Guest guest Posted July 22, 2005 Report Share Posted July 22, 2005 " Congress.org " <no-reply wrote:Thank you for using Congress.org Mail System Message sent to the following recipients: Representative Bradley Message text follows: July 22, 2005 [recipient address was inserted here] [recipient name was inserted here], Dear Rep. Bradley, In 1994 vitamin consumers generated the largest volume of mail to Congress on any issue in the HISTORY of Congress when we passed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. Today, CAFTA threatens to undo all of our hard work, and to set the USA up for harmonization to an excessively restrictive global trade guideline for vitamins and minerals just finalized on July 4th 2005 at the 28 General Session of the UN's Codex Alimentarius Commission. The seeds of our health freedom destruction are sewn inside Section 6 of CAFTA where members are forced to form a Sanitary-Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Committee for the purpose of insuring ONGOING HARMONIZATION of our laws under the terms of the SPS Agreement in the WTO Trade Agreement. (See www.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/CAFTA/CAFTA-DR_Final_Texts/Section_ Index.html If you examine Article 3 of the WTO's SPS Agreement you will read the following words: " To harmonize sanitary and phytosanitary measures on as wide a basis as possible, members SHALL base their food safety measures on international standards, guidelines or recommendations. " (Codex sets the international standard for food safety, and they intend to fill in the blanks on allowed potencies at levels even LOWER than RDAs- see http://www.alliance-natural-health.org/_docs/ANHWebsiteDoc_145.doc Vitamin consumers drove many congressmen out of office who failed to vote for DSHEA in '94. Any member of Congress who fails to heed our concerns about CAFTA and votes for this unconstitutional trade agreement anyway, despite how it sets us up for harmonization to Codex, and despite its continuing the failed policies of NAFTA which gave us our present $617 Billion trade deficit risks being driven from office. IAHF will be posting a list of any member of Congress who ignores our concerns. We urge you to watch Kevin Miller's excellent documentary on this issue Also you can view this movie http://iahf.com/wbs-weba.mp4 Or you can read whats below... We may not be ABLE to stop CODEX, but we CAN keep it from coming HERE. The pro-CAFTA forces aren't really for true free trade. They are for global managed trade...because that is what CAFTA (like NAFTA) really is. Think about it. Why does it take over 1,000 pages to define free trade? We've had over 10 years of NAFTA so we should know what to expect with CAFTA. CAFTA fits hand-in-glove with the world-government agenda to make the U.S. just another client state. How? Consider: CAFTA article 10.16.3 places the United States under the jurisdiction of international tribunals supervised by the United Nations. Consider: CAFTA article 10.5.2(a) states that these international tribunals must use " customary international law " as established by the " principle legal systems of the world " when deciding cases. Welcome to the United Nations' world court system! And then there's the unconstitutional granting of " fast track " authority to the president. Article I, section 8, clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the sole authority to regulate international trade. But CAFTA, like NAFTA, treats the U.S. Constitution as a relic. We already suffer from the World Trade Organization and its international bureaucrats. CAFTA will add another layer of unaccountable world elites who will tell us what we can and cannot do. Even the French understand the critical importance of national sovereignty. They recently rejected the proposed constitution of the European Union. Remember that the E.U. started as a trade agreement in 1957, and now it is a regional supra government. NAFTA. CAFTA. And then the Union of the Americas. CODEX TEXT APPROVED IN ROME JULY 4, 2005 THE ONLY WAY TO STOP CODEX IN THE USA IS TO TAKE ACTION NOW AND STOP CAFTA!!!! The nightmare scenario which IAHF first warned the world about in 1996 came true today at the 28th General Session of the Codex Alimentarius when the global trade guideline for vitamins and minerals was RATIFIED (with nary a whimper of protest from US Codex Manager Dr.Ed Scarbrough, our traitorous delegate.) SEE WHAT TO DO BELOW: WE MUST KILL CAFTA TO STOP CODEX FROM COMING HERE: THE SHELL GAME CONTINUES------> CODEX RATIFIED AN EMPTY SHELL What Codex ratified was a FRAMEWORK with the blanks on allowable potencies to be filled in next November at the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Use Meeting in Bonn. How they intend to fill in those blanks, however, is highly predictable given that the World Health Organization's " Nutrient Risk Assessment Project " is being " led " by an FDA employee: Christine Lewis Taylor, a dietician who firmly believes that taking any nutrient above RDA levels merely " enriches the urine. " The Pharma Dominated vitamin trade associations have conned their vitamin company and health food store members into thinking that " SOUND SCIENCE " would be used to fill in the blanks on allowable potencies, and that a " victory " was won when a move to scrap RDAs as the basis for filling in the blanks was replaced by a move to base them on " scientific " risk assessment instead. www.crnusa.org/PR04_110204jointCodex.html) But just how " scientific " is it in FACT when they're only looking at presumed " RISKS " while ignoring BENEFITS? The Pharma Dominated trade associations have conned their members into believing that the END POINT of the Codex risk assessment would be the " SUL " S or " Safe Upper Levels " generated by the US National Academy of Sciences. These numbers aren't much different from the potencies that vitamin companies are currently allowed to sell in the USA so vitamin companies have easily bought into this LIE. The awful REALITY, however is that the SULs are only the STARTING point for this most unscientific risk assessment, because the fine print calls for them to be further watered down til by subtracting junk science derived " nutrient risk factors " and junk science derived numbers from some mythical " average diet " which doesn't in fact exist, you end up with a the numbers generated by the German Federal Institute of Risk Assessment show in this table, which as you can see in some cases are even LOWER than the RDAs: www.alliance-natural-health.org/_docs/ANHWebsiteDoc_145.doc The UK based Alliance for Natural Health sees all of this, and in an effort to head it off commissioned the Dutch based HAN Foundation to do a PROPERLY SCIENTIFIC risk assessment which takes into account the BENEFIT of dietary supplements, which the so called World Health Organization is outrageously IGNORING completely: www.alliance-natural-health.org/index.cfm?action=news & ;ID=174 Judging from what just happened in Rome, however, no vitamin consumer in America can count on Codex paying the least bit of attention to the HAN Foundation's findings however when Codex meets next in November. We have to assume the worst- that they'll fill in the blanks on allowable potencies exactly the way the FDA would want them to, which is of course just the way the German government would like as seen in the table above. WHY YOU MUST KILL CAFTA ON THE HOUSE FLOOR- HOW CAFTA TIES IN WITH CODEX CAFTA VOTE - CONGRESS MUST NOT ALLOW CAFTA AND CODEX TO OVERRIDE DSHEA The Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) Treaty will require the U.S., a member of the World Trade Organization, to revise our food laws and regulations based on Codex decisions. CAFTA would force harmonization of our dietary supplements and regulations to international standards, overriding the DSHEA Act of 1994. The Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) and the even-broader Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) are both modeled after the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). These agreements are typical bureaucratic monstrosities of managed trade that masquerade as free trade and would expand NAFTA to include first Central America and then the rest of the Americas in an economic union. True free trade would take a few pages of written text to enact (eliminate these barriers to trade and these tariffs, etc.); all three of these agreements encompass thousands of pages of bureaucratic textual garbage sprinkled liberally with rules, regulations, and special-interest benefits. Buried in the language of CAFTA is Section 6 that would require of all its members that they form a Sanitary and Phyto-Sanitary (SPS) committee for the purpose of insuring ongoing harmonization under the terms of the SPS Agreement in the World Trade Organization (WTO). You can find that text at the following website: www.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/CAFTA/CAFTA-DR_Final_Texts/Section_ Index.html . If you then look at Article 3 of the WTOs SPS Agreement, you will read the following words: " To harmonize sanitary and phytosanitary measures on as wide a basis as possible, Members shall base their food safety measures on international standards, guidelines or recommendations. " (emphasis added) And as you all know by now, Codex sets the international standards for food safety including vitamins & minerals. So, CAFTA, which is set for a vote in the House of Representatives any time after they reconvene July 11th, 2005, is another critical link by which health-freedom haters hope to bypass the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 and obligate the United States and Canada by treaty to harmonize to the harshly restrictive Codex vitamin-and-mineral standards. They cannot be allowed to succeed, and we at the NHF completely oppose these two treaties that would put a knife in the back of our health freedoms. ~IMPORTANT- For House consideration, when they return, the Senate Bill 1307 (click here http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:3:./temp/~c109OjRqbt:: to view bill), ratifying CAFTA, can be voted on without going to committee. It is on the House calendar and may be brought up at any time. I URGE TO VOTE AGAINST CAFTA NOW. Today, CAFTA threatens to undo all of our hard work, and to set the USA up for harmonization to an excessively restrictive global trade guideline for vitamins and minerals just finalized on July 4th 2005 at the 28 General Session of the UN's Codex Alimentarius Commission. The seeds of our health freedom destruction are sewn inside Section 6 of CAFTA where members are forced to form a Sanitary-Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Committee for the purpose of insuring ONGOING HARMONIZATION of our laws under the terms of the SPS Agreement in the WTO Trade Agreement. (See www.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/CAFTA/CAFTA-DR_Final_Texts/Section_ Index.html If you examine Article 3 of the WTO's SPS Agreement you will read the following words: " To harmonize sanitary and phytosanitary measures on as wide a basis as possible, members SHALL base their food safety measures on international standards, guidelines or recommendations. " (Codex sets the international standard for food safety, and they intend to fill in the blanks on allowed potencies at levels even LOWER than RDAs- see http://www.alliance-natural-health.org/_docs/ANHWebsiteDoc_145.doc Vitamin consumers drove many congressmen out of office who failed to vote for DSHEA in '94. Any member of Congress who fails to heed concerns about CAFTA and votes for this unconstitutional trade agreement anyway, despite how it sets us up for harmonization to Codex, and despite its continuing the failed policies of NAFTA which gave us our present $617 Billion trade deficit risks being driven from office. IAHF will be posting a list of any member of Congress who ignores citizen's concerns. I urge you to watch Kevin Miller's excellent documentary on this issue at www.welltv.com and or accesshttp://iahf.com/wbs-weba.mp4 Since I was disabled from using an FDA approved substance, I NEED my vitamins to live, work, be a CONTRIBUTORY citizen! CAFTA will take my HEALTH away, necessitating a visit to the doctor for a VITAMIN, which CAFTA, via Codex Alimenatarius may NO LONGER be available! This in and of itself, IS UNAMERICAN nad NOT what our fore-fathers believed! PLEASE!!!! OPPOSE CAFTA!!! Respectfully, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.