Guest guest Posted April 27, 2005 Report Share Posted April 27, 2005 Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:21:17 -0700 Progress Report: Tweedledee, Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber " American Progress Action Fund " <progress http://www.americanprogressaction.org The Progress Report by Christy Harvey, Judd Legum and Jonathan Baskin with Nico Pitney and Mipe Okunseinde April 26, 2005 SOCIAL SECURITY Tweedledee, Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber MEDIA The Privatization of PBS UNDER THE RADAR Go Beyond The Headlines ThinkProgress.orgFor news and updates throughout the day, check out our blog at ThinkProgress.org. SOCIAL SECURITY Tweedledee, Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber Speaking in South Carolina earlier this month, President Bush described the " urgent need for the United States Congress to work with the administration to get something done now " on Social Security. Today, the Senate Finance Committee holds its first hearing on Social Security reform and the White House can't be bothered to show up. After months of self-congratulations for " taking on the issue, " the administration won't send anyone to the Senate to take questions on the president's proposals. Instead, they will rely on surrogates to present their own plans for Social Security privatization. Here's a preview of what you'll hear: POZEN – MASSIVE BENEFIT CUTS FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS: Businessman Robert Pozen, who will testify today before the committee, has a Social Security privatization plan that includes " progressive price indexing. " Current Social Security benefits are calculated based on the growth in wages, a system called " wage indexing. " Some people propose linking Social Security benefits to the growth in prices (price indexing), which would mean big benefit cuts because prices rise much more slowly. Pozen's " progressive price indexing " maintains wage indexing for low-income workers, switching to price indexing for high-income workers and using a hybrid of the two for the middle class. Although it sounds attractive, the impact of progressive price indexing on the middle class would be devastating. Under Pozen's plan, the average wage earner who retires in 2075 would see a 28 percent benefit cut. A significant portion of the savings created by benefit cuts is squandered by diverting 2 percent of Social Security payroll taxes into private accounts. President Bush has called Pozen's proposal " interesting. " FERRARA – PIE IN THE SKY: Peter Ferrara, a senior fellow at the Institute for Policy Innovation, proposes allowing huge transfers from payroll taxes into private accounts – far larger than even the president is suggesting. (The president proposes allowing 4 percent of payroll taxes to be diverted; Ferrara proposes 10 percent of the first $10,000 in income to be diverted and 5 percent of all other income.) Under the Ferrara plan " personal accounts would be backed up by a safety net providing a Federal guarantee that workers with personal accounts would receive at least as much as promised by Social Security under current law. " Sound too good to be true? It is. Ferrara " pays " for his proposal by transferring $68 trillion over the next 75 years from general revenues to the Social Security system, more than twice the predicted Social Security shortfall. Since the government is already running a deficit in excess of $400 billion a year, all of this money would have to be borrowed. Chuck Blahous, assistant to the president for economic policy, has commented favorably on the Ferrara proposal. TANNER – DISMANTLING SOCIAL SECURITY: Michael Tanner of the Cato Institute will present his plan to effectively dismantle Social Security. The Tanner proposal would fully privatize the retirement component of Social Security. Individuals will be able to divert all 6.2 percent of their payroll taxes into private accounts. (They would receive a bond equal to the amount they have contributed to the existing system.) Technically, workers could choose to remain in the traditional system, " accepting a level of benefits payable with the current level of revenue. " Since there would be little or no revenue going into the traditional system, this would mean draconian benefit cuts. If someone invests in private accounts and his or her investments tank, there is no safety net. Don't take it from us, take it from Peter Ferrara: " Cato wants to get rid of the entire Social Security system. " BUSH APPROVAL ON SOCIAL SECURITY SINKS TO 31 PERCENT: Why is President Bush letting these guys take up the mantle of Social Security reform? He hasn't been the most effective spokesman. After months on the road talking up his Social Security proposals just 31 percent of Americans approve of how he is handling the issue. Bush is so desperate he has recruited Tom DeLay to help him sell his Social Security plan. Today, DeLay is scheduled to participate in a Social Security event with President Bush in Galveston, Texas, and then will fly back to D.C. with Bush on Air Force One. For the latest news and commentary, check out American Progress's Social Security page. MEDIA The Privatization of PBS According to people within the Public Broadcasting Service, the supposedly politically independent PBS " is being forced to toe a more conservative line in its programming " by its oversight agency, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which is being stacked with right-wing appointees. Over the past few years, President Bush has attempted to flood the CPB board with partisan political operatives. The result, according to a senior FCC official, is that today CPB " is engaged in a systematic effort not just to sanitize the truth, but to impose a right-wing agenda on PBS. It's almost like a right-wing coup. It appears to be orchestrated. " STACKED BOARD: Created in the 1960s, CPB was purposefully designed as an independent body in order to provide a buffer between the independent public broadcast networks and the partisan government. In fact, Congress funds CPB two years in advance to " shield it from momentary bursts of partisan anger " and keep PBS safe from the muck of daily politics. That was then. Now, the chairman of the CPB board is Kenneth Tomlinson, a close friend of uber-strategist Karl Rove and an individual who has contributed thousands to Republicans over the past decade. President Bush also nominated Gay Hart Gaines and Cheryl Halpern, individuals who have given more than $816,000 to conservative causes over the past 14 years, to the CPB Board of Directors. Interestingly enough, Gaines was a key fundraiser for Newt Gingrich back when the House speaker campaigned to " zero out " CPB funding and privatize PBS. A CORPORATION IN HIS OWN IMAGE: In recent months, at least three senior CPB officials – all of whom had left-leaning associations – have departed or been dismissed, making the effects of the stacked deck even more apparent. Last week, CPB's board decided not to renew the contract of its chief executive, Kathleen Cox, choosing instead to replace her with Kenneth Ferree. Before becoming the chief executive of CPB, Ferree was at the Federal Communications Commission, where he " played a significant role in the failed effort to loosen rules " for giant media conglomerates to consolidate their empires. (It was backlash from the American public that defeated his efforts.) Now Ferree is at CPB, but not because of his love for public broadcasting. In an interview with the New York Times Magazine, Ferree admitted to not watching much PBS, not even its flagship show, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, which he called " slow. " In Ferree's own words, " I don't always want to sit down and read Shakespeare, and Lehrer is akin to Shakespeare. Sometimes I really just want a People magazine. " THE LYNN CHENEY SHOW: In addition to stacking the board of CPB, the administration hired Michael Pack, a producer with close ties to the Bush administration. How close? In 2002, Pack greeted outgoing PBS President Pat Mitchell at Vice President Cheney's house with an " inappropriate " proposal for a children's series featuring the vice president's wife, Lynn Cheney. DESPERATELY SEEKING CENSORSHIP: The Public Broadcasting Act prohibits CPB from interfering with public TV's programming, but someone may need to remind its Board of Directors. During her confirmation hearings, new board member Cheryl Halpern advocated a policy of " aggressive " censorship and suggested CPB should be allowed to penalize and " remove physically " broadcasts it decides are unbalanced. In fact, media watchdog groups accused the Bush administration of using a " litmus test " to select board members; the White House reportedly sunk the candidacy of a nominee who stated CPB should intervene in programming only in " extraordinary circumstances. " And now the current board is starting to do the job for which it was apparently hired, tightening its grasp over programming content. Earlier this year, for the first time in its history, the CPB insisted on tying any new PBS funding to " an agreement that would commit the network to strict 'objectivity and balance' " in its programs. But its supposed quest for " objectivity and balance " is decidedly subjective. On its website, the CPB claims it'll listen to the opinions of public officials and keep them under wraps: " These opinions may be expressed in … private conversations with CPB board members and other officials. " TILTING AT " LIBERAL " WINDMILLS: CPB's own research shows that there is already " objectivity and balance " within PBS. According to two different national polls and a series of focus group sessions, the American public thinks there is no real bias in PBS. The group Fairness and Accurate Reporting claims CPB has it wrong – public broadcasting isn't designed to balance a right/left tilt: " If anything, PBS (and public broadcasting in general) is theoretically designed to balance the voices that dominate the commercial media. " The national media watchdog group continues on to point out, " As the 1967 Public Broadcasting Act proposed, public broadcasting should have 'instructional, educational and cultural purposes' and should address 'the needs of unserved and underserved audiences, particularly children and minorities.' " Under the Radar JUDICIARY – AMERICANS OPPOSE GOING NUCLEAR: A Washington Post–ABC News poll reveals Americans oppose the nuclear option by a 2-to-1 margin. Senate Majority Leader Bill First (R-TN) has indicated he will try to change Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster on judicial nominees, but even many conservatives " were reluctant to abandon current Senate confirmation procedures: Nearly half opposed any rule changes, joining eight in 10 Democrats and seven in 10 political independents, the poll found. " UNITED NATIONS – BOLTON PUSHED EXAGGERATED SYRIA INTEL: It seems that Iraq was not the only country where the Bush administration sought to inflate the weapons threat by forcing intelligence to conform to its opinion or policy views. According to former intelligence officials, then-Undersecretary of State John Bolton " clashed repeatedly with American intelligence officials in 2002 and 2003 as he sought to deliver warnings about Syrian efforts to acquire unconventional weapons. " The fight over the intelligence was due to Bolton trying to push through intelligence claims, publicly and in Congressional testimony, that the Central Intelligence Agency and other experts had already " rejected as exaggerated. " Though Bolton eventually kowtowed to the truth, his colleagues found " the prolonged and heated disputes over Mr. Bolton's proposed remarks " to be " unusual within government. " One former senior official went so far as to call it part of " a pattern in which Mr. Bolton sought to push his public assertions beyond the views endorsed by intelligence agencies. " The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is reviewing these recent assertions as well as another " previously unknown episode. " HOMELAND SECURITY – 9/11 COMMISSION CONTINUES TO BE IGNORED: At the very beginning, the Bush administration flatly opposed establishing the 9/11 Commission and then undercut the Commission every step of the way. It is no surprise then that " many of the 9/11 Commission's far-reaching recommendations to protect the U.S. against terrorist attacks … are foundering as special interests have intervened, congressional enthusiasm has waned, and other priorities preoccupy the White House. " After the Commission released its final report in August, its ten members were " determined to avoid the fate of other Washington blue-ribbon panel whose proposals were ignored " and established an independent organization to that end. Unfortunately, with a few notable exceptions, " the proposals are falling prey to a resistance by bureaucracies to give up power or money, and a lack of consistent pressure from the White House and Republican congressional leaders. " Some of the ideas yet to be implemented include " the call to free up more radio frequencies for use by fire, police and other emergency responders, " overhauling congressional oversight of intelligence and homeland security, allocating homeland security funds based on risk and terrorist threat, not pork barrel politics, and the creation of " a single, consolidated and reliable 'watch list.' " BUDGET – CASH SHIFTS AWAY FROM GANG PREVENTION: President Bush's budget proposal for 2006 contains $50 million in funding for Helping America's Youth, Laura Bush's new project to " help organizations keep young people out of gangs. " Unfortunately, that pales in comparison to the $4.2 billion the president proposes cutting " from youth and crime-prevention programs with similar aims. " Overall, USA Today reports, Bush proposes cutting federal funding for youth and crime-prevention programs by 5 percent, including many programs integral to crime prevention nationwide. Included in the cuts are a $34.7 million Elementary and Secondary School Counseling program, and an effective grant program for extra counselors in high-risk schools, as well as a 40 percent cut in federal juvenile crime prevention funds. Recently, Laura Bush visited a Boys & Girls club in Philadelphia and said Boys & Girls Clubs are " a great example of a community-based center that engages young people through positive youth development. " Under her husband's budget proposal, the clubs overall would lose 19 percent of $80 million in federal funds. IRAQ – INSURGENTS MOUNT NEW WAVE OF ATTACKS: According to U.S. defense officials, Iraqi insurgents are showing " improved coordination and greater tactical sophistication in a new surge of attacks. " A sharp decline in violence followed national elections in January, but the new surge in violence " comes amid a stalemate over the formation of a new Iraqi government, which US officials worry is dissipating an opportunity opened by the January 30 elections to undercut Sunni support for the insurgency. " More than the number of attacks, officials say the coordination and sophistication of recent insurgent efforts are alarming. U.S. commanders continue to play down the attacks as " desperate acts by desperate individuals, " but the new phase of the insurgency " could set back US hopes for making significant reductions in its 142,000-strong force next year. " DON'T MISS CORPORATE: Ralph Reed on Microsoft payroll. ETHICS: DeLay hitches a ride on Air Force One. MEDIA: So-called liberal media misreports origin of the term " nuclear option. " DAILY GRILL " [T]here is a concern about demand and supply. And those issues have to be addressed not by jawboning, but by having a strategic plan for dealing with the problem. " – Condoleezza Rice, 4/25/05 VERSUS " The president of the United States must jawbone OPEC members to lower the price. " – President Bush, 2000 DAILY OUTRAGE According to newspaper reports, Bush judicial nominee Janice Rogers Brown said that " people of faith were embroiled in a 'war' against secular humanists who threatened to divorce America from its religious roots. " ARCHIVES Progress Report STUDENTS Calling all bloggers. Join the hottest place on the web for young progressives. Check Out Campus Progress Now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.