Guest guest Posted May 23, 2005 Report Share Posted May 23, 2005 " HSI - Jenny Thompson " <HSIResearch HSI e-Alert - Red Threads Mon, 23 May 2005 12:48:31 -0400 HSI e-Alert - Red Threads Health Sciences Institute e-Alert **************************************************** May 23, 2005 Dear Reader, Morocco, India, Spain, Iran, Azerbaijan, Italy, Turkey, Greece... These exotic locales have one thing in common: The cultivation of saffron, a spice that's exceedingly difficult to harvest. Saffron is produced from fragile, dark red filaments that must be hand picked from tiny Crocus sativus flowers that bloom for less than four weeks each year. The harvest is painstaking; more than 4,600 flowers net only one ounce of saffron threads. No wonder the threads sell for $200 per ounce. So, what does the price of saffron have to do with health? Plenty, as it turns out. In fact, new research shows that saffron just might be an effective antidepressant. ----------- Mild to moderate ----------- Most people know saffron as a spice common to Mediterranean, Eastern and Middle-Eastern recipes. In addition to adding a unique flavor to foods, saffron has also been used for many centuries as a medical treatment for a variety of health conditions, including inflammation, digestive problems, kidney stones, menstrual disorders, colds, insomnia, asthma and depression. The last item on that list was the focus of a recent saffron study conducted by researchers at the Tehran University of Medical Services in Iran. Forty patients who were diagnosed with mild to moderate depression were recruited to receive either 30 mg of saffron per day or 20 mg of Prozac per day. No placebo was used. After measuring depressive symptoms throughout the six-week trial period, both saffron and Prozac were found to be equally effective in relieving depression. The authors note that the promising results justify funding for larger saffron studies of longer duration that would include placebo groups. Neither saffron nor Prozac caused adverse side effects, but that result would almost certainly be different in a longer trial. Saffron is considered a generally safe botanical, but should not be taken by women who are pregnant. ----------- Big guns & botanicals ----------- Because saffron is expensive, using it daily to address depression may not be practical. It may also be hard to find high quality saffron in supplement form. From what I've read, saffron powder is not recommended because it's often produced with fillers, synthetic materials or rejected dry saffron stems. As with any botanical product, a doctor or an experienced herbalist should be consulted before taking saffron. Still, this new study is intriguing for two reasons: 1) It suggests that we may have another item to add to the list of natural treatments for depression (others include St. John's wort, omega 3 fatty acids, B vitamins and magnesium), and 2) Once again a best selling depression drug has performed no better than a botanical. In the e-Alert " Two Heads Are No Better Than One " (4/23/02), I told you about a Duke University study that compared St. John's wort to Zoloft in treating severe depression. The result: Neither St. John's wort nor Zoloft were more effective overall than placebo in treating severe forms of depression. St. John's wort is generally used to treat mild to moderate depression - not severe depression. Zoloft, however, is frequently prescribed to treat severe depression, but in an eight-week trial, this blockbuster drug with sales of more than $2 billion per year was found to be no more effective than placebo. ----------- Saffron's future ----------- In spite of the high price of saffron supplements, this botanical is one to watch. Animal research has indicated that saffron may inhibit cancer formation and shrink existing tumors while enhancing the effectiveness of chemotherapy. And other studies have shown that the anti-inflammatory properties of saffron may help prevent atherosclerosis. I'll be keeping an eye out for further research of this exotic botanical. **************************************************** ....and another thing They say it's much worse than they thought it would be. But is it really so bad? According to a recent survey, Americans just don't measure up when it comes to these four key health goals recommended by doctors: * Exercise regularly * Maintain proper body weight * Eat five or more servings of vegetables and fruits each day * Don't smoke And according to a Reuters report, the Michigan State University researchers who conducted the survey were surprised to find that only three percent of Americans follow all four of these health guidelines. Doesn't sound so good, does it? Only three percent. And this was no timid little phone survey; it involved about 153,000 subjects who participated in a U.S. government trial in 2000. But let's look at how subjects answered when asked which of those guidelines they followed individually: * Exercise regularly: 22 percent * Maintain proper body weight: 40 percent * Five servings daily of fruits and vegetables: 23 percent * Don't smoke: 76 percent Now it doesn't look so bad. Arguably, smoking is the item on the list that creates the greatest health risk. And only one in four smoke? That's excellent. And the percentage of non-smokers has been growing in recent years - obviously a very good trend. The other three categories could use improving, but more than one in five exercise regularly, and nearly one in four gets the recommended minimum of fruits and vegetables each day. I thought both of those categories would score lower. Michigan State researcher Matthew Reeves told Reuters that we need to do more " societally and in terms of government " in creating an environment where it's easier to follow the Big Four guidelines. Do more " societally " ? Is he suggesting that healthy people put more pressure on friends and loved ones? That sounds like the perfect way to become the relative everyone tries to avoid at Thanksgiving dinner. Or does he want to see public service advertising on TV with " Get Healthy! " messages? Are you stifling a yawn? Me too. And government intervention? Please. Let's go to Exhibit A: The new USDA Food Guide Pyramid. Case closed. I certainly hope that Mr. Reeves isn't suggesting something more intimidating; especially " in terms of government. " Because you can't make people be healthy. A lot of people simply don't want to lead a healthy lifestyle. And that's their right. I once worked with someone whose father had emphysema and needed to receive oxygen from a tank. One evening he accidentally set his oxygen tube and himself on fire while lighting a cigarette. And even THAT didn't convince him to quit smoking! Someone like that is probably not inclined to eat right and exercise daily, no matter how many times they hear it's good for them. So let's not fret too much over the fact that only three percent do all the right things. Those people are really no different from the emphysema patient who refuses to stop smoking. They're all just doing what they're most inclined to do. To Your Good Health, Jenny Thompson Health Sciences Institute **************************************************** Sources: Hydro-Alcoholic Extract of Crocus Sativus L. Versus Fluoxetine in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Depression: A Double-Blind, Randomized Pilot Trial " Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Vol. 97, No. 2, 2/28/05, sciencedirect.com " A Spicy Treatment for Depression " Kimberly Beauchamp, N.D., Healthnotes Newswire, 4/21/05, pccnaturalmarkets.com " Few Americans Follow Health Advice, Report Says " Reuters, 4/26/05, reuters.com ***************** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.