Guest guest Posted September 12, 2005 Report Share Posted September 12, 2005 I wonder what the justifications for such research (that needs to be kept out of " terrorist " hands) are in the first place.... Kind regards Sepp <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4219692.stm>Experts guard access to research Access to studies will be carefully policed Medical research bodies are joining together in a bid to reduce the risk of sensitive medical research falling into the hands of terrorists. The Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council are seeking to assuage public concerns. They have agreed a series of measures to safeguard sensitive studies. The move follows public concerns bioscience research could be misused in the development of bioweapons. There are seven areas of research identified by the US National Academy of Sciences as being open to potential misuse, and which therefore need to be closely guarded: Rendering vaccines ineffective Creating resistance to antibiotic or antiviral drugs Increasing the potency of a disease-causing organism (pathogen) or making a non-pathogen virulent Increasing the likelihood of a pathogen being transmitted Making it able to spread more widely Avoiding diagnostic or disease detection systems Enabling a biological agent or toxin to be transformed into a weapon Scientists say research into harmful biological pathogens and toxins has to continue to aid the fight against the disease they cause, and to improve the response to any bioterror attacks. But the three UK bodies have strengthened existing protocols to increase awareness amongst the scientific community and identify and assess risks of misuse even at the initial grant application stage. There will also be changes to funding application forms, new guidance for funding committees and a tightening of organisational guidelines on good practice in research. Alarm Colin Blakemore, chief executive of the Medical Research Council, said: " The medical research community recognises that there are concerns about possible harmful uses of civil research. " These additional safeguards in our assessment processes will draw such issues more clearly to the attention of applicants for MRC funding and encourage them to address any areas for potential misuse of their research at the earliest possible stage. " Such measures on their own will not prevent the efforts of a determined terrorist, but this is a positive step by the research community to raise awareness and reduce the risks. " Dr Mark Walport, director of the Wellcome Trust said: " We understand that many people are alarmed by the threat of bioterrorism. " But we need to balance these fears with sensible and practical measures that will help us manage such risks while ensuring that the benefits of research are realised. " We hope the policies we have adopted both reassure the public and encourage the scientific community to remain vigilant to the risks of misuse. " There are many deadly infectious agents and it is vital for public health that the scientific community can pursue legitimate research to understand and treat these diseases. " Professor Julia Goodfellow, chief executive of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, said: " This risk is not new, nor is it restricted to high-tech areas of science or those directly related to human health. " -- The individual is supreme and finds its way through intuition. Sepp Hasslberger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.