Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Former MI5 Agent Says 9/11 An Inside Job

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

r

Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:35:09 -0400

[alfranken] Fw: Former Agent Says 9/11 An Inside Job

 

 

 

 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/index.html

 

Former MI5 Agent Says 9/11 An Inside Job

Attack Was 'Coup de'tat,' Buildings Were Demolished By Controlled

Demolitions

 

Prison Planet | June 27 2005

 

Former MI5 agent David Shayler, who previously blew the whistle on

the British government paying Al Qaeda $200,000 to carry out political

assassinations, has gone on the record with his conviction that 9/11

was an inside job meant to bring about a permanent state of emergency

in America and pave the way for the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq and

ultimately Iran and Syria.

 

David Shayler joined MI5 in October 1991 and worked there for five

years. He started at F Branch (counter-subversion) in January 1992,

and worked in T Branch (Irish terrorism) from August 1992 until

October 1994. He left the organization in 1996.

 

Shayler appeared on The Alex Jones Show to kick off what will be a

wider public campaign to educate the public on 9/11 issues and

government corruption.

 

Shayler again risked jail by speaking out. The British government

has a legal gag preventing him from speaking about his work during his

MI5 tenure. Since what Shayler discussed was already on the public

record (a consequence of which was his imprisonment on two separate

occasions), he now feels safer in stepping back out into the limelight.

 

Shayler delved into his past investigations and the evidence that

led some within MI5 to conclude that the Israelis bombed their own

London embassy in July 1994. Shayler said that the Israelis framed two

Palestinians who remain in jail to this day.

 

" The same thing has happened with two Palestinians who were

convicted of conspiracy to cause the attack on the Israeli Embassy in

Britain in 1994 but MI5 didn't disclose two documents which indicated

their innocence. One document indicated another group had carried out

the attack and the other document was the belief of an MI5 officer

that the Israelis had actually bombed their own embassy and allowed a

controlled explosion to try and get better security and these

documents were never shown to the trial judge let alone the defense. "

 

Shayler said that his suspicions were first aroused about 9/11

when the usual route of crime scene investigation was impeded when the

debris was immediately seized and shipped off to China.

 

" It is in fact a criminal offence to interfere with a crime scene

and yet in the case of 9/11 all the metal from the buildings is

shipped out to China, there are no forensications done on that metal.

Now that to me suggests they never wanted anybody to look at that

metal because it was not going to provide the evidence they wanted to

show people that it was Al-Qaeda. "

 

Shayler then went on to dismiss the incompetence theory.

 

" The more I look at it, you realize that it's not incompetence.

There were FBI officers all over the country, Colleen Rowley is

obviously the one who managed to get a congressional hearing, but

there was plenty of evidence certainly. "

 

" There are so many questions that need to be answered, protocols

being overridden within national defense, people actively being

stopped from carrying out investigations. This wasn't an accident,

they were aware there was intelligence indicating those kind of

attacks, there were FBI intercepts saying it in the days before the

attacks. When you look at it all, that is a big big intelligence

picture and yet these people were crucially stopped from doing their

jobs, stopped from trying to protect the American people. "

 

Shayler elaborated by saying the evidence suggests the attack was

originally meant to be much wider in scope and was an attempt at a

violent coup intended to decapitate the entire government as a pretext

for martial law.

 

" So you're looking at a situation in which you almost have a coup

de'tat because you've got to bear in mind that there were weapons

discovered on planes that didn't take off on 9/11. Now people have

obviously postulated that they were going perhaps to attack the White

House, Capitol Hill. That looks to me like an attempt to destroy

American government and declare a state of emergency, in fact a coup

de'tat, a violent coup de'tat. "

 

" There are so very many questions about this and you realize again

that none of the enquiries ever get to the bottom of any of these

things, they don't take all the evidence, they don't often take any

evidence under oath when they should be taking it under oath. "

 

Shayler was forthright in his assertion that the attack was

planned and executed within the jurisdiction of the

military-industrial complex.

 

" They let it happen, they made it happen to create a trigger to be

able to allow the invasion of Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq and of

course what they're trying to do now is the same thing with the

invasion of Iran and Syria. "

 

Shayler ended by questioning the highly suspicious nature of the

collapse of the twin towers and Building 7, the first buildings in

history, all in the same day, to collapse from so-called fire damage

alone.

 

" I've seen the results of terroristic explosions and so on and no

terrorist explosion has ever brought down a building. When the IRA put

something like a thousands tonnes of home-made explosives in front of

the Baltic Exchange building in Bishopsgate and let off the bomb, all

the glass came out, the building shook a bit but there was no question

about the building falling down and it doesn't obey the laws of

physics for buildings to fall down in the way the World Trade Center

came down. So you have the comparison of the two, Building 7 compared

with the north and south towers coming down and those two things are

exactly the same, they were demolished. "

 

David Shayler joins a spate of recent credible whistleblowers who

share the same sentiments about the real story behind 9/11. Former

Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W.

Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds publicly questioned the unexplained

collapse of WTC Building 7 earlier this month.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/160605governmentcomplicit.htm

 

In addition, a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under

President Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts, shared his concerns last week

when he said the Bush Administration were making the same mistakes as

the Nazis when they invaded Russia in the dead of Winter. Roberts

seriously doubts the official explanation behind 9/11.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/240605doubtsstory.htm

 

Click here for a clip in which Shayler discusses 9/11.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/270605shaylerclip.mp3

Prison Planet.tv rs can listen to the whole hour long

interview by clicking here. Shayler also discusses his investigations

of Irish Republican terrorism which led back to the British government

and the murder of Princess Diana.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...