A Policy of Absolute Barbarism?

[Guest guest]

S

Sat, 24 Sep 2005 20:08:43 EDT

A Policy of Absolute Barbarism?

 

 

 

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10376.htm

 

 

A policy of absolute barbarism?

 

Basra; another milestone in war on terror

 

" What our police found in their car was very disturbing - weapons,

explosives, and a remote control detonator. These are the weapons of

terrorists. We believe these soldiers were planning an attack on a

market or other civilian targets. " Sheik Hassan al-Zarqani, spokesman

for the Mehdi Army

 

By Mike Whitney

 

09/24/05 " ICH " -- -- We are only interested in one thing regarding the

melee that broke out in Basra following the arrest of two British

commandoes on September 20: whether or not the car they were driving

contained explosives? The answer to that question could decide the

future of Iraq as well as the fate of Bush's war on terror. Nothing

should deter us from getting to the bottom of this crucial question

and no extraneous fact or fiction should divert our attention from

uncovering the answer.

 

If it can be clearly established that there were explosives in that

vehicle then we can say with some degree of certainty that the wave of

terrorism that is spreading across Iraq is, at least, in part the work

of British and American Intelligence. That would imply that current

counterinsurgency efforts now involve the premeditated killing of

innocent people to achieve the stated policy objectives. This is the

very definition of terrorism.

 

Early news reports from both the BBC and the Washington Post confirmed

allegations that bomb-making material was discovered in the captured

vehicle. The Post's Ellen Knickmeyer stated, " The Iraqi security

officials on Monday variously accused two Britons they detained of

shooting at Iraqi forces or TRYING TO PLANT EXPLOSIVES. " (Washington

Post, 9-20-05; " British Smash into Jail to Free Two Detained Soldiers)

Neither the Post nor the BBC have printed retractions or

clarifications on this story even though it has swept across the

internet with a fury not seen since the Downing Street memo. In fact,

this story is significantly more important. The entire war on terror

is predicated on the belief that the murdering of innocent people

cannot be rationalized. The incident in Basra puts all that into

question.

 

Bush has marshaled the public fear from 9-11 into a rallying cry for

his global-onslaught. He has waved the bloody-shirt of terror to

enhance his power as executive and declare a permanent state of war.

Terror has provided the foundation for savaging civil liberties,

imprisoning American citizens, and acting with complete impunity.

 

" The deliberate and deadly attacks which were carried out on September

11 were more than acts of terror. They were acts of war " , Bush boomed.

The powers of the " war president " depend entirely on his nebulous war

on terror.

 

The same is true for Tony Blair. The British PM has acted-out the same

rituals as Bush; railing against the " evil ideology " of Muslim

fanaticism saying, " We must confront and deal head on with the

extremism that is based on a perversion of the true faith of Islam. "

 

Blair's fulminations have resulted in the most extraordinary attack on

civil liberties in the last 100 years. His pretentious rhetoric has

produced a de facto state of martial law for Muslims living in England.

 

Now his muddled justification for endless war and butchery is facing

its greatest challenge; a Ford Cressida packed with a trunk-load of

explosives on the streets of Basra. If proof emerges that the car

contained bombs then Bush's war of terror will fall apart like a

mobile home in a Texas hurricane.

 

The Chinese news service Xinhuanet reported that, " A police patrol

followed the attackers and captured them to discover that they were

two British soldiers. The soldiers were using a civilian car packed

with explosives. " (Xinhuanet 9-20-05) The same basic story appeared on

Syrian and Turkish TV, and in other news reports in the Gulf States

 

The Washington Post's foreign office filed a similar report by

Jonathan Finer stating that, " Monday's clashes stemmed from the arrest

by Iraqi police on Sunday of two Britons, WHOM IRAQI POLICE ACCUSED OF

PLANTING BOMBS " .

 

And then there was this from Syrian correspondent in Baghdad Ziyad

al-Munajjid:

 

" Many analysts and observers here had suspicions that the occupation

was involved in some armed operations against civilians and places of

worship and in the killing of scientists. But those were only

suspicions that lacked proof. The proof came today through the arrest

of the two British soldiers while they were planting explosives in one

of the Basra streets. This proves, according to observers, that the

occupation is not far from many operations that seek to sow sedition

and maintain disorder, as this would give the occupation the

justification to stay in Iraq for a longer period. " Abdel al-Daraji,

Muslim cleric in Baghdad told the UK Telegraph that " Britain was

plotting to start an ethnic war by carrying out mass-casualty bombings

targeting Shia civilians and then blaming the attacks on Sunni groups. "

 

" Everyone knows the occupiers agenda, said al-Daraji. " Their intention

is to keep Iraq an unstable battlefield so they can exploit their

interests in Iraq. "

 

Whether the reports are accurate or not is almost irrelevant. They

feed the widespread dissatisfaction with the occupation and contribute

to the conspiracy theories that animate the national discourse. The

belief that the British and American black-ops are behind the violence

has captured the popular imagination and will be impossible to dispel.

The damage to the occupation is incalculable.

 

As the story spreads through Iraq, support for the al-Jaafari

government is certain to wane and the Shi'ites will increasingly drift

towards the resistance. The occupation leaders will have to devise a

strategy to restore confidence in their legitimacy or face the steady

erosion of support. If that proves to be impossible, then we're bound

to see more radicalized Shi'ites entering the rival camp. A massive

movement of Shi'ites into the resistance would pose a serious

challenge to the ongoing American-British presence.

 

The Basra incident is a fatal blow to the Pentagon's narrative of

foreign terrorists stirring up trouble in Iraq. The military depends

heavily on the al-Zarqawi myth to feed public fears and divert

attention from a brutish occupation. From this point forward every

terrorist bombing and random act of violence will be scrutinized as

(potentially) the work of British or American agents.

 

How can Bush and Blair hope to allay the suspicions of Iraqi people

after Basra?

 

What can they possibly do to rebuild faith in the stated goals of the

occupation?

 

The Basra incident is another milestone in the faltering war on

terror. The questions that emerge are fundamental to understanding

whether we are engaged in a noble effort to liberate and democratize

the Iraqi people, or complicit in the deliberate murder of innocent

civilians.

 

If the car driven by the two commandos was loaded with explosives,

then we can assume that it would have been used to kill civilians.

 

Why does this surprise us?

 

We've already seen the " Shock and Awe " invasion that cost tens of

thousands of lives. We've already seen the horrific photos of tortured

and sadistically abused prisoners at Abu Ghraib. We've already heard

the news of the 200 prisoners at Guantanamo who are starving

themselves to death under the Pentagon's watchful eye. We've already

chronicled the calculated destruction of Iraqi society and the daily

assault on their main cities. We've already read of the use of napalm,

cluster-bombs, unidentified chemicals and other banned weapons on

civilian enclaves. And, we've already noted the growing number of

young Sunni men who bob-along the Euphrates River after being shot in

the back of the head by the CIA-trained goons at the Interior Ministry.

 

Is it so hard to believe that Special Forces are now directly involved

in attacks on civilians?

 

Aren't we seeing the logical extension of a policy that rejects all

ethical and moral constraints? A policy of absolute barbarism?

 

Basra will tell.