Franken Foods: RACISM, FRAUD & RETALIATION - CHAPELA ACCUSES UC BERKELEY

[Guest guest]

GMW: RACISM, FRAUD & RETALIATION - CHAPELA ACCUSES UC BERKELEY

" GM WATCH " <info

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:05:30 +0100

 

 

 

 

 

GM WATCH daily

http://www.gmwatch.org

------

EXCERPTS:

 

CHAPELA: " It was time to open my case up to the purview of the state of

California, the nation and the world. It is with happiness that I come

to the court... "

 

CHAPELA'S LAWYER: " The other requirement (for tenure) is a requirement

of political correctness — it is one that doesn't speak out against

private funding "

 

Chapela's outspoken criticism of Novartis " derailed a tenure case that

is as close to a sure thing on this campus. "

------

Professor Takes UC to Court, Citing Discrimination

Chapela Says His Origin, Criticism of UC Sparked Retaliation

http://www.dailycal.org/article.php?id=18390

 

[image caption: Associate professor Ignacio Chapela, shown here

protesting in December of last year, says UC has discriminated against

him in

denying him tenure.]

 

UC Berkeley associate professor Ignacio Chapela took his ongoing battle

for tenure to court yesterday, claiming his national origin and

criticism of a UC research contract drove UC to deny him tenure.

 

Chapela, an associate professor of microbial biology, was denied tenure

twice in 2003, after receiving nearly unanimous support from the first

two tenure committees. He lost his bid for tenure when it was rejected

by the third and final committee.

 

He has since gained immense support from his followers, who claim his

rejection was a response to his opposition to UC research contracts and

other controversial articles he published.

 

" It was time to open my case up to the purview of the state of

California, the nation and the world, " Chapela said in a press conference

Monday. " It is with happiness that I come to the court to do what the

university has not been able to do. "

 

In January, Chapela and the university reached a mutual agreement to

conduct a new tenure review process, said George Strait, assistant vice

chancellor of public affairs. The final review committee is set to make

its revised recommendation in two weeks, but Chapela went forward with

the suit because he faced an April 21 deadline for filing a

discrimination lawsuit.

 

Chancellor Robert Birgeneau has ultimate authority on granting tenure.

 

Because the committee will make its recommendation after this week's

filing deadline, the future of the lawsuit depends on the chancello''s

decision, said Chapela's attorney, Daniel Siegel.

 

In the lawsuit, Chapela argues that his criticism of genetically

modified organisms in a 2001 Nature magazine article made him a victim of

retaliation by the university. The magazine later rescinded its

support of

the article, saying that " the evidence available is not sufficient to

justify the original paper. " He has maintained that the magazine's

action was because of corporate pressures on the publication.

 

Chapela, originally from Mexico, also claims to be a victim of racial

discrimination during the tenure process.

 

Finally, he claims that the university committed fraud by not

disclosing significant information about the criteria required for

obtaining

tenure.

 

UC Berkeley officials could not comment on the specifics of Chapela's

case, but Strait said the tenure process has multiple steps so no one

individual has influence over the process.

 

" (UC Berkeley's) review process is designed among the most rigorous

processes in the entire United States, and it has to be because we have

the best faculty, " he said.

 

In 1998, Chapela's outspoken criticism of the university's $25 million

research agreement with a Swiss biotechnology corporation, Novartis,

drew national attention. At the time, Chapela said any such agreement

with a private interest like Novartis would prevent the university's

research mission of serving the public good.

 

Siegel said UC Berkeley claims tenure is determined on the basis of

teaching, research and commitment to the university through service, but

it fails to mention another factor.

 

" The other requirement (for tenure) is a requirement of political

correctness — it is one that doesn't speak out against private funding, "

Siegel said.

 

He added that Chapela's outspoken criticism of Novartis " derailed a

tenure case that is as close to a sure thing on this campus.

 

 

-------------