Where the Hell Is YOUR Proof? 9 /11

[Guest guest]

911TruthAction...com

Saturday, October 22, 2005 1:22 AM

[911TruthAction] where_the_hell

 

 

 

 

http://tvnewslies.org/html/where_the_hell_is_your_9_11_pr.html

 

 

TvNewsLIES Challenges

Believers of the Official Version of 9/11:

 

 

Where the Hell Is YOUR Proof?

Jesse, Editor - TvNewsLIES.org - October 2005

 

THE BACKGROUND

 

To this day, there has been no independent official inquiry into the

attacks of September 11, 2001. The Kean Commission, with which most

Americans are familiar, was based on the Bush/PNAC version of events.

It was charged with probing the breakdown of intelligence prior to

the attacks and making suggestions for improving communications among

the competing agencies involved. The Commission, formed after more

than a year of opposition by the Bush administration, did

not…repeat...did NOT…investigate or report about the causes of the

attacks.

 

Far more important – to this day there has not been a single piece of

evidence presented to the public that corroborates the official

government version of the most devastating attack in our history.

Think about that. For more than four years, scores of credible

experts have challenged the explanations offered by the Bush

administration, and yet not a shred of evidence has been offered by

the US government to support the official version of events they claim

took place on that day.

 

Even more absurd is that fact that not a single official inquiry has

attempted to respond to, discredit, or refute the questions that have

been raised. On the contrary, both the American government and the

complicit media have dealt with the every single challenge to the 9/11

explanations in two ways. They either totally ignore them or dismiss

them out of hand as ridiculous conspiracy theories. Most of the

well-researched and revealing findings by independent investigators

are unknown to the vast majority of Americans.

 

THE BELIEVERS

 

Time and time again, when I come across close-minded Bush supporters,

I witness the effects of an unexplainable phenomenon: a highly

dangerous variation of HIV – a condition I call the Hypocrisy &

Illogic Virus. Strangely, the most severe symptoms of this condition

seem to manifest themselves during any and all discussions of the

events of 9/11,

 

The disease is easily diagnosed by the appearance of two disabling

features: the need to approach all issues of national importance with

an air of shameful hypocrisy, and the absolute inability to use any

form of logic during discussions of such matters

 

Collectively, people afflicted with this disorder approach 9/11 as one

person. They all blindly believe what they have been told by their

government. They all adamantly refuse to listen to any questions that

have been raised about inconsistencies in the official version that

simply don't make sense. And if they engage in any dispute about

these discrepancies, their arguments are illogical to an extreme, and

they are simply unable to follow any rational argument to its conclusion.

 

The sad reality is that there is no way to convince these brain-washed

believers that there may be something more to the story of 9/11 than

what they have been told. That's not too surprising, since most of

these people still buy into the Bush/PNAC reasons for invading Iraq.

They blindly accept whatever they are told and close their minds

tightly to any other information, no matter how factual. They cannot

be reached. There is simply no way. The disease is far too endemic to

treat with any ordinary approach. They believe as they do, and that's

all there is to it.

 

So, let's turn the tables and put the burden of proof on them!!!

 

I believe that I, and every single person involved in the independent

9/11 research community must ask one question of the people who still

believe the official 9/11 story. We must demand that those who accept

the Bush/PNAC explanation of the events of that terrible day answer a

single question:

 

" WHERE THE HELL IS YOUR PROOF? "

 

You claim that the President and his handlers have told you the truth.

You refuse to consider the information we show you that punches huge

holes into the official version. You refuse to check out the

information for yourself. You tell us what we have uncovered is

false. Okay, we'll buy that, we'll concede that you're right...and

that all of us are wrong.

 

In fact, we'll take it all back and admit the errors of our ways IF

you do something first. Show us YOUR proof. Tell us why we should

believe the story you have swallowed, and show us what you have to

back up your claims! You'd better have something more than a

borrowed smirk when you tell us we're way out in left field. You

better be ready to answer just one simple question:

 

Where the Hell is YOUR proof, true believers? Where the Hell is it?

 

THE BATTLE

 

I'm not sure why the independent research community has not yet taken

this approach. Why does the burden of proof always fall on the

researchers when the evidence they present is ignored? Why is it their

burden to convince the non believers that there are legitimate

questions about 9/11 that remain unanswered and hard evidence that

we've all been fooled, big time?

 

The facts about 9/11 that has been uncovered are dismissed by people

who apply unbelievably skewed logic to their opposing argument. They

believe a story when the only proof they use to validate the story is

the story itself. That's it! All they know is what they have been

told. News reports, video, witnesses, whistle blowers, their own eyes

and even common sense contradict their beliefs. Still, these people

continue to accuse the researchers of being either crazy or

traitorous. What kind of convoluted reasoning has infected such a

large segment of the nation?

 

This is a battle for truth. It's not a debate over conflicting

philosophies. It is a battle between those who are searching for

facts and those who choose to deny that a search is necessary. How

long do those in blinders have to be engulfed in flames before they

believe an independent researcher who warns them of the increasing heat?

 

The level of denial and resistance can only be explained by

understanding a very basic human response: sometimes truth is too

painful for people to deal with. In this case, the perpetrators of

9/11 understood that most Americans could not permit themselves to

consider the involvement of people within their own government in the

dastardly attacks of that day. They could never allow themselves to

even consider such a possibility, even though people within the

administration had openly professed that just such an event would

benefit their cause!

 

Those responsible for the tragedy clearly understood this aspect of

human psychology. That is why they can hide in plain sight without

fear of discovery, regardless of how much new evidence is uncovered,

and regardless of how many legitimate questions are raised about their

connection to the attacks.

 

As a result, the only effective battle cry at this point must be:

Where the Hell is YOUR proof?

 

I take part in or observe countless discussions on 9/11; often in

Internet forums. I read the posts and hear the responses of thousands

of people who have not spent five minutes looking at the four years of

evidence that has been uncovered by independent researchers.

Amazingly, the same people feel fully qualified to dismiss new

evidence with an insult or to present their own un-researched,

amateurish conclusions. They know nothing about any information that

might have been revealed while their heads were buried in the black

hole of the mainstream media. But they constantly and vehemently

insist that they do.

 

Without requiring a thimbleful of supportive evidence, these people

continue to accept the official story of 9/11. That hypocrisy simply

has to end just as our silence in the presence of that hypocrisy has

to end. And it has to end now.

 

THE BLINDED

 

The ball now must be thrown to the nay sayers, the folks in blinders

who believe everything they are told by the WH and its media

mouthpieces. They must be held accountable for their unfounded beliefs

by challenging them for convincing proof that we are wrong. There is

no room here for even a fraction of the challenges that should be

made. Still, we have to start somewhere, so let's at least call for

responses from the politically blinded to what follows:

 

*

Where the HELL is YOUR proof that PNAC's call for a

`catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor' was only

an unbelievably astounding and timely coincidence rather than a

statement that should have raised reasonable suspicion?

 

In the late 1990's members of the Project for a New American Century

wrote a treatise in which they foresaw a strategic " transformation " of

the U.S. military into an imperialistic force of global domination

that would require a huge increase in defense spending. " The process

of transformation, " the plan said, " is likely to be a long one, absent

some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor. " The

members of this group, known as PNAC, were appointed to many high

level positions in the new Bush administration. Only months after

they came to power, the United States experienced a new Pearl Harbor.

That has never been publicized or explained as anything other than

mere coincidence.

 

* Where the HELL is YOUR proof that Al Qaeda actually planned and

carried out the attacks of 9/11?

 

In 4 years I have not seen a single bit of proof that Al Qaeda was

involved in those events. I have seen some snap shots of Arab men at

an airport. I was told a slew of things about these men. I was told

that the passport of one of the alleged hijackers miraculously floated

to the surface of the rubble, unscathed by the heat that had

obliterated thousands. I was told way too much about these men for me

to believe that the story was not prepared in advance. Two days was

not sufficient time for that kind of information to be uncovered and

declassified by our government. Not only did that reek of black ops,

but to this day almost nothing of what we were told about he nineteen

hijackers has been verified. The tape of Osama bin Laden shown by the

government raised questions about the actual identity of the man in

the film. As a matter of fact, I watched the so-called confession I

with a person whose native is Arabic. He told me that the English

translation was misleading. While he rejoiced at their success,

nowhere in the tape did Osama admit involvement in the attacks!

 

* Where the HELL is YOUR proof that Dick Cheney was NOT conducting

drills on 9/11 that paralyzed Air Force responses to the real attacks?

 

There is irrefutable evidence that Dick Cheney was running a

completely separate chain of Command & Control via the Secret Service

on the morning of 9/11, assuring the paralysis of Air Force and its

ability to intercept the hijacked planes. The Secret Service has the

technology to see the same radar screens the FAA sees in real time.

They also have the legal authority and technological capability to

take supreme command in cases of national emergency. In fact, Dick

Cheney was the acting Commander in Chief on 9/11. When publicly asked

about the exercises, that involved simulated attacks by hijacked

planes against the WTC, Cheney refused to comment, claiming the

information was classified.

 

* Where the HELL is YOUR proof that Tower 7 collapsed as a result

of the attacks?

 

I have not seen even a single computer model explanation as to how or

why Building 7 collapsed in the exact same manner as the two Towers

that were hit by airplanes. As a matter of fact Building 7, which

sustained no impact at all, was not mentioned in the Kean Commission

report at all. The FEMA report of the collapse remains inconclusive,

unable to offer a reasonable explanation for the collapse. Larry

Silverstein, owner of the complex publicly claimed he gave permission

for Tower 7 to be `pulled,' a fire department term for demolished.

Demolition of such a building would have required weeks, if not months

of preparation. No explanation has ever been given for this baffling

anomaly.

 

* Where the HELL is YOUR proof that `put' orders placed on the two

Airlines involved in the attacks were mere coincidence?

 

I have never seen the names of the people who placed those orders. I

don't know that their identities have been uncovered of if they have

been questioned. I have not seen anyone vindicated of any

foreknowledge of 9/11 after making investments that would only pay off

if the specific airlines involved were to experience a drop in stock

prices.

 

* Where the HELL is YOUR proof that Porter Goss knew nothing about

$100,000 that was wired to Mohammed Atta?

 

I cannot fathom why the person who was sitting with Porter Goss (our

current CIA Director) on the morning of 9/11, and who had wired

Mohammed Atta $100,000 just prior to the event, was never

investigated. This could be the smoking gun of smoking guns (if you

believe that Atta was involved) that has been covered up from the start.

 

* Where the Hell is YOUR proof that Donald Rumsfeld did not

organize an illegal military group that would " provoke terrorist

attacks which would then require ` " counter-attack " by the United States?

 

Here's what I know: In the Los Angeles Times, military analyst William

Arkin described a secret army set up by Donald Rumsfeld, similar to

those run by Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger and which Congress

outlawed. This " super-intelligence support activity " was designed to

bring together the " CIA and military covert action, information

warfare, and deception " . According to a classified document prepared

for Rumsfeld, the new organization was known as the Proactive

Pre-emptive Operations Group, or P2OG. It was formed to provoke

terrorist attacks which would then require " counter-attack " by the

United States on countries " harboring the terrorists " . Doesn't that

sound exactly like what happened on 9/11?

 

That's all I have room for, so I'll sit back and wait for someone to

send me some proof, assuming that a single person out there knows

where the Hell it is.

 

THE BOTTOM LINE

 

The bottom line is simple: I have not seen anything at all that makes

me believe the official story of 9/11, which, when considered on its

own merits, is so implausible as to be considered a bad joke. Anyone

who reads David Ray Griffin's book, The 9/11 Commission Report

Omissions and Distortions, needs to go no further than the first

chapter before this becomes crystal clear. At that point it becomes

very difficult to decide whether to laugh at the ridiculous nature of

the official story or to scream with disbelief that the American

public still buys into it.

 

So, once again, I ask the people who refuse to explore the findings of

the independent research community, - the only real investigation into

the events of September 11th 2001 - where the Hell is YOUR proof?

 

To those of you who will try to discredit and ridicule this article on

forums or in calls to right wing radio, I say this: Research the

events of 9/11 in depth, come up with YOUR proof that the official

version is credible, or just shut up!

 

You have a helluva lot of research to do before you are qualified to

intelligently debate the events of 9/11 with anyone who has spent more

than four years in the independent research effort. Don't bother to

cite official sources to back up your points, since most of them have

been debunked. Try to understand that you can not use the authors of

the official version to support their own validity. It's a dumb tactic.

 

The researchers have done a great deal of valid work. They have been

trying to attract your attention so that you can examine it for

yourself. They are not asking you to take their word for

anything…they just want you to look at and think about what has been

uncovered. Do it for your own good, not theirs. Stop arguing against

their credibility until you have seen what they have seen, and until

you know what they know. Do some homework, then come and talk, but be

prepared to show us where the Hell you found YOUR proof, and why we

should believe you.

 

Once again, keep in mind that THE KEAN COMMISSION DID NOT CONDUCT AN

INVESTIGATION INTO 9/11! It was not their assignment! They were tasked

with making recommendations to improve national security based on the

official story. They were not asked to find out what happened. They

went in with an official account of the events, and were asked to make

their recommendations based on what the Bush/PNAC administration

wanted the public to believe happened on that day.

 

Independent researchers are the only people who have investigated the

events of 9/11. They have uncovered and presented mountains of

evidence that totally expose the official account for what it is; a

cover-up, nothing more.

 

If anyone takes the time to really examine that evidence - and I

repeat - evidence, he or she will find something very disturbing yet

highly probable. The material that has been amassed strongly suggests

complicity in the events of 9/11 by rogue elements within American and

foreign governments. But the evidence does NOT point directly to a

government conspiracy.

 

It does however, point to direct involvement by several key members of

the Bush/PNAC administration, acting on their own, outside the rule of

law, without participation in any mysterious governmental conspiracy.

Their motives have been clearly established and published by the

culprits themselves and evidence of their involvement has been clearly

established by independent research.

 

There is nothing more to be said. The information is out there for

the taking. The books have been written, the speeches have been made,

the documents have been posted, the documentaries have been produced

and the truth has been told. That is as far as anyone doing

independent research can go. All that remains is for the believers to

respond.

 

So bring `em on! Let's see if those who swear to the lies they have

been told can convince anyone, even themselves that the official

version of 9/11 explains to the nation and the world what really

happened on that day.

 

So, where the Hell is YOUR proof, true believers? We're all waiting to

see.

 

 

Links to other articles:

*

An URGENT Message from the Editor!

*

9/11-PNAC, 9/11-PNAC - SHOULD BE THE #1 TOPIC OF DISCUSSION

A WAKE-UP CALL THE ALTERNATIVE AND LIBERAL MEDIA:

TO STOP IGNORING 9/11 AND THE PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY

*

They Are Not " Conspiracy Theories " - They Are, in Fact,

" Discoveries "

*

Before you call this a " Conspiracy Theory " read this! Learn the

difference between theory and fact!

*

9/11 – US Complicity: Implausible, or Very Probable? - Questions

for the People Who Believe the Official Conspiracy Theory

* 9/11 - All the Proof You Need

* 9/11 Facts

*

WHY AMERICANS REFUSE TO BELIEVE THE 9/11 EVIDENCE!!! - The

attacks of 9/11 were so unthinkable that most Americans would refuse

to believe the complicity of their own government, even if presented

with a mountain of evidence. - Very simply, it is possible to escape

blame if you do something that nobody in the world believes you could do.