Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

GMW: Scientists fired for speaking out on biotech project

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

GMW: Scientists fired for speaking out on biotech project

" GM WATCH " <info

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:10:30 +0100

 

 

 

 

 

GM WATCH daily

http://www.gmwatch.org

------

1.Florida scientists claim they were fired for being outspoken

2.Florida aims to regain momentum on Scripps, biotech

 

COMMENT

 

A couple of very timely items with the Biotech Industry Organisation

(BIO) having its annual bash in Philadelphia.

 

This years event is bound to be packed with mayors and governors from

across the US desperate to lure biotech companies to their area with

promises of tax breaks, government grants, and even help with parking.

 

One of those who will be pumping the flesh is Florida governor Jeb

Bush, brother of president George W. Bush. As our second press report

below

notes, " Bush plans to shake hands in Florida's booth at the upcoming

Bio2005 biotechnology industry conference in Philadelphia. He said he'll

do whatever he can to 'close the deal' when life-science companies

express interest in relocating to Florida. "

 

Bush has already spearheaded an initiative to hand over USD510 million

of Florida and Palm Beach County taxpayers money to build a new biotech

centre for the Scripps Research Institute, based in San Diego. Land,

buildings, labs, offices, equipment, even employees' salaries for seven

years: Scripps got it all for free, putting in no money of its own. The

company will eventually repay Florida up to USD155 million, half of the

state's investment. But the payback provision will not kick in until

2011. Bush and other Florida officials hope that Scripps will make

Florida a biotech hub – like San Diego.

 

The wisdom of using San Diego as a model is open to question, given the

industry's record of failure there. But Bush seems blind to the risks.

" It's always good to have sceptics, but I like to be on the dreaming

side, " he told the press. " It's a lot more fun on the dreaming side of

the road. "

 

Yet biotech, as the Associated Press has reported, " remains a

money-losing, niche industry firmly rooted in three small regions of the

country: 'This notion that you lure biotech to your community to save its

economy is laughable,' said Joseph Cortright, a Portland, Ore. economist

who co-wrote a report on the subject. 'This is a bad-idea virus that has

swept through governors, mayors and economic development officials.' "

(Biotech investment busy going nowhere)

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4134

 

Another damaging effect of the bad-idea virus taking hold can be seen

in item 1. Florida Department of Environmental Protection scientists

have been warned that they would face " the harshest possible discipline "

for hampering efforts to build Scripps.

 

And firings and relocations of scientists who have spoken out is just

what has been happening of late as science has been subverted by

development pressures.

 

Lisa Interlandi, an attorney for the Environmental & Land Use Law

Center which represents groups opposed to the designated site for

Scripps,

is clear about where the pressure is principally coming from: " There was

an atmosphere created, from the state, from the governor's office, that

this project had to be approved at all costs. "

------

1.Some South Florida scientists claim they were fired for being

outspoken

By Neil Santaniello

Staff writer

South Florida Sun-Sentinel

June 19, 2005

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/southflorida/sfl-pscience19jun19,0,485361\

4,print.story?coll=sfla-news-sfla

 

Andy Eller said he was just doing his U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

job -- protecting the endangered Florida panther from development -- when

he was fired in 2004 for finding fault with the science his employer

used to approve home and road construction through panther territory in

southwest Florida.

 

Marine biologist David Boyd said the Florida Park Service reassigned

him to an office 170 miles away after he pointed out environmental flaws

in a plan to widen an 18-mile stretch of U.S. 1 into the Florida Keys.

 

Florida Department of Environmental Protection scientist Herb Zebuth

said supervisors tried to make him see the Scripps Florida biotechnology

park project their way after he voiced concern about its potential

impact on water storage at a public meeting.

 

The day after his February 2004 remarks appeared in the press, Zebuth

said he was pulled into a phone call with then-DEP Secretary David

Struhs for " a pep talk ... on how great Scripps was. "

 

Previously, Zebuth said, DEP workers were warned they would face " the

harshest possible discipline " for hampering efforts to build Scripps,

" which, of course, is being fired. "

 

Ideally, science goes about the business of finding answers to

questions unpolluted by politics or ideology. Conclusions get handed

off to the

policy makers, who factor the findings into their decisions or perhaps

reject them. But in South Florida, the cases of Eller, Boyd, Zebuth and

other federal and state environmental agency scientists demonstrate

that political science can get in the way of real science, environmental

activists and other critics charge. During the past six years, a series

of instances of scientists openly criticizing or exposing the flaws in

environmental protection and restoration has brought a range of

retaliatory actions -- from reprimands to firings.

 

" I can say that I've seen a trend, " said Frank Jackalone, the Sierra

Club's senior regional representative for Florida. " I have heard

anecdotally from my fellow policy advocates that the word in the

scientific

community is: Don't rock the boat. "

 

Officials with the state agencies and the water management district

have said that they don't try to control what scientists can do or

say, or

retaliate with pink slips for open differences of opinion with

management. They have attributed the dismissals and demotions to work

performance problems.

 

A wildlife service official said the agency strives to upgrade its

scientific output and address deficiencies. The Department of

Environmental

Protection said it has an open-door policy allowing staff freedom to

question agency directives.

 

" The amount of great science being brought forward is overwhelming, "

said Ernie Barnett, DEP director of ecosystem projects.

 

The water district's former executive director, Henry Dean, said

earlier this year: " I would never try to suppress scientific debate. "

 

But South Florida Water Management District scientists Lou Toth and

Nick Aumen said they learned first hand that open criticism can be an

occupational hazard for government scientists in South Florida.

 

Toth, who helped turn the Kissimmee River from an engineering slash

into a meandering waterway again, was a " chief environmentalist

scientist, " the district's upper echelon of scientific talent, along

with its

2001 Employee of the Year.

 

But when he told the South Florida Sun-Sentinel that momentum to fix

the river had slowed, he was demoted in 2003, removed from the project

and given a $6,593 pay cut. To explain that action, district officials

branded Toth a maverick employer too openly critical of co-workers.

 

Aumen got into trouble in 2000 after complaining government managers

were too inaccessible -- glued to cell phones and stuck in meetings -- to

communicate well with their scientists. After his remarks appeared in

The Miami Herald, Aumen was fired from his $96,977-a-year research

director job, despite past positive reviews of his performance.

Supervisors

explained the move in part by accusing Aumen of being too " cynical " and

too inept at managing people.

 

Aumen rebounded with an aquatic ecologist job for Everglades National

Park and now sits on a key committee for the federal government watching

over the water district's Everglades water-filtering work.

 

Joe Schweigart, a consultant and former water district deputy executive

director, said he recalls an open atmosphere and healthy respect for

differences of scientific opinion at the district into 1990s.

 

Today " that atmosphere seems to be throttled, " said Schweigart, who

once oversaw the water district's Everglades cleanup project.

 

Just one or two scientists getting into trouble for speaking out can

have a stifling effect on honest scientific commentary, said Samuel

Poole, a lawyer and former water district executive director.

 

" It doesn't take too many incidents ... for people to learn that if

they have something to say that the administration doesn't want to hear,

they should keep it to themselves, " Poole said. Charges of controlled

science are not unique to South Florida, others note.

 

" I think in general scientists who work for the government are preyed

upon by political pressures, " said Audubon of Florida Senior Vice

President, Charles Lee. But, he said, " any time you have the stakes as

high

as they are in South Florida, you are going to have greater pressures. "

 

One monumental pressure is development -- builder plans to spread more

and more gated communities and golf courses over green spaces where

certain flora and fauna already are dwindling or reduced to a rarity. Put

both forces together, " and it becomes a kind of recipe for manipulating

science so development can move forward, " said Jeff Ruch, executive

director of the watchdog group Public Employees for Environmental

Responsibility (PEER).

 

When Bruce Boler came to Southwest Florida five years ago to protect

water quality on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency he

said developers, " were so used to just getting everything

rubber-stamped. "

 

But Boler said his aggressive enforcement of the federal Clean Water

Act angered some federal environmental regulators too. He resigned his

EPA post in October 2003 after his employer decided to accept a

developer-funded study that concluded natural wetlands can release more

pollution than they soak up. Boler now works for Everglades National Park.

 

The wetland study was a stretch " to give builders credit for improving

water quality by replacing natural wetlands with golf course and other

development, " Ruch's group, PEER, charged.

 

Eller's case, too, is one of science subverted amid development

pressure, PEER has argued. Wildlife service officials said Eller was

fired for

missing work deadlines and for other performance problems. Eller said

he was shown the door for being a whistle- blower.

 

Eller filed a complaint under Federal Data Quality Act about the

information the wildlife service used reviewing panther habitat

destruction

by builders.

 

In agency documents " They told me to insert information I knew was

falsely portraying healthier [panther] populations, " Eller said. " They

were

slanting biological opinions. "

 

After conducting an internal review, the wildlife service admitted in

March that it had disseminated errors and discredited science with its

panther data, understating the animal's actual habitat, and said it

would correct the problems.

 

" I feel validated, " Eller said.

 

" We recognized there were some flaws, " said Jay Slack, field supervisor

for the wildlife service ecological services office in Vero Beach. But

he added there was nothing nefarious to it. Others in the agency had

brought the problem to light too, and corrections did not change in a

major way earlier panther conclusions, Slack said. He said his agency

is a

" catalyst " for upgrading and improving the science it uses.

 

The former Florida Keys biologist, Boyd, said he was to relocate to

Hobe Sound from a Key Largo office that was shut down. Boyd said both

occurred after he criticized a federal permit allowing a wider U.S. 1

into

Florida Keys.

 

In written comments, Boyd said it wove in outdated information and

ignored a major report warning of an already-strained Keys ecology. That

did not go over well with the upper level management of the DEP, which

oversees his agency, Boyd said he later learned.

 

" Our bosses were unhappy [with the criticism], but I'm sure it came

from above them, " said Boyd. He left the park service of his own accord

and, so as not to uproot his family, took a job with the Monroe County

Health Department.

 

DEP officials say Boyd was relocated to fill vacancies at the other

office, not in retaliation. " We're losing a lot of people to retirement,

we're having to move a lot of people around, " DEP Secretary Colleen

Castille said earlier this year.

 

Asked about Zebuth's allegation the DEP would not tolerate anti-Scripps

comments, Castille said: " I think Herb misunderstood his conversation

with managers. "

 

But Zebuth said he is crystal clear on what he heard.

 

" There was an atmosphere created, from the state, from the governor's

office, that this project had to be approved at all costs, " said Lisa

Interlandi, an attorney for the Environmental & Land Use Law Center

representing environmental groups opposed the Mecca Farms site for

Scripps.

 

DEP's chief since February 2004, Castille said scientists can speak

honestly at her agency when they want to question or challenge policies.

" Scientists in the agency feel very comfortable and come to me if they

feel we're going down the wrong path, " Castille said.

 

DEP employees tell it differently, said Jerry Phillips, Florida

director for PEER. " They're scared to talk to their supervisors

candidly on

projects, much less go to the district director, " Phillips said.

 

Water district officials have said they don't suppress what scientists

can say or report. But critics say the agency behaves in a way that

shows some intolerance for negative feedback on its Everglades work.

 

Last January, water district employees slated to participate in a

National Academies of Science forum on the Everglades in Hollywood were

told not to go, shortly after their bosses became ticked off by an

academies report on the agency's water-storage and land acquisition work.

Other attendees branded what happened as a " boycott, " but district

officials denied that. They said their experts scheduled to present

information

had more pressing business to tend to then. The water district noted

that it had at least participated in the meeting on paper because it

forwarded technical reports in lieu of people.

 

" It was not a good use of our staff time, " said Chip Merriam, district

deputy executive director, at the time.

 

Neil Santaniello can be reached at nsantaniello or

561-243-6625.

South Florida Sun-Sentinel

------

2.Florida aims to regain momentum on Scripps, biotech

By Stacey Singer

Palm Beach Post, June 09, 2005

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/business/content/state/epaper/2005/06/09/s3b_SCRIPP\

S_0609.html

 

Enterprise Florida, the state's economic development arm, announced

Wednesday that it had retained the nonprofit Milken Institute to

develop a

strategic plan for building the state's life-sciences industries.

 

Bush, calling himself the state's top economic development official,

said he would be personally involved in the marketing effort. Bush plans

to shake hands in Florida's booth at the upcoming Bio2005 biotechnology

industry conference in Philadelphia. He said he'll do whatever he can

to " close the deal " when life-science companies express interest in

relocating to Florida

 

" This is really important, so governors need to be involved with this, "

Bush said in remarks to reporters recorded by his staff after his

closed meeting in West Palm Beach this week. " When people ask me... to be

part of the team that closes the deal, I'm going to be there. "

 

Bush met with about 20 hand-picked economic development and education

officials in West Palm Beach Tuesday, asking pointed questions about how

agencies work together when a company shows interest in moving to

Florida, attendees said. Bush asked the Business Development Board of

Palm

Beach County whether its relationship with county commissioners had

improved since the rancorous early days of the Scripps project. They

assured him it had

 

The BDB had secured Mecca Farms and the adjacent Vavrus Ranch as a home

for a 4,000-acre biotech village around Scripps in October 2003. After

the county took on the Mecca property, the BDB transferred its contract

to buy part of the Vavrus ranch to a spin-off it had created. That

spin-off stands to reap a $51 million windfall, after selling development

rights to a partnership of the Lennar-Centex home builders

 

Many in the county still believe that windfall belongs to the public.

Environmentalists believe the land should not be developed at all, but

restored as a watershed to supply the wild and scenic north fork of the

Loxahatchee River

 

While lawsuits over the dispute wind their way through federal and

state courts, marketers are trying to return the focus to the original

vision for Scripps' expansion to Florida & mdash; high-wage, high-skill

jobs

that can diversify the economy and produce new treatments and cures for

diseases.

 

" Our competitor states were holding us up to a certain amount of

ridicule, saying, 'Look, Florida had this announcement, and now

inertia has

taken over,' " said Darrell Kelley, who heads Enterprise Florida. " Now

we can prove to the rest of the world that Florida is serious about

life-sciences development

 

Kelley said he has a six-point plan for what needs to happen next

 

*Market Florida as a biotech/life-science center by " ensuring the rest

of the world understands the importance of the Scripps decision to put

its eastern location in Palm Beach County

*Sell the concept within the state, by ensuring " everyone understands

and becomes an advocate of the evolution of the life sciences in Florida

*Attract venture capital to the state to finance the growth of new

companies.

* Improve the science infrastructure, especially the amount of wet-lab

space, by encouraging private-sector investment

*Help develop a workforce that has the education and training to step

into the new biotechnology jobs

*Strategically market and develop the land set aside to develop a

biotechnology industry

*Kelley said the discussion will continue on June 29, when the county's

BDB convenes a much larger " Bioscience Stakeholders' Meeting " on these

topics, at the West Palm Beach Marriott

* " What we are doing is regaining the momentum, " Kelley said. " Now there

is a whole new level of energy. Now we want to capture the moment. "

 

 

 

----------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...