Guest guest Posted November 3, 2005 Report Share Posted November 3, 2005 Wild Salmon Far More Healthy than Farmed Fare A major study that tested contaminants in fish around the world concluded that farm-raised salmon have significantly more dioxins and other cancer-causing contaminants than salmon from the wild. Researchers stated that eating more than a meal of farm-raised salmon per month, depending on its country of origin, could increase the chances of having cancer in future years. Farmed salmon in Northern Europe ranked highest in pollutants, followed by North America and Chile. Farm-raised salmon were found to contain higher concentrations of 13 pollutants, including PCB's and dioxins, which are let out when industrial waste is burned. The average dioxin level in farmed fish was about 11 times higher than wild fish. Salmon absorb these pollutants through their environment, storing them in fat that people then eat. Therefore, consuming high levels of these toxins is believed to increase the risk of certain cancers and affect brain and fetus development in children. " We are certainly not telling people not to eat fish… We're telling them to eat less farmed salmon, " said David Carpenter of the University at Albany, N.Y, who performed tests on 700 salmon from all over the world. The study blames the feed used by fish farmers for these high levels of toxins because the fish food used on farms concentrates ocean pollutants. According to Carpenter, farmed salmon eat lots of fish oil and meal made from just a few species of ocean fish, which concentrates the contaminants they are exposed to, while wild salmon eat a greater variety. The salmon farming industry says that the results of the study show that the pollutant levels are well within the FDA's legal limits. The FDA replied by stating the amount of pollutants found in salmon should not cause significant concern, explaining that the tests were performed on raw salmon, with the skin on. If the skin was removed and grilled, large amounts of dioxins and other accumulated pollutants in the fish fat would be killed. But many groups say that the focus should not be on acceptable levels of pollutants set by the government, but rather on ways to reduce toxins. " These fish don't have to be contaminated, " stated Jane Houlihan of the Environmental Working Group. Houlihan's group and others advocate for simply changing feeding practices on fish farms. According to the trade group Salmon of the Americas, farmers in the U.S., Canada and Chile who are replacing some of the fish oil in salmon feed with soybean and canola oil have seen annual drops in PCB levels of 10 to 20 percent. The practice of farming salmon in floating pens began just 20 years ago. Now more than half of the world's salmon is farmed, turning the fish from a seasonal food to a year-round product. http://www.citizens.org/news/newsletter/2004/january_16,_2004.cfm _________________ JoAnn Guest mrsjoguest www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest/Genes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.