Guest guest Posted August 2, 2005 Report Share Posted August 2, 2005 The Homocysteine and Cardiovascular Disease connection: Further Information JoAnn Guest Aug 01, 2005 16:29 PDT http://www.willner.com/article.aspx?artid=166 Further Information on the Homocysteine and Cardiovascular Disease connection. A recent study in the journal, Circulation, has cast some doubt on the exact nature of the link between homocysteine and heart disease. An editorial in that publication implied that we may in fact be somewhat premature in how we have viewed the role of homocysteine. While it may be true that we do not yet have all of the facts, we need to be careful to keep everything in proper perspective. We do know that there is a connection, and we do know that increasing the B vitamins folate, B6 and B12, with a lowering of homocysteine, seems to be protective. It is certain worth trying for those who are at risk. What is the downside of increasing our supplement and or dietary intake of these inexpensive and beneficial nutrients? Steve Austin, N.D., wrote an insightful commentary in the Quarterly Review of Natural Medicine 12-31-98 p. 305-307 His article was titled " Clouds Appear in the Relationship Between Homocysteine and Cardiovascular Disease " . Readers of this column know that numerous trials report a positive link between serum homocysteine and coronary heart disease (CHD). Likewise, there is clear evidence that folic acid and to a lesser extent vitamins B6 and B12 lower homocysteine levels. As homocysteine induces vascular damage both in vitro and in animal models, it has been widely assumed that homocysteine is not simply a marker, but rather probably a contributory agent. Recently, a large (232 coronary heart disease cases) nested (prospective) case control study by Folsom, et al. in Circulation was " unable " to solidly confirm an independent correlation between elevated homocysteine and cardiovascular disease (average follow up of 3.3 years).(1) In that report, higher B6 status (measured as pyridoxal 5'-phosphate) correlated strongly with protection, but dietary B6 did not, nor did other B vitamins. If the relationship between PLP and cardiovascular protection had anything to do with homocysteine, folic acid status should have also been linked to protection because " folate status " is a much stronger determinant of homocysteine levels than is B6 status. A skeptical editorial appeared in the same issue of Circulation.(2) In that editorial, the follow points were made, with literature support: •Myocardial infarction " increases " homocysteine, providing a different perspective on what might be chicken and what might be egg. •In vitro experiments purporting to show that homocysteine is atherogenic are conducted at concentrations far " in excess " of what really " occurs " in vivo. •There is at least some animal evidence that B-vitamin supplementation-induced decreases in homocysteine are not accompanied by " improvement " in endothelial function. •Several lines of research have not linked genetic defects in enzyme activation that cause homocysteine elevations to vascular disease, suggesting that the strong link between homocysteine and CHD may not be " cause and effect " . An hypothesis is put forward in the editorial that possibly the inflammatory component of atherosclerosis increases demand for folic acid, and the drop in folate status causes homocysteine to rise, but only as a marker -- not as a " significant " player. On the other hand, the editorial acknowledges that B-vitamin deficiency might be directly linked to heart disease and treating with supplements might be protective, though the consequent fall in homocysteine might merely be the decline of an " uninvolved marker " . There remains little question that B-vitamin supplementation lowers homocysteine(3) -- the recent publications do not dispute that. In fact, some of the recent links between B-vitamin supplementation and reduction in heart disease(4) were acknowledged in the Circulation editorial. Other such studies, however, were ignored,(5) including the recent intervention trial wherein B-vitamin supplementation (250 mg vitamin B6 per day and 5 mg of folic acid) given to a group with high homocysteine levels resulted in an incidence of cardiovascular disease no higher than in people with normal homocysteine levels(6) -- a hopeful though not " conclusive " study. What do the data from the Folsom trial really tell us? A look at the fine print is actually quite different from the negative message broadcast by the media following publication. Actually, a closer look reveals that the Folsom trial found the following: •Serum pyridoxal 5' phosphate (PLP) correlated strongly and inversely with CHD in both sexes. •Homocysteine did " correlate " with CHD -- but " only " in women. •Plasma folate correlated very strongly and inversely with CHD -- but " only " in women (p=0.003). •As expected, supplement use correlated strongly with reduced homocysteine. •Supplement use was high in healthy controls, but the difference did not reach " statistical significance " . •There was no correlation whatever between dietary B vitamins and CHD. Circulation editorial opinions aside, what are we to glean from these data? The Folsom trial clearly supports the link between B-vitamin supplementation and reduced homocysteine levels. Further, it shows a link between serum homocysteine and CHD, but the relationship was limited to women only. It is not at all clear why there was no relationship in men. Nor is it clear why most significant relationships in the study " softened " when controlled for HDL and total cholesterol, smoking, and other risk factors. The stronger effect with supplements compared with food is to be expected in that, particularly with folate, bioavailability is far better from synthetic pills than from natural sources. Finally, the very strong link between PLP and CHD prevention requires further investigation. The idea of " normalizing physiology " by supplying B vitamins to patients with a need for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease and with elevated homocysteine levels will still make sense to many healthcare professionals. But only intervention trials will tell us whether such supplementation will " actually " reduce " coronary artery disease " " risk " in the same predictable way it lowers homocysteine. Some kind of link between B vitamins, homocysteine and CHD still appears to exist (though the current study found it only in women). The question remains, however, what's chicken and what's egg? Dr. Austin has been a guest on The Willner Window, and is a contributor to Health Notes Online. He Is author of Breast Cancer: What You Should Know (But May Not Be Told) About Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment., available at Willner Chemists. (1) Folsom AR, Nieto J, McGovern PG, et al. Prospective study of coronary heart disease incidence in relation to fasting total homocysteine, related genetic polymorphisms, and B vitamins. Circulation 1998;-98:1-7. (2) Kuller LH, Evans RW. Homocysteine, vitamins, and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 1998;98:196-9 [editorial]. (3) Homocysteine Lowering Trialists' Collaboration. Lowering blood homocysteine with folic acid based supplements; eta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 1998; 316:894-8. (4) Peterson JC, Spence JD. Vitamins and progression of atherosclerosis in hyper-homocyst(e)ineaemia. Lancet 1998; 351:1008 [research letter]. (5) Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB, et al. Folate and vitamin B6 from diet and supplements in relation to risk of coronary heart disease among women. JAMA 1998; 279:359-64. (6) de Jong SC, Stehouwer CDA, van den Berg M, et al. Normohomocysteinemia and vitamin-treated hyperhomocysteinemia are associated with similar risks of cardiovascular events in patients with premature peripheral arterial occlusive disease. A Prospective study. JoAnn Guest mrsjo- DietaryTi- www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest/Diets Netherlands J Med 1998; 52:S41. AIM Barleygreen " Wisdom of the Past, Food of the Future " http://www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest/Diets.html Start your day with - make it your home page Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.