The Tipping Point: Where the Neo Con-Job Unraveled

[Guest guest]

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:48:29 +0200

The Tipping Point: Where the Neo Con-Job Unraveled

S

 

 

 

http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_19697.shtml

 

 

By Phil Toler

Sep 21, 2005, 16:51

 

 

The Tipping Point

 

Where The Neocon Job Unraveled

 

 

 

By Phil Toler

 

 

 

No matter how they spin it, the red-handed nabbing of two British

agents-provocateurs in Basra will lift the veil of deceit that has

cloaked the otherwise unexplainable internecine attacks between Sunnis

and Shi'ites. The long-held Israeli/Neocon goal has been to break up

Iraq, among other Arab states, into more easily managed Bantustans.

The obvious fault lines among the Sunni, Shia, and Kurd communities

made Wolfowitz believe achieving the goal would be a cakewalk. It

wasn't the toppling of Saddam he was talking about, you see, and all

those terrible 'mistakes' made by Proconsuls Garner and Bremmer were

as carefully calculated as the rest of this bloody farce.

 

 

 

What happened in Basra, from the Iraqi standpoint — which is all that

matters now that the end-game approacheth — is that two Brits in robes

were driving a civilian car packed with explosives. Their mission was

to throw a heavy distraction at the Shia militias who were quite upset

that three of their chiefs were taken captive by the Brits. They

sought to blow up a huge bomb in the busy marketplace, with the

obvious blame pointing to Sunnis. But, as often happens with such

false flag tactics, they backfired.

 

 

 

Now, those in the Shi'ite community who favor the withdrawal of the

occupation troops, sidelined only by their apparent power grab in the

elections, are smelling the salts of reality and will come out of

their stupor to realize the Yanks have screwed them yet again. They'll

go back to the bloody beginning, say, to the massive bombing of the UN

Headquarters in Baghdad, and recalculate. They know they weren't

responsible, and it will dawn on them that the `coalition' had far

more to gain from the routing of the international body, such as it

is, than the `dead-enders' in the Sunni Community. Same goes for the

Jordanian Embassy, the scores of journalists, the mosque bombings, and

virtually all of the so-called suicide bombers. These actions all had

the effect of fomenting civil war with the Kurds, who are heavily

backed by the Israelis, being the only local party to gain from the

mayhem.

 

 

 

Early in the war, there were reports of Iraqi men being detained by

occupation authorities for several hours while they were interrogated

and had their vehicles `searched'. The were released on the condition

they must go to a specific police station to pick up their papers, or

some such necessity. Fortunately, a lucky few discovered by

happenstance that explosives had been placed in their vehicle with the

purpose remote detonation at whatever destination they were directed

to. Apparently the trick still works, because the rash of `suicide'

car bombings is unceasing.

 

 

 

But back to Basra. The Yanks have to placate the Shia — at least

enough to feel secure that they will not be overwhelmed from the rear,

the only point of escape if such becomes necessary. It was the only

reason elections were held in a way that would guarantee nominal Shia

control of the `government'. But, perhaps with Iran's nominal

assistance, the Shia began to look for proof of coalition involvement

in acts that really only benefit the coalition. Hence the capture of

the two Brit operatives en flagrante. You can ignore comfortably

British claims their disguised boys were just surveying suspected

militants. If that was their true mission, why would they shoot up the

Iraqi police who stopped them, and why would storming of the police

station occur before negotiations could produce the soldiers' release

with far less hoopla? More crucial, why would the usually calm city of

Basra erupt in such rage? Perhaps they're feeling the twisting Yankee

knife in their backs yet again.

 

 

 

As for the other predictions I have made, the potential for economic

collapse has been virtually guaranteed by Katrina and her sibling,

Rita, which is poised to take out the drilling platforms Katrina

missed. Throw in further damage to refineries, and they're going to

have to retrofit the nation's gas pumps to accommodate triple digit

fill-ups. Toss in roughly the cost of another Iraqi war, which has

quietly surpassed the Vietnam debacle in one third less time, to sop

out the pork to Halliburton and the like for hurricane cleanup, and

it's clear the numbers in the debit column will overwhelm real

American assets to back them up. It's all blue sky from here on out, baby.

 

 

 

As for the growth of doubts about the official legend of 9/11, a

former Bush official has bluntly stated that the WTC buildings were

brought down by explosives, and it is reported that the probe into the

outed CIA asset has begun to sniff at the edges of the strange

anomalies for which no answer has been given. And this is the real

danger for the Neocons, the only thing that could conceivably bring

down the Bush administration, or lead to unabashed martial law so that

all would know the color of their true designs. In this regard,

America will collapse from the rot within and on a schedule that

resembles the famously aggressive Spartans far more than Britain or Rome.

 

 

 

Enjoy your Fall, folks, I've got to go stock the storm shelter.

 

 

 

 

 

© Copyright 2005 by AxisofLogic.com