Guest guest Posted October 22, 2008 Report Share Posted October 22, 2008 Recently there was some discussion regarding colloidal copper. It has interested me but I have read that it is easy to take too much and is toxic if you do. And that the important issue is copper/zinc balance: http://www.drkaslow.com/html/zinc-copper_imbalances.html (link and info courtesy of Tony in a previous post) However copper is valuable as an anti-inflammatory and an anti-viral. The following article recommends using copper salicylate or copper ascorbate instead of colloidal copper. http://www.health-science-spirit.com/copper.html They are both easy to make and are supposedly much less toxic than colloidal copper. The article also recommends using zinc in the form of the Schweitzer Formula. Also relatively easy to make. Has anyone used any of these compounds? Might these compounds be more compatible with tumors? - Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2008 Report Share Posted October 22, 2008 I would think that it would be much easier to take too much copper when you are taking several mg's at a time with the copper salicylate or copper ascorbate than when you are taking mere parts per million with colloidal copper. In the case of copper salicylate you would also have to be comfortable with the known dangers of taking aspirin. Colloidal copper would be beneficial for the same reasons as other colloids, at least in a true superior colloidal product - tiny particle size resulting in large surface areas at only a relatively few parts per million. oleander soup , " Norton, Steve " <stephen.norton wrote: > > Recently there was some discussion regarding colloidal copper. It has > interested me but I have read that it is easy to take too much and is > toxic if you do. > > And that the important issue is copper/zinc balance: > > http://www.drkaslow.com/html/zinc-copper_imbalances.html > <http://www.drkaslow.com/html/zinc-copper_imbalances.html> (link and > info courtesy of Tony in a previous post) > > However copper is valuable as an anti-inflammatory and an anti-viral. > The following article recommends using copper salicylate or copper > ascorbate instead of colloidal copper. > > http://www.health-science-spirit.com/copper.html > <http://www.health-science-spirit.com/copper.html> > > They are both easy to make and are supposedly much less toxic than > colloidal copper. The article also recommends using zinc in the form of > the Schweitzer Formula. Also relatively easy to make. > > Has anyone used any of these compounds? Might these compounds be more > compatible with tumors? > > - Steve > > > > <http://geo./serv?s=97359714/grpId=14348479/grpspId=1705060814/ > msgId=9702/stime=1224631180/nc1=5191948/nc2=5191951/nc3=3848641> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2008 Report Share Posted October 22, 2008 Thanks, Tony. I will have to look a little closer at colloidal copper. - Steve oleander soup oleander soup On Behalf Of TonyTuesday, October 21, 2008 10:46 PMoleander soup Subject: Re: Colloidal copper I would think that it would be much easier to take too much copperwhen you are taking several mg's at a time with the copper salicylateor copper ascorbate than when you are taking mere parts per millionwith colloidal copper. In the case of copper salicylate you wouldalso have to be comfortable with the known dangers of taking aspirin.Colloidal copper would be beneficial for the same reasons as othercolloids, at least in a true superior colloidal product - tinyparticle size resulting in large surface areas at only a relativelyfew parts per million.Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.