Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Chemical Poisons Cause Increasing Levels Of Illness - Tobacco Blamed

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

2 Aug 2005 15:32:29 -0000

Health Supreme Update: Chemical Poisons Cause Increasing

Levels Of Illness - Tobacco Blamed

sepp

 

 

 

 

Health Supreme Update: Chemical Poisons Cause Increasing Levels Of

Illness - Tobacco Blamed

 

August 02, 2005

 

 

------

 

" Low levels " of chemicals, from toxic mercury in tooth

fillings, foods and vaccines, from industrial waste

hexafluorosilicic acid added to our drinking water, to

herbicides and pesticides in vegetables and fruits as well as

mosquito spray liberally distributed in the air, are ever

increasing and according to some are to be blamed for rising

levels of illness. Interestingly, tobacco smoke takes all the

blame, as it has since cigarettes were first " identified " as

the cause of lung cancers, providing cover for radioactive

pollution from atomic bomb experiments in the 1950's and 60's.

 

A toxic cocktail of over 200 different chemicals is found today

in the blood stream of newborns. Then, not more than weeks

after birth, more toxins are injected to " vaccinate " the little new

citizens. Rising rates of cancers and brain disorders are observed,

and all we hear is we must " stop smoking " . Even second hand smoke has

become a hugely dangerous thing - if we are to believe the

scientific-efforts-turned-propaganda - to blame for the ever worsening

state of our health.

 

Adding insult to injury, chemicals such as aspartame and MSG,

which are known to be associated with, if not be an outright cause of

obesity, are " approved " by health authorities the world over to be

added to the food supply, while vitamins and minerals, known to be

vital for our survival, are under attack by international legislation

of the European Community and of Codex Alimentarius. In a recent

meeting of the Codex Alimentarius Commission here in Rome, one of the

official observers-cum-lobbyists was ... you may have guessed it - the

Committee of the Glutamic Acid Manufacturers in the EU.

 

Mark Sircus, the Director of the International Medical Veritas

Association offers an intelligent discussion of the dangers of poisons

we willingly introduce into the environment and consequently into our

bodies and the unwillingness of our health " authorities " to do

something about it.

 

- - -

 

 

Science of Low Level Toxicities

 

 

International Medical Veritas Association

Mark Sircus Ac., OMD

 

It is the inability to see the effects of chronic, low level

toxicities on human health that has been, and remains, our greatest

failing as intelligent beings. Dr. Boyd Haley

 

 

One of the greatest alarm calls in human history has gone

unnoticed for years and as such, the low levels of toxicities are

moving higher. Even with the rising tide of reports of chemical

pollution in human blood streams, among newborn babies and adults

alike, we get reporters and medical officials dismissing concerns of

chemical toxicity. The WallStreet Journal published last week, " For

years, scientists have struggled to explain rising rates of some

cancers and childhood brain disorders. Something about modern living

has driven a steady rise of certain maladies, from breast and prostate

cancer to autism and learning disabilities. " The last thing the

Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Federal Drug and Food

Commission (FDA) care to admit is that these increases are being

driven by the rising tide of chemical poisons entering people's blood

streams.

 

The FDA has failed completely in its mission of protecting the

public and has allowed without resistance thousands of harmful

chemicals to flood the environment and contaminate our foods, even

approving the poisoning of the public water supply with chemicals like

fluoride and chloramines.[1] The CDC does not want the public to

understand that it is a part of a paradigm and industry that is

actively using poisons (drugs) at high enough doses to kill people.

The toxicology and pharmacology of pharmaceutical drugs (and vaccines)

in reality go beyond what is considered low level toxicity.

Pharmaceutical drugs directly kill hundreds of thousands of people a

year around the world because of their poisonous characteristics.[2]

The western medical establishment has no choice but to pretend and

sell the public on the fantasy that drugs and vaccines are safe when

they are not.

 

A Harvard thesis has shown a connection between water

fluoridation and a 700% increase in osteosarcoma in young men if they

are exposed to fluoridated water during their 6th to 8th years.[3]

 

Dr. Paul Connett

 

 

Finally the scientific community is responding to the alarming

rise in disease and is intensely scrutinizing the prevalence in the

environment of certain industrial chemicals that are showing up in

just about everyone's blood streams. The Wall Street Journal

continued, " A growing body of animal research suggests to some

scientists that even minute traces of some chemicals, always assumed

to be biologically insignificant, can affect such processes as gene

activation and the brain development of newborns. An especially

striking finding: It appears that some substances may have effects at

the very lowest exposures that are absent at higher levels. Some

scientists, many of them in industry, dismiss such concerns. But the

new science of low-dose exposure is challenging centuries of accepted

wisdom about toxic substances and rattling the foundation of

environmental law. "

 

Extremely low levels of phthalates[4], which are used in toys,

building materials, drug capsules, cosmetics and perfumes, have been

statistically linked to sperm damage in men and genital changes,

asthma and allergies in children.[5]

 

 

The greatest problem facing modern civilization is the massive

poisoning that is occurring as industry continues to produce hundreds

of millions of tons of chemicals a year and as dentists and doctors

continue to put people in harm's way by exposing their patients to

toxic substances. That problem is compounded by highly placed medical

officials and doctors who are deliberately preventing us from

realizing the truly massive threat and harm being done. Studies of

animals, and in some cases people, suggest that most of the compounds

that are showing up in childrens' and adults' blood can affect the

brain, hormones, reproductive system or the immune system, or that

they are linked to cancer.

 

<em>Minuscule doses of bisphenol A, which is used in

polycarbonate plastic baby bottles and in resins that line food cans

are endocrine disruptors[6] and have been found to alter brain

structure, neurochemistry, behavior, reproduction and immune response

in animals.[7]

 

 

Researchers at Tuffs University School of Medicine have already

found that pregnant lab animals exposed to very low levels of

bisphenol A produced offspring with impaired mammary-gland

development. The exposure levels in the study at Tuffs were 2,000

times lower than the Environment Protection Agency's safe dose for the

chemical.[8] We have to learn about the ill health effects from these

industrial chemicals quickly because they are being produced in vast

quantities worldwide.

 

Unbelievable as it seems there are doctors working hard to make

sure that we remain passive in front of the chemical avalanches

falling all around us. They would have us poisoned while blindsiding

us with: " It's the dose, not the detection that makes the poison. " Dr.

Charles A. McKay Jr., Dr. Michael G. Holland and Dr. Lewis S. Nelson

would deny patients appropriate treatment for chemical toxicity and

belittle their fellow physicians saying, " unscrupulous medical

practitioners are ordering heavy metal tests to `prove' to patients

the need for chelation or other unnecessary, and potentially

dangerous, treatments. " These doctors go on to say that " A large

portion of our toxicology clinic population is convinced their

symptoms are due to poisoning, when neither their symptom complex nor

laboratory testing justify such a conclusion. " [9]

 

Scientists have found that with some chemicals, traces as

minute as mere parts per trillion have biological effects.

 

 

It is pathetic to see these doctors mocking other doctors about

the toxic loads in patients when the Centers for Disease Control

itself reports that chemicals such as cadmium, mercury and

insecticides were found in the bodies of test subjects at levels that

could be causing health problems.[10] Or when someone like Dr. Jerome

A. Paulson, an associate professor of pediatrics at the George

Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, who

specializes in children's environmental health says, " We have fouled

our own nest. We contaminated the environment sufficiently that there

are measurable amounts of potentially toxic substances in people —

kids and adults. " The CDC reported recently that most American

children and adults were carrying in their bodies dozens of pesticides

and toxic compounds used in consumer products, many of them linked to

potential health threats and we have doctors mocking others for

testing and the appropriate treatment of such conditions. Putting all

the latest information together it is easy to see that it would

actually be the rare person whose body remained un-poisoned,

untainted, unaffected from the chemical rape that most of us are being

subjected to - yet official mainstream medicine's only answer is to

increase toxic exposure with more toxic medicine and vaccines.

 

Autism is upon us because it's the outcome of the 50-year

experiment of dousing every living being with an overload of toxic

substances, including vaccines.

 

Dr Gregory Ellis

 

 

It's not difficult to imagine what has led Doctors McKay, Holland

and Nelson to discount the large scale poisoning and the long list of

chemicals that are inter penetrating everyone today. These doctors

have a 1500's Swiss doctor named Paracelsus on their brains, a

primitive doctor who advocated the use of metals, such as mercury and

antimony for medical treatment. Paracelsus was the first to say, " It

depends only upon the dose whether a poison is a poison or not. A lot

kills - a little cures. " McKay, Holland and Nelson are thinking that

chemical pollution and chemical drugs and mercury still used in

medicine and dentistry, and the tons of mercury being poured into the

atmosphere and the billions pounds of pesticides used every year and

even the mercury, aluminum and formaldehyde pumped into babies bodies

with vaccines does not qualify as a high enough dose to be alarmed

about. Modern science challenges this axiom of toxicology of Dr.

Paracelsus of 500 years ago yet it is conditioned so deeply into

medical officials' brains that they cannot see that they are legally

condoning the poisoning of the public.

 

There is no safe blood lead level in children.

 

Dr. Jim Pirkle (CDC)[11]

 

 

A parallel reason for casting down Paracelsus and his followers

was provided by the National Academy of Sciences in July, which stated

that the preponderance of scientific evidence shows that even very low

doses of radiation pose a risk of cancer or other health problems and

there is no threshold below which exposure can be viewed as harmless.

This is critical and addresses radiation amounts commonly used in

medical treatment. The committee gave support to the so-called

" linear, no threshold " model that is currently the generally

acceptable approach to radiation risk assessment. This approach

assumes that the health risks from radiation exposure declines as the

dose levels decline, but that each unit of radiation — no matter how

small — still is assumed to cause cancer. That means your dental and

chest X-Rays are dangerous and the CT Scans are 100 times more

dangerous, and it means that Oncologists use treatments that cause

cancer to treat cancer when they use radiation treatments. The

vaccinationists do the same thing. They use treatments that cause

death and disease to prevent disease. They hide behind the bizarre

medical assumption that " the dose makes the poison. " The CDC, IOM,

FDA, APA, the AMA and many other organizations are living in a fantasy

world based on an ancient theory that is being disproved every day by

scientist researching into the toxicities of chemicals.

 

A chemical used in munitions, called perchlorate[12], is known

to inhibit production of thyroid hormone[13], which children need for

brain development. The chemical has been detected in drinking water

supplies in at least 25 states, as well as in fruits, vegetables and

breast milk in mothers across the country.[14]

 

 

This is the tragic mistake of medicine and the greatest failing of

our civilization that Dr. Boyd Haley has been talking about for many

years. Medicine has endorsed wide scale poisoning whether through

industrial pollution, poisoning of the water supplies, food supplies

with pesticides, hormones, and preservatives, and through highly toxic

drugs and vaccines. All have finally combined to destroy any

possibility about using poisons in medically appropriate doses because

each toxic chemical is administered and layered on top of preexisting

exposures. And it is anyone's guess how the hundreds of chemicals in

the blood and cells mix with new toxic medical treatments so all bets

are off and medicine must change its paradigm. To not do so today is

criminal.

 

The weed killer atrazine affects the levels of a number of

hormones needed for normal development and function of the

reproductive system, including estrogen, prolactin, luteinizing

hormone, and follicle stimulating hormone. [15] Atrazine has been

linked to sexual malformations in frogs that were exposed to water

containing just 1/30th as much atrazine as the EPA regards as safe in

human drinking water.[16]

 

Mercury offers the clearest picture of the chemical madness that

has overtaken industry, medicine and dentistry for it is the most well

researched toxin in the environment. It is also the most toxic

non-radioactive element, which is poisonous on a cellular level at any

level like radiation is. Yet despite the clear science that affirms

these statements we see the World Health Organization playing games

with peoples heads saying, " The risk from side effects of thimerosal

is theoretical, uncertain and, at most, extremely small. " Dr. David

Baskin at the department of Neurosurgery at Baylor College of Medicine

demonstrated that " thimerosal in micromolar concentrations rapidly

induce membrane and DNA damage, and initiate caspase-3 dependent

apoptosis in human neurons and fibroblasts. " In their studies cells

were incubated with 125nM – 250uM concentrations of thimerosal and

they reported that thimerosal is toxic if applied in micromolar

concentrations from 1uM to 250uM.[17] Dr. J. Curtis Pendergrass and

Dr. Boyd Haley confirm this stating, " Pure thimerosal was toxic at the

low nanomolar level – an extremely low concentration, about 10,000

times less than the thimerosal concentration found in most vaccines.

These results leave little doubt about thimerosal being the toxic

agent in the vaccines. " [18]

 

 

For certain doctors and health care officials the cancer rates,

heart disease, increases in asthma, diabetes, autism, serious

neurological diseases and the broad depth of learning disabilities has

not reached proportions to be alarmed about yet. For them the doses

are still minimal and the detection/statistics irrelevant. When the

dose would become poisonous enough to be worried about remains

abstract if we use doctors like McKay, Holland and Nelson's

assumptions about toxicity dangers as a guide. Certainly we should

expect more from Associate Professors of Emergency Medicine, Associate

Medical Directors, Assistant Professors of Emergency Medicine, and

Assistant Professors of Surgery, which these doctors are.

 

When it comes to underestimating the poisonous properties of

chemicals these doctors are among a huge crowd. Representatives of the

Chemical and pesticide industries, along with the CDC itself would

like us to feel that discovery of the chemicals in the human body do

not mean they posed a threat to human health. " Exposure to these

man-made and natural substances is extremely low, " said American

Chemistry Council spokesman Chris VandenHeuvel. The CDC's director Dr.

Gerberding said that " for the vast majority " of the 148 chemicals in

the report, " we have no evidence of health effects. " When we hear

Gerberding make such statements can we feel secure and go to sleep at

night secure that our children are safe? All the evidence is screaming

a loud no and it seems that Dr Gerberding is either being misled by

her staff or is consciously misleading the public and abusing her

power as the head of the CDC.

 

Chemical toxicity and poisoning is a medical problem that is easy

for medical officials to downplay because it takes so long to develop.

Even potent poisons like mercury accumulate slowly in the human body

throughout life. Mercury can cause Minamata disease when it reaches a

critical level, and it can cause deformities in an unborn fetus at

much lower concentrations. In the case of the famous mercury tragedy

in Japan the first case of the disease was only observed 24 years

after a factory began dumping mercury into the Minamata Bay.

 

We no longer need to test every person to `prove' the general need

for people to detoxify. Any toxicologist and doctor worth their salt

would be assuming 180 degrees in opposition to doctors like McKay,

Holland and Nelson. They would be encouraging their patients to assume

that a great part of the etiology of their complaints and serious

diseases are due to poisoning, even when laboratory testing does not

strongly verify such a conclusion. The chemicals are there in the

environment and in everyone's bodies, no one is immune as recent tests

are showing.

 

What if it turns out some common substances have essentially no

safe exposure levels at all? That was ultimately what the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency concluded about lead after studying

its effects on children for decades. Indications that some other

chemicals may have no safe limits have led regulators in Europe and

Japan to bar the use of certain compounds in toys and in objects used

to serve food.

 

There is no safe level of mercury, and no one has actually

shown that there is a safe level.

 

Dr. Lars Friberg

 

Chief Adviser to the WHO on mercury safety

 

 

It is known that levels as low as 0.03 micrograms/m3 may affect

your health when the exposure is not only transient. Paints, which

contained mercury, had to be taken off the market after releasing only

2-3 micrograms/m3. Because of the extreme toxicity of mercury, the

U.S. EPA drinking water standard for mercury is 2 parts per billion,

which allows for not over 4 micrograms per day mercury exposure for an

average adult. Four micrograms is 12 thousand trillion atoms of

mercury and this is only one chemical. It is now impossible to view

chemical toxicity in isolation and it is a well known law of

toxicology that trace chemicals have greater effects in combination

than singly. Traditional toxicology, which tests things individually,

is now obsolete because there are no clinical situations where any

chemical substance stands alone...

 

The human body is complex, and effects seen in tests on small

laboratory animals and in human cells don't necessarily mean health

risks to people.

 

 

Medical officials will find any excuse (like the one above) to

delay the day of reckoning. Many of them would have us believe that

our understanding of the dangers of exposure to low doses of chemicals

is still developing and thus we should study the subject more

thoroughly. Others more honest and less bound by conflicts of interest

simply move to ban chemicals like fluoride and thimerosal when it is

obvious that they are hurting people. Russia outlawed the use of

Thimerosal 20 years ago, veterinarians also spare their beloved

animals from the effects of that poison. Most of Europe and many

townships in the United States have completely rejected the

fluoridation of water. Why? Because fluoride is a poison and thus you

see warnings to keep even toothpaste out of the reach of children.

 

" The question is what do we do about these low levels once we know

they're there, " says Steve Hentges of the American Plastics Council, a

trade association. What we are going to do to stop the poisoning of

our world and populations is a huge question that we are all going to

have to struggle with. Medical doctors and scientists who understand

the severity of the situation know that all people need to detoxify

the chemical poisons that have found their way into their bodies and

would suggest treatments to that effect. The medical establishment and

the pharmaceutical companies, on the other hand, would have us

continue the chemical onslaught and even add to the problem by making

sure medical treatments increase the body's chemical burden instead of

reducing it.

 

Mark Sircus Ac., OMD

Director International Medical Veritas Association

http://www.detoxchelationclinic.com

http://www.imva.info

http://www.worldpsychology.net

+55-83-3252-2195

www.skype.com ID: marksircus

 

-----------------------------

 

[1] Bollyn, Christopher. The Unhealthy Consequences of

Chloraminated Water. Chloraminated water kills fish and reptiles. When

it was added to the San Francisco water supply it nearly had the same

effect on some humans. " I almost died, " Denise Kula Johnson of Menlo

Park said the day after chloramines were added to her water supply. " I

was in the shower and suddenly I could not breathe. I passed out on

the floor. I was terrified. " According to Dr. Winn Parker the most

at-risk groups from chloraminated water are: the fetus in the first

trimester, children to age three, people over age 60 and those with

human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

 

[2] Dr. Barbara Starfield of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene

and Public Health reported in the Journal of the American Medical

Association (JAMA) that 106,000 people in the United States alone die

from non-error, negative effects of drugs. In England that number is

approximated to be 20,000. (Kohn L, ed, Corrigan J, ed, Donaldson M,

ed. " To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. " Washington, DC:

National Academy Press); 1

 

[3] Dr. Paul Connett posted on 20 July 2005 at 4:55 am. I am

really surprised that Medical News Today published the puff piece from

the American Dental Association about their celebration of 60 years of

fluoridation, but missed the real news from last week. This was the

revelation carried by the Washington Post and the Associated Press

(July 13, 2005) that a Harvard thesis has shown a connection between

water fluoridation and a 700% increase in osteosarcoma in young men if

they are exposed to fluoridated water during their 6th to 8th years.

Particularly disturbing is the information that the thesis adviser,

Porfessor Cheser Douglass, who is also a consultant to Colgate, has

covered up these results in talks to the public and in a report to his

funding agency. Both the NIEHS and Harvard University are

investigating his conduct.

 

[4] Phthalates is the group name for chemical substances based on

phthalic acid. Phthalates are chemicals used to make plastics flexible

and they have been implicated in causing premature breast development

in girls, which is a condition called thelarche. There has been an

epidemic of thelarche on the island of Puerto Rico for the last two

decades where affected girls begin breast development between the ages

of 6 and 24 months. Researchers have finally concluded that the cause

is phthalates. There is some indication that phthalates may also

affect thyroid function.

 

[5] http://www.mindfully.org/Plastic/Plasticizers/phthalates.htm

 

[6] Endocrine disruptors interfere with the functioning of the

endocrine system, in at least

four possible ways:

 

1) mimic or partly mimic the sex steroid hormones estrogens

and androgens (the male sexhormone) by binding to hormone receptors or

influencing cell signaling pathways. Those that act like estrogen are

called environmental estrogens.

 

2) block, prevent and alter hormonal binding to hormone

receptors or influencing cell signaling pathways. Chemicals that block

or antagonize hormones are labeled antiestrogens or anti-androgens.

 

3) affect the synthesis, transport, metabolism and excretion

of hormones, thus altering the concentrations of natural hormones.

 

4) modify the making and function of hormone receptors.

 

[7] Peter Waldman. Wall Street Journal. New York, N.Y.: Jul 25,

2005. pg. A.1

 

[8] Munoz-de-Toro, Mônica et al. Perinatal exposure to Bisphenol A

alters peripubertal mammary gland development in mice. Endocrinology.

May 2005 doi:10.1210/en.2005-0340

 

[9] McKay Jr., Charles A., Holland, Michael G, Nelson, Lewis S.

EDITORIAL: A Call To Arms For Medical Toxicologists: The Dose, Not The

Detection, Makes The Poison . International Journal of Medical

Toxicology. Int J Med Toxicol 2003; 6(1):1

 

[10] National reports on human exposure to environmental chemicals

have been issued by the CDC every two years since 1999. For this

year's report, issued in July of 2005, CDC's Environmental Health

Laboratory measured 148 chemicals or their breakdown products in blood

or urine. The samples for this report were collected from 2,400 people

who participated in CDC's National Health and Nutrition Examination

Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2002. NHANES is an ongoing national

health survey of the general U.S. population. The report provides

exposure data on the U.S. population by age, sex, and race or ethnicity.

 

[11] Dr. Jim Pirkle is the deputy director for science at CDC's

Environmental Health Laboratory.

 

[12] http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ccl/perchlorate/perchlorate.html

 

[13] Environmental Working Group: Perchlorate, the explosive main

ingredient of rocket and missile fuel, contaminates drinking water

supplies, groundwater or soil in hundreds of locations in at least 43

states. Well over 20 million people drink water from public and

private sources known to be polluted with perchlorate. This estimate

includes millions of customers of 81 contaminated public water systems

in California and aproximately 20 million customers in the three

states who get at least part of their drinking water from the

perchlorate-tainted Colorado River.

 

http://www.ewg.org/reports/rocketwater/

 

[14] http://www.gilroydispatch.com/news/contentview.asp?c=146576

 

[15] Environmental Working Group: Atrazine contaminates the tap

water of more than 10 million people in the Midwest (EWG, 1999) and

causes more health standard violations in tap water than any other

EPA-regulated chemical pollutant. Water utilities spend at least $30

million per year now testing and treating tapwater for the chemical.

Given the new information on the dangers atrazine poses to children,

and the costs water suppliers would face to provide safe water to

infants and children, EPA should ban atrazine.

 

[16] Sanders, Robert. Popular weed killer atrazine feminizes

native frogs across Midwest, could be impacting amphibian populations

worldwide 30 October 2002. University of Berkely.

 

[17] Baskin, David, Ngo, Hop, Didenko, Vladamir. Thimerosal

induces DNA breaks, caspase-3 activation, membrane damage, and cell

death in cultured human neurons and fibroblasts. ToxSci Advanced

Access published May 28, 2003

 

[18] Haley, Boyd. Mercury and Thimerosal Toxicity: A Factor in Autism

 

also: Dr. Haley Rebuts the American Dental Association Position on

Mercury Amalgam Safety

 

 

See related:

 

Report shows toxic chemicals prevalent in Americans' bodies

Shannon Brennan - Monday, August 1, 2005.

Two new studies contain good news, bad news and worse news when it

comes to the toxic chemicals in our bodies. The good news, reported by

the Centers for Disease Control, is that lead exposure in children is

down significantly and secondhand-smoke exposure has been reduced. The

bad news, also from the CDC, is that Americans are carrying at least

148 toxic compounds in varying levels in their bodies, and little is

known about what levels are a threat to health. The most worrisome

news, from the Environmental Working Group, shows that even in utero,

babies have an average of 200 chemical contaminants in their

bloodstreams. The EWG report analyzed 10 samples of umbilical-cord

blood taken by the American Red Cross across the country.

 

" Big Pharma " is using " Western Medicine " to Destroy America...

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

 

 

 

posted by sepp on Tuesday August 2 2005

Print this article

 

URL of this article:

 

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/08/02/chemical_poisons_cause_increasin\

g_levels_of_illness_tobacco_blamed.htm

 

 

 

 

Related Articles

 

Cancer - Are Chemicals To Blame?

Cancer may be largely to blame on man made chemicals in our

environment, rather than on smoking and diet, the factors that are

emphasized by medical experts. The article reporting the Canadian

study was printed in the Penticton Herald, a relatively obscure paper

and I haven't seen it taken up by other press outlets so far. A

separate study of scientists from the Shanghai University of

Traditional blames... [read more]

March 11, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

Senate Bill To Limit Pharma Liability for Mercury Poisoning

A provision introduced by Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist in the

Protecting America in the War on Terror Act, introduced in January

this year as Senate Bill S-3, will effectively limit the liability of

pharmaceutical manufacturers including Merck, GlaxoSmithKline,

Aventis, Weyeth and Eli Lilly, for having caused widespread poisoning

of children resulting in damage to normal brain development. As a

matter of fact, an epidemic of autism is sweeping especially... [read

more]

April 23, 2005 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

Dropping like flies: poisoned by ASPARTAME

Sudden Cardiac Death or SCD, according to the US Centers for

Disease Control, is the number one killer, having ended the lives of

close to half a million Americans in 1999. Sudden Cardiac Death is not

a " heart attack " or myocardial infarction, caused by clogged arteries.

It's an electrical problem in which the cardiac conduction system that

generates the impulses regulating the heart suddenly outputs rapid or

chaotic electrical impulses,... [read more]

September 26, 2003 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

Depleted Uranium - Silent genocide to haunt perpetrators

A new wonder weapon - uranium-tipped anti-tank munitions and

bunker-breaking missiles - is set to become a distinct liability for

those using them, quite apart from killing massive numbers of

civilians by acute radiation sickness, birth defects and cancer. Gulf

War I or " Desert Storm " was the first live proving ground, Kosovo was

covertly nuked by Nato bombs, Afghanistan is widely contaminated and

Iraq has just been given the death... [read more]

August 05, 2003 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

Millions of bees dead - Bayer's Gaucho blamed

Synthetic honey and GMO bees - Part II A French governmental

report confirms suspicions of a mass poisoning of bees involving

hundreds of thousands of colonies of honey bees. According to the

report of the French Scientific and Technical Committee, Bayer's seed

treatment GAUCHO pesticide is to blame - at least in part. Earlier

this year, I published an article by French journalist Michel Dogna,

who had investigated the ecological... [read more]

November 26, 2003 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

'Green Gasoline' Benzene Leukemia Risk In Children Confirmed

A recent French study reports that children living within reach of

either a gas station or a car repair shop have a fourfold risk of

developing leukemia. The study confirms the warnings given by German

heart specialist Hans Nieper who investigated the health effects of

two substances employed in the automotive industry since the 1980s. In

fact when lead was shown to be toxic, it was eliminated from gasoline

and... [read more]

August 19, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------

 

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/08/02/chemical_poisons_cause_increasin\

g_levels_of_illness_tobacco_blamed.htm

 

 

 

 

--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...