Guest guest Posted July 12, 2005 Report Share Posted July 12, 2005 I didn't send this to my friends, figuring that maybe my last e-mail was one of the best that I have written, and I should allow my friends to have a fond memory of me a little longer before I write another e-mail. I have to be careful not lose credibility by crying " foul " every time I send an e-mail. But I'm getting the feeling that some people may still not be swayed of the danger. So maybe there is a little gem inside this could-have-been e-mail that you all can use to persuade ignorant Americans of the real danger. ------------- This is reality. Note the reasoning. Toxic until proven safe. This is actually happening. There is a complete disregard for science, common knowledge, and common sense. It is a slap in the face to people who value making choices regarding their bodies. Abortion rights advocates resent being told what they can and cannot do with their bodies, so how do you think we feel when we're told what WE can and cannot do with OUR BODIES as a result of this ridiculous rational? Freedom of choice is more important for irresponsible women than it is for people who take responsibility for our health. Explain that. Note the rational given in the quote below and pay close attention: " The EU said the rules were needed for consumer protection AND to provide common rules that would allow companies to sell supplements across the EU. " Does it make sense how CAFTA could compel the USA to restrict supplements in order to benefit free trade? --------- The European Union's high court upheld proposed restrictions on the sale of food supplements, despite objections from trade organisations that claimed the rules would ban popular vitamin pills. The European Court of Justice in Brussels said the EU law was " appropriate for securing the free movement of food supplements and ensuring the protection of human health. " The law setting up a " positive list " of food supplements approved for sale across the 25-nation EU is due to come into force on August 1. Food supplements not on the list will be banned. Trade groups, led by the Alliance for Natural Health, had lobbied hard to overturn the legislation, claiming it would ban thousands of vitamin and mineral supplements. However the court in Luxembourg backed the rules which were approved by EU governments and the European Parliament in 2002. The EU said the rules were needed for consumer protection and to provide common rules that would allow companies to sell supplements across the EU. " Certain restrictions can be justified by the protection of public health, " said a European court statement. The court " considered the measures in question to be necessary and appropriate for the purpose of achieving that objective. " Under the rules, only food supplement ingredients approved by the European Food Safety Authority will be authorised for sale. The campaign to overturn the regulation has been particularly vocal in Britain, where the Alliance for Natural Health - a Europe-wide association of manufacturers, distributors and consumers - joined other groups in mounting a legal challenge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.