Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Why alternate medicine opposes allopathy.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Friends,

 

Many people fail to understand why the alternate physicians have a quarrel with

the allopaths. Modern medicine with all its fancy drugs, swanky research and

glistening gadgets seems almost invincible and more than sufficient to conquer

disease. But once you have been in the receiving end of this " science "

especially while suffering from a chronic disease, you realise that all that

glitters may not be gold.

 

The allopathic principles may be surmised as under;

 

1. The symptoms are the disease. Therefore destroy the symptoms to destroy the

disease. 2. Lack of physical symptoms denote lack of disease. 3. The physical

body and a part of the mind alone are susceptible to disease. 4. All disease (or

dis-ease) has to be fought on war footing as it is bad for health. 5. The

physician knows best. The patient should remain a silent spectator to his

skills. 6. Germs are the main cause of disease. 7. The body has no capacity to

fight disease without the help of a doctor. There is no internal correction

system.8. The body/mind complex cannot renew itself. 9. The external/internal

environment is an enemy which is constantly seeking to destroy the body. 10.

Nature is powerless against disease. 11. Disease is static and it can be fought

only by medicines at the material plane.

 

However almost all other forms of alternate healing are of the opinion that;

 

1. Symptoms are the body's language trying to point out the source of the

problem or trying to let the body/mind/intelligence complex know that some

anomaly has ocurred. 2. Disease begins at the karmic plane making its way down

through the mental/emotional plane into the physical body. 3. Only the soul is

disease free, man can be diseased at all other levels. 4. Not all diseases go

against the body, many are a part of the development process

(birth-childhood-youth-adult-old age-death) and indicate correctional processes

taking place within the body which is trying to throw away toxins of the

process. 5. The patient knows best, the physicians job is to assist the patient

in his attempts to set right the malady and regain his former state of health.

6. Cracks in the immune system lead to disease. Germs cannot thrive unless an

internal error has ocurred laying down the foundation of disease. In some cases

the germs also may be the scavengors trying to remove the waste products

generated

as the immune system fights the disease. 7. The body is fully equipped to fight

disease and the physician should interfere with proper life saving and vitality

building exercises only when he feels that the vital force is loosing against

the disease force. 8. The body/mind complex knows fully well what to do at every

stage in case of disease unless its diagnostic and healing abilities have been

compromised by human and mechanical forces. The inherent healing force of the

body always tries to throw out the disease force from within outwards. 10.

Though the environment and internal system is constantly at a state of flux the

inherent idea is to achieve equilibrium and not to lead to further chaos. The

position changes only at advanced old age when the soul starts preparing to shed

the old body and acquire a new one. 11. Disease is a dynamic force and the

physician should be able to deal with it at a dynamic level. If disease is not

dynamic it can not affect the dynamic life/vital

force in the first place.

 

I think now the position of modern medicine vis a vis alternate medicine is

somewhat clear. I would love the distinguished members of the list to

add/distract to/from what I have tried to discuss.

 

Love & Regards, Jagannath.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Jagannath, thank you. I have been following this issue closely for many years

and I have accumulated a broad range of knowledge, reading and life experience

on the subject.

 

I have a persistent dream of creating a longitudinal study to compare the

morbidity and mortality rates of people who believe in the rightness of

allopathic medicine and follow their doctors' advice, against people who avoid

doctors or who don't follow the advice of MD's, for whatever reason. It would

have to correct for issues such as diet and lifestyle.

 

What I don't have is the money, resources or connections to get this project in

motion.

 

If anybody on this list has those kinds of connections and would like to

collaborate with me at some level, I would love to hear from you.

 

Thank you all,

Nina

 

 

Jagannath Chatterjee <jagchat01

Jun 27, 2005 8:16 AM

ayurveda , connect_ticket ,

homeopathy_open , minutus ,

alternative_medicine_forum

Why alternate medicine opposes allopathy.

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

Many people fail to understand why the alternate physicians have a quarrel with

the allopaths. Modern medicine with all its fancy drugs, swanky research and

glistening gadgets seems almost invincible and more than sufficient to conquer

disease. But once you have been in the receiving end of this " science "

especially while suffering from a chronic disease, you realise that all that

glitters may not be gold.

 

The allopathic principles may be surmised as under;

 

1. The symptoms are the disease. Therefore destroy the symptoms to destroy the

disease. 2. Lack of physical symptoms denote lack of disease. 3. The physical

body and a part of the mind alone are susceptible to disease. 4. All disease (or

dis-ease) has to be fought on war footing as it is bad for health. 5. The

physician knows best. The patient should remain a silent spectator to his

skills. 6. Germs are the main cause of disease. 7. The body has no capacity to

fight disease without the help of a doctor. There is no internal correction

system.8. The body/mind complex cannot renew itself. 9. The external/internal

environment is an enemy which is constantly seeking to destroy the body. 10.

Nature is powerless against disease. 11. Disease is static and it can be fought

only by medicines at the material plane.

 

However almost all other forms of alternate healing are of the opinion that;

 

1. Symptoms are the body's language trying to point out the source of the

problem or trying to let the body/mind/intelligence complex know that some

anomaly has ocurred. 2. Disease begins at the karmic plane making its way down

through the mental/emotional plane into the physical body. 3. Only the soul is

disease free, man can be diseased at all other levels. 4. Not all diseases go

against the body, many are a part of the development process

(birth-childhood-youth-adult-old age-death) and indicate correctional processes

taking place within the body which is trying to throw away toxins of the

process. 5. The patient knows best, the physicians job is to assist the patient

in his attempts to set right the malady and regain his former state of health.

6. Cracks in the immune system lead to disease. Germs cannot thrive unless an

internal error has ocurred laying down the foundation of disease. In some cases

the germs also may be the scavengors trying to remove the waste products

generated

as the immune system fights the disease. 7. The body is fully equipped to fight

disease and the physician should interfere with proper life saving and vitality

building exercises only when he feels that the vital force is loosing against

the disease force. 8. The body/mind complex knows fully well what to do at every

stage in case of disease unless its diagnostic and healing abilities have been

compromised by human and mechanical forces. The inherent healing force of the

body always tries to throw out the disease force from within outwards. 10.

Though the environment and internal system is constantly at a state of flux the

inherent idea is to achieve equilibrium and not to lead to further chaos. The

position changes only at advanced old age when the soul starts preparing to shed

the old body and acquire a new one. 11. Disease is a dynamic force and the

physician should be able to deal with it at a dynamic level. If disease is not

dynamic it can not affect the dynamic life/vital

force in the first place.

 

I think now the position of modern medicine vis a vis alternate medicine is

somewhat clear. I would love the distinguished members of the list to

add/distract to/from what I have tried to discuss.

 

Love & Regards, Jagannath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I can't recall the exact details, but I remember in the early '70s

doctors in Los Angeles county went on strike for six months to

protest the high cost of malpractice insurance. During the period

when the doctors weren't practicing medicing, the mortality rate in

LA county went down.

 

I'm sure you can track down the details by using Google etc.

 

 

Ron

 

 

, Nina Moliver

<ninalynn@b...> wrote:

> Jagannath, thank you. I have been following this issue closely for

many years and I have accumulated a broad range of knowledge, reading

and life experience on the subject.

>

> I have a persistent dream of creating a longitudinal study to

compare the morbidity and mortality rates of people who believe in

the rightness of allopathic medicine and follow their doctors'

advice, against people who avoid doctors or who don't follow the

advice of MD's, for whatever reason. It would have to correct for

issues such as diet and lifestyle.

>

> What I don't have is the money, resources or connections to get

this project in motion.

>

> If anybody on this list has those kinds of connections and would

like to collaborate with me at some level, I would love to hear from

you.

>

> Thank you all,

> Nina

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I found this REALLY interesting....so i googled

Here's some links

 

http://yarchive.net/med/doctor_strikes.html

 

http://drtong.com/vaccine.html

 

, " marangneng " <

marangneng> wrote:

> I can't recall the exact details, but I remember in the early '70s

> doctors in Los Angeles county went on strike for six months to

> protest the high cost of malpractice insurance. During the period

> when the doctors weren't practicing medicing, the mortality rate in

> LA county went down.

>

> I'm sure you can track down the details by using Google etc.

>

>

> Ron

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Well here are a few links about death rates dropping when doctors strike:

 

Death Rate Drops During Doctor Strike In Israel

http://www.heart-disease-bypass-surgery.com/data/articles/67.htm

 

Though not giving specific info about doctors on strike, this article

gives information on mortality related to iantrogenic (treatment for

disease) causes

http://drtong.com/drug_mortality.html

 

Doctors' strike in Israel may be good for health

http://www.vaccination.inoz.com/doctordeathrate.html

 

 

 

In , " marangneng "

<marangneng> wrote:

> I can't recall the exact details, but I remember in the early '70s

> doctors in Los Angeles county went on strike for six months to

> protest the high cost of malpractice insurance. During the period

> when the doctors weren't practicing medicing, the mortality rate in

> LA county went down.

>

> I'm sure you can track down the details by using Google etc.

>

>

> Ron

>

>

> , Nina Moliver

> <ninalynn@b...> wrote:

> > Jagannath, thank you. I have been following this issue closely for

> many years and I have accumulated a broad range of knowledge, reading

> and life experience on the subject.

> >

> > I have a persistent dream of creating a longitudinal study to

> compare the morbidity and mortality rates of people who believe in

> the rightness of allopathic medicine and follow their doctors'

> advice, against people who avoid doctors or who don't follow the

> advice of MD's, for whatever reason. It would have to correct for

> issues such as diet and lifestyle.

> >

> > What I don't have is the money, resources or connections to get

> this project in motion.

> >

> > If anybody on this list has those kinds of connections and would

> like to collaborate with me at some level, I would love to hear from

> you.

> >

> > Thank you all,

> > Nina

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thank you all for your answers. I have been seeing this kind of information

all my life. What I'm looking for is the opportunity to shape and create a

longitudinal study that can evaluate the real impact of pharmaceutical

medical treatment on large numbers of people. Anyone who has the resources

or contacts to help set something like this up will receive much

appreciation from me.

 

Nina

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...