Top Politicians, Economists, Other Leaders State 9/11 Possibly an Inside Job

[Guest guest]

S

Sat, 10 Sep 2005 18:56:36 -0700 (PDT)

Top Politicians, Economists, Other Leaders State 9/11

Possibly an Inside Job

 

 

 

 

 

Top Politicians, Economists, Other Leaders State 9/11 Possibly an

Inside Job

 

Morgan Reynolds, Former Chief Economist under President Bush

 

Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of Treasury under Pres. Reagan

 

U.S. Senator Mark Dayton

 

U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney

 

Professor David Ray Griffin, Renowned Theologian

 

Robert M. Bowman, Head of Advanced Space Programs, Dept. of Defense

 

Michael Meacher, UK Minister of Environment (1997 - 2003)

 

Catherine Austin Fitts, Assistant Secretary of Housing For President Bush

 

9/11 statement signed by 100 prominent Americans, 40 9/11 family members

 

Sept. 8, 2005

Dear friends,

 

When four planes tragically crashed four years ago on September 11th,

the course of history was inalterably changed. Yet questions about

what actually happened on that fateful day are asked with increasing

frequency, even by some top government officials and other respected

public leaders. Read the statements below (links to sources provided)

from a former chief economist of President George W. Bush, an

assistant secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan, a current

U.S. Senator, a sitting Congresswoman, a renowned theologian, the head

of advanced space programs for the Department of Defense under Reagan,

a British cabinet minister under Prime Minister Tony Blair, and more.

 

 

 

Each of these prominent leaders now claims that there are serious

problems with the official government story of 9/11. Some of these

highly respected individuals even believe that 9/11 may have been an

inside job. It can be very uncomfortable to even consider the

possibility that certain individuals within government were involved

either in allowing the attacks to happen, or in some way facilitating

them in order to forward their hidden agendas. Yet the facts

increasingly point in that direction.

 

 

 

The mainstream media has sadly failed to give significant coverage to

the serious questions being raised these public figures. We invite you

to have the courage to listen to their words and explore this vital

topic, and then to share this powerful information with your friends.

If we act now, we can powerfully work together to call for a truly

independent investigation and to strengthen democracy in our nation

and our world. For an abundance of reliable, verifiable information

revealing key facts on 9/11 and what we can do about it, don't miss

our compelling 9/11 Information Center at

http://www.wanttoknow.info/911information Thanks for caring, and may

we build a brighter future for ourselves and for our future generations.

 

 

 

 

With best wishes,

Fred Burks

Former language interpreter for Presidents Bush and Clinton, member of

the WantToKnow.info Team

 

 

 

 

P.S. Our hearts and deepest wishes for support and encouragement go

out to all affected by Hurricane Katrina. If you are interested in

donating to support those affected, we have found that Brother's

Brother Foundation makes the best use of funds donated. To make a

contribution: http://www.brothersbrother.org

 

 

 

 

Morgan Reynolds, Former Chief Economist under

 

President Bush

 

 

June 13, 2005, Washington Times/ UPI

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm

 

 

 

A former Bush team member during his first administration is now

voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on

9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during

President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that

the official story about the collapse of the WTC is " bogus " and that

it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin

Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.

 

 

 

http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/article/1518131/27302.htm - More

on Reynolds

 

" If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade

Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government

attack on America would be compelling, " said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, a

former member of the Bush team. Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at

Texas A & M University, also believes it's " next to impossible " that 19

Arab terrorists alone outfoxed the mighty U.S. military, adding the

scientific conclusions about the WTC collapse may hold the key to the

entire mysterious plot behind 9/11. Reynolds...claims explosives and

structural experts have been intimidated in their analyses of the

collapses of 9/11. In a detailed analysis just released supporting the

controlled demolition theory, Reynolds presents a compelling case.

 

 

 

Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Sect. of Treasury under

 

Pres. Reagan

 

 

 

http://www-hoover.stanford.edu/bios/roberts.html - Website of

Stanford's Hoover Institute describes Roberts

 

 

 

The Honorable Paul Craig Roberts is a senior fellow at the Hoover

Institution. During 1981¨C82, he served as assistant secretary of the

Treasury for economic policy. He was awarded the Treasury Department's

Meritorious Service Award for " his outstanding contributions to the

formulation of United States economic policy. " A former editor and

columnist for the Wall Street Journal and columnist for Business

Week...the Forbes Media Guide ranked him as one of its top seven

journalists. He has testified before committees of Congress on 30

occasions.

 

 

 

 

http://www.lasvegastribune.com/20050729/headline3.html - Las Vegas

Tribune's July 29, 2005 article on Roberts

 

 

 

Roberts said he hasn¡¯t changed his political ideology or jumped from

the Republican-conservative ship but " just can¡¯t respect a party

leadership who doesn¡¯t respect the truth. " " I guess the real story

about 9/11 is about what the people are actually saying. I¡¯ve gotten

hundreds of emails in response to my columns and many of them talk

about not getting the truth from the government or the media about

what really happened at the World Trade Center. I know many qualified

engineers and scientists have said the WTC collapsed from explosives.

In fact, if you look at the manner in which it fell, you have to give

their conclusions credibility. "

 

 

 

U.S. Senator Mark Dayton

 

 

July 31, 2004, The Star-Tribune (Minneapolis - St. Paul)

http://web.archive.org/web/20040811061345/http://www.startribune.com/stories/157\

6/4904237.html

http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?op=modload & amp;name=News & amp;file=ar\

ticle & amp;sid=369

 

 

 

Sen. Mark Dayton, D-Minn., charged...that the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) and the North American Aerospace Defense Command

(NORAD) have covered up " catastrophic failures " that left the nation

vulnerable during the Sept. 11 hijackings. " For almost three years

now, NORAD officials and FAA officials have been able to hide their

critical failures that left this country defenseless during two of the

worst hours in our history, " Dayton declared during a Senate

Governmental Affairs Committee hearing. Dayton said NORAD officials

" lied to the American people, they lied to Congress and they lied to

your 9/11 commission to create a false impression of competence,

communication and protection of the American people. "

 

 

 

U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney

 

 

July 23, 2005, Atlanta Journal-Constitution (Atlanta's leading newspaper)

http://www.ajc.com/hp/content/auto/epaper/editions/saturday/news_241efd8d9666d13\

800b4.html

http://www.WantToKnow.info/050723ajc.mckinney

 

 

 

Rep. Cynthia McKinney led a Capitol Hill hearing Friday [July 22,

2005] on whether the Bush administration was involved in the terrorist

attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. " What we are doing is asking the unanswered

questions of the 9/11 families, " McKinney...said during the

proceedings. The eight-hour hearing, timed to mark the first

anniversary of the release of the Sept. 11 commission's report on the

attacks, drew dozens of contrarians and conspiracy theorists who

suggest President Bush purposely ignored warnings or may even have had

a hand in the attack ¡ª claims participants said the commission

ignored. " Congresswoman McKinney is viewed as a contrarian, " panelist

Melvin Goodman, a former CIA official, said. " And I hope someday her

views will be considered conventional wisdom. "

 

 

 

Note: Though the mainstream press largely failed to report on this

important hearing, C-SPAN did air all eight hours of testimony given

on August 31st and Sept. 2nd (because of Hurricane Katrina, part two

was aired on C-SPAN 2), both at 8 PM.

 

 

 

Professor David Ray Griffin, Renowned Theologian in LA

 

Times

 

 

August 28, 2005, Los Angeles Times

http://www.latimes.com/features/printedition/magazine/la-tm-crgriffin35aug28,1,3\

835884.story

http://www.WantToKnow.info/050828latimes911conspiracy - LA Times

Article with links for verification

 

 

 

A professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology, 66-year-old

David Ray Griffin...compiled a summary of material arguing against the

accepted story that 19 hijackers sent by Osama bin Laden took the

aviation system and the U.S. military by surprise that awful day in

his 2004 book " The New Pearl Harbor. " He recently followed up with the

book " The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, " a

critique of the Kean commission document. " For the first year and a

half I just accepted the conventional view. When a colleague suggested

to me about a year after 9/11 that he was convinced our own government

or forces within our own government had arranged it, I didn't accept

that. Then several months later another colleague sent me [a link to]

a website that had a timeline. Once I started reading that and saw all

those stories drawn from mainstream sources that contradicted the

official account, I decided I needed to look into it more carefully,

and the more I looked, the worse it got. The fact that Building 7 [a

47-story skyscraper in the WTC complex] collapsed when it had not been

hit by an airplane, and collapsed in seven or eight seconds, that's a

smoking gun. The fact that standard operating procedures were not

followed that morning, and we've gotten three different stories now by

the U.S. military as to why they did not intercept the planes, that's

a smoking gun. There was a Zogby poll in New York. The question asked

was, do you believe the government had advance knowledge of the

attacks and consciously let them happen? Forty-nine percent in New

York City said yes.

 

 

 

Note: On May 7, 2005, Dr. Griffin, who has authored or edited over two

dozen scholarly books, was featured on C-SPAN 2 giving an excellent

lecture on the 9/11 cover-up at the University of Wisconsin. To view

this revealing lecture free online, The prestigious

National Press Club also hosted him for an excellent talk on July 22,

2005. To read a transcript of this speech,

 

 

 

Robert M. Bowman, Head of Advanced Space Programs for DOD

 

More- http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911