BIRD FLU INTRODUCED VIA VACCINE?

[Guest guest]

A

Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:47:15 -0700 (PDT)

BIRD FLU INTRODUCED VIA VACCINE?

 

 

 

 

http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=1320

 

BIRD FLU INTRODUCED VIA VACCINE?

 

Thursday, October 13, 2005 - FreeMarketNews.com

 

Little known but much too broad, Project Bioshield is a $5.6 billion

program Bush signed into law in July 2004 that would apparently strip

U.S. citizens of any recourse in the event that the feds decide on

certain health-care remedies. These would presumably include the

mandatory application of unproven vaccines to counter real or

perceived health threats worldwide.

 

Recent reports use the term " Bio-Fascism " to characterize initiatives

such as Project Bioshield, describing it as " the merging of the

military medical establishment with public health bureaucracies, to

enforce the will of the ostensible federal regulator (the Food and

Drug Administration (FDA)) and Big Pharma. The latter is a descriptive

term for the gigantic transnational drug companies who have used their

enormous clout to generate government programs that mandate the use of

their products for so-called public safety purposes. Too often, as has

been seen recently, what is initially perceived as a drug for the

public good evolves into a danger because of unforseen side effects.

Vaccines are usually rushed into production without prior testing,

allowing side effects to manifest themselves only through broad

application.

 

President Bush's recent remarks about mandating vaccinations for avian

flu is further evidence of the militarization of public health care

and would also seem to reflect a dangerous misunderstanding about

disease and palliative methodologies. Medical science, especially in

its initial stages, is replete with side effects and even

ramifications that can carry over into the next generation. What is

perhaps even more worrisome than Bush's plans to militarize public

health care is his focus, one might say obsession, on martial law as a

curative for almost every weighty issue of his second term.

 

According to an article recently posted on a major alternative news

sight entitled Avian Flu Fright - Politically-Timed For Global

'Iatrogenocide,' Leonard G. Horowitz, DMD, MA, MPH writes that the

current hysteria over Avian flu, which Bush seems to share, is

actually resulting in its manufacture in military labratories in the

United States and abroad. He points out that the Avian Flu, currently

causing the slaughter of thousands of wild birds, has shown no

propensity to " mutate " and jump to humans - and in fact such a

mutation is highly unlikely. Rather, what will happen, he predicts,

should the hysteria continue unabated is that the West will respond to

public concerns by first creating and then making available a vaccine

for which there is as yet no disease; in other words - since a vaccine

is a weak form of what it is intended to combat - introduce into the

real world the deadly virus that probably would not otherwise make its

appearance.

 

" To make the human vaccine specific for the H5N1 mutant virus, " he

writes, " you must start with the human virus which does not yet exist,

except in perhaps military-biomedical-pharmaceutical laboratories. In

fact, this is precisely what is being prepared based on news reports.

To produce the human pathogen, the avian virus must be cultured for

lengthy periods of time in human cell cultures, then injected into

monkeys and ultimately humans to see if these experimental subjects

get the same feared flu. Thus, the flu virus the world currently fears

most is either: 1) now being prepared in labs paid by industrialists

with massive wealth-building incentives to " accidentally release the

virus; or 2) has already been prepared in such labs to take advantage

of this current fright and future sales following the virus's release.

… Remember, to be effective against a virus, a vaccine is said to

require specificity. If authorities were to now have the main H5N1

Avian flu strain feared to spread at some future date there's no

assurance by the time they developed the vaccine the strain would

remain sufficiently the same for the vaccine to be effective anyway

due to expected viral mutations. Viral mutations over time is a

function of the agent's newness. New man-made viruses, laboratory

creations, like the ones currently being prepared for vaccine trials,

are less stable not having evolved over the millennia. Thus, the

entire vaccine effort is largely, if not entirely, a sham with

ulterior motives. "

 

And he adds, " Remember too, that a vaccine's reliability requires

years, or at least months, of testing in the targeted population.

Vaccine injury data must, or should, be meticulously collected over

this period to assure the vaccine is not killing and maiming more

persons than it is helping or saving. Can you seriously believe this

assurance will be provided by government or pharmaceutical industry

officials in this pandemic's wake? FEMA's failed Katrina response

pales by comparison to this public health liability and vaccine-injury

certainty. " -ST

 

staff & nbspreports - Free-Market News Network