Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Organic Boom Around the World

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

13 Sep 2005 12:53:10 -0000

Organic Boom Around the World

press-release

 

 

 

 

The Institute of Science in Society Science Society

Sustainability http://www.i-sis.org.uk

 

General Enquiries sam Website/Mailing List

press-release ISIS Director m.w.ho

 

This article can be found on the I-SIS website at

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/OBAW.php

========================================================

 

 

ISIS Press Release 13/09/05

 

Organic Agriculture Enters Mainstream

 

Organic Boom Around the World

*************************

 

The challenges of certification and the threats of corporate

makeover. Dr. Mae-Wan Ho

 

A fully referenced version of this article is posted on ISIS

members' website http://www.i-sis.org.uk/full/OBAWFull.php.

Details here http://www.i-sis.org.uk/membership.php

 

What is organic agriculture?

 

The WHO/FAO/Codex Alimentarius Commission defines organic

agriculture as a holistic production management system that

promotes and enhances agro-ecosystem health, including

biodiversity, biological cycles and soil biological

activity; that emphasizes management practices in preference

to off-farm inputs, using, where possible, agronomic,

biological and mechanical methods, as opposed to synthetic

materials.

 

IFOAM (International Federation of Organic Agriculture

Movements) and other advocates give similar definitions [1].

 

World organic agriculture by area

 

There are currently more than 26 million hectares of

farmland under organic management in approximately 100

countries worldwide, two million hectares more than the

previous year [2,3]. In addition, the area of certified

" wild harvested plants " is at least a further 19.7 million

hectares. This is an underestimate of the actual area under

organic management, as not all are certified organic.

 

In terms of organic area, Australia leads with 11.3 million

hectares, followed by Argentina (3 million hectares) and

Italy with 1.2 million hectares. In terms of organic

farmland in comparison with the total agricultural area,

Austria, Switzerland and Scandinavian countries are at the

top. In Switzerland more than ten percent of the

agricultural land is managed organically.

 

Organic agriculture increasing rapidly in many countries

 

Organic production is increasing rapidly across North

America The US has the most area in the region and fourth

largest in the world, serving both domestic and export

markets. USDA figures show organic acreage doubled between

1992 and 1997 to over 1.3 million acres [1]. Production

increased to 2.3 million acres by 2001, representing 0.3

percent of cropland and 0.2 percent of pasture.

 

Canadian organic production is also increasing, especially

in grain. Fruits and vegetables are the other primary

organic products. Most organic produce is exported,

primarily to US. In Mexico, organic agriculture has

increased very rapidly. There are now almost 35 000 small

organic farms in Mexico growing coffee, bananas, citrus,

grains, peanuts, strawberries and other crops; many on

contract to US-based firms.

 

Cuba has been an innovative global leader in low-input

sustainable agriculture, yet it has only a small certified

organic sector. Since 1997, Swiss-based FiBL (Research

Institute of Organic Agriculture) has been collaborating on

an organic citrus project, converting citrus plantations,

and support the marketing of organic citrus juices in

Europe. Cuban farmer receive more than double the price paid

for conventional fruit.

 

Organic production is rising across Latin America, mostly

for export. Like those in North America, organic farmers are

experiencing increasing problem with GM crops threatening to

contaminate their fields and seed supply. Argentina, the

second largest grower of GM crops in the world, is also the

organic production leader in Latin America. Organic

production began in the 1980s with a handful of small farms.

By 1992, Argentina wrote national organic rules based on

IFOAM and European standards and was a pioneer in developing

rules for organic animal production. In 1992, there were 5

000 ha in organic production, in 1998, 231 000, in 1999, 1

020 000 and in 2003, more than 3 000 000 ha. Over 80 percent

of its produce is exported to EU, most of the rest to US.

Domestic market in Argentina is also growing and it now

absorbs 15 percent of production annually, valued at about

US $3 million.

 

In Asia, China, India and Japan are the largest organic

producers. Japan is the region's largest market and buys the

majority of Asia's production.

 

Global organic market booming

 

The global market for organic food was about US $26 billion

in 2001. Europe and North America together accounted for

almost 80 percent of this total with estimated sales over US

£20 billion. Europe's organic market was about US $12

billion, and it has had the most dramatic annual growth

rates. Japan was the third largest with estimated organic

sales of US $350million. These three markets – EU, US and

Japan – continue to drive the global demand for organic

food.

 

German is the largest national market for organic foods in

Europe at €3.1 billion, (2003 figures), UK the second

largest at €1.60 billion, and France a close third at €1.578

billion [4].

 

Since 1997, total US food sales have grown between 2 to 4

percent, according to the Organic Trade Association. During

the same time, sales of organic foods grew about 20 percent.

Total organic sales reached $13 billion in 2004, and

projected at $30 billion by 2007 [5].

 

Certification and Accreditation an obstacle to growth

 

One major obstacle to growth in the organic sector is

certification and accreditation [1]. Products are labelled

organic based on certification that they have been grown,

handled and processed in accordance with organic standards.

These certifications are now generally provided by third

parties, which are then accredited to any overlying

organization, which may be national, international,

governmental or non-governmental.

 

Certification systems and standards were initially developed

by farmers and farmer organizations, and shaped by local

conditions and markets. Hence the roots of certification

contained both diversity and local control, even though

there was a lot in common. As organic agriculture expanded,

more specialized certifying organizations have been created,

many of these becoming larger in size and scope.

 

IFOAM has commented on its website that, " The growth of

organic agriculture and markets during the last decade has

been accompanied by a rapid growth in the number and

complexity of private sector standards followed by the

burgeoning of government organic regulations. Though the

purpose of certification was to foster confidence of buyers

and enhance trade, the plethora of certification

requirements and regulations is now considered to be an

obstacle for the continuous and rapid development of the

organic sector. "

 

For example, there are virtually no mutual equivalence

agreements between countries on organic standards. Efforts

to establish equivalence among the many regulatory systems

have been led by IFOAM together with FAO, the International

Trade Centre of the United Nations Conference on Trade and

Development, the European Union. There is consensus about

standards on major issues – such as the clear exclusion of

GMOs – though debate continues on others, such as the use of

food additives and processing aids.

 

As the national governments in Europe and North America

institutionalise certification and also become involved as

accrediting organizations, they may become " gatekeepers "

controlling access to these largest markets. It also

increases the cost and complexity of certification to the

point that small-scale farmers may be excluded.

 

Price premium is also an obstacle, resulting primarily from

the high costs of labour, far greater than money save in

reduced inputs such as pesticides and chemical fertilizers.

But the higher return to farmers is integral to the future

of organic agriculture.

 

Concentration of production, processing and distribution

 

The traditional open, fragmented structure of organic

agriculture is becoming more concentrated, mimicking the

conventional agricultural produce market in mergers and

acquisitions, and a trend towards concentration of

production, processing and distribution. This has had

several negative effects: an accelerated loss of genetic

diversity, reduced innovation, less responsiveness to

consume and social interests, and fewer decision-makers in

the industry[1].

 

Food industry giants - Archer Daniels Midland, Cadbury,

Schweppes, Coca Cola, ConAgra, Dean Foods Dole, Gernal

Mills, Groupe Danone, H.J. Heinz, Kellogg, Mars, Parmalat

Fianziano, Draft, Sara Lee and Tyson Foods - are buying up

successful organic firms. Novartis has " Tender Harvest " , a

leading organic baby food brand, produced by its subsidiary

Gerber.

 

The US dairy industry – whether conventional or organic – is

highly concentrated. One company, Horizon Organic Dairy,

processes and distributes almost 70 percent of the organic

milk in the US. Horizon was founded in 1992 to market

organic yoghurt, but soon expanded to a complete line of

dairy products. Today it is the largest single US organic

brand by sales ($187million) and by distribution, even with

a 30 to 50 percent price premium. The company has also

gained market share through acquisition of many local and

regional dairies. Horizon is now buying dairy companies and

brands in Britain (Meadow Farms Ltd., Organic Matters Ltd.,

and Rachel's Organic) and has made a licensing agreement

with a Japanese organic milk producer.

 

Horizon cut contractually-promised premiums to farmer after

it bought out The Organic Cow of Vermont, resulted in

decreases in farmers' incomes by as much as $15 000 per

family, even as the company reported a 200 percent increase

in profits on net sales of $160 million. Horizon has since

been acquired by Dean Foods, the largest fluid milk producer

in the US and one of the five largest in the world with $10

billion in annual sales.

 

Farmers find it hard to deal with big companies, as big

companies find it too troublesome to deal with individual

farmers.

 

In the US, half of retail organic sales go through the " core

channel " , natural food retailers, including natural

supermarket chains, independent retailers, and cooperatives,

as well as direct sales. Natural foods supermarkets and

supermarket chains (the " supernaturals " ) are the most

rapidly growing part of this category. The largest chain by

sales in the US and in the world is Whole Food Market, with

140 stores and $3.7billion sales. The second is Trader

Joe's, owned by German retail giant Albrecht Discounts.

Trader Joe's has 200 much smaller stores in 17 states, with

annual sales of £1.9 billion. The third larges chain is

Wild Oats, with 102 stores in US and Canada and an estimated

$946 million in sales. Over the past several years, Whole

Foods and Wild Oats have acquired almost all other retail

chains of meaningful size in the core channel.

 

Farmers markets, community-supported agriculture (CSA)

establishments and food co-ops remain important outlets for

organic foods. There are 2 651 farmers markets, over 1 000

CSAs and 300 food co-ops selling organic foods. Cooperative

Development Services, which provides consulting on the food

cooperative business, estimates total US co-op sales at $750

million annually (2003). Direct sales, farmers markets and

CSAs account for 3 percent of all sales in the US, Health

and Natural products stores for 48% and mass market outlets

for 49 percent.

 

Jason Mark writes in the San Francisco Chronicle that [5],

" the best guarantee that your food will be produced

according to environmental and social principles is to meet

the people who grow it. Support your local farmers' market

and become friendly with the vendors there. Or get a

subscription with a Community Support Agriculture program,

in which you get weekly food deliveries from a specific

farm. Those outlets represent the original ethic of the

organic food movement. "

 

 

 

========================================================

This article can be found on the I-SIS website at

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/OBAW.php

 

If you like this original article from the Institute of

Science in Society, and would like to continue receiving

articles of this calibre, please consider making a donation

or purchase on our website

 

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/donations.

 

ISIS is an independent, not-for-profit organisation

dedicated to providing critical public information on

cutting edge science, and to promoting social accountability

and ecological sustainability in science.

 

If you would prefer to receive future mailings as HTML

please let us know. If you would like to be removed from our

mailing list at

 

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/mailinglist/.php

========================================================

CONTACT DETAILS

 

The Institute of Science in Society, PO Box 32097, London

NW1 OXR

 

telephone: [44 1994 231623] [44 20 8452 2729] [44 20

7272 5636]

 

General Enquiries sam Website/Mailing List

press-release ISIS Director m.w.ho

 

MATERIAL ON THIS SITE MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM

WITHOUT EXPLICIT PERMISSION.

FOR PERMISSION, PLEASE CONTACT enquiries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...