Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

IPT versus normal chemo

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Insuliin Potentiation Therapy (IPT) is considered to be much more

effective than normal chemo and much safer as well. Which is likely

why the FDA does not like it.

 

If I had to go the chemo route, IPT is probably the way I would go -

and I would certainly stick with the rest of my protocol of good

supplements and diets too, especially the oleander.

 

See: http://cancertutor.com/Cancer02/IPT.html

 

Keep up the faith, m'lady - we are gonna kick that onc's prediction in

the tail.

 

 

 

oleander soup , " Rhoda Mead " <hummingbird541

wrote:

>

> Tony, I'm looking into several options, among them IPT, if I can

arrange it

> practially and financially. For those who don't know what it is, IPt

uses

> the well-known ability of tumor cells to uptake sugar at a much

greater rate

> than normal cells. So smaller amounts of chemo are combined with

insulin,

> etc, to enter cells preferentially.

>

> Tony or everyone, do you know whether IPT is as effective as full-blast

> chemo. Bear in mind that my onc says that even with chemo I have only 18

> months to 2 years to my expiriy date. Rhoda

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...