Seattle and I

worked here in Renton.

 

In 1987 when the mercury problem hit me, it hit me hard. I didn't

understanding what was going on. About five years prior to `87, I

was noticing that my energy levels were going down, and then

continued to go down, albeit fairly slow at first. They began to

accelerate in their rate of descent for the last three years of the

five-year period. My problems didn't just happen over night, though

that can happen to some people. It was a slow progression where I

continued to get weaker and weaker and could do less and less each

day. In 1987 my wife wanted to go listen to somebody talk one night,

so I said: " Well, I'm going to be tired whether I stay here or I

take you there, " plus she didn't want to drive at night, so I drove

her. While we were there the speaker said to me: " You have mercury

poisoning from the dental fillings in your teeth and you need to do

something about it now. " I don't know if you're like me, Greg, but I

was the typical American who said: " Right! Sure I do. Me and

millions of other people have this stuff in our mouths and why would

it be me? "

 

I was in total disbelief at that time, and if other people are in

disbelief that their dentists would put a highly toxic poison in

their mouths, I can understand that because I totally related to

that. This little voice had kept saying to me all the time, " You

know John, you haven't been feeling that good, " and I would

say: " Shut up and go away! " It wasn't until two weeks after that,

that I finally said, " Okay, I'll check it out " just to quiet the

voice inside me. Meanwhile I'm losing my energy and ability to do

anything, so I wound up looking for somebody out here in the Seattle

area that knew what was going on. I went to John Bastyr University,

which is a naturopathic school and nobody seemed to know. I tried to

get in to see Dr. Bastyr, who was still alive at that time, but he

wasn't taking new patients so I couldn't get in to see him. So I

went to my local health food store and I asked the owner: " Who do

you know that can help me with mercury poisoning from the dental

fillings in teeth? " He said: " Dr. Sandra Denton. " She was at the

Tacoma Clinic, Dr. Jonathan Wright's clinic. You may be aware of his

clinic here in the Renton area now – it was in Kent at the time. She

was there for a two-year window, 1987-1989, then left and went to

Alaska where she resides now. She had a handle on what was going on.

She had been to see Hal Huggins (www.drhuggins.com) where she

watched him for three months and saw the results he was getting with

taking the fillings out and detoxifying people and basically

cleaning out their mouths. She took one look at my mouth and just

like the fellow at that conference I went to with my wife she

said, " You have mercury poisoning from the dental fillings in your

teeth and you need to do something about it now. "

 

Greg: Did she do any tests on you to determine that or could she

tell just by looking at you?

 

John: She just looked at me first and said that was the case and

then she did the testing. We did the blood testing, hair testing,

and urine testing. The really bizarre part about doing those three

tests was that they normally don't show anything. For example, if I

were to pick you up and put you in a bucket of mercury nude and then

take you out of that bucket and say, " Test Greg for mercury; " if we

don't do it in the first minute or two minutes of time, the mercury

will bind itself within your tissue and we won't find it. It won't

be in the blood, urine, or the hair. It's very difficult to find

unless you understand the footprint of mercury and what it looks

like in the body once it gets in there, and how to read the reports.

Fortunately, she had studied long enough and well enough to

understand what she was looking at when we did get the reports back

a month later. They were all there and she said: " Your first

assignment is to read Dr. Huggins' book It's All In Your Head. The

next thing you need to do is take these supplements and take the

fillings out of your teeth. "

 

I was virtually flat broke at the time. I had no money and no way of

doing anything to earn money because I was so fatigued. I said to

her: " I'll take your silly supplements but I'm not taking the

fillings out of my teeth. " She wasn't happy when I said that. The

amazing thing was that within two days I was clear enough (and I had

been really foggy in my brain up until that time) to go ahead and

start reading the book. After almost two months went by I went to

see Dr. Denton again and she said: " I've never, ever seen anybody

recover this quickly. "

 

My test results were an absolute reflection of what Dr. Huggins

pointed out in his book when a person is mercury poisoned. It was at

that time that I started believing maybe there was something to this

and that maybe I really had been poisoned. I was out of bed and

functioning again to some degree. I could start thinking more

clearly. I finished reading It's All In Your Head. Dr. Huggins has

since written some other books: Uninformed Consent with Dr. Levy,

his cardiologist, and Solving the MS Mystery. I got the message real

clear that there was something going on with the mercury. The only

thing I was doing at the time was basically detoxifying my body from

mercury. All the while I still had the fillings in my teeth. If you

detox the body while the fillings are in your teeth, it's kind of

like standing in the shower while the water is still running and I

toss you a towel and say: " Here, dry off! " Nothing is going to

happen. You're just going to continue to get wet. Turning off the

faucets to the shower amounts to taking the fillings out of your

teeth, and that's 90% of the cost in most cases. The other 10% of

the cost is in detoxifying the body.

 

Greg: There aren't many dentists around the country that even

specialize in mercury free dentistry. What's troublesome to many who

contemplate doing this is that in some cases you have to get a lot

of teeth pulled – it's not easy to just take the mercury out. What

do you think about this because there are some cosmetic problems

with alternative dentistry?

 

John: That's absolutely true. Some of the amalgam fillings are so

massive that when you drill them out, there's not enough of the

tooth left to save it. In a lot of cases the tooth has to come out

or it will come out later as a result of removing the mercury. I had

one gold crown and when we removed the crown, underneath was a big

hunk of mercury that had disintegrated and underneath that was

rotted tooth. When he ground the rotted tooth down to where it was

solid tooth again, you could see the black outline of where the

mercury had gone down into the nerve chamber. Although there are

some cosmetic concerns about removing mercury from your teeth the

bottom line is this, would you rather suffer terrible health

problems and possibly die by leaving this toxic mercury in your

mouth or would you rather deal with some cosmetic issues that in

most cases can be corrected?

 

Greg: What are some mercury free alternatives to replace the

fillings?

 

John: There are over 250 composites in the marketplace today.

There's no reason to put mercury in the mouth and there's no reason

to use a highly toxic poison, the second most toxic material and the

most prevalent toxic material on the planet known to man (the most

toxic being radioactive plutonium). When mercury is put into the

mouth it continuously releases poison. While we chew or take hot or

cold fluids into our mouths, the mercury releases much faster. In

either case, it's releasing poison into your body 24 hours a day, 7

days a week. If you place a mercury filling in your mouth today and

pull it out five years later and re-assay it, which has been done,

instead of it being 52% mercury, which it was when it was first

placed in the mouth, it's now down to 26% mercury. The obvious

question is: " Where did that other 26% go? " It went into the system.

80% went into your system and the other 20% went into your

neighbors, friends, relatives, spouse, etc. by breathing second hand

mercury. This can affect the spouse very significantly. If somebody

decides to have their fillings removed but their spouse who has a

mouth full of fillings does not, the first person can be `re-merced'

from the spouse by just being around them and living with them.

 

But you are absolutely right. There are very few dentists out there

that can do it and do it correctly (remove fillings). What I found,

having worked with a whole bunch of people for 17 years, is that

many people hear this is a good thing to do and they run out and

have their fillings removed and replaced and what happens is they

get sicker. The reason they get sicker is that they go to their own

dentist, typically, who is not in favor of taking the fillings out

but he/she begrudgingly agrees to do it. The dentist doesn't protect

the patient from the vapor as the fillings are being drilled out,

and as a result the patient gets very toxic and some people have

become quadriplegics and some have even gone into comas by

inadequate protection during filling removal. It's mandatory that

you go to someone who knows what he or she is doing. I say you need

more than that, you need to have a nitrous oxide nosepiece taped to

your nose and use it to bring in oxygen or outside air or a

combination thereof and you need to insist on it. If the dentist

won't do it, I submit to you that you want to get up and walk out

the door – it's that important.

 

Greg: With regard to the dentists that still use the mercury amalgam

fillings, you said that 52% of the filling is mercury. Do the

dentists know this? Do they know what they're telling their patients

or are they just as clueless about it?

 

John: They know exactly what's in the filling material because it

comes in little capsules in two components – one full of mercury and

the other, which is the alloy mixed in with it, copper, tin, zinc,

and silver. The problem is these dentists become robots because of

the mercury. They've been told all these years that the mercury

doesn't go anywhere; that it stays bound up within the filling

material, which is clearly not the case. There are pictures now

showing 50-year old fillings still off-gassing mercury.

 

Greg: What would you do if your dentist told you mercury fillings

are perfectly safe to put in your mouth, as most dentists will tell

their patients today?

 

John: If I went to a dentist today and they told me that, I would

vote with my feet – I would walk or run out the door. I would not

have that man or woman do anything in my mouth. It's a very toxic

poison and I don't think too many people even realize it, but the

amount of mercury that's in one of the large molars is enough to

pollute a 10-acre lake, making the fish too toxic to eat.

 

Greg: That seems hard to believe.

 

John: It's true.

 

Greg: Isn't it true that even if you go into a dentist's office and

get non-mercury fillings, you're still being exposed to mercury

because they're using it so often in their practice?

 

John: That's true. The worst place you can go in a dental office is

the room where the hygienist does the cleaning because as they

polish those old fillings, they release a whole bunch of mercury in

the air. That is the most toxic room in the entire dental office and

very few people understand that. I suggest to people that if they

still have the fillings in their teeth, don't go in and have those

fillings cleaned. You can have your teeth cleaned, but tell them not

to touch those amalgam fillings (amalgam is a compound of mercury

with other metals).

 

Greg: How many dentists are still working with mercury? Is it still

a common practice or are many of them waking up to the truth that

this is a poison and they need to stay away from it?

 

John: Some of them that still have a little bit of their brain left

are waking up to it. The others are still so `merced-out' that they

can't fathom the problem and they're not willing to change because

of that. It's a mind problem and the mercury plays havoc with the

mind, it blocks it so that you don't even want to hear about doing

this.

 

Greg: How long does the mercury stay in place in the filling? You

mentioned that half of it went into the body and air – what happens

to the other half? Does it stay in the filling indefinitely? Are we

constantly being poisoned as long as we have the fillings in our

mouth?

 

John: We are constantly being poisoned as long as the fillings are

in the teeth until the full 52% leaves and the filling breaks down

or crumbles. The 50-year old filling I mentioned before was the old

one that I call " low-copper amalgams " produced prior to the year

1974. This is a very important issue. Prior to 1974, that filling

material was 52% mercury, 30% silver, 4% copper, 14% tin and zinc

(these are approximate numbers, but they're very close). That

particular formulation took 30-40 years to build up enough mercury

in the system to cause a major system breakdown. After '74 they

changed the material in the formula because the Hunt brothers were

playing with the price of silver on the commodities market and the

dentists didn't want to lose their margin of profit, so they

switched the copper and the silver in the formula. When that

happened that released the mercury and copper 50 times faster than

before into the system. Instead of taking 30-40 years to build up

enough mercury in the system to cause a major system breakdown, it

can now occur in 3-5 years. It has tremendously accelerated the

problem. The classic symptom of a mercury-toxic patient is

unexplained irritability.

 

Greg: Which is what you said you had too?

 

John: Yes! I had terrible unexplained irritability. My wife would

say good morning to me and I would verbally accost her. I knew it

was wrong when I was doing it, but the thing with mercury is when

you do something like that and you know it's wrong and you're

powerless to stop it, that's the mercury in control.

 

Greg: What are some of the other classic symptoms of being poisoned

with mercury?

 

John: Memory loss, endogenous depression, emotional instability, and

chemical sensitivities just to name a few. If it takes 3-5 years to

build up enough mercury in your system to cause a major system

breakdown as opposed to taking 30-40 years like before, some

interesting health problems begin to show up. If you go back to the

year 1974 and you say nobody was using the new mercury and by 1980

nearly every dentist was using it, you have a window there of three

years. At that point Chronic Fatigue Syndrome went right off the

chart. Mercury vapor that off-gasses from the fillings in the teeth

gets onto the oxygen sites in the red blood cells and it takes over.

The red blood cells have a much more powerful affinity for mercury

than does the oxygen. In fact, the oxygen has around a 1X affinity

for the oxygen site (this is the gas oxygen). Carbon monoxide (I'm

going to throw that in because it is also a factor) has a 500X

affinity for that oxygen site. Mercury vapor has thousands X

affinity for that oxygen site. It's absolutely impossible for oxygen

on its own to kick either mercury or carbon monoxide off the red

blood cells. Once they get on there, they're basically on there

permanently.

 

Greg: One of the things we've covered here at our company is that

one of the leading contributors to disease is a lack of oxygen in

the body – suffocating the cells of their oxygen. If what you're

saying is correct, do you believe then that the reason why mercury

is causing so many health problems is due to the oxygen being

suffocated in the body?

 

John: Well that's one of the main things it's doing. There were some

very interesting studies conducted on sheep and monkeys at the

University of Calgary in the late 1980s and early 1990s with mercury

to see how it acted on these animals. They used sheep and monkeys in

the studies. First they started with the sheep by putting mercury

fillings in them. They had a radioactive trace element of mercury in

the fillings so they could follow it in the system. Within 29 days

it went through the entire system including crossing the placental

membrane, going into the fetus and so forth. The whole reason for

doing this study was to see if it was released into the system at

all and, of course, they found a massive release. A lot of it went

to the gastrointestinal area but it really went everywhere. I have

the studies on that. It's very clear what happened and anyone can

see this.

 

They decided that since the mercury did go somewhere, they would do

monkey studies. Had it not gone throughout the system of the sheep,

they wouldn't have followed up with the monkey studies. In the study

with the monkeys they only ate twice a day and again, in 28 –29

days, the mercury went throughout the entire system. Massive amounts

were found in the gastrointestinal area. It's interesting to note

that gastrointestinal ailments trouble millions of people. Not only

does mercury affect your entire system, it affects your oxygen

transfer capacity very badly. For example, we have the four oxygen

sites on each red blood cell and it seems that for a man, if you

block three and a half of those four sites (with mercury and/or

carbon monoxide), he will basically `go to bed', not caring whether

he lives or not. A woman, for some reason, seems to get by and

function until three and three-quarters are blocked, which is just

amazing to me. I don't know what the difference is, but there is

some difference between male and female.

 

Greg: What I also want to discuss with you, beyond what you're

talking about with mercury coming from amalgam fillings, is how

ubiquitous mercury is in the environment. Why don't you expound on

that more so that our readers can understand that, yes, it's a

serious problem with fillings, but it is also a serious problem with

vaccines, fish and industrial products.

 

John: I can talk about that to some degree. The biggest source of

mercury exposure is from the fillings in the teeth. The second main

source is from fish, albeit a much smaller source, but still quite

significant. The next source is from all the vaccines that are

preserved with a product called thimerosal. I will attempt to

explain to your readers what thimerosal is. They start with

elemental mercury and they hop it up 1,000 times by converting it to

methyl mercury. They then increase it to ethyl mercury, which is

even more toxic than the methyl, and then they add aluminum to the

vaccine that has a synergistic effect with the mercury, causing it

to have an effect that is 10,000 times more toxic than elemental

mercury, which is already the most toxic, non-radioactive material

known to man. It's really, really nasty. I've read some of the

vaccine sheets. We're hearing a lot now that the new vaccines are

mercury-free, however, if you get the MSDS sheet for the mercury-

free vaccine you'll read thimerosal listed in the contents.

 

Greg: Are you saying that this is a scam?

 

John: I'm telling you that people need to get the drug sheet and

read the drug sheet. You're going to find that thimerosal is still

listed in there.

 

Greg: Why do they even need to use thimerosal in the vaccines in the

first place?

 

John: In the beginning, a lot of people thought it was a

preservative. Eli Lily came up with it in 1929. They gave it to a

bunch of terminal patients who, of course, died. They said that

since the vaccine didn't accelerate their deaths it was therefore

all right to use and we've been using it ever since. It has been

grand fathered in, essentially, through the FDA. When we were

younger most of us only got two or three shots. Today, most children

are given 22 shots by the age of two. This thimerosal is so toxic

and there's so much of it in the system, it's absolutely

unbelievable. For example, if a child could get rid of mercury under

normal conditions, 80% would go out through the colon using bile and

20% would go out through other sources, such as the lungs, skin,

urine, and so forth. The problem is that children cannot make bile

for the first six months of their life, so there is a six-month

window of time when these vaccines are applied that the mercury

accumulates because children don't even produce the bile needed to

help detoxify the body. Children with autism, for example, show very

little if any mercury in the hair when they check the hair sample,

and yet the children that don't have autism show mercury in the hair

and everybody thinks that's the reason why they're smarter. The fact

is that the mercury shows in the hair for those children who are

excreting it. The only way mercury shows in the hair is if you are

naturally excreting it or taking a detoxifying agent. Take a hair

sample today and one six months after a detoxifying program and

you'll measure how much mercury comes out in the hair.

 

Greg: So the main reason they are putting mercury in vaccines is

because it acts as a preservative?

 

John: That's what Eli Lily came up with in the beginning, but I'm

told by people who are quite close to the scene that what the story

really is, is that the toxins in the vaccine are so toxic, they are

so unsterile, that this is a way of sterilizing the vaccine so that

it can be injected and not have the person die on the spot.

 

Greg: If the drug companies really could come up with mercury-free

vaccines, what would they use as a substitute?

 

John: Well, I have not heard of a substitute yet. I was speaking to

a vet who teaches at one of the major universities in the country

and he said he was working with the West Nile Virus and saw a lot of

animals die from getting the shot and he said he saw a lot others

getting sick from it. He asked the rep from the pharmaceutical

company why they hadn't removed the thimerosal from the vaccine and

the rep said: " We don't have an adequate substitute we can use. "

That was his answer and I guess it would be mine as well if that

were the case.

 

Greg: You touched on autism. This is a huge problem that has been

getting a lot of press lately. How strong of a link is there between

autism and mercury? Is it all mercury-induced? Are there other

things in the vaccines that you believe are causing autism?

 

John: The fact is the brain cannot handle this mercury with the

aluminum in it that is 10,000 times more toxic, especially that of a

newborn or in-vitro when the mother is still carrying a baby. To be

putting this kind of mercury in vaccinations is unbelievable. Dr.

Boyd Haley, the Chair of the Chemistry Department at the University

of Kentucky, has gone on record saying that autism is caused only by

mercury poisoning. I would suggest that anyone who is researching

autism go look up his website www.altcorp.com or look up Dr. Boyd

Haley at the University of Kentucky.

 

Greg: Just recently some stories have come out in the UK papers

saying that there is no link between autism and the MMR vaccine.

Have you heard about these reports and do you have any input for our

readers?

 

John: I sure do. I recently read the January/February 2004 issue of

Mothering magazine and in there they say they have taken information

from The Safe Minds Organization that refutes the Danish autism

study. What they found was that they had dropped out some of the

senior children that had bad cases of autism. For some reason these

numbers just dropped out of their study. When they did their study

they said it wasn't a problem. At the top of the Mothering issue it

says: " Denmark Has Good News: Autism Rate Declined after the 1992

removal of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from

vaccines, from 1 in 150 before 1992 to 1 in 500 today. These

statistics are the result of an analysis of the country's autism

registry data conducted by Safe Minds, an autism advocacy group. The

analysis follows on the heal of the study `Association Between

Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines and Autism,' by Danish researchers

who concluded that Denmark's autism rates rose after thimerosal was

removed from vaccines. The Safe Minds analysis found a flaw in the

methodology of the study, which was published in the October 1, 2003

edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). "

 

" In our review of the Danish data we identified a flaw that resulted

in a substantial loss of autism case records from the registry,

which essentially renders the findings from the JAMA study and by

the Danish colleagues invalid, " Sally Bernard, Executive Director of

Safe Minds. " The registry allows 10-25% of diagnosed autism cases to

be lost from its records each year. The effect of this loss is such

that the records will disappear from the older age groups to a much

greater degree than from younger age groups in any given registry

year. "

 

So they've apparently done some mucking around with the results. The

Mothering story goes on to say: " The results are based on finding

fewer older children than younger ones in the researchers' 2000

registry cohort. Since the older children received thimerosal

vaccines, and the younger ones did not, they falsely concluded that

thimerosal is not a factor in autism. The Safe Mind analysis

demonstrates, instead, that the decline is likely due to the loss of

older children's records from the registry records, rather than a

true decline from the autism rates in the older group. " There's more

to it, but that's enough to give you the flavor of the Popsicle and

what they're doing. The complete Safe Minds analysis is available at

www.safeminds.org

 

Greg: A lot of people this year have been coerced into taking the

flu shot. How much of a problem is the mercury in these vaccines? Is

the same amount of thimerosal used in all these different shots or

does it vary? How bad of a problem is it across the board with all

the shots?

 

John: All the shots, as far as I can tell are preserved with

thimerosal. Maybe some of them have changed but I haven't seen that

change yet and I've read the drug sheets on those that claim they

are " mercury-free, " even the children's vaccines and the flu shots,

and they're all preserved with thimerosal. This even includes IV

drips bags.

 

Greg: What can you tell us about the lawsuits pending against the

vaccine manufacturers?

 

John: About two or three months ago there were 26 firms that banded

together to go after the vaccine manufacturers as a force and sue

them on the basis of the vaccines causing autism, in particular

regarding the thimerosal as a cause of the autism. I would say

that's fairly significant. There were some television ads asking

people who had children with autism to join in on the lawsuit

against the vaccine manufacturers.

 

Greg: I got some information here from the Autism Autoimmunity

Project out of Florida that said that 1 in 150 children or 1 in 68

families are affected with autism. Do you know anything about these

figures? Are they accurate?

 

John: I don't specifically know whether or not they're accurate but

I did see the statistics on how much thimerosal is actually being

placed in the body of these children through the vaccines. These

vaccines, by the way, are not mandatory.

 

Greg: Yet most people are led into believing that they are.

 

John: That's correct. The fact of the matter is they get between and

0 per student at every school to administer the vaccines.

 

Greg: Who pays the school this money?

 

John: To my understanding it's Health and Human Services that's

doing it. I'm also told through Dr. Jonathan Wright's newsletter

that $1,000 is paid to the school district for every child that gets

on Ritalin, again paid by Health and Human Services.

 

Greg: What would be the benefit to getting these children

vaccinated? Why are they paying for it?

 

John: If you get down to the nuts and bolts of it what you'll find

is they have a committee at the CDC, the Center for Disease Control

and Prevention, and this committee decides how many shots the

children are supposedly required to have, but if you press the CDC

they'll say that none are required, they are recommended by agents

who represent the pharmaceutical companies. Essentially it's a case

of a fox watching the chicken coop. It was written up in Mothering

magazine March/April 2001. It was issue 105 with a great 18-page

article and I encourage anyone to get that and read it. You can find

out more about this story and links to other sites for related

topics by going to their website at: http://www.mothering.com/10-0-

0/html/10-8-0/10-8-mercury105.shtml In the 18-page article they

talked about how this committee was set up by the CDC and the

members that made up this committee were members from the vaccine

manufacturers. They're the ones that tell you how many shots your

child is going to have, and when they're going to get them, what the

sequence is, and there are no independent studies that I know of

that show that these things number one work, and number two are

required.

 

End of Part 1.

 

This material may be freely published, broadcast, or redistributed

without written consent provided CRUSADOR ENTERPRISES is listed as

the source and our website: www.HealthLiesExposed.com is listed.

_________________

JoAnn Guest

mrsjoguest

www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest/Genes