Guest guest Posted December 29, 2003 Report Share Posted December 29, 2003 All, Here is another quote from the recently published translation of the Dao De Jing that I mentioned the other day. It's by Roger Ames and David Hall. from p.56 of the hard cover edition: " If Wittgenstein is insightful in observing that the limits of our language are the limits of our world, then perhaps in order to understand the Chinese philosophical tradition, we are going to need more language. It will only be when students of Chinese philosophy are able to bring a sophisticated understanding of dao and tian to a reading of a Chinese text in the philosophically astute way that they understand terms such as kosmos, logos, and nous in their reading of the classical Greek corpus that they can really begin to take the Chinese world on its own terms. " If you substitute the word " medicine " for the word " philosophy " in the foregoing quote, the statements are no less true. And when you consider that medicine, particularly Chinese medicine, is the application of certain philosophical notions to the solution of matters that concern life and death, the compelling truth of these remarks only becomes more powerful. If you consider yourself a student of Chinese medicine, a teacher of Chinese medicine, a practitioner of Chinese medicine, or even a patient of Chinese medicine, then perhaps these comments can help bring the so-called language debate into clearer forcus. Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.