Does anyone know if an autopsy has been done to prove candida theory?

[Guest guest]

I have always believed that nearly everyone living on a western diet

will have some sort of candida overgrowth, even if they are unaware

of it.

 

However, someone the other day asked if this is a correct theory

surely they would find candida in the brain and other organs when

they do medical autopsies.

 

I thought it was a good point, and wonder if anyone knows if there

has been any cases of this?

 

The fact that candida can make your memory fussy and make us so ill,

surely there would be evidence of it in our organs?

 

My only other theory is is that it could be the toxins from the

candida causing all these problems, not the candida itself which may

be harder to pin point?

 

I would like to hear other peoples views?

 

All the best

Diana Moore

http://www.bowentherapy.homestead.com

http://www.scoliosis.homestead.com

[Guest guest]

Hallo Diana,

 

Interesting questions!

 

As for the autopsies: we only get answers to questions we ask.

I doubt if mainstream coroners look for evidence of Candida.

 

As for your second question: you are right, a large part of the

damage comes from the mycotoxins that are excreted by the

fungal forms of bacteria like candida.

 

Here is an excerpt from a longer article posted a while ago, on

the connection between heavy metal poisoning and parasites:

 

We have completely ignored what's called benign bacteria, because as a bacterial

 

form they are non-disruptive to our physical state.

 

But they are pleomorphic. Pleomorphic means that they can change form.

 

If you acidify the body, they will start to move into a yeast form, and if you

give

 

them enough food from undigested proteins they will become a fungal form.

 

At these higher levels they will become much more degenerative.

 

They attach themselves. They hang on. They're not just visiting. They colonize

your body!

 

 

 

Now, you can't get away from these guys. They are everywhere.

 

If you're on this planet, they're with you. Your only defense is a strong

terrain.

 

Snip...showing a slide of blood with heavy metal poisoning.

 

Heavy metal poisoning causes free radical damage. See how the cells all around

 

the heavy metal are starting to break downWe have completely ignored what's

called

 

benign bacteria, because as a bacterial form they are non-disruptive to our

physical state.

 

 

 

Your first line of defense is E. (a herbal formula that supports liver and

kidney.)

 

That secretion that you are seeing here is by this fungal form.

 

This fungal form will secrete a mucus, that is called a mycotoxin, and will use

 

it to pick up undigested food and the heavy metals so that the heavy metals will

 

stay in the body, and support the activity of this fungal form.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ien in the Kootenays

http://ienvan.multiply.com (blog)

http://wildhealing.net (Rainforest Herbs)

http://wildwholefoods.net (AFA algae)

 

 

[Guest guest]

....Healthy person has many desires. Ill person has only one - to be

well and healthy again...

 

The hypothesis of a fungal aetiology (eg. Candida albicans) in

chronic- degenerative illness, able to connect the ethical qualities

of the individual with the development of specific pathologies,

reconciles the two orientations (allopathic and holistic) of

medicine. The hypothesis is a strong candidate for being that missing

element of psychosomatics that was sought but never found by one of

the fathers of psychosomatics, Viktor von Weiszacker. In considering

the biological dimensions of the fungi, for instance, it is possible

to compare the different degrees of pathegenecity in relation to the

condition of organs, tissues and cells of a guest organism, which in

turn also and especially depend on the behaviour of the individual.

 

In the Candida theory, this Italian doctor has very high success rate

with the very cheap and non-invasive sodium bicarbonate even with

brain tumors which could asnwer your question Diana. To this date,

science and medicine has NO answer what is the real cause of cancer.

What if medicine refused the oncological principle which assumes that

cancer is generated by a cellular reproductive anomaly? This

principle so far didn't bring any positive solutions in cancer

treatments so why doctors are still sticking to it? However, if the

fundamental hypothesis of cellular reproductive anomaly is

questioned, it becomes clear that all the theories based on this

hypotheses are INEVITABLY FLAWED.

 

As background information, it is important to review the picture of

presumed genetic influences in the development of cancer processes as

they are depicted by molecular biolgists. These are the scientists

who perform research on infinitesimally small cellular mechanisms,

but who in REAL LIFE NEVER SEE A PATIENT. ALL PRESENT MEDICAL SYSTEMS

ARE BASED ON THIS RESEARCH, AND THUS, UNFORTUNATELY, ALL THERAPIES

CURRENTLY PERFORMED !!!! All those who work in the field do nothing

but repeat the stale litany of reproductive cellular anomalies on a

genetic basis. It is better to look for new horizons and conceptual

instruments that are capable of unearthing a real and unique

neoplastic aetiology.