Validity Of AIDS/HIV Tests Challenged By New Lawsuit

[Guest guest]

S

Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:04:56 -0700 (PDT)

Validity Of AIDS/HIV Tests Challenged By New Lawsuit

 

 

 

 

Validity Of AIDS/HIV Tests Challenged By New Lawsuit

 

AIDS - HIV

Information Access

health

media credibility

 

 

Health Supreme reports:

 

The test kits used to determine " HIV positive " status in patients are

deeply flawed - they were developed on the basis of faulty scientific

methodology and assumptions and are without value in determining

whether a person suffers from " HIV Aids " , alleges Kim Marie Bannon in

a civil suit filed under the Consumer Protection Act of the State of

Kansas, US.

 

 

 

The legal action against the makers of Aids test kits CALYPTE

BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION and ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION was filed

more than a year ago, on 12 April 2004 in the Sedgwick County District

Court by Dennis Webb of Wichita Kansas.

 

 

At the base of the suit is the scientific mishandling of the Aids

crisis from the very beginning, when on April 23, 1984, the then US

Health Secretary Margaret Heckler announced at a press conference that

the " probable " cause of AIDS had been found.

 

A controversy between Gallo and Montagnier distracted us from the fact

that the " virus " thought to cause immune deficiency had never been

unequivocally isolated.

http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/recent/misc/032002f.html

 

 

Neither has anyone explained in scientific terms how the virus, which

cannot be found in large numbers of immune deficient individuals,

causes the illness.

 

Neville Hodgkinson has written up the history for us to follow.

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/nhodgkinson.htm

 

Hodgkinson's excellent article, which first appeared in the Journal of

Scientific Exploration, really sheds lots of new light on this tragic

issue.

http://www.altheal.org/overview/scivircatastrophe.htm

 

 

Kim Marie Bannon, the courageous woman who is taking on the

multibillion pharma manufacturers, says:

http://www.kimbannon.com/home/home.html

 

I was " diagnosed " in 1992. I spent 10 years doubting yet living with

the stigma of conventional AIDS dogma. In April 2002 I stumbled on the

Perth Group's article " The Yin and Yang of HIV. "

http://healtoronto.com/yinyang.html

 

 

I began studying the issue and eventually started looking for an

attorney. I've worked in the legal field in Wichita since 1983, and I

feel it is only my excellent reputation with the local bar that

enabled me to get a lawyer to take the case.

 

Rest assured I'm not looking for a settlement. I want lots of publicity.

 

I welcome anyone with media contacts to help me get my story out.

 

I plan to have the defendants so totally exposed that a settlement and

gag order would do them no good anyway.

 

 

 

I realize that my life might be more peaceful if I just kept my HIV

" status " under wraps and went on with the knowledge that I'm not going

to die from AIDS, but my soul would not be at peace knowing that so

many suffer from the orthodox viewpoint.

 

My lawsuit focuses on the narrow issue of the tests which will

hopefully be easier for a jury to understand than the multitude of

issues that will surely eventually be raised in the whole fiasco.

 

It will provide a precedent upon which other cases can be built in the

future. And if they can't test you, they can't diagnose you. Others

can escape the terror that has been perpetrated on me, as well as on

so many of you.

 

 

 

If you are interested in the legal details, here is a copy of the

papers filed in court just two weeks ago.

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/04/27/aids_test_unscientific_test_kit_\

makers_sued_in_kansas.htm

 

Also of relevance in this quest for understanding more and better of

where the truth about AIDS really lays, is the interesting AIDS

article that Sepp Hasslberger had published over a year ago. On his

Health Supreme blog, he recounts in detail a great exchange he had

just been having with others who, like many of us indeed, thought that

the AIDS cures and tests had nothing really bad about them. He wrote:

 

 

 

Recently, a friend from the UK sent a copy of an article published in

the Observer, titled: " UK firm tried HIV drug on orphans " which

details experiments with toxic AIDS drugs on orphans in New York,

involving the British drug giant GlaxoSmithKline.

http://www.laleva.org/eng/2004/04/pharmaceutical_reality_uk_firm_tried_hiv_drug_\

on_orphans.html

 

Reading the article that I had forwarded to some people, a medical

doctor friend has had the following comment:

 

" I see nothing wrong with this. At least the children received

treatment for free. "

 

 

 

That's where we differ, I replied. To me, AIDS treatment (AZT) is

highly toxic and potentially will kill the patient. Considering the

high rate of false positives of the AIDS test, that is something to be

avoided.

 

My friend's reply to that was that

 

" there are several AIDS tests, the initial screening test may have

a low false positive rate, but not the others - one can count the

number of AIDS virus particles in the blood, etc. "

 

 

 

Knowing that this is not the case, I tried once more, saying no Aids

test is able to count virus particles in the blood.

 

Both the Elisa and Western blot testsare non-specific and react to

(stressed) protein fractions. None of the tests counts virus particles

in the blood.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003538.htm

 

In fact, the virus itself is a construct that escapes logic.

 

 

 

It is not present in many so-called HIV positive individuals, even in

people with full blown Aids symptomology, and it has not been shown

scientifically to cause anything.

 

If you start looking into the critical literature you'll get a great

surprise.

 

 

 

Not content with my reply, my doctor friend asked for help from a

pharmacist, editor of several pharmacists' publications and specific

drug databases.

The question

 

" Is Josef right about distrusting AIDS tests and viral counts? "

 

which then elicited the following answer:

 

" I think this is an extreme position, but one that some folks

around the world have taken.

 

I think the president of some African nation took this position

and his people decided not to protect against HIV and it resulted in

thousands or millions more HIV positive individuals. We'll get you an

answer... "

 

 

 

 

After some days, my friend wrote, saying:

" Here is a reply worth noting, to try to put the AIDS test question in

its proper perspective. It comes from the objective source that does

not make money on any drugs. "

 

 

 

The " expert " , Jim Avedikian, owner of what his website describes as

" the Largest and Oldest HIV Specialty Pharmacy in the San Gabriel

Valley " , had this to say:

 

" I can't believe that this myth is still floating around! If 4 out

of 5 AIDS tests were false positives, you would be hearing a lot more

about it in the media.

 

Although it may be technically true that HIV does not kill you

directly, the decimated immune system it leaves behind subjects you to

dozens of opportunitic infections which will kill you.

 

Please do not reprint or spread these rumors in your publications

.... it will do a lot more harm than good! "

 

 

 

Less than convinced, I replied once more, saying " the response of Jim

Avedikian is rather disappointing. He avoids the scientific issue of

the validity of Aids tests. You would be hearing a lot more about it

in the media is not really an argument that allays any scientific

concern. "

 

My friend, after this, bowed out of the conversation with an excuse,

but it just so happens that in another online conversation, I came

across the answer to the question.

 

 

 

Neville Hodgkinson, former medical correspondent of the London Sunday

Times, has outlined the history of our medical response to the AIDS

problem in a highly interesting article, meticulously documenting what

he says.

http://www.altheal.org/overview/scivircatastrophe.htm

 

After this eye opener, the ball is back with the scientists who have

been telling us to take the drugs and shut up.

 

Let them respond, if they can...

 

 

 

 

In essence, despite more than $100 billion spent on AIDS by US

taxpayers alone, scientists have not been able to ascertain how HIV

causes the AIDS syndrome.

 

Predictions about the course of the epidemic have proved inaccurate.

 

While millions are said to be infected and dying in Africa, AIDS

deaths have fallen in Europe and the USA and now total fewer than 250

a year in the UK, which has a population of nearly 60 million.

 

 

 

Claims that cocktails of antiviral drugs are responsible for a decline

in Western AIDS are unsupported by clear evidence.

 

On the contrary, the US Government has reversed a policy of " hit hard,

hit early " in HIV-positive people, citing " unexpected toxicities " from

the drugs.

 

The HIV theory of AIDS causation has fulfilled certain social and

public health needs, but the scientific community has not acknowledged

or addressed serious flaws in AIDS theory and medical practice, in

particular a failure to validate " HIV " diagnostic tests against

isolation of virus.

 

 

 

Genetic and chemical signals produced by disordered immune cells may

have been misinterpreted as evidence of the presence of a lethal virus.

 

There is vast over-diagnosis of AIDS and " HIV disease " in Africa and

other countries where malnutrition and grossly impoverished living

circumstances, with associated infections, are the real killers.

 

More-

http://www.masternewmedia.org/hiv_aids/hiv_aids_testing/hiv_aids_testing_attacke\

d_by_new_lawsuit_20050808.htm