Guest guest Posted September 13, 2003 Report Share Posted September 13, 2003 Emmanuel Alon, Sometimes you shock me when you use precise anatomical language that would generally only be learned in Western medical school or in a graduate PhD program. " Potential space " indeed. Not the kind of thing learned at ACTCM ... are you channeling clinical professors at UCSF? Well stated. Emmanuel Segmen >>>>Emmanuel, for more shocking displays of advanced medical knowledge you should check out Alon's acu/orthopedics classes. They're in san francisco, which i believe is your nieghborhood. I've been doing the program and can vouch that he knows more than they teach at ACTCM. i guess not everybody needs to go to med school to learn medicine. Dean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2003 Report Share Posted October 5, 2003 The incidence of PDPH can range from 26-85+%, depending on the experience of the operator, and on the gauge and type of needle used. >>>This number must be from spinal taps not from epidural blocks. It that common after epidural blocks when done by a skilled dr alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2003 Report Share Posted October 5, 2003 Hi All, Herbalists! Can you recommend a highly effectgive and reeliable herbal remedy for Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH)? Gabrielle wrote > What is a blood patch? TCM? Western? Jason replied > … basically a blood patch is a procedure to stop [CSF] leakage. Alon added: > … you draw blood and inject it in the epidural space. This almost > always stops the leak immediately as well as the related headache. Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is very common after puncture (more often accidental) of the dura mater in spinal taps of epidural/spinal anaesthesia.It is attributed to CSF leakage and resulting intracranial hypotension. The incidence of PDPH can range from 26-85+%, depending on the experience of the operator, and on the gauge and type of needle used. Where possible, one should use 24-27 gauge needles, and pencil-point needles (Sprotte or Whitacre) rather than cutting needles (Atraucan or Quincke). These steps reduce the incidence of PDPH significantly. Epidural blood patch (EBP) has been used for >30 years to treat PDPH. Even today, it is used widely. It involves injection of 5-20 ml of the patient’s blood back into the epidural space. Flender et al (1994) conclude that prolonged PDPH/ post-spinal headache “should be treated by epidural blood patch. The use of >10 ml cannot be generally recommended, although in this case most of the blood patch of 15 ml was localized caudally. Careful monitoring for side effects is necessary with blood volumes >10 ml. If there is no immediate relief, conservative therapy with 24-48 h of bedrest is recommended. If the headache persists a second blood patch should be performed, with the volume and the probable caudal spreading of the first taken into account”. However, EBP is not without risk (Ezri et al 2002; Moral 2002) and alternatives are being sought. Garcia et al (2000) suggest that percutaneous injection of fibrin glue at the site of dural puncture seems promising for the prophylaxis of headache associated with CSF leakage, and may be an alternative to an epidural blood patch. Moral et al (2002) suggest i/v hydrocortisone; they had excellent results with it. Acupuncture (AP) seems to be a likely alternative to EBP. Lee JH & Lo J (1978, Minn Med. Jul;61(7):429-30) reported on AP in treatment of chronic pain and post-lumbar puncture headache. One year's experience.|PMID: 672868 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]. Unfortunately, I cannot get access to the abstract or full text. Can any of YOU summarise their results? Barrios-Alarcon et al (1989 Reg Anesth. Mar-Apr;14(2):78-80) reported that painkillers, AP and EBP all failed to help 56 adults with post-lumbar puncture headache (PLPH), whereas dextran injection gave 100% satisfactory results. An average of 20 ml dextran was injected epidurally over a period of 120 seconds with patients in the sitting or lateral decubitus position. All patients reported headache relief within 15 minutes to 24 hours. Follow-up at 6-12 months revealed no recurrence. Burning sensation at the injection site and dysesthesia at the time of injection were noted in 3.5% and 7.1% of patients, respectively. [PMID: 2484880 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]]. In marked contrast, Tsenov (An alternative method for treating headache after spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. 1996 Akush Ginekol (Sofiia).;35(4):6-7) reported 100% success with AP in 35 pregnant women with PDPH. AP was used 1-3 times at ST08, LI04, GB11,14, BL10, GV14,20. Headache passed in 30/35 women after 1 session, in 4/35 after 2 and in 1/35 after 3 sessions. PMID: 9254576 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Have any of you used AP, especially Tianying AP - needling the original puncture track – to treat PDPH? I have treated several horses w acute sciatica and severe lameness [not putting the limb to the ground] after some idiot had injected highly irritant Cu-EDTA into the rump muscles over the sciatic nerve. As part of the AP formula, I used dry-needling of the original needle-track with excellent and rapid results. AP should carry very low risk of adverse effects, and I have seen somewhere [? In the Abstracts section of the American J Acup] that Tianying AP was used successfully for that purpose. If any of you want Medline abstracts relating to conventional treatment of PDPH [EBP, hydrocortisone, etc], email me off-list and I can send them on. Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc Research Management, Sandymount Ave., Dublin 4, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2003 Report Share Posted October 6, 2003 Hi All, & Hi Alon, >> The incidence of PDPH can range from 26-85+%, depending on the experience of the operator, and on the gauge and type of needle used. Alon wrote: > This number must be from spinal taps not from epidural blocks. It > that common after epidural blocks when done by a skilled dr? Alon, you are correct. The DEFINITION of PDPH is headache after dural PUNCTURE; indeed the most common view of the aetiology is CSF leakage with cranial hypotension, and very rare pneumocephalus. My understanding is that in epidural injections/anaesthesia, one aims to inject OUTSIDE the dura, i.e. one does not aim to puncture the dura. Therefore there should be no leakage of CSF. Therefore, compared to a skilled doctor doing a spinal tap, a skilled doctor giving an epidural injection should not have the same rate of post-procedure headache. But mistakes happen ... Accidental puncture of the dura can happen even with epidurals. Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc Research Management, Sandymount Ave., Dublin 4, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2003 Report Share Posted October 6, 2003 My understanding is that in epidural injections/anaesthesia, one aims to inject OUTSIDE the dura, i.e. one does not aim to puncture the dura. >>>You inject just after you brake through the ligament. Remember the epidural at these levels is a potential space Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2003 Report Share Posted October 6, 2003 My understanding is that in epidural injections/anaesthesia, one aims to inject OUTSIDE the dura, i.e. one does not aim to puncture the dura. >>>You inject just after you brake through the ligament. Remember the epidural at these levels is a potential space Alon Alon, Sometimes you shock me when you use precise anatomical language that would generally only be learned in Western medical school or in a graduate PhD program. " Potential space " indeed. Not the kind of thing learned at ACTCM ... are you channeling clinical professors at UCSF? Well stated. Emmanuel Segmen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.