Guest guest Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 Mon, 16 May 2005 08:09:54 -0700 Progress Report: From the New Deal to the Raw Deal " American Progress Action Fund " <progress The Progress Report by Christy Harvey and Judd Legum with Nico Pitney and Mipe Okunseinde www.progressreport.org 4/22/2005 For news and updates throughout the day, check out our new blog at ThinkProgress.org. ECONOMY From the New Deal to the Raw Deal Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal promised Americans " cradle-to-grave security. " Today, President Bush and big corporations are set to unravel that promise, replacing it with a Raw Deal. Under the guise of the " Ownership Society, " President Bush is helping companies foist costs and risk onto American workers. This weekend, the Washington Post reported the retirement safety net is coming unraveled and, for many American workers, making ends meet in retirement is going to be a lot tougher. Economists and financial planners have long compared retirement security to a three-legged stool comprised of Social Security, employee pensions and personal savings. Today, thanks to President Bush and his corporate cronies, all three legs are in jeopardy. LEG ONE – SOCIAL SECURITY: The first leg of retirement security is Social Security. President Bush's new plan to privatize Social Security will mean a benefits cut for many Americans. (No wonder so many Americans are against his plan.) Under the Bush plan, millions of American workers will see their Social Security checks shrink dramatically. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, under Bush's plan, by 2055, Social Security benefits for medium earners " would drop 66 percent, or two thirds, compared to the current benefit structure. " Instead of seeing $1,844 a month, someone making $36,600 a year would receive a mere $626. The cut is even higher for middle-class Americans making a little more: under the Bush plan, workers making $59,000 today will see their Social Security benefits slashed by 87 percent in 2055. That means instead of a monthly Social Security check of $2,441, their benefit would be just over $300. (Here are more details on how the president's plan will hit American workers.) LEG TWO – PENSIONS: The second leg of the retirement stool – pension plans – is also being sawed off. Traditional pension plans offered workers guaranteed security in their retirement. As Newsweek points out, they offered " an income you can't outlive—a critical point as lives grow long. " But according to the Christian Science Monitor, " The nation's private pension system is fraying and at risk of unraveling altogether. " Today only 20 percent of Americans have a traditional, defined-benefit plan; that's down " 50 percent from just 20 years ago. " And more and more companies are defaulting on their pension plans. (For an example of how this works, just look at the United Airlines fiasco.) Of those plans, " more than 75 percent are underfunded. " When a plan fails – which 192 did last year alone – it's dumped on the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp, the government insurer that's supposed to guarantee workers some benefits if their company goes under. The PBGC today is facing a deficit of nearly $30 billion. (American Progress's Christian Weller has some ideas of ways to fix the pension crisis.) LEG THREE – PERSONAL SAVINGS: The third leg of retirement security is personal savings. Americans' personal savings rate was below 1 percent this year. (Compare that to the 12.3 percent personal savings rate of 1950.) Much of the money Americans make today goes toward breaking even. People are making less – the American workforce took an across-the-board pay cut this year when the growth in wages trailed inflation for the first time in 14 years. The value of the minimum wage is down; unemployment is up; and more Americans have fallen into poverty. (For a look at the state of America under President Bush, check out the Center for American Progress's Quarterly Taxpayer Report.) HEALTH CARE: The squeeze will be particularly intense for employees who have to spend more precious retirement dollars on their health benefits. In 1988, 66 percent of companies with more than 200 employees offered health benefits to retired employees; according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, last year that plummeted to only 36 percent. Employers have cut 5 million workers from their insured rolls from 2001 alone. And those remaining are stuck with higher bills, as businesses are passing along expenses by " nearly doubling the amount that employees must kick in for a typical family plan to $222 a month. " JUDICIARY The Political Grandstanding Continues Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) has spent months threatening to detonate the nuclear option, a reckless move that would destroy the centuries old tradition of the Senate filibuster. Late last week, Frist finally declared that the time is nigh: " Upon completion of action on the pending highway bill, the Senate will begin debate on fair up or down votes on judicial nominations. " As expected, Frist will be leading with two of the most radical nominees: Priscilla Owen and Janice Rogers Brown. Frist would lead the American people to believe that he sought out " an appropriate resolution " before being forced to invoke a move that " no White House and no party in control of the Senate has ever, ever resorted to … in order to achieve its goal. " For additional information, check out our Nuclear Option Resource Guide. REWRITING THE CONSTITUTION: In his most recent statement regarding the nuclear option, Frist again attempted to rewrite the Constitution to his own advantage; once again, he claimed a " Constitutional responsibility … to advise and consent with fair, up or down votes. " In fact, the responsibility stipulated by the Constitution is simply to " advise and consent " with absolutely no language – and thus no mention of " up or down votes " – on how the Senate is supposed to exercise this duty. Frist knows this to be a fact. Last week on the Senate floor, Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) asked Frist the simple question: " Does the Constitution accord to each nominee an up-or-down vote on the Senate floor? " Frist had no choice but to admit: " No, the language is not there. " (Here are John Podesta and Mark Agrast's ideas on how the Senate can reclaim its duty to advise.) THE UP OR DOWN VOTES THAT FRIST WON'T ALLOW: Last week, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) " offered to help confirm some of President Bush's blocked judicial nominees from Michigan in an attempt to stave off [the nuclear option] showdown. " More than just a show of good faith, the offer demonstrated a commitment to moving forward with Senate business rather than continuing to be stymied by political wrangling. Frist not only rejected the offer to get those judges confirmed but called the proposal " a sham. " Reid, and the rest of America, was forced to ask: " Do you want to confirm judges or do you want to pick a fight? " THE NOMINEES THAT AREN'T COMING: Frist and his fellow Senate conservatives are not the only ones talking one game but playing another. In full support of the nuclear option, the White House bemoans the vacancies on the benches; but, thus far President Bush has refused to help move business forward by sending forth reasonable nominees to be confirmed. As continually pointed out by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the year is " one-third complete and the president has sent only one new nominee. 29 other vacancies sit without nominees. " The White House continues to shout from the political grandstands while judicial benches sit empty. Under the Radar STATE WATCH – MISSOURI'S PLAN TO KICK 100K PEOPLE OFF MEDICAID: Missouri Governor Matt Blunt ® is trying to balance the state budget on the backs of the poor and the disabled. At Blunt's request, the legislature sent him a budget that " will eliminate Medicaid coverage for almost 100,000 low-income parents, people with disabilities and elderly people who receive benefits. " Perversely, " those most affected will be women who are leaving welfare for work in low-wage jobs and children in the foster care system. " For instance, " a single mother with three children would loose coverage if she made more than $300 a month. " ENVIRO – SCHWARZENEGGER'S ENVIRONMENTAL COLONIALISM: In the Rocky Mountain West " energy companies have proposed more than two dozen power plants...that would be fueled by coal -- a high-polluting fossil fuel that...is a major contributor to global warming. " Now, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger " pledged support for a proposed 1,300-mile electricity transmission line " that would allow power from polluting plants located in Wyoming, Utah and Nevada to flow into California. Joe Desmond, the governor's energy advisor claims that all the plants will be built " will be high-tech plants that get to the goal of near-zero emissions. " But the San Francisco Chronicle reports that " [o]f 31 coal-based proposals now in various stages of permitting processes, none currently plans on using the advanced technology Desmond mentioned. " CRIME – DEATH PENALTY DATA FLAWED: The AP reports " while state law requires the collection of data about Ohio's capital punishment system, the records are incomplete and often wrong. " The flawed data " makes analysis of that system difficult, countering a goal of lawmakers who hoped to use the data to make the system as fair as possible. " Data that was tagged as related to death penalty decisions included " more than 600 of those were not for death penalty cases. " Meanwhile " at least 18 capital indictments were not reported to the court. " CORPORATE POWER – GREENSPAN DEFENDS SARBANES-OXLEY: Sarbanes-Oxley, the law that was passed to ensure ethical corporate conduct in the wake of Enron and other scandals, is under attack. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce says the law damages " the long-term competitiveness of U.S. companies and the U.S. capital markets and....create burdens on these companies and their management well beyond...what is needed to remedy acknowledged abuses. " Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan disagrees. Speaking yesterday at the University of Pennsylvania Greenspan said the law " importantly reinforced the principle that ... corporate managers should be working on behalf of shareholders to allocate business resources to their optimum use. " JUDICIARY – ROVE GUIDED RADICAL JUDGE'S CAREER: Several " crucial moments " in the judicial career of Texas Supreme Court Justice Priscilla Owen have been " guided by the hand " of Karl Rove, the New York Times reports. Indeed, thanks in large part to Rove, the once-unknown " serial activist " Texas judge is today one of the seven nominees at the heart of the Senate's battle over the nuclear option. According to the Times, Rove helped launch Owen's career, selecting her as a candidate in the course of his 1990s campaign to turn the Texas Supreme Court into the " business-friendly…stronghold it is today. " Rove then offered her the services of his consulting firm, and raised nearly $1 million for her campaign. Later, Rove would overrule then-White House counsel Alberto Gonzales in choosing Owen as one of President Bush's very first appeals court candidates. GOOD NEWS Wal-Mart will apologize for " a recent newspaper advertisement that equated a proposed Arizona zoning ordinance with Nazi book-burning, " calling the original funding decision a " 'terrible' mistake. " DON'T MISS IRAQ: " How the 'tough guys' made America weak " HEALTH: What does Iraq terrorist al-Zarqawi have to do with STDs? ENVIRO: How the EU is doing the job the EPA won't MEDIA: PBS legend Bill Moyers puts on his boxing gloves DAILY GRILL " [A]n all-Democratic congressional delegation would have little political influence if President Bush is elected to a second term … [then-Senate Minority Leader Tom] Daschle's role as leader of Bush's opposition would be a 'terrible liability' during a round of base closures. " – Case being made by Jim Thune (R-SD) as to why he could do a better job than Daschle in protecting Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota, 10/27/04 VERSUS " Ellsworth in South Dakota on military base closure list " – Headline, 5/16/05 DAILY OUTRAGE The Saudi company SABIC, leading maker of the potentially cancer-causing gasoline additive MTBE, spent over a million dollars lobbying Congress to limit its liability for damages caused by the chemical. The House of Representatives delivered. © Copyright 2005 by American Progress Action Fund. All rights reserved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.