Guest guest Posted August 26, 2003 Report Share Posted August 26, 2003 > > 2 cents more: > Just to remark upon a previously mentioned thread .... I do not believe > pushing for a doctoral first degree for acupuncturists is the answer. There > are > many fine healers possessing master degrees. To force practitioners to be > OMD's > would be to discriminate against minority traditions (as TCM has rapidly > become the standard as opposed to 5E, Japanese, Korean to name a few), to > weed out > the economically challenged (even more so than present) and to basically > exclude many fine people from offering their healing talents. I say, make > the CM > doctorate available but make it sequential to a master degree. > There were many fine healers with diplomas before the master's too. To be truthful, our profession long ago should have started with a 1000 doctorate like every other doctorate profession did, increasing its education as was warranted. It is unfortunate that we chose to go after a vo-tech style process, probably because it is less expensive to begin with, and some states are more anal about doctorate programs. It didn't stop the DC's, ND's, MD's, or DO's. We came in late and are stuck with doing things more ethically, which the other folks were not required to do. As far as a doctorate interfering with variety of philosophy, I believe that the opposite is true. It is, howevere, a lot more difficult to brainwash a single format into someones head as being the end-all when a dcotoral level education expsoses them to all the field has, which is my hope. Too many graduates come out thinking they know a lot, but have been exposed to so little. Soem states will retainthe Master's as the entry level, and some states are already preparing for the DOM title entry level. It is part of the evolution. All this same dicsussion happened when the MAster's was introduced as the new entry level, but it made our people better. In 20 years the landscpae wil be different. DAvid Molony > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2003 Report Share Posted August 26, 2003 In a message dated 8/25/2003 9:20:51 PM Pacific Standard Time, acuman1 writes: > It is unfortunate that we chose to go after a vo-tech style process, > I hardly consider my education to be " vo-tech " ... seems a needlessly insulting analogy, really. Maya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2003 Report Share Posted August 27, 2003 it does not matter what you call iyt. basic graduation is more than adequate if the curricula & course work taught & conducted is of a high standard. the old diplomas were very good as the grounding was very good & knowledge base was very strong. today we seem to have lots of info but not much is looked at actual ability to use it by each practitioner. so the actual utility skills have been diluted & hence the need for more education & experience. anand --- acuman1 wrote: > > > > 2 cents more: > > Just to remark upon a previously mentioned thread > .... I do not believe > > pushing for a doctoral first degree for > acupuncturists is the answer. There > > are > > many fine healers possessing master degrees. To > force practitioners to be > > OMD's > > would be to discriminate against minority > traditions (as TCM has rapidly > > become the standard as opposed to 5E, Japanese, > Korean to name a few), to > > weed out > > the economically challenged (even more so than > present) and to basically > > exclude many fine people from offering their > healing talents. I say, make > > the CM > > doctorate available but make it sequential to a > master degree. > > > There were many fine healers with diplomas before > the master's too. To be > truthful, our profession long ago should have > started with a 1000 doctorate like > every other doctorate profession did, increasing its > education as was > warranted. It is unfortunate that we chose to go > after a vo-tech style process, > probably because it is less expensive to begin with, > and some states are more anal > about doctorate programs. It didn't stop the DC's, > ND's, MD's, or DO's. We came > in late and are stuck with doing things more > ethically, which the other folks > were not required to do. > As far as a doctorate interfering with variety of > philosophy, I believe that > the opposite is true. It is, howevere, a lot more > difficult to brainwash a > single format into someones head as being the > end-all when a dcotoral level > education expsoses them to all the field has, which > is my hope. Too many graduates > come out thinking they know a lot, but have been > exposed to so little. > Soem states will retainthe Master's as the entry > level, and some states are > already preparing for the DOM title entry level. It > is part of the evolution. > All this same dicsussion happened when the MAster's > was introduced as the new > entry level, but it made our people better. In 20 > years the landscpae wil be > different. > > DAvid Molony > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > ===== Anand Bapat Pain Management Specialist Sports Injury Specialist Blacktown, Parramatta, Punchbowl, & Hammondville 0402 472 897 ______________________ Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Messenger http://uk.messenger./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.