Guest guest Posted September 16, 2005 Report Share Posted September 16, 2005 New Scientist ' Tells On Old Scientists JoAnn Guest Sep 14, 2005 17:13 PDT 9/9/05 Author: Christopher Barr Source: Naturally Speaking NATURALLY Speaking By Christopher C. Barr 'New Scientist' tells on old scientists " Most published scientific research papers are wrong, " read the opening of a " Breaking News " item last week from the ' New Scientist ' magazine web site. The article gave several reasons including " poor study design, researcher bias, and selective reporting " as contributing factors that " make most research findings false " . It also cited that researchers " massage their conclusions after the fact " . A representative example of these points from last week's ' New Scientist ' article appeared this week as though made to order. Poor study design News headlines proclaimed that B vitamins do not prevent heart attacks. They singled out folic acid and pyridoxine (commonly called 'vitamin B6'). Pyridoxine has been noted as a preventative factor against heart disease. However, this study tested pyridoxine in those who already had heart disease and who had suffered heart attacks. Damage was already done prior to the preventative action of pyridoxine being introduced. Pyridoxine prevents the build-up of homocysteine. This study consisted of individuals that already had elevated levels of homocysteine. Furthermore, the study focused on folic acid that breaks down homocysteine after it is formed rather than focusing on pyridoxine which prevents the build up of homocysteine. Researcher bias The lead author of the cited study has a lengthy history of downplaying the importance of homocysteine though that was not reported in the news. Selective reporting The study was reported as one that demonstrated folic acid or B6 alone had no effect against further heart attacks, and that both used together resulted in more heart attacks. However, the study did not test B6 but rather " high dose vitamin B pills " that happened to contain B6. The tested substances were identified as " high-dose vitamin B pills " , " high-dose folic acid " , and " fake pills " . The truth is that they were all fake pills. The alleged " nutrients " tested were of the man-made, synthetic variety rather than from a whole food form. One news article reported " Folates, such as folic acid and vitamin B " though folate is a separate substance from either folic acid or the vitamin B complex. Folate only occurs in food while folic acid does not naturally occur in food. Furthermore, the synthesized 'nutrients' were used " In addition to standard heart medicines " . Though the biased researcher boldly stated that " The homocysteine hypothesis is dead " , the only truthful conclusion that can be accurately reached from this study is that synthetic nutrients in combination with standard heart medications will not prevent repeated heart attacks in those who have an already damaged heart, and may make existing conditions worse in a small minority of individuals. This study did not examine actual life enhancing nutrients. Massaged conclusions The lead researcher erroneously concluded that, " The results of the trial are important because they tell doctors that prescribing high doses of B vitamins will not prevent heart disease or stroke. " The study did not address preventing heart disease but rather further heart attacks in those already having heart disease with previous heart attacks. Furthermore it did not address actual vitamins but rather man-made varieties. This week's articles proclaiming B-vitamins to be of no value against heart disease by old scientists is a perfect example of last week's article that proclaimed " Most published scientific research papers are wrong, " by ' New Scientist '. Christopher C. Barr writes Naturally Speaking from Arkansas: The Natural State … naturally! You may write him at P. O. Box 1147, Pocahontas, Arkansas 72455 or by e-mail at servant-. JoAnn Guest mrsjo- www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest/Diets AIM Barleygreen " Wisdom of the Past, Food of the Future " http://www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest/Diets.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.