Gross National Happiness - A Kingdom's experiment with growth.

[Guest guest]

Dear Friends,

 

Not GDP but GNH. Gross National Happiness, that is the measure used by the King

of Bhutan to gauze his people. Please read this very interesting article;

 

What money can’t buy

Looking for happiness? Consult Bhutan’s King, suggests Andrew C. Revkin A

Bhutanese landscape

What is happiness? In the US and in many other industrialised countries, it is

often equated with money. Economists measure consumer confidence on the

assumption that the resulting figure says something about progress and public

welfare. The gross domestic product, or GDP, is routinely used as shorthand for

the well-being of a nation.

 

But the small Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan has been trying out a different idea.

In 1972, concerned about the problems afflicting other developing countries that

focused only on economic growth, Bhutan’s newly crowned leader, King Jigme

Singye Wangchuck, decided to make his nation’s priority not its GDP but its GNH,

or gross national happiness.

 

 

 

Bhutan, the king said, needed to ensure that prosperity was shared across

society and that it was balanced against preserving cultural traditions,

protecting the environment and maintaining a responsive government. The king,

now 49, has been instituting policies aimed at accomplishing these goals.

 

 

 

Now Bhutan’s example, while still a work in progress, is serving as a catalyst

for far broader discussions of national well-being.

 

 

 

Around the world, a growing number of economists, social scientists, corporate

leaders and bureaucrats are trying to develop measurements that take into

account not just the flow of money but also access to health care, free time

with family, conservation of natural resources and other noneconomic factors.

The goal, according to many involved in this effort, is in part to return to a

richer definition of the word ‘happiness’, more like what the signers of the

Declaration of Independence in US had in mind when they included “the pursuit of

happiness” as an inalienable right equal to liberty and life itself

 

 

 

 

“We have to think of human well-being in broader terms,” said Lyonpo Jigmi

Thinley, Bhutan’s home minister and ex-prime minister. “Material well-being is

only one component. That doesn’t ensure that you’re at peace with your

environment and in harmony with each other.” It is a concept grounded in

Buddhist doctrine, and even a decade ago it might have been dismissed by most

economists and international policy experts as naive idealism.

 

 

 

“The goal of life should not be limited to production, consumption, more

production and more consumption,” said Thakur S. Powdyel, a senior official in

the Bhutanese Ministry of Education. “There is no necessary relationship between

the level of possession and the level of well-being.” Saul, the Canadian

political philosopher, said that Bhutan’s shift in language from “product” to

“happiness” was a profound move in and of itself.

 

 

 

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1051031/asp/knowhow/story_5408504.asp

 

 

 

FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.

 

 

 

FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.