Government presses health chiefs for more fluoridation of drinking water (UK)

[Guest guest]

" Zeus " <info

Government presses health chiefs for more fluoridation of

drinking water (UK)

Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:14:03 +0100

 

 

http://health.telegraph.co.uk/health/main.jhtml;jsessionid=3CDL5ONS3BKSBQFIQMGCN\

AGAVCBQUJVC?xml=/health/2005/10/11/nfluro10.xml & sSheet=/health/2005/10/11/ixhmai\

n.html

 

Government presses health chiefs for more fluoridation of drinking water

(Filed: 11/10/2005)

 

The first significant attempt for more than 20 years to extend water

fluoridation across England has been launched by the Government.

 

Health chiefs have been told to use new powers granted by Parliament

to add fluoride to their supplies as a way of improving the oral

health of their populations and to ''reduce inequalities''.

 

Under the 2003 Water Act, the 28 strategic health authorities now have

the final say over whether fluoride should be added to the supply.

That overturned a 1985 ruling that effectively left the decision up to

the water companies, which were reluctant to fluoridate for fear of

being sued and did not want responsibility for public health decisions.

 

Since then, no new scheme has been approved. However, water companies

are now under a duty to fluoridate the water if they are requested to

do so by a strategic health authority.

 

Fluoride is present naturally in virtually all water supplies but most

levels fall short of the optimum for dental health, which is one part

per million. For years ministers have wanted to see fluoridation

expanded beyond the six million people currently covered by natural

and artificial schemes.

 

A letter sent to health executives by Prof Raman Bedi, the chief

dental officer for England, says the new laws provide a ''realistic

option'' of doing so.

 

Such a move is enormously controversial and will provoke an outcry

from anti-fluoride campaigners.

 

The Government says that there will be thorough local consultation

before any new schemes go ahead and these will need to demonstrate

" strong local support " .

 

Opponents say the risks from fluoride are unknown, the science

questionable and that studies have been equivocal in their conclusions.

 

forwarded by

Zeus Information Service

Alternative Views on Health

www.zeusinfoservice.com