French and Dutch Patriots Rout the New World Order

[Guest guest]

http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=6285

 

Thursday 2nd June 2005 (18h09) :

French and Dutch Patriots Rout the New World Order

 

By Michael James in Frankfurt, Germany - June 1, 2005

 

On May 29, 2005, under a blazing sun, a raggle-taggle army of French

patriots, nationalists, libertarians, conservatives, socialists and

communists joined together as one in an unprecedented strategic

alliance and mounted a stunning, crippling attack on the New World

Order in the heart of Europe.

 

Just three days later, fired by the courage of their French cousins to

the south, the Dutch people rallied to the standard and put to flight

whatever remained of the European elites' parasitic army of

self-absorbed, Lucifer-worshipping propagandists; treading underfoot

all 252 pages of 'The Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe',

a veritable Devil's Charter for the final subjugation and control of

an already heavily regulated people.

 

Within the space of less than a week, the beast-men who arrogantly run

the Europe Union out of a sense of natural entitlement and

intellectual superiority, licking their chops at the prospect of

Europe's first real head of state with potent executive powers and a

triumphant expansionary agenda, have fallen from their over-world

abode of studied indifference and invulnerability into a pit of

unfathomable despair.

 

In the thirty-three months it took to write and then rewrite the new

constitution in a frantic bluster of secret negotiations and

self-congratulatory banquets, and at a cost to taxpaying munchkins of

untold millions of euros, nothing could have prepared them for this

dark hour. For these pampered viceroys of a revived Roman empire who

take upon themselves the title of 'Excellency' work to a timetable set

by a higher master - a master who jealously stalks the corridors of

power, from Whitehall to Washington, Beijing to Moscow, looking to

devour those who serve less than flawlessly and without an eye on the

clock. It's five minutes to twelve, and the ticking has rudely

stopped. The master is furious.

 

This wasn't meant to happen. The propaganda has always worked in the

past. The entire left-right spectrum of the French political and

Catholic establishment, backed by a nimble phalanx of pseudo experts

and geriatric SWAT teams of white-haired university professors with

impressive titles, joined with both 'respectable society' and the

drug-addled icons of popular Parisian culture to remind all good

citizens through the whoring mainstream media and their legion of

multiple-orifice presstitutes that it was their duty to say " Oui " . But

the sons and daughters of French liberty, seething with an indignant

rage shared by millions of Europeans denied the right to vote,

confronted the globalist beast and yelled " Non! "

 

The political tsunami was felt from the west coast of Ireland to the

east coast of Greece. " Non! The Earthquake, " proclaimed the headline

on the front page of La Tribune, while the globalist newspaper

Libération attacked the rebellious French, describing the result as

representing " a general disaster and an epidemic of populism, which is

sweeping everything in its path " . The May 30 edition of the Europhile

British daily, The Guardian, went further and claimed boldly:

" Yesterday was nothing less than the beginning of the second French

revolution. "

 

The mainstream German press, constrained as it is by a general

prohibition on all talk of alternatives to the European Union, could

only speculate on what might have happened had the German people been

allowed to vote. " The fears that surfaced during the debate in France

are not foreign to us, " said Henrik Uterwedde, Deputy Director of the

German-French Institute in Ludwigsburg. If Germans had been granted a

referendum, he continued, " the discussion would have gone exactly the

same way " .

 

" The French voted for us, " was a common refrain on the streets of

Frankfurt. The German parliament, traditionally fearful of allowing

ordinary citizens to vote in referenda, in much the same way it fears

any objective discussion about the lies contained within the pages of

Germany's official 'history' books, treasonously ratified the treaty

with a comfortable majority on Friday, May 27, following a series of

quisling pro-EU speeches reminiscent of East Germany's subservience to

the Soviet Union.

 

This audacious betrayal of the German people took place against a

backdrop in which the mainstream media made no mention of the planned

NATO and US neoconservative takeover of the German armed forces, an

agenda concealed in cleverly worded provisions in Articles 1-14 and

1-16 of the treaty. Indeed, mindful of the wrath of the City of London

and its insidious international banking operations, already

responsible for instigating and financing two world wars to break the

spirit of the German people, the federal media shut down all

discussion of the constitution's implications for other independent

European armies.

 

As neatly summarised by journalist and peace campaigner Israel Shamir,

the French saved their fellow Europeans from a fate worse than death

by killing a document that would forever bind sovereign national

armies to NATO, placing them under the control of neo-fascist

Washington and its Satanic, Zionist puppet masters in London.

 

" The proposed constitution was about to subordinate the European Armed

Forces to the NATO, meaning to the US command, " wrote Israel Shamir in

the May 30 edition of TheTruthSeeker.co.uk. " But for [the] wisdom of

the French voters, in the next US invasion, Europeans would be forced

to serve in the invading force, whether it is Iran or Russia that the

Neo-cons will decide to subdue. "

 

Wrong-footed, winded and fumbling, the flabby, grey-faced politicians

and lawyers are out in force: explaining, soothing, prevaricating.

It's spin time again. Like a host of Armani-suited Jabba the Hutts,

sliming their way from one government-controlled mainstream media

outlet to the next, Europe's political degenerates are putting the

shine on a humiliating defeat with words carefully chosen lest they

unwittingly acknowledge the power that ordinary people still possess.

Britain's best-known murderer, Tony Blair: " Time for reflection " .

Germany's outgoing Chancellor, Gerhard Schroeder: " Regrettable " .

France's Traitor-in-Chief himself, Jacques Chirac: " I take note " .

 

The elites are busy scribbling the notes of which Chirac spoke.

Legally, the treaty requires ratification in all 25 European Union

member states, yet angry Bilderbergers such as Jose Manuel Barroso,

the current head of the European Commission, are already hissing that

either dissenting nations would be 'invited' to vote again until they

get it 'right', or that something may miraculously emerge from the

small print previously overlooked, which would allow for a more

liberal interpretation of the rules. " We cannot say that the treaty is

dead, " Barroso warned ominously.

 

But the Dutch disagree. As I write, millions of them are kicking the

corpse of this odious treaty; and should there be yet one twitch

remaining in the body of its articles, the British and the Danes will

finish the job.

 

For American readers unacquainted with life on the European continent,

understand that this is nothing less than the start of a full-blooded

political insurrection that cuts right across the artificial political

divide. While the wheels have come off the European project, leaving

the vehicle stuck in a constitutional ditch, opponents of the

globalist agenda are now poised for what should be an aggressive and

determined attack on the very engine of expansion and integration.

 

For both Americans and Europeans, the enemy is the same. It employs

trauma-based economic terrorism under the banner of 'free markets' to

demolish the nation state and our God-given rights to liberty and

self-determination. It works through price-gouging, tax largesse for

corporations that destroy free-enterprise, the wholesale destruction

of the middle classes by encouraging the export of quality jobs abroad

and the import of cheap labour to displace what few options are left.

It is dedicated to the creation of artificial conflicts and trivial

distractions to keep people divided and drugged, and it maintains the

constant drumbeat of militarism that nuances the dance of death in

which the United Nations and the United States are willing partners

who fake being out of step.

 

The world has long since surrendered its hope that fearless Americans

will rise up by force of arms and reclaim their birthright, retaking

their great country from the freedom and wealth-destroying Zionist

cabal in Washington. While their children die for Israel and oil in a

war to depopulate a broken Arab nation that did them no harm, most

Americans are lost in a bizarre fantasy world of asinine government

propaganda, junk entertainment and effeminate shopping malls.

 

But though, for now, the issue is a diabolical treaty settled without

a whiff of gun-smoke at the ballot box, the French have raised the

standard of resistance against a wounded but unrepentant New World

Order, and the battle lines are drawn. Europe's parasitic elites in

London, Brussels and Strasbourg will neither forgive nor forget; and

in the months and years to come, they will not go down without drawing

blood. So mark this day and mark it well, for Europe stands before the

fire.

 

At long last, the fight-back has begun.

Michael James is a British freelance journalist and translator,

resident in Germany for almost 13 years. Permission to republish his

work in any media is freely granted.

 

Last updated 02/06/2005

 

by : Michael James

Thursday 2nd June 2005

[Guest guest]

Hello,

 

when not important changes can be achieved the NO was for nothing.

 

The people of France and Holland and all over Europe should organize

themselves discuss and define points they don't want and look for or

develop alternate concepts they agree to.I think it is important to

exclude politicans in this process, Particularly the democrats love

to jump on every resistance movement to make it their own or destroy

it.

 

Randolf

 

 

, " califpacific "

<califpacific> wrote:

> http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=6285

>

> Thursday 2nd June 2005 (18h09) :

> French and Dutch Patriots Rout the New World Order

>

> By Michael James in Frankfurt, Germany - June 1, 2005

>

> On May 29, 2005, under a blazing sun, a raggle-taggle army of French

> patriots, nationalists, libertarians, conservatives, socialists and

> communists joined together as one in an unprecedented strategic

> alliance and mounted a stunning, crippling attack on the New World

> Order in the heart of Europe.

>

> Just three days later, fired by the courage of their French cousins

to

> the south, the Dutch people rallied to the standard and put to

flight

> whatever remained of the European elites' parasitic army of

> self-absorbed, Lucifer-worshipping propagandists; treading underfoot

> all 252 pages of 'The Treaty Establishing a Constitution for

Europe',

> a veritable Devil's Charter for the final subjugation and control of

> an already heavily regulated people.

>

> Within the space of less than a week, the beast-men who arrogantly

run

> the Europe Union out of a sense of natural entitlement and

> intellectual superiority, licking their chops at the prospect of

> Europe's first real head of state with potent executive powers and a

> triumphant expansionary agenda, have fallen from their over-world

> abode of studied indifference and invulnerability into a pit of

> unfathomable despair.

>

> In the thirty-three months it took to write and then rewrite the new

> constitution in a frantic bluster of secret negotiations and

> self-congratulatory banquets, and at a cost to taxpaying munchkins

of

> untold millions of euros, nothing could have prepared them for this

> dark hour. For these pampered viceroys of a revived Roman empire who

> take upon themselves the title of 'Excellency' work to a timetable

set

> by a higher master - a master who jealously stalks the corridors of

> power, from Whitehall to Washington, Beijing to Moscow, looking to

> devour those who serve less than flawlessly and without an eye on

the

> clock. It's five minutes to twelve, and the ticking has rudely

> stopped. The master is furious.

>

> This wasn't meant to happen. The propaganda has always worked in the

> past. The entire left-right spectrum of the French political and

> Catholic establishment, backed by a nimble phalanx of pseudo experts

> and geriatric SWAT teams of white-haired university professors with

> impressive titles, joined with both 'respectable society' and the

> drug-addled icons of popular Parisian culture to remind all good

> citizens through the whoring mainstream media and their legion of

> multiple-orifice presstitutes that it was their duty to say " Oui " .

But

> the sons and daughters of French liberty, seething with an indignant

> rage shared by millions of Europeans denied the right to vote,

> confronted the globalist beast and yelled " Non! "

>

> The political tsunami was felt from the west coast of Ireland to the

> east coast of Greece. " Non! The Earthquake, " proclaimed the headline

> on the front page of La Tribune, while the globalist newspaper

> Lib¡¦ation attacked the rebellious French, describing the result as

> representing " a general disaster and an epidemic of populism, which

is

> sweeping everything in its path " . The May 30 edition of the

Europhile

> British daily, The Guardian, went further and claimed boldly:

> " Yesterday was nothing less than the beginning of the second French

> revolution. "

>

> The mainstream German press, constrained as it is by a general

> prohibition on all talk of alternatives to the European Union, could

> only speculate on what might have happened had the German people

been

> allowed to vote. " The fears that surfaced during the debate in

France

> are not foreign to us, " said Henrik Uterwedde, Deputy Director of

the

> German-French Institute in Ludwigsburg. If Germans had been granted

a

> referendum, he continued, " the discussion would have gone exactly

the

> same way " .

>

> " The French voted for us, " was a common refrain on the streets of

> Frankfurt. The German parliament, traditionally fearful of allowing

> ordinary citizens to vote in referenda, in much the same way it

fears

> any objective discussion about the lies contained within the pages

of

> Germany's official 'history' books, treasonously ratified the treaty

> with a comfortable majority on Friday, May 27, following a series of

> quisling pro-EU speeches reminiscent of East Germany's subservience

to

> the Soviet Union.

>

> This audacious betrayal of the German people took place against a

> backdrop in which the mainstream media made no mention of the

planned

> NATO and US neoconservative takeover of the German armed forces, an

> agenda concealed in cleverly worded provisions in Articles 1-14 and

> 1-16 of the treaty. Indeed, mindful of the wrath of the City of

London

> and its insidious international banking operations, already

> responsible for instigating and financing two world wars to break

the

> spirit of the German people, the federal media shut down all

> discussion of the constitution's implications for other independent

> European armies.

>

> As neatly summarised by journalist and peace campaigner Israel

Shamir,

> the French saved their fellow Europeans from a fate worse than death

> by killing a document that would forever bind sovereign national

> armies to NATO, placing them under the control of neo-fascist

> Washington and its Satanic, Zionist puppet masters in London.

>

> " The proposed constitution was about to subordinate the European

Armed

> Forces to the NATO, meaning to the US command, " wrote Israel Shamir

in

> the May 30 edition of TheTruthSeeker.co.uk. " But for [the] wisdom of

> the French voters, in the next US invasion, Europeans would be

forced

> to serve in the invading force, whether it is Iran or Russia that

the

> Neo-cons will decide to subdue. "

>

> Wrong-footed, winded and fumbling, the flabby, grey-faced

politicians

> and lawyers are out in force: explaining, soothing, prevaricating.

> It's spin time again. Like a host of Armani-suited Jabba the Hutts,

> sliming their way from one government-controlled mainstream media

> outlet to the next, Europe's political degenerates are putting the

> shine on a humiliating defeat with words carefully chosen lest they

> unwittingly acknowledge the power that ordinary people still

possess.

> Britain's best-known murderer, Tony Blair: " Time for reflection " .

> Germany's outgoing Chancellor, Gerhard Schroeder: " Regrettable " .

> France's Traitor-in-Chief himself, Jacques Chirac: " I take note " .

>

> The elites are busy scribbling the notes of which Chirac spoke.

> Legally, the treaty requires ratification in all 25 European Union

> member states, yet angry Bilderbergers such as Jose Manuel Barroso,

> the current head of the European Commission, are already hissing

that

> either dissenting nations would be 'invited' to vote again until

they

> get it 'right', or that something may miraculously emerge from the

> small print previously overlooked, which would allow for a more

> liberal interpretation of the rules. " We cannot say that the treaty

is

> dead, " Barroso warned ominously.

>

> But the Dutch disagree. As I write, millions of them are kicking the

> corpse of this odious treaty; and should there be yet one twitch

> remaining in the body of its articles, the British and the Danes

will

> finish the job.

>

> For American readers unacquainted with life on the European

continent,

> understand that this is nothing less than the start of a full-

blooded

> political insurrection that cuts right across the artificial

political

> divide. While the wheels have come off the European project, leaving

> the vehicle stuck in a constitutional ditch, opponents of the

> globalist agenda are now poised for what should be an aggressive and

> determined attack on the very engine of expansion and integration.

>

> For both Americans and Europeans, the enemy is the same. It employs

> trauma-based economic terrorism under the banner of 'free markets'

to

> demolish the nation state and our God-given rights to liberty and

> self-determination. It works through price-gouging, tax largesse for

> corporations that destroy free-enterprise, the wholesale destruction

> of the middle classes by encouraging the export of quality jobs

abroad

> and the import of cheap labour to displace what few options are

left.

> It is dedicated to the creation of artificial conflicts and trivial

> distractions to keep people divided and drugged, and it maintains

the

> constant drumbeat of militarism that nuances the dance of death in

> which the United Nations and the United States are willing partners

> who fake being out of step.

>

> The world has long since surrendered its hope that fearless

Americans

> will rise up by force of arms and reclaim their birthright, retaking

> their great country from the freedom and wealth-destroying Zionist

> cabal in Washington. While their children die for Israel and oil in

a

> war to depopulate a broken Arab nation that did them no harm, most

> Americans are lost in a bizarre fantasy world of asinine government

> propaganda, junk entertainment and effeminate shopping malls.

>

> But though, for now, the issue is a diabolical treaty settled

without

> a whiff of gun-smoke at the ballot box, the French have raised the

> standard of resistance against a wounded but unrepentant New World

> Order, and the battle lines are drawn. Europe's parasitic elites in

> London, Brussels and Strasbourg will neither forgive nor forget; and

> in the months and years to come, they will not go down without

drawing

> blood. So mark this day and mark it well, for Europe stands before

the

> fire.

>

> At long last, the fight-back has begun.

> Michael James is a British freelance journalist and translator,

> resident in Germany for almost 13 years. Permission to republish his

> work in any media is freely granted.

>

> Last updated 02/06/2005

>

> by : Michael James

> Thursday 2nd June 2005