Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

GM WEEKLY WATCH 141

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

WEEKLY WATCH 141

" GM WATCH " <info

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:36:08 +0100

 

 

 

 

---------------------------

WEEKLY WATCH number 141

---------------------------

---------------------------

from Claire Robinson, WEEKLY WATCH editor

---------------------------

 

Dear all:

 

It's good to see the Australian states maintaining, and even

intensifying, their robust stance against GM contamination

(AUSTRALASIA). In

India, meanwhile, problematic Bt cotton may have sprung a new disease and

it's certainly suffering a battering from sucking pests (ASIA).

 

New research supports previous findings that Monsanto's Roundup

herbicide can contribute to an increase in fungal disease, posing a

serious

food safety risk as well as a major economic threat to farmers

(RESEARCH).

 

Please revisit our CAMPAIGN OF THE WEEK on Terminator, which last week

reprinted an erroneous email address. Make sure your comments get to

the right place!

 

Claire claire

www.gmwatch.org / www.lobbywatch.org

 

-------

CONTENTS

-------

AUSTRALASIA

THE AMERICAS

ASIA

EUROPE

AFRICA

MIDDLE EAST

RESEARCH

COMPANY NEWS

LOBBYWATCH

MUST-SEE MOVIE

CAMPAIGN OF THE WEEK

 

---------------------------

AUSTRALASIA

---------------------------

 

+ NEW SOUTH WALES GM CROP BAN EXTENDED

NSW Agriculture Minister Ian Macdonald has extended the state ban on GM

crops from 2006 to 2008, bringing NSW into line with other states.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5719

 

+ CANOLA DESTROYED DUE TO GM CONTAMINATION

Millions of canola seedlings have been destroyed after one variety in a

New South Wales crop trial was found to be GM. All the crops were

supposed to be non-GM varieties in nine trials of canola varieties.

Farmers

are worried in case the contamination proves to be more widespread.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5721

 

+ STRICT LIABILITY CALL FROM MINISTER

Western Australia's Agriculture Minister Kim Chance has called on GM

companies to take greater care and responsibility for their product or

face clean up costs.

 

" Regretfully, the GM companies appear unable to contain their product

within the laboratory or within Office of Gene Technology Regulator

(OGTR) trial sites and they appear unable or unwilling to respect WA's

moratorium or those in place in other Australian jurisdictions, " Mr

Chance

said.

 

Mr Chance says without strict liability for adverse effects from GMOs -

something the biotech industry steadfastly refuses to contemplate - the

GM moratoria introduced by the Australian states will continue

indefinitely.

 

" Until we have assurances that we have an adequate legal framework, no

state jurisdiction is ever going to lift their moratorium. "

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5719

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5722

 

+ GM CROP CONTAMINATION MAY SPARK REVIEW OF LIABILITY LAWS

The federal and state governments are being urged to consider national

liability laws after canola crops in four states were contaminated with

GM material. The Western Australian government said the legal framework

needed an urgent review in the wake of the nation's biggest ever

contamination cases.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5722

 

+ NZ JUDGE RAISES CONCERN OVER PEPPER SPRAY

In a Rotorua court ruling in New Zealand, Judge James Weir raised

serious concerns over police failure to follow their own procedures and

their use of pepper spray (OC) at an anti-GM protest earlier this year.

 

Felicity Perry, Arthur Price and Simon Oosterman were acquitted of all

charges relating to the protest against GM trees in Rotorua. They had

pleaded not guilty to charges of obstruction and resisting arrest.

 

A Northland farmer who was present at the protest told GM Watch, " I had

the unfortunate experience -during a peaceful protest - of witnessing

large aggressive security guards/police seizing a very slight young

woman, dragging her across the 'no go' line and nearly wrenching her arm

off, getting her in a headlock. Peaceful protestors were grabbed, pepper

sprayed, I was horrified and was

thankful to not be injured in the fray. A number of farmers and

foresters had travelled down to Rotorua to participate in a GE TREE

conference/hui,

due to our concerns about the risks of GE trees to the environment and

forestry industry, but did not expect this sort of behavior from the

police and security guards. "

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5717

 

+ MORE ON HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER FROM GM CATTLE STORY

Allegations have been made by GE Free NZ that AgResearch soil tests

suggest 'horizontal gene transfer' may have occurred with soil

micro-organisms in land where transgenic cattle have been grazing for

6 years.

However, AgResearch has strongly contested this claim. Scientist Dr Jack

Heinemann of the Institute of Gene Ecology, at the University of

Canterbury in New Zealand, gives his views on the evidence at

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5724

 

---------------------------

THE AMERICAS

---------------------------

 

+ UNI OF MANITOBA BLOCKED VIDEO ON GM CROPS

Researchers at the University of Manitoba have accused the university

of blocking the release of their video exploring the risks of GM crops

while at the same time courting funds from biotech companies.

 

The university originally demanded assurances it would not be liable if

anyone sued. One insurer demanded a $50,000 deductible for any lawsuits

by Monsanto.

 

The university appears to have now dropped the lawsuit issue, but

McLachlan said the university is still demanding control over where

and when

the video is shown, while at the same time requiring a disclaimer

indicating the project has nothing to do with the university.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5712

 

+ GM BAN SUPPORTERS FILE LAWSUIT OVER BALLOT WORDING

Supporters of Measure M, a California ballot initiative seeking to

prevent contamination from GMOs, has filed a lawsuit in Sonoma County

Superior Court.

 

" The (Sonoma County) Farm Bureau has had their facts wrong all along,

so their ballot statement was no surprise, " said Dave Henson, main

author of the measure.

 

Supporters of the measure, which will appear on the Nov. 8 ballot, want

to halt printing of the ballot measure until the language is revised.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5702

 

+ LAWMAKER WANTS TO NULLIFY GM CROP BAN

A Central California legislator is pursuing a bill in the 2005 state

legislative session that would nullify voter-approved bans on GM crops.

Sen. Dean Florez, D-Bakersfield, has revived a bill attacking GMO bans

in place in Marin, Mendocino and Trinity counties, as well as the cities

of Arcata and Point Arena. The bill would affect Sonoma County's Nov. 8

ballot measure to establish a GM crop ban, and a proposed ordinance

prohibiting biotech crops in Lake County.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5702

 

+ CORPORATE CRONYISM IN U.S.

The blatant extremity of the cronyism of the Bush administration is

starting to wake people up to the political and corporate corruption

of US

government agencies, like the Environmental Protection Agency, the Food

and Drug Administration and FEMA, which is run by Dubya's pal but

performed abysmally in the recent disaster in New Orleans.

 

But there's still limited recognition of the fact that problems like

the FDA's cosiness with the biotech and pharma corporations go way beyond

the partisan policies and cronyism of a single administration.

 

Consider, for instance, Michael R. Taylor, whose career managed to

intermingle being a vice president for Monsanto with working for the FDA

and the US Dept of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service -

long before the Dubya ascendency.

More on Bush's cronies and on Taylor:

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5715

 

---------------------------

ASIA

---------------------------

 

+ INDIA: UNUSUAL DISEASE ON BT COTTON

A fact-finding team visited Bt cotton and non-Bt cotton fields on

September 9, 2005 to inquire into the incidence of an unusual disease on

cotton crop, especially on Bt cotton, in Warangal district of Andhra

Pradesh. The disease has apparently affected more than 50,000 acres of

cotton crop.

 

The fact-finding team, after its day-long visit to villages and

meetings with numerous farmers, concludes that Bt cotton seems to be more

vulnerable to this disease (which seems to be a viral disease being

spread

by sucking pests) than non-Bt cotton.

 

The fact-finding visit also has important findings on the central

claims of the Bt cotton technology - that of controlling pest damage

to the

flowering and fruiting parts of the cotton plant (economically

important parts). The team found high incidence on these parts of

Spodoptera (a

destructive moth) and Helicoverpa (bollworm - the very pest that Bt

cotton is supposed to resist!) on Bt cotton plots, with considerable

damage.

 

The team has called for urgent investigations by the government and an

advice service to help farmers control the phenomenon.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5709

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5720

 

+ THE POLITICS OF GM COTTON FAILURE

Suman Sahai has written in India's national paper The Hindu about the

Indian regulator GEAC's continuing approvals of Bt cotton in spite of

widespread failure of the crop, " What the GEAC is doing with respect to

Bt cotton amounts to criminal negligence. Its biased decisions are

resulting in debilitating losses for poor farmers, especially in rainfed

areas. The members of the GEAC must be held accountable for the losses

faced by farmers, sometimes leading them to taking extreme steps. The

government has remained unmoved by reports of crop failures and

impervious

to demands that a thorough review be undertaken of the Bt cotton

performance in India, before proceeding any further with it. It

continues to

commit offences against farmers by allowing a substandard product to be

sold to them. "

 

Dr Sahai refers in the article to the recently published study by

Indian government scientists, lead by Keshav Kranthi at the Central

Institute for Cotton Research (CICR), showing that the " protection

offered by

Bt cotton lasts only for part of the plant's life cycle and most

critically, that bollworm readily attack the bolls because Bt toxin

expression

was below effective levels in the economically most important part of

the plant. "

 

This article, and the fact that Gene Campaign has now issued a notice

to the Ministry of Environment and Forests to file a complaint over the

GEAC's failure to regulate GMOs properly, has stung Keshav Kranthi into

responding.

 

Kranthi dismisses concerns over Bt cotton as " meaningless hullabaloo "

and claims that Bt cotton is, in fact, " a brilliant technology " ,

" state-of-the-art " etc., despite the fact that the CICR study, as he

admits,

confirms " inherent inadequacies " .

 

Revealingly, Kranthi writes, " our main intention [in doing the study]

was to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the technology so that it

can be improved further. " This would seem to tie in with allegations

made at the time of the study's publication, that the real intention

behind it was to admit to the problems with GM cotton in India only in

order to lay the ground for further GM cotton approvals.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5708

 

+ RETHINK ON GM URGED FOR ORISSA

A rethink on GM crops is being urged for the Indian state of Orissa.

Serious objections are being raised on behalf of organic farmers and a

variety of organisations in Orissa to the way in which the public and

farmers have been left out of policy making on GM: " a delegation of

farmers had met the chief minister in March, 2005 and he had promised to

conduct a serious study on the matter of declaring Orissa as an 'organic

agriculture state' which will ban GM seeds and food. "

 

Predictably, it hasn't hapened and the fear is that the introduction of

GM could bring the same ruin that it has for thousands of farmers in

the neighbouring state of Andhra Pradesh, from which Monsanto has now

been banned because of GM cotton's dire performance and the company's

refusal to compensate farmers.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5707

 

+ CHINA CULTIVATES RECORD HIGH-YIELD NON-GM RICE

Chinese agronomists have cultivated new species of " super rice, " the

Super Rice II YOU 28, with average per hectare yield reaching a record

high of 18,449.55 kilograms.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5713

 

+ JAPANESE CONSUMERS SHUN U.S. GM SOY...

Japanese consumers are shunning American GM soybeans. Major tofu

producer Asahi Food Processing Co. is due later this month to market tofu

made only with Australian soybeans, which are not GM, through

supermarkets

in the Tokyo area.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5718

 

+ ... AND SOUTH KOREANS TOO

South Korea's state-run Agricultural and Fishery Marketing Corporation

has bought 25,000 tonnes of non-GM US soybeans from ADM.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5718

 

---------------------------

EUROPE

---------------------------

 

+ 'CO-EXISTENCE' OF GM WITH OTHER CROPS IMPOSSIBLE

Speaking at a conference in Bologna, Italy on 'Co-existence' of GM with

conventional or organic crops, Dr Ignacio Chapela told the conference,

" 'Co-existence' of GMOs and GM-free plants is biologically impossible.

If we keep thinking like this, it won't be a question of if

contamination will occur; it will be a question of when and how much.

We do not

have the political will, the technical capacity or the independence of

thought to deal with 'co-existence', neither to monitor its development,

nor to remedy its consequences. Proposed biosafety and bioethical

frameworks will not prevent contamination. "

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5704

 

+ ACTIVIST DEFENDS GM CARGO SHIP PROTEST

Greenpeace campaigner Ben Ayliffe, who was involved in a two-day

protest on a cargo ship, said he believed it was carrying illegal and

unapproved GM crops. Greenpeace had claimed the MV Etoile, which was

stopped

from heading into Bristol in June last year, was carrying GM animal

feed. Ten men and three women deny a public nuisance charge at Cardiff

Crown Court.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5714

 

+ SEVEN YEARS LOST FOR GENETIC ENGINEERING

An article with the above title has appeared in the German press,

featuring much bleating from the industry about Germany's strict

liability

laws on GM crops. The industry is desperately hoping that the upcoming

German elections will deliver an aggressively right-wing government

sympathetic to their interests. Fortunately, it's far from clear that the

" German Margaret Thatcher " and her admirers will sweep the board in the

way the biotech brigade have been hoping.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5723

 

-------

AFRICA

-------

 

+ ZAMBIAN MILLERS DEMAND STERN ACTION AGAINST GM POLLUTERS

The Millers Association of Zambia (MAZ) has apparently found evidence

of illegal imports into Zambia, which has a policy of being GM free. MAZ

chairman, Caleb Mulenga, has since called on the government to be on

red-alert and look out for illegally imported and contaminated GM

mealie-meal and take stern action against culprits. The Times of

Zambia in an

editorial supports the call for tough action, saying any illegal

introduction of GMOs into the country amounts to economic sabotage and an

attack on the future health and welfare of the people of Zambia.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5725

 

+ JEFFREY SMITH INTERVIEW

Jeffrey Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, is in Africa this month. A

hard-hitting interview with him is at

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5705

 

-------

MIDDLE EAST

-------

 

+ WHAT IRAQ'S ORDER 81 REALLY MEANS FOR FARMERS

" Farmers shall be prohibited from reusing seeds of protected varieties "

- so reads article 15 of Iraq's order 81, ... one of 100 " orders "

brought in by the US-run coalition provisional authority which ruled Iraq

prior to handing over to Iraqis - and which have stayed in place ever

since.

 

Opponents have leapt on Order 81, saying it means farmers can keep no

seeds at all... Such claims give the big seed firms angling to grab a

share of the Iraqi market..., particularly Monsanto's pro-active PR team,

an opening to insist that the order does no such thing. Campaign groups

Grain and Focus on the Global South have even had to add a

Monsanto-approved clarification to their critical report from October

2004, saying:

" The law does not prohibit Iraqi farmers from using or saving

'traditional' seeds. It prohibits them from re-using seeds of 'new' plant

varieties registered under the law. "

 

So that's all right then? Well, no. There are, in fact, next to no

'traditional' seeds left in Iraq. Much of the public sector-controlled

local seed industry was destroyed in fighting and looting and the UN has

just warned that seed shortages now threaten the country's food security,

saying Iraq can meet just 4 percent of its demand for quality seeds

from its own resources.

 

And who is ready to step in with their patented, no re-use,

cheap-this-time, pay a fortune when all the traditional, re-usable

seeds are gone,

seeds? Er, the US agri-business giants of course.

- From Private Eye no 1140

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5700

 

-------

RESEARCH

-------

 

+ GLYPHOSATE LINKED TO DAMAGING FUNGAL DISEASE, FUSARIUM

Fusarium head blight (FHB) of wheat has become an increasing problem in

North America in recent years, notably in the US Corn Belt and the

Canadian Prairies. This damaging disease is considered a major threat

as it

not only greatly reduces yield and grain quality but causes excessive

contamination of the grain with fungal toxins (mycotoxins).

 

Mycotoxins such as vomitoxin, produced by the fungus in grain and

straw, are detrimental to animal and human health. This means FHB

represents

both a serious food safety concern and an economic threat to farmers.

 

A new paper by Fernandez et al, published in Crop Science, points to

the application of glyphosate as a significant predisposing factor for

the development of the disease. Glyphosate is the active ingredient in

Monsanto's Roundup - the herbicide used with Monsanto's

glyphosate-resistant Roundup Ready GM crops, which are heavily grown

in the US Corn Belt

and the Canadian Prairies.

 

This is not the first research to suggest that glyphosate could cause

an increase in fungal populations.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5710

 

-------

COMPANY NEWS

-------

 

+ DOW WINS BT PATENT BATTLE WITH MONSANTO

Dow Chemical Co. said it won rights to a " broad and enabling "

technology for creating GM Bt crops, such as those sold by Monsanto.

Concluding

a dispute between the two companies that has run for more than a

decade, the US Patent and Trademark Office awarded a patent to Dow

AgroSciences.

 

Monsanto has yet to review the patent ruling, spokeswoman Lori Fisher

said. However, Monsanto believes it holds sufficient patents on related

technology to continue marketing and developing its products, she said.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5716

 

-------

LOBBYWATCH

-------

 

+ WE'RE BEING FED BIG FAT LIES

An excellent piece of journalism from The Times features our old

friends, the BBSRC, Spiked, SIRC, the Science Media Centre and others.

Here's

the essence of the story:

 

The UK government's House of Commons Health Committee published its

Obesity Report in May 2004. Over ten months, the committee had

investigated childhood obesity, producing 148 pages that demanded

radical changes

in government nutrition policy. For the food industry, this meant a

widespread and costly set of new restrictions.

 

The report was subjected to a massive coordinated onslaught of attacks

from so-called independent critics keen to exonerate the food industry

by denying any link between eating junk food and obesity! These critics

include the usual suspects mentioned above and their allies. For

example:

 

EXCERPT from Times article:

[Professor Tom Sanders, a media-friendly nutritionist at King's College

London, said,] " It may surprise many readers to learn... that most

published studies do not show that overweight children report eating more

'junk food' than their lean peers. " The problem, he suggested, was that

the committee had been taken over by powerful " anti-food industry

lobbyists " - a charge echoed by apparently independent think-tanks

such as

the Oxford-based Social Issues Research Centre (SIRC).

 

David Hinchliffe, then an MP and the Health Committee's chairman, smelt

more than a rat. The aggressive media assaults on his committee, he

believes, were symptomatic of wider behind-the-scenes manipulation by the

food industry in a battle for public opinion.

Read the entire article (well worth it!) at

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5706

 

+ AGBIOVIEW ATTACKS BENBROOK'S " SCIENCE AND CREDIBILITY "

An attack on the agronomist Dr Charles Benbrook by Sivramiah Shantharam

has gone out on the AgBioView list. It effectively accuses Dr Benbrook

of being corrupt, calling him a " professional misinterpreter and a

misleader " on biotech issues who is guilty of continuously " cherry

picking

data for his slanted analysis " . " People like Benbrook do these kind of

things, " it says, to earn a living. In Benbrook's case, it specifies,

it's done " at the behest of the organic and other anti-GM lobby who hire

him " .

 

Those " like Benbrook " who, according to the AgBioView attack, are paid

to mislead and deceive are contrasted with " busy professional

scientists [who] must keep busy doing their honest to good research

work that

will stand scrutiny of their professional peers " . The fact that, amongst

other things, Dr Benbrook was for seven years Executive Director of the

Board on Agriculture of the US's National Academy of Sciences, is

dismissed as irrelevant - simply something " flaunted " by the anti-GM

lobby

to try and lend " credibility to his 'scientific' (sic) analysis " .

 

The irony is, of course, that with Dr Benbrook's background and

credentials, if he were remotely minded to earn an income doing dodgy

science

in the way that is being suggested here, he could have earned himself a

fortune by now, while enjoying a massive research budget, courtesy of

the biotech industry and its various front institutes. The only cost

would have been to his integrity.

 

The man behind the AgBioView attack is an ex-Syngenta employee with a

history of smears and misinformation on the GM issue.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5703

 

+ MONSANTO LOBBIES TO KEEP STATUS QUO FOR GM CROPS

In the US, despite years of controversy over Monsanto's GM seeds, there

hasn't been a single congressional hearing on legislation calling for

labeling GM foods, even as much of Europe, Japan and other nations

adopted labeling Iaws. Monsanto lobbyists have worked hard to preserve

the

current system in which its GM products are treated as essentially

equivalent to regular crops - and therefore don't need additional

labeling.

 

Monsanto is a big spender on lobbying, dishing out more than $18.5

million from 1999 through 2004. In 2004, Monsanto had nine in-house

Washington lobbyists on its payroll, along with another 13 at private

firms.

More: http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5711

 

+ PETER RAVEN AND " TRANSGENES IN MEXICAN MAIZE "

In a recently published paper commenting on whether native Mexican

maize is contaminated with GM material, Peter Raven, Director of the

Missouri Botanical Garden, contributes his bit to the usual industry PR

strategy of:

1. We say we can utilise this technology in a way that does not impact

on any other growers or consumers who do not want GM contamination.

2. When faced with evidence to the contrary, we try and deny the

evidence and, if possible, attack those who supplied it.

3. Finally, we say GM contamination is not just inevitable but is both

natural and desirable.

(Peter H. Raven, Transgenes in Mexican maize: Desirability or

inevitability? Perspective Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,

10.1073/pnas.0506082102.

Published online before print Sept 6, 2005)

 

Prof Joe Cummins comments on Raven's paper and points out that his

understanding of basic genetics is " unconventional " (!), at

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5699

 

-------

MUST-SEE MOVIE

-------

 

+ THE CORPORATION

The long-awaited DVD of this superb documentary film is now available

worldwide. Winner of 24 international awards, The Corporation explores

the nature and spectacular rise of the dominant institution of our time.

Footage from pop culture, advertising, TV news, and corporate

propaganda illuminates the corporation's grip on our lives. Taking its

legal

status as a " person " to its logical conclusion, the film puts the

corporation on the psychiatrist's couch to ask, " What kind of person

is it? "

The Corporation includes interviews with corporate insiders and critics -

including Noam Chomsky, Michael Moore, Vandana Shiva on seed saving, Dr

Samuel Epstein on cancer and industry, Jane Akre and Steve Wilson on

Monsanto's GM bovine growth hormone, and an extraordinarily enlightened

carpet magnate - plus true confessions, case studies and strategies for

change.

DVD available from www.thecorporation.com

 

-------

CAMPAIGN OF THE WEEK

-------

 

+ ACTION NEEDED TO STOP TERMINATOR

(Please note: last week we were given an incorrect email address for

comments to be sent to; the correct one is below)

Indigenous peoples, local communities, peasants and small-scale

farmers' organizations and others have the opportunity to send written

comments on the potential impacts of Terminator to the United Nations

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) before September 30, 2005.

Terminator

(also called Genetic Use Restriction Technology - GURTs) refers to

plants that are genetically modified to render sterile seeds - preventing

farmers from saving and re-using harvested seeds.

 

SAMPLE DEMANDS to put in your letter/email and more info are at

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5698

 

WRITING YOUR SUBMISSION:

You can present your written comments in any format. You may also send

comments in the form of audiotape with recorded comments from community

members, representatives or elders.

 

Please use the following reference in your submission so that your

comments go to the right place: " Ref: SCBD/STTM/DCO/va/48601 " Advice

on the

report of the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Genetic Use Restriction

Technologies " .

 

SEND YOUR COMMENTS TO (by email and/or fax if possible):

Hamdallah Zedan, Executive Secretary, Convention on Biological

Diversity, United Nations Environment Programme, World Trade Centre

413 Saint-Jacques Street, Suite 800, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2Y 1N9

secretariat

FAX: 1 514 288 6588

 

Please also send a copy of your submission to the Ban Terminator

Campaign: lucy

 

 

 

 

-------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...