Guest guest Posted August 22, 2003 Report Share Posted August 22, 2003 Something went wrong with my email system. 3 copies of the same was not my intention. Sam. ga.bates [ga.bates] 22 August 2003 16:08 Chinese Medicine RE: Re:TCM Pracitioners teaching western doctors... I am sorry but I have to disagree with the writer below for a couple of reasons. 1st Reason: The " behaviour " on this list has not been " derisive, condescending " as she claims. It has in fact been pretty civilised from what I have read on some TCM lists. We need this kind of exchange since discussion is the life blood of an email list. 2nd Reason: Western medicine and the institutions and infrastructure which support it is HUGELY CORRUPT. There may be good docs out there as Marco in Guatemala reported, wish there were more, but there aren't. Just do a Google search on > Lupron scandal < to see what I mean. 3rd Reason: WM is HUGELY IGNORANT. It has at best 500 year old knowledge base built up from our colonial experience on the gun decks of ships, where barbers would clear away the dead and dying and make way for the next cannon volley. TCM has thousands of years of knowhow by comparison. Just today I was talking to a gentleman whose son has severe colitis and IBS. His NHS Consultant said the patient did not have to restrict his diet in any way. Can you believe that ? But it is true, and I know because I have personally had an identical experience from a NHS Consultant. These people do not heal, they simply preside over the patients deterioration and ultimate demise & at great expense too for they get paid a fortune for doing bugger all most of the time. Sammy. Lynn Detamore [healthworks] 22 August 2003 10:30 Chinese Medicine Re:TCM Pracitioners teaching western doctors... i really do not understand the need for some of the derisive, condescending behavior exhibited by some group members. come on, let's be decent to one another. presumably, we are all adults here, eh? the days of 'medical deities' are over, save those vestiges of ego that do exist in white coats. it certainly is not fair to label the whole conventional medical establishment, nor any other profession, on the backs of those few self-righteous. those folks exist in every profession, including chinese medicine. we are all here to help patients. let's review some sesame street ethics, and recall examples of cooperation. if an md or do takes a short course in chinese medicine and learns enough to make good referrals in our directions, we only lose out if they don't already have our names and faces in their repetoire of connections! i also don't understand the notion of doctors getting paid 'big money' for medicare services. in real healthcare life no professional or patient can put 'big money' and 'medicare' in the same sentence, except to state that if doctors bill medicare, they'll never see much money, let along big money! it used to be that medical practices put caps on how many medicare patients they could take, sometimes expressed as a percentage of their patient base. at that point, they would not take more medicare patients. ah, but things are very different now. the present trend is that medical practices stop billing medicare altogether, meaning that their medicare patients have to go elsewhere. doctors get screwed by medicare. those few exceptions, the more computerized information is, sometimes end up in jail, or at least with no more medical practice. anyone see the 60 minute episode about the cardiologist and thoracic surgeon in redding, california? from someone who knew both of those doctors professionally, i am told they they were really nice guys. but, they must have been a little full of themselves, enough to think it was ethical to screw the system by which they felt screwed. remember karma, and the golden rule? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.