Guest guest Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:07:57 -0700 Progress Report: When Sugar Isn't Sweet " American Progress Action Fund " <progress The Progress Report by Judd Legum, Faiz Shakir, Nico Pitney, Mipe Okunseinde and Christy Harvey www.progressreport.org 6/14/2005 For news and updates throughout the day, check out our blog at ThinkProgress.org. CAFTA When Sugar Isn't Sweet With congressional passage of the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) uncertain at best, President Bush faces a " major embarrassment " as another one of his top priorities heads toward failure. So Bush is pulling out all the stops. " High-profile officials, " lobbyists and corporate executives have descended upon Capitol Hill. The head of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has threatened, " If you [lawmakers] are going to vote against it, it's going to cost you. " And President Bush has resorted to " trying to deflect attention from the economic shortcomings ... by arguing that its rejection would be a foreign policy setback " and transparent last ditch efforts to sweeten the pot for lawmakers. It did not have to be this way. CAFTA does not fail because it is a trade agreement but rather because it fails to be smart trade policy. Since World War II, presidents have seen success on major trade deals because they have " tried to pursue a bipartisan " policy. On the other hand, CAFTA represents another missed opportunity, where President Bush has chosen ideology over consensus. THE NEW HAVEN, CT, FREE TRADE AGREEMENT: President Bush hails the fact that CAFTA " would open up a market of 44 million consumers for our farmers and small business people. " But the combined economies of the six other CAFTA nations " only equal that of New Haven, Conn. " and " account for barely one percent of U.S. trade. " U.S. exporters " would pay lower tariffs, but the prospects for significantly expanding the volume of exports beyond current levels are speculative to many. " Though lobbyists in the agriculture industry tout a big increase in exports, " they judge the size of the CAFTA 6 economies according to their ability to buy goods that are locally produced and thus locally priced. These figures say absolutely nothing about the ability of these countries to afford U.S.-made products, which will be much more expensive. " By the time CAFTA is fully implemented, the U.S. International Trade Commission estimates the policy would provide additional benefits to the U.S. economy worth only " $166 million each year. " BUSH TRADES AMERICAN JOBS...: Though the " number of [American] workers likely to be directly affected by CAFTA is small, " these are real people with real families. Unfortunately, " the Bush administration's fiscal irresponsibility with tax cuts and unnecessary spending priorities has crippled our ability to help workers retrain and compete on the international stage. " Most notable amongst these failures is the state of the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program, one of the primary safety nets in place for displaced workers. The Bush administration " has tightened the eligibility requirements for TAA, denying many workers even the modest resources available under that program, " and " pursued policies that leave many workers who qualify for TAA benefits without access to this program. " From education to small businesses to research and development, President Bush continues to " [undercut] the domestic investments necessary for a broad national consensus on trade. " ....AND CENTRAL AMERICAN HUMAN DIGNITY...: Wary of the CAFTA agreement, Central American bishops and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops joined in stating, " The moral measure of any trade agreement should be how it affects the lives and dignity of poor families and vulnerable workers. " More than just a human rights issue, labor standards are " crucial to ensuring that developing nations fully and effectively participate in the global economy. " President Bush claims that CAFTA " would bring ... higher labor standards for [Central American] workers. " In fact, the agreement " would actually weaken the existing workers' protections currently available ... [in] the region. " Furthermore, though none of the Central American countries are " in compliance with basic International Labor Organization standards, " CAFTA sets no new labor standards. Instead, its only enforceable labor provision requires participating nations to police themselves, even though they have " a poor record. " ....FOR MORE CORPORATE PROFITS: Though President Bush did not take the time to look out for workers from the United States or Central America, the usual players will be doing just fine under CAFTA. The pharmaceutical and telecommunications industries would be " some of the biggest winners if the pact is approved. " With public health an issue of concern, there is reason for worry over CAFTA. The Bush administration's insistence that CAFTA contain various protective provisions for the drug industry " could increase the cost of much-needed drugs in the region. " The Costa Rican pharmaceutical industry estimates that the cost of medicines will increase by 800 percent " under CAFTA intellectual property provisions. " One would think " workers' rights would enjoy the same guaranteed protections as CAFTA provides to prescription drug companies. Environmental and food safety laws deserve the same legal standing that CAFTA extends to CDs and Hollywood films. " IRAQ The American Public Is on the March While President Bush continues to offer a rosy vision of Iraq that ignores the reality on the ground, the American public is indicating that it wants real answers to the degenerating situation in Iraq. Polls show that no matter how you ask the question, the public is dissatisfied with the Bush policy. Instead of responding to concerns by offering more details about an exit strategy, Bush continues to grandstand with simple phrases like " Freedom is on the march. " AS CASUALTIES MOUNT, STILL NO STRATEGY FOR SUCCESS: As of yesterday, at least 943 people, including U.S. forces, had died since Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari announced his government six weeks ago. Daily attacks in Iraq kill scores of people, but do not attract the media attention they once did. Today, already Iraqi police say at least 23 people were killed and 58 others wounded in two separate insurgent attacks. Yesterday, the U.S. death toll pushed past 1,700, and still the Bush administration is unwilling to give details on an exit strategy. The public unease over Iraq is best reflected in the changing position of Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC), who coined the phrase " freedom fries " but now says he will introduce legislation this week calling for a phased withdrawal of U.S. troops. Congress previously rejected an effort by some lawmakers to force the administration to come forward with a detailed exit strategy. The White House has rejected the growing chorus of voices seeking more answers by falling back on its usual response: " We will leave when we complete the mission. " PUBLIC GROWING UNEASY WITH BUSH'S UNWILLINGNESS TO CHANGE COURSE: A new Gallup poll shows that nearly 60 percent of Americans favor some sort of withdrawal of troops, with half who take this position wanting complete withdrawal and the other half seeking a phased withdrawal. A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll showed a majority of Americans -- 52 percent -- believe the war in Iraq has not contributed to the long-term security of the United States. And an AP-Ipsos poll finds that 56 percent of Americans disapprove of Bush's handling of Iraq. Together, these numbers have also served to undermine President Bush's effectiveness, leaving his job approval ratings at their lowest levels ever. Yet instead of changing course and offering the American public some hope that a new approach will be taken to resolve the conflict, Bush continues to whitewash the problem with repetitive assurances that " Democracy is on the march. Freedom is on the march. " INSURGENCY FUELING A NEW GENERATION OF FIGHTERS: The Bush administration is finding it hard to answer even the simplest questions about Iraq. White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan said yesterday, " In terms of assessments [of how things are going in Iraq], I think that's best left to the coalition forces to give you assessments of what the latest is on the ground. " According to military officials on the ground, foreign fighters are increasingly fueling the Iraqi insurgency. The flow of foreign fighters onto the battlefields of Iraq is a continuing fallout of the Bush administration's insistence on going into Iraq with too few forces and no post-conflict plan, thus leaving the borders porous. As a result, the military believes these foreign fighters are developing into " new extremist " who plan to spread the terrorist tactics they have acquired across the globe. BUSH ADMINISTRATION HAS FEW ANSWERS FOR DEALING WITH THE INSURGENCY: Despite President Bush's public statements that the enemy " cannot be deterred by negotiations, " the U.S. forces in Iraq have so few answers as to how to deal with the insurgency that they have recently been forced to engage in talks with the insurgents. In an indication that the choices we're facing in Iraq are between bad and worse, the administration is even considering " difficult-to-swallow " ideas such as granting amnesty for some Iraqi insurgents. The recent moves demonstrate that Bush's slogans do not constitute a policy, and it will take more than military action to resolve the Iraq conflict. CONSTITUTIONAL DRAFTING PROCESS TURNING INTO LONG-FEARED SECTARIAN CONFLICTS: The 55 legislative members selected by the Iraqi people just four months ago are encountering great difficulties in resolving the framework of the Iraqi Constitution. The foremost problem facing the Iraqis is how best to include the Sunni Arab population in the constitutional drafting process. Currently, Sunni Arabs hold only two of the 55 seats on the committee, a problem which precipitated a phone call from President Bush to President Jalal Talabani yesterday. The intelligence community has repeatedly warned of the problem of sectarian conflicts, yet the Bush administration failed to change course. To resolve the issue, the U.S. has finally sought to assemble a true international coalition that includes our European allies. According to a senior administration official, " Having the French, the Germans, the Russians and the United States sitting together and underscoring a common vision for Iraq will be a significant event, even at this point. " Under the Radar RACE -- SENATORS FAILED TO CONDEMN LYNCHING: The Senate yesterday issued a rare formal apology (its first of any kind to African Americans), expressing regret " for having rejected decades of pleas to make lynching a federal crime. " Could there possibly be a less controversial resolution? Surprisingly, the answer is yes. Several senators waited until the last minute to add their names to the resolution, when they knew it was scheduled for a vote. And outrageously, at least six senators refused to co-sponsor the resolution, including Sens. Richard Shelby (R-AL), Thad Cochran (R-MI), Trent Lott (R-MI), Lamar Alexander (R-TN), John Cornyn (R-TX), and Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX). GLOBAL WARMING -- EXXON IN DENIAL: The Wall Street Journal reports, " Openly and unapologetically, the world's No. 1 oil company disputes the notion that fossil fuels are the main cause of global warming. Along with the Bush administration, Exxon opposes the Kyoto accord and the very idea of capping global-warming emissions. " While companies like BP and Royal Dutch Shell are starting to embrace alternative energy sources, Exxon " publicly predicts that solar and wind energy will continue to provide less than 1% of the world's energy supply in 2025. " President Bush trumpets hydrogen power as the long-term solution to our energy problems. But Exxon " puts its research dollars into extracting hydrogen from petroleum, not from water. " FOREIGN POLICY -- BUSH BLOCKS DEMAND FOR PROBE INTO UZBEK MASSACRES: One month ago, White House ally and Uzbek dictator Islam Karimov ordered his military to massacre hundreds of his own citizens in " probably the worst atrocity conducted by a government against protesters since Tiananmen Square. " President Bush stayed silent about the killings for weeks, then called only for an international investigation into the massacres. But now, it seems, he doesn't even want that. The Washington Post reports that U.S. defense officials have " helped block a new demand for an international probe " from NATO into the killings. ECONOMY -- AMERICA'S NEW GILDED AGE WORRIES GREENSPAN: The gap between the richest and poorest Americans has been growing for decades -- today, while the wealthiest 20 percent of Americans took in 50 percent of the country's income, the bottom fifth's share has dropped to just 3.5 percent. Questioned about this growing divide last week, even Federal Reserve chief Alan Greenspan admitted it poses a serious danger. " As I've often said, this is not the type of thing which a democratic society -- a capitalist democratic society -- can really accept without addressing, " Greenspan said. INTEL -- RIGHT LEADS EFFORT TO THWART 9/11 COMMISSION REFORMS: " The new national intelligence director, John D. Negroponte, is not yet heeding a top recommendation of the Sept. 11 Commission to tear down barriers that divided U.S. spy agencies, " according to a former commission member quoted by the Los Angeles Times. Moreover, congressional conservatives led by House Armed Services Chairman Duncan Hunter (R-CA) are also trying " to limit Negroponte's ability to move intelligence personnel between agencies, pressing for legislation that would have given relevant committee chairmen like himself the power to block such moves. " GOOD NEWS In a win for community and independent media, the Supreme Court " let stand an appeals court ruling that limits the number of television stations, radio stations and newspapers a media company can own in a single market. " DON'T MISS TALKING POINTS: DR-CAFTA Agreement Badly Flawed; Smart Trade Policy Needed. HUMAN RIGHTS: What Pakistan is focused on instead of Osama bin Laden. MEDIA: USA Today takes a trip down Downing Street. CONSERVATIVES: How the other half lives. DAILY GRILL " We have put the enemy on the run, and now they spend their days avoiding capture, because they know America's Armed Services are on their trail. " -- President Bush, 5/27/05 VERSUS " You better run, you better do what you can Don't wanna see no blood, don't be a macho man You wanna be tough, better do what you can So beat it, but you wanna be bad " -- Pop Singer Michael Jackson, " Beat It " DAILY OUTRAGE With a plate of chicken as a prop, Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) made the argument that Americans can know that Guantanamo detainees are being treated well by simply looking at the menu of their meals. © Copyright 2005 by American Progress Action Fund. All rights reserved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.