Mercury (Thimerosal) in Vaccines: INGESTED iNOT THE SAME AS INJECTED!

[Guest guest]

Mercury (Thimerosal) in Vaccines: INGESTED NOT THE SAME AS INJECTED!!

--

 

Regarding the article " Mercury (Thimerosal) in Vaccines FDA report "

DATED 08 Aug 2004

 

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/youropinions.php?opinionid=4459

 

 

(1) INGESTED IS NOT THE SAME AS INJECTED!!!!!

 

Humans are supposed to have " friendly flora " living in their gut.

MERCURY-- in the TUNAFISH sandwich that we eat for lunch

--WILL BE DEALT WITT, to a large extent, BY THOSE BACTERIA!!

 

On the other hand, mercury which is injected is " free " to " travel "

throughout the bloodstream.

 

What system does the FDA think is in place for removing mercury

which is disseminated in that way?

 

How many mothers unknowingly used a mercury-containing spermicide,

perhaps for years, before becoming pregnant ... and then wondering

what went wrong, after the baby was born and had neurological

problems?

 

The report says, " the FDA evaluated the amount of mercury an infant

might receive in the form of ethylmercury from vaccines under the

U.S. recommended childhood immunization schedule... "

 

But the FDA does not address the issue -- reported by some parents,

and probably unknown by others --

of the massive overdose which can occur if the multi-dose container

is not shaken extremely well before each use.

 

What is the largest quantity of thimerosal-containing vaccine which

has been available? How much mercury could any one infant have

received, if the bottle were not shaken well?

 

The report says, " the FDA evaluated the amount of mercury an infant

might receive in the form of ethylmercury from vaccines under the

U.S. recommended childhood immunization schedule . . . "

 

But there is no mention of the " hot lots " of vaccines -- which are

listed at a website on the internet, if one knows where to look --

which contained excessive amounts of thimerosal.

 

If a child received one (or more) of those, then what?

 

 

" . . . thimerosal has been used in some immune globulin

preparations, anti-venins,

skin test antigens, and ophthalmic and nasal products,

in addition to certain vaccines. "

 

Thimerosal is also injected into pregnant mothers with a potential

Rh factor discrepancy.

 

At some time in the past, it was not given until a second or

subsequent pregnancy; and today the infant could be tested while the

mother is still pregnant.

 

In some places in the United States, a pregnant woman who is Rh-

negative is routinely vaccinated -- with a thimerosal containing

substance (brand name in the U.S., RhoGam) --

thus allowing the thimerosal to circulate into the growing fetus.

Also, for many years, paint -- ordinary house paint -- contained

mercury as a preservative.

 

How many mothers painted the nursery while she was pregnant?

AND some spermicides contained mercury.

 

Was it a preservative? No, it was the spermicide.

 

How many mothers unknowingly used a mercury-containing spermicide,

perhaps for years, before becoming pregnant ... and then wondering

what went wrong, after the baby was born and had neurological

problems?

 

 

(5) HEPATITIS A VACCINE In the United States, the Hepatitis

A vaccination still contains thimerosal, and is given within just a

few days of birth.

 

Does the FDA think that a newborn has a " functioning " immune system,

which can mount an immune reponse and also remove mercury?

 

(5) ACETAMINOPHEN AND VACCINATIONS

In a recent newspaper article promoting vaccinations, a young child

receives shots for hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis,

polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b and pneumococcus -- all at one

visit.

 

The doctor gives the shots. Then,

he is quoted as saying:

 

" All done . . . [n]ow Daddy's going to give you your Tylenol and

Mama's going to pick you up and love you. "

 

What's wrong with this scenario?

A well-respected on-line medical information service, eMedicine

says:

 

" Acetaminophen is rapidly absorbed from the stomach and small

intestine and metabolized by conjugation in the liver to nontoxic

agents,

which then are eliminated in the urine . . . .

 

In acute overdose or when maximum daily dose is exceeded over a

prolonged period, the normal pathways of metabolism become

saturated. "

 

[ See: http://www.emedicine.com/emerg/byname/toxicity-

acetaminophen.htm }

 

Isn't there a very great likelihood that such a quantity of

vaccines, all at once, would be likely to

 

" saturate the normal pathways of metabolism " in a very young child?

 

At what age does an infant develop an immune system?

 

---

-----------

Read the news article that this opinion was posted about:

Mercury (Thimerosal) in Vaccines FDA report

_________________

 

JoAnn Guest

mrsjoguest

www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest/Genes

[Guest guest]

Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:05:03 -0000

 

" Janice Crabtree " <billyandcolby

Re: Mercury (Thimerosal) in Vaccines: INGESTED iNOT THE SAME

AS INJECTED!

 

 

 

 

 

> Humans are supposed to have " friendly flora " living in their gut.

> MERCURY-- in the TUNAFISH sandwich that we eat for lunch

> --WILL BE DEALT WITT, to a large extent, BY THOSE BACTERIA!!

 

 

 

That sounds logical in a perfect world (or stomach). During my

pregnancy (and I've read this is common during pregnancy) I developed

a systemic Candida overgrowth. My friendly flora were overcome by the

unfriendly flora. Both of my mercury-toxic sons are missing the good

flora, too, which we determined with bacteriology tests. Would this

mean that mercury injested might not be eaten by flora as suggested?

Also, ASD children usually cannot produce (or produce less)

glutathione than typical children. Glutathione is necessary for

excretion of heavy metals. For this reason, I am keeping them away

from all fish, as well as all Thimerosal. Wish I had known sooner.

 

Janice

[Guest guest]

, " califpacific "

<califpacific@g...> wrote:

>

> Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:05:03 -0000

>

> " Janice Crabtree " <billyandcolby>

> Re: Mercury (Thimerosal) in Vaccines: INGESTED iNOT THE

SAME AS INJECTED!

>

Humans are supposed to have " friendly flora " living in their gut.

MERCURY-- in the TUNAFISH sandwich that we eat for lunch --WILL BE

DEALT WITH, to a large extent, BY THOSE BACTERIA!!

>

>

 

 

 

> That sounds logical in a perfect world (or stomach).

 

 

You mean in a world " free " of Pharmaceuticals and Processed Foods????

According to my research ancestors didn't have ANY of these

problems!

 

 

JoAnn

[Guest guest]

I somehow missed this original message, but I would like to make a

comment.

 

 

 

 

" Janice Crabtree " <billyandcolby>

> Re: Mercury (Thimerosal) in Vaccines: INGESTED iNOT THE SAME

> AS INJECTED!

>

> > Humans are supposed to have " friendly flora " living in their gut.

> > MERCURY-- in the TUNAFISH sandwich that we eat for lunch

> > --WILL BE DEALT WITT, to a large extent, BY THOSE BACTERIA!!

>

 

 

 

 

First: It wasn't enough to signigantly clean up the mercury.

My thoughts are that when each fish in the food chain from smallest to

largest ate their mercury laced meal, each and every one of those fish

also had " friendly flora " in their guts and they still became polluted

with mercury which became more concentrated as it was passed higher up

the food chain.

 

Second: Most people have damaged gut flora due to chemical ingestion.

Fish probably have more natural bacterial flora in their intestines

than humans and they still accumulated the mercury.

 

Third: Ingesting mercury itself will damage intestinal flora. So, I

believe a more correct statment would be....Mercury will deal with

your flora ...rather than your flora will deal with the mercury.

 

 

I love fish and would like to be able to eat a lot of it, but

unfortunatly I feel that I have to limit my intake due to most being

contaminated by mercury. With mercury being such a highly toxic material we have

to be aware of it and limit our exposure.

 

 

just my 2 cents,

 

Frank

 

 

 

, " califpacific "

<califpacific@g...> wrote:

>

> Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:05:03 -0000

>

> " Janice Crabtree " <billyandcolby>

> Re: Mercury (Thimerosal) in Vaccines: INGESTED iNOT THE SAME

> AS INJECTED!

>

>

>

>

>

> > Humans are supposed to have " friendly flora " living in their gut.

> > MERCURY-- in the TUNAFISH sandwich that we eat for lunch

> > --WILL BE DEALT WITT, to a large extent, BY THOSE BACTERIA!!

>

>

>

> That sounds logical in a perfect world (or stomach). During my

> pregnancy (and I've read this is common during pregnancy) I developed

> a systemic Candida overgrowth. My friendly flora were overcome by the

> unfriendly flora. Both of my mercury-toxic sons are missing the good

> flora, too, which we determined with bacteriology tests. Would this

> mean that mercury injested might not be eaten by flora as suggested?

> Also, ASD children usually cannot produce (or produce less)

> glutathione than typical children. Glutathione is necessary for

> excretion of heavy metals. For this reason, I am keeping them away

> from all fish, as well as all Thimerosal. Wish I had known sooner.

>

> Janice

>