Exposed: 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You're Not Supposed to Know

[Guest guest]

Brought to you by The Best Yeafs in Life Exposed: 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You're Not Supposed to Know (opinion) Sunday, October 19, 2008 by: Mike Adams (see all articles by this author) (NaturalNews)

With Breast Cancer Awareness month fully upon us once again, retail

stores have been invaded with everything pink, including "pink ribbon"

candies and personal care products made with blatantly cancer-causing

ingredients. Retail grocery stores like Safeway even hit up customers

for donations at the cash register, promising to raise funds to find

"the cure for cancer." Consumers of course, have virtually no idea where the funds they donate actually go, nor do they know the truths about breast cancer they'll never be told by conventional cancer

non-profit organizations. In this article, I'll reveal ten important

myths about breast cancer, and the truths that can save your life. Myth #1: Breast Cancer is not preventable The Truth: Up to 98% of breast cancer cases can be prevented through diet, nutritional supplements, sunshine and exercise

It's true: Breast cancer can be almost entirely prevented through

commonsense changes in diet, the addition of anti-cancer nutritional

supplements, boosting vitamin D creation from sunlight, avoiding

exposure to toxic chemicals in consumer products, pursuing regular

exercise and eating a live foods diet. The breast cancer

industry -- which depends on the continuation of cancer for its profits

and employment -- has so far refused to teach women even basic cancer

prevention strategies (such as increasing the intake of vitamin D,

which prevents 77% of all cancers). See:

http://www.naturalnews.com/021892.html Myth #2: Pink ribbon products are sold to raise money to support breast cancer victims. The Truth: Nearly 100% of the funds are used to recruit more breast cancer patients into highly-lucrative treatments that do more harm than good.

You know where all that money goes that you donate to the "search for

the cure" and other cancer scams? Virtually none of it goes to actually

teach women how to prevent cancer. The World Health Organization says

70% of all cancers are preventable, but the breast cancer industry helps zero percent of women actually prevent it. Those funds actually go to recruiting breast cancer patients by offering "free" mammograms.

This is the clever recruitment strategy of the cancer industry. It's

sort of like a greasy garage mechanic offering a "free" checkup on your

car's transmission. It's in his financial interest to find something

wrong (or to break something), just like it's in the financial

interests of the cancer industry to diagnose a women with cancer and

scare her into expensive, high-profit treatments like chemotherapy, radiation therapy or cancer surgery. (Mammogram false positives are commonplace...)

Want proof of where these funds go? Check out this grant list at the

Komen for the Cure organization, and you'll see it's almost entirely

spent on recruiting more women with mammograms: http://www.komenphoenix.org/site/c.nsKZ... When you read that list, note that there is not a single grant provided for nutritional education to teach women how to prevent cancer with vitamin D, cruciferous vegetables, anti-cancer herbs, supplements or to avoid dangerous cancer-causing food ingredients like sodium nitrite, MSG and chemical sweeteners. Myth #3: The only proven treatments for breast cancer are chemotherapy and radiation The Truth: Chemotherapy doesn't work and radiation causes cancer

Chemotherapy is a fraud, plain and simple. It's as ludicrous as

poisoning patients with mercury and calling it medicine (which is

something doctors did a hundred years ago, by the way). There is absolutely no reliable scientific evidence

Sure, there's evidence that chemotherapy shrinks tumors. Too bad,

however, that tumor size is irrelevant. Artificially reducing the size

of a tumor does nothing to reverse the physiology of cancer in a

patient's body. It doesn't initiate the healing that needs to take place to reverse cancer and stay cancer free. And this doesn't even take into account the quality of life issues here: Chemotherapy doesn't help people LIVE any longer, but it sure does make them DIE longer!

showing that chemotherapy has any positive effect whatsoever on breast

cancer. Try to find the science yourself: It doesn't exist! Myth #4: Chemotherapy is safe and doesn't cause permanent damage to your health The Truth: Chemotherapy causes vomiting, hair loss, muscle loss, brain damage, heart damage, kidney damage and liver damage. Much of this damage is permanent. Read these stories to learn more: Cancer Drug Causes Permanent Brain Damage http://www.naturalnews.com/024475.html Chemotherapy Causes Brain Shrinkage http://www.naturalnews.com/021200.html Chemotherapy Found to Cause Permanent Brain Damage http://www.naturalnews.com/020665.html Myth #5: Regular mammograms are the best way to detect cancer The Truth: Mammograms harm 10 women for every one woman they help Here's part of a story we published in 2006, called Breast Cancer Screening Harms Ten Women for Every One That it Helps (http://www.naturalnews.com/020829.html)

"A new study by researchers from the Nordic Cochrane Centre in Denmark

found that mammograms may harm ten times as many women as they help. The researchers examined the benefits and negative effects of seven breast cancer screening

programs on 500,000 women in the United States, Canada, Scotland and

Sweden. The study's authors found that for every 2,000 women who

received mammograms over a 10-year period, only one would have her life

prolonged, but 10 would endure unnecessary and potentially harmful

treatments." Got that? For every 2,000 women receiving

mammograms, only ONE would have her life extended at all. TEN women,

though, would be harmed with chemotherapy, radiation or mastectomies. What the study didn't point out, by the way, is that all these treatments are highly profitable

for the cancer industry. That's the real reason why mammograms are

pushed so aggressively onto women. It's not because mammograms detect

cancer; it's because mammograms make them money.

To the breast cancer industry, a woman is nothing more than a piece of

meat with a cash reward attached to it. The push for mammography is a

marketing ploy designed to keep women scared, misinformed and lined up

to be poisoned with chemotherapy while they shell out their life

savings for treatments that, for most of them, aren't even medically

justified! That's why I say the breast cancer industry is, by any honest assessment, a crime against women. In America,

husbands who beat their wives are considered criminals. They're

arrested and locked away. But those very same men, when wearing a

doctor's coat, can assault women with chemicals, slice off their

breasts with scalpels and even kill those women... all with impunity.

There's not a single breast cancer doctor who has ever been arrested

for the death of a patient. The true history of western medicine's violence against women In

time, of course, this will change. Medical violence against women is a

crime, regardless of whether the weapon is a fist, a baseball bat or a

syringe full of chemicals that will cause permanent damage to her vital

organs. In time, chemotherapy will be outlawed and breast cancer

doctors will be put out of work or prosecuted for their crimes against

women. Perhaps they'll even be castrated as part of a "fitting"

punishment. To all the women reading this, note carefully the history of western medicine

and its numerous assaults on women over the years. Do you know where

the term "hysterectomy" comes from? It comes from the belief by male

doctors that women's emotions were "hysterical," and they believed the

best way to "cure" women of their hysteria was to violently cut her

reproductive organs out of her body. The procedure was widely adopted by male surgeons

and used for well over a hundred years to treat women who were

diagnosed as suffering from virtually every kind of emotional variance

you can imagine. Doctors who didn't use scalpels to remove these organs

from a woman's body often resorted to so-called "pelvic massages" -- a

medicalized raping of the female patient by the male doctor, of course.

Even today, tens of thousands of hysterectomies are performed each year

with no medical justification whatsoever. Doctors continue to view

women's bodies as diseased and abnormal, surgically removing their

breasts and reproductive organs for no justifiable reason whatsoever.

It's even being done today as a cancer prevention procedure, against women who have no cancer at all!

Western medicine's treatment of breast cancer patients today is little

more than an extension of hundreds of years of medical violence against

women by the male-dominated medical establishment. Want proof?

Notice that cancer doctors never advise men to surgically remove their

testicles as a way to "prevent" testicular cancer? That's because the

male surgeons performing these operations prefer to maim women, not men.

If you have the stomach for it, read the rest of the truth about how

conventional doctors and surgeons commit outrageous medical violence

against women and children even today: http://www.naturalnews.com/019930.html Myth #6: BRCA-positive women should consider mastectomies to prevent cancer The Truth: Cruciferous vegetables target BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, preventing cancer with nutrition

Women who are BRCA positive are being scared into utterly unnecessary

double mastectomies -- a procedure that benefits no one except the

surgeon. What nobody is telling these women is that cruciferous vegetables contain anti-cancer nutrients that specifically target BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, protecting these women from breast cancer. All it takes is a single ounce of fresh broccoli juice each day, or fresh sprouts, superfoods or other nutrient-dense foods or juices consumed daily.

Cancer doctors, of course, conveniently forget to tell women about

these little facts. It would hurt their business if women knew how to

prevent cancer on their own, at home, with everyday groceries and

simple herbs.

Here's text from one study that might interest you. It shows that I3C

(from broccoli) and genistein (from fermented soy) inhibit

estrogen-stimulated receptor activity in a dose-dependent fashion: "...we

showed that I3C induces BRCA1 expression and that both I3C and BRCA1

inhibit oestrogen (E2)-stimulated oestrogen receptor (ER-) activity in

human breast cancer cells. We now report that both I3C and genistein

induce the expression of both breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1

and BRCA2) in breast (MCF-7 and T47D) and prostate (DU-145 and LNCaP)

cancer cell types, in a time- and dose-dependent fashion. http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v94/n...

Conventional cancer doctors, of course, refuse to tell women about

scientific evidence like this. If women could prevent breast cancer

with I3C, why would they need cancer doctors? The answer, of course, is

that they wouldn't. You can buy I3C, but the way, right here: http://www.vitacost.com/NSI-I3C-Indole-...

The FDA, of course, won't allow companies selling I3C supplements to

tell you the scientifically-validated truth about their anti-cancer

benefits. It's all part of the censorship and oppression that

characterizes today's cancer industry. The U.S. government, of course,

is the co-conspirator in this sad tragedy of misinformation. It is the job of the FDA and the cancer industry to keep women stupid, uninformed and scared when it comes to breast cancer. The last thing they want is for women to be nutritionally literate. Myth #7: The cancer non-profits are searching for a cure for cancer The Truth: Even if one was found, they would never allow a cure to be publicized: It would destroy the cancer treatment

It's the great scam of the cancer industry: We're searching for a cure,

they claim! Never mind the fact that they've been using this same con

since the late 60's, when they claimed to be only a few million dollars

away from curing cancer forever. The search for "the cure" is

pure deception. It's a clever con to take money from people for all

those silly pink ribbon activities, but the truth is that the cancer industry doesn't believe there's such a thing as cure.

Just ask the FDA, the AMA or any state health licensing board: Anyone

claiming to have a cancer "cure" is immediately considered a quack.

Over the last several decades, countless doctors researching genuine

cancer cures have been arrested, imprisoned or run out of the country.

Read about Stanislaw Burzynski to learn about just one example: http://www.cancure.org/burzynski_instit...

Finally, even if they actually find a "cure" (which they won't, since

that would destroy the profits of the cancer industry), do you think

they would give it away for free? Of course not! They'd charge hundreds

of thousands of dollars for it, milking the maximum profits out of a

terrified population for their newest wonder drug. Notice, by

the way, that not a single conventional breast cancer non-profit group

-- nor any drug company -- has announced that its breakthrough cancer

drugs will be given away for free. And that leads me to this question:

If they're not planning on giving away the cure for free, then why are you giving them money for free to pay for their R & D?

Why should people donate money to the wealthiest corporations in the

world (the drug companies) who are going to take their money and use it

to develop a new wave of drugs that are sold to cancer victims at

outrageous price markups sometimes exceeding 550,000% of the cost of

the chemical ingredients? The truth is, anyone who donates

money for any such "search for the cure" is being conned outright.

There's a suc*** born every minute, P.T. Barnum famously said. What he

neglected to add is that most of them are now buying pink products and

thinking they're helping find a "cure" for cancer. Don't be

suc***ed. Keep your money, or invest it in vitamin D supplements or

anti-cancer herbs. You want to cure cancer? Cure it in your own body

first. It's a lot less expensive, and you get to keep your hair, too. industry Myth #8: There is no cure for breast cancer The Truth: There are MANY natural cures for breast cancer available right now Just a few hours of research will turn up numerous natural cures for cancer: Vitamin D,

cat's claw herbs, the Essiac formula, medicinal mushrooms, spirulina,

cruciferous vegetables, green tea, graviola herbs, Chinese medicinal

herbs, oxygen therapy, alkalizing water therapies and much more. All these cures have one thing in common: They are ALL suppressed by the FDA and FTC. Telling the truth about anti-cancer foods, herbs or supplements is now a criminal offense in America. Myth #9: If my mother had breast cancer, I'll get it too The Truth: Breast Cancer is not caused by bad genes; it's caused by bad diets

This is another common lie told to woman by cancer doctors to scare

them into medically unnecessary cancer "treatments" (which can kill you

or harm you). Did you know that radiation treatment for one breast

actually causes cancer in the OTHER breast? See: http://www.naturalnews.com/News_000366_...

Your genes don't control your health, but what you put in your mouth

and on your skin has near-total control over your health! If your

parents had cancer, they were no doubt eating cancer-causing foods (processed meats)

and not using anti-cancer foods, superfoods, herbs and supplements.

They were also likely deficient in vitamin D, and they probably didn't

drink fresh anti-cancer vegetables on a daily basis (www.JuiceFeasting.com).

Lastly, they no doubt had regular exposure to cancer-causing chemicals:

Cigarette smoke, chemical solvents, perfume chemicals, household

cleaners, pesticides, skin care products, conventional cosmetics, etc. Read the truth about processed meats: http://www.naturalnews.com/022288.html Myth #10: Sunlight causes cancer The Truth: Sunlight generates Vitamin D in your skin, which prevents 78% of ALL cancers The disinformation

put out by the cancer industry about sunlight has reached a level of

absurdity that's virtually unmatched in the history of medicine. If you

believe what the American Cancer Society tells you (still being

suc***ed?), sunlight causes cancer! Yes, that's right:

Sunlight causes cancer, they claim. According to the entire cancer

industry (and most dermatologists, too), you'd be much better off

hiding in a cave, or living your life under fluorescent lights or

smothered in a layer of toxic sunscreen chemicals (which actually DO

cause cancer, by the way). Somehow, the human race has

miraculously managed to survived 350,000 years of natural sunlight

without be obliterated. This is nothing short of astonishing, given

that sunlight is so deadly. It sort of makes me wonder how the human

race survived at all, with sunlight striking any given area of the

Earth, say, 50% of the time. Did our ancestors live underground?

The ploy here is so obvious that it's child's play to expose their

strategy: Cancer industry authorities know that vitamin D prevents 77%

of all cancers. Since sunlight exposure causes the skin to generate

vitamin D in the human body (for free, no less), the cancer industry

has come to the realization that in order for it to continue surviving

(and exploiting cancer patients), it has to scare people away from

anything that might actually prevent or cure cancer. This is

the whole reason behind the sunlight scare campaigns, of course. It's

all just a clever profit strategy to keep people sick and diseased by

enforcing widespread vitamin D deficiency

across the human population. Note, too, that this deficiency is

especially prominent in men and women of darker skin color, which means

the cancer industry's whole campaign against sunlight is filled with

disturbing racial overtones that smack of genocide. (Ever wonder why

breast cancer is FAR more aggressive in black women and white women?

It's the vitamin D deficiency caused by the skin color, of course. But

cancer docs never tell their black patients anything about it...) Remember this: Healthy people with abundant vitamin D levels in their blood don't get cancer and they almost never catch colds. They also don't need vaccines,

by the way. These are three huge profit centers for conventional

medicine: Cancer, vaccines and colds. This is why the industry goes to

such great lengths to (hilariously) try to discredit the sun.

It's hilarious because the sun, of course, is the source of ALL life on

our planet. Without the sun, there would be no plants, no bacteria, no

animals, no fish and certainly no humans. The sun is the single most

important source of life on our planet, and without it, we'd all die in

a matter of a few hours (from the cold alone). That the cancer industry

would declare war on the sun is just a disturbing example of how far

removed modern medicine is from the real world. Why the cancer industry is dangerous to women The cancer industry people are living in a world of self-reinforced fictions,

where sunlight is bad and chemotherapy chemicals are good; where food

is useless but pharmaceuticals are essential. Almost everything said to

you by a conventional cancer doctor is the opposite of what's real, and

yet they believe their own delusions only because those delusions are

so widely shared by their colleagues. It is circular logic at its

worst, driven by arrogance and greed, and totally lacking any

discernable degree of intellectual honesty or compassion for the value

of a human life. The cancer industry is, in a very real way, a danger to the safety of men and women alike. It is a kind of home-grown medical terrorism,

through which the application of fear and disinformation results in

massive corporate profits that are only exceeded by the body count of

our dead women; our mothers, daughters, sisters, aunts and nieces who

fall victim to conventional cancer treatments. They are being lost to a

medical regime wielding weapons of mass destruction: Chemical weapons

(chemotherapy), radiological weapons (radiation) and weapons of sharp

steel (scalpels). These weapons of medical violence are being

directed at our women for one purpose only: To secure profits that go

into the hands of a few wealthy men who sit at the top of these

organizations, raking in fifty-million-dollar salaries while the cancer

treatment centers send women home in body bags. It is the ultimate act of cruelty to promise a woman "treatment" and then deliver poison. It is the ultimate act of violence to promise a woman "healing" and then mutilate her body. The cancer industry, as operated today, is ultimately a criminal organization engaged in acts of medical violence against women. Why women should revolt against the cancer industry Even

worse, it is being staffed by women, cheered by women and supported by

women. In World War II, before the Jews were exterminated, Nazi

soldiers pried the gold fillings out of their mouths. The fillings were

sold off, and the money went to two places: The pockets of the top Nazi

commanders, and the continued funding of the prison camps and

extermination chambers. The Jewish prisoners, in other words, paid for

their own gas chamber treatments using the gold right out of their own

mouths. Today, women are paying for their own cancer industry

chemical assaults using the dollars right out of their own pockets.

Those who support the conventional breast cancer non-profits are feeding the very beast that may someday destroy them and send them home poisoned, emaciated, or mutilated beyond repair.

And you know what the pink ribbon non-profits will do to help these

women? WIGS. They'll give them wigs to cover their hairless heads. Chemotherapy

victim or concentration camp prisoner? They both produce these same

results. Zyklon B gas, by the way, was manufactured by a pharmaceutical

company. It is no coincidence

that women who receive chemotherapy visually resemble the women of the

Nazi concentration camps. They become emaciated through dangerous

losses of muscle mass and bone mass. They lose their hair, vomit their

food and suffer the devastating effects of massive nutrient loss.

They are, in effect, both prisoners of the same system of control and

violence against women. It is a system that has existed for thousands

of years, taking on new names and new faces as it shifts from one

corner of the planet to another. Today, that system of abuse

and violence against women has a corporate logo, a cute pink symbol and

a clever slogan. It has hundreds of offices all across the country, and

thousands of pink products in retail stores. It is a system of violence

against women, painted pink and repackaged as something that cares for

women; and in that disguise, aided by the purchasing dollars of

gullible consumers, it is ensnaring women in a system of such great

evil that it can only be accurately compared to historical events like

the Holocaust. May God save our women from the cancer industry, lest we lose four generations to this modern chemical holocaust

that has been unleashed against our mothers, daughters, grandmothers

and sisters. And if our government will not protect us from this

home-grown terrorism that seeks to turn the bodies of women into

corporate profit centers, I hope that the People of America will one

day wake up and take all justified (non-violent) measures to protect

themselves from the cancer industry. It is odd, I think, that

women will protest in front of abortion clinics in order to save the

life of an unborn child, and yet that same woman will say nothing when

a cancer doctor destroys the life of her own mother or daughter. It is

time to start protesting the cancer clinics and cancer non-profits. It

is time to end this chemical holocaust

Throughout history, women have fought hard for the right to vote, to

pursue an education and to be heard. I believe it is time that women

exercised those rights to protect their freedoms and their lives from

the conventional cancer industry. and this

medical violence against women. The women should be marching against

mammograms and chemotherapy, demanding the arrest and prosecution of

cancer surgeons who perform unjustified double mastectomies. About the author:

Mike Adams is a natural health researcher and author with a passion for

teaching people how to improve their health He is a prolific writer and

has published thousands of articles, interviews, reports and consumer

guides, impacting the lives of millions of readers around the world who

are experiencing phenomenal health benefits from reading his articles.

Adams is an independent journalist with strong ethics who does not get

paid to write articles about any product or company. In 2007, Adams

launched EcoLEDs, a manufacturer of mercury-free, energy-efficient LED lighting products that save electricity and help prevent global warming. He also launched an online retailer of environmentally-friendly products

(BetterLifeGoods.com) and uses a portion of its profits to help fund

non-profit endeavors. He's also a successful software entrepreneur,

having founded a well known email marketing software company whose technology currently powers the NaturalNews email newsletters. Adams also serves as the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center,

a non-profit consumer protection group, and pursues hobbies such as

Pilates, Capoeira, nature macrophotography and organic gardening.

[Guest guest]

Thanks, , for sending this to the

list.

 

While I always like to read what Mike has to say, I sometimes get a bit weary

with some of his very simplistic ideas about healing cancer. Certainly his

list is very good, but they are not a “for sure” for every breast

cancer patient. And what happens in a petri dish and what actually

happens in the body are almost always two different things.

 

The truth is that a healthy diet, nutritional supplements, sunshine and exercise

do NOT ALWAYS prevent cancer, breast or otherwise. Hormonal driven cancers are

some of the most difficult to heal and, in my opinion, one reason is because so

many of the chemicals in our environment are mimic hormones (estrogen). I see

absolutely nothing about environmental toxins and chemicals in his article

(maybe I missed it as I skimmed). The real truth is that we are literally

bombarded by toxic chemicals be just walking out our front door. And many

of us live with toxic chemicals inside our homes. I have been doing some

research for the OAW Environmental Cleanse that will be on our website

soon. While I know about chemicals and the importance of limiting them as

much as possible, I am amazed at how “sick” most new homes and

offices are.

 

The chemical industry in the US has run amuck and for many people there is

absolutely no way to avoid chemicals….chemicals that can and will make

people sick, if not in the short-term, then in the long run. The chemical

industry has given us one thing that we all enjoy and this is

CONVENIENCE. Yet, we are literally killing ourselves in the name of

CONVENIENCE. We are a lazy nation which shows in the rise of disease and

the rise of early-age onset disease. We are seeing disease in children

and young adults that used to never be seen. And how profitable this is

for the pharmaceutical companies as they now have the opportunity to get people

on drugs at even younger ages…..the kind of drugs that they tell people

they must stay on “for the rest of your life.”

 

I agree with Mike about the “Breast Cancer Industry” and actually

wrote an article about it a couple of years ago: http://www.oasisadvancedwellness.com/learning/pink-fraud-breast-cancer.html

Make no mistake about it, cancer IS a very profitable INDUSTRY…four

treatments for me were over $18,000 (doc wanted me to do 6 months) in 2000, so

I image it is even more now. He is “right-on” about the fraud and

ridiculous antics that go on in the name of finding a cure for breast cancer.

All the pink ribbons, walks, runs, corporate donations, etc. are not helping

one iota! I deal with clients, almost daily, who have gone through what “the

industry” has to offer for breast cancer and it mostly follows the same

cycle for every one. Women are losing breasts at an alarming rate, are being

poisoned by chemo and radiation only to find that with 6 months the cancer that

they thought was gone is now back somewhere else. Of course, stronger

chemo and radiation are recommended again and this “cycle”

continues until they have no more to offer and the person now has no immune

system to speak of and has been radiated and chemoed to an inch of their life.

I often wonder “why” these women do not sue their

oncologists? Until families and patients begin to “require”

results this barbaric treatment will continue. People sue all the time

when a drug has harmed them…..well, why not chemo/radiation? One

reason is because we have been brain-washed about its effectiveness and most

people “think” they will be “the one” that this

barbaric treatment actually works for. I have been told many times that

much of chemotherapy is still in clinical trials (yes, you become a lab rat)

and is really not even FDA mandated. I’m not sure about how true

this is as I remember my oncologist using the words “FDA recommended”

however, he wanted to use a double-whammy (making me think that I was getting

something special) which actually were code words for “clinical trial”

as I found out one year later that they had to stop “trials” on one

of the chemotherapy drugs that I used (the double whammy) because the dosages

that were being given were TOO HUGH and people were DYING!!!!! I am so

thankful that I stopped after 4 treatments – of course, that “double

whammy, ended up putting me in the hospital with severe dehydration.

 

I’m not ragging-on Mike. He is a good reporter and is providing a

great service. But it’s prudent to remember that he is a “reporter”

and often makes healing naturally from cancer seem very simplistic and successful

EVERY time if one uses what is being recommended. Certainly, using

natural methods/medicines are the BEST way to heal, but it takes tremendous

desire, discipline and determination (not many people write about this aspect).

It’s certainly a 24/7 undertaking with much involved since mind, body and

soul must be included in order to achieve success.

 

Be Well

Loretta

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exposed: 10

Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You're Not Supposed to Know (opinion)

Sunday,

October 19, 2008 by: Mike Adams (see all articles by

this author)

 

 

 

 

 

(NaturalNews) With Breast

Cancer Awareness month fully upon us once again, retail stores have been

invaded with everything pink, including " pink ribbon " candies and

personal care products made with blatantly cancer-causing ingredients. Retail

grocery stores like Safeway even hit up customers for donations at the cash

register, promising to raise funds to find " the cure for cancer. "

 

Consumers of course, have virtually no idea where the funds they donate

actually go, nor do they know the truths about breast cancer they'll

never be told by conventional cancer

non-profit organizations. In this article, I'll reveal ten important myths

about breast cancer, and the truths that can save your life.

Myth #1: Breast

Cancer is not preventable

 

The Truth: Up to 98% of breast cancer cases can be

prevented through diet, nutritional supplements, sunshine and exercise

 

It's true: Breast cancer can be almost entirely prevented through commonsense

changes in diet, the addition of anti-cancer nutritional supplements, boosting

vitamin D creation from sunlight, avoiding exposure to toxic chemicals in

consumer products, pursuing regular exercise and eating a live foods diet.

 

The breast cancer industry -- which depends on the continuation of cancer for

its profits and employment -- has so far refused to teach women even basic

cancer prevention strategies (such as increasing the intake of vitamin D, which

prevents 77% of all cancers). See: http://www.naturalnews.com/021892.html

 

Myth #2: Pink

ribbon products are sold to raise money to support breast cancer victims.

 

The Truth: Nearly 100% of the funds are used to recruit more

breast cancer

patients into highly-lucrative treatments that do more harm than good.

 

You know where all that money goes that you donate to the " search for the

cure " and other cancer scams? Virtually none of it goes to actually teach

women how to prevent cancer. The World Health Organization says 70% of all cancers are preventable, but

the breast cancer industry helps zero percent of women

actually prevent it.

 

Those funds actually go to recruiting breast cancer patients by offering

" free " mammograms.

This is the clever recruitment strategy of the cancer industry. It's sort of

like a greasy garage mechanic offering a " free " checkup on your car's

transmission. It's in his financial interest to find something wrong (or to

break something), just like it's in the financial interests of the cancer

industry to diagnose a women with cancer and scare her into expensive,

high-profit treatments like chemotherapy, radiation

therapy or cancer surgery. (Mammogram false positives are commonplace...)

 

Want proof of where these funds go? Check out this grant list at the Komen for

the Cure organization, and you'll see it's almost entirely spent on recruiting more women with

mammograms: http://www.komenphoenix.org/site/c.nsKZ...

 

When you read that list, note that there is not a single grant provided for nutritional education

to teach women how to prevent cancer with vitamin D, cruciferous vegetables, anti-cancer herbs,

supplements or to avoid dangerous cancer-causing food ingredients like sodium

nitrite, MSG and chemical sweeteners.

Myth #3: The only

proven treatments for breast cancer are chemotherapy and radiation

 

The Truth: Chemotherapy doesn't work and radiation causes cancer

 

Chemotherapy is a fraud, plain and simple. It's as ludicrous as poisoning

patients with mercury and calling it medicine (which is something doctors did a hundred years

ago, by the way). There is absolutely no reliable scientific evidence

 

Sure, there's evidence that chemotherapy shrinks tumors. Too bad, however, that

tumor size is irrelevant. Artificially reducing the size of a tumor does

nothing to reverse the physiology of cancer in a patient's body. It doesn't

initiate the healing

that needs to take place to reverse cancer and stay cancer free. And this

doesn't even take into account the quality of life issues here:

Chemotherapy doesn't help people LIVE any longer, but it sure does make them

DIE longer!

showing that chemotherapy has any positive effect whatsoever on

breast cancer. Try to find the science yourself: It doesn't exist!

Myth #4:

Chemotherapy is safe and doesn't cause permanent damage to your health

 

The Truth: Chemotherapy causes vomiting, hair loss, muscle loss,

brain damage, heart

damage, kidney damage and liver damage. Much of this damage is permanent. Read

these stories to learn more:

 

Cancer Drug Causes Permanent Brain Damage

http://www.naturalnews.com/024475.html

 

Chemotherapy Causes Brain Shrinkage

http://www.naturalnews.com/021200.html

 

Chemotherapy Found to Cause Permanent Brain Damage

http://www.naturalnews.com/020665.html

Myth #5: Regular

mammograms are the best way to detect cancer

 

The Truth: Mammograms harm 10 women for every one woman they

help

 

Here's part of a story we published in 2006, called Breast Cancer Screening Harms Ten Women for Every One

That it Helps (http://www.naturalnews.com/020829.html)

 

" A new study by researchers from the Nordic Cochrane Centre in Denmark

found that mammograms may harm ten times as many women as they help.

 

The researchers examined the benefits and negative effects of seven breast cancer

screening programs on 500,000 women in the United States, Canada, Scotland

and Sweden. The study's authors found that for every 2,000 women who received

mammograms over a 10-year period, only one would have her life prolonged, but

10 would endure unnecessary and potentially harmful treatments. "

 

Got that? For every 2,000 women receiving mammograms, only ONE would have her

life extended at all. TEN women, though, would be harmed with chemotherapy,

radiation or mastectomies.

 

What the study didn't point out, by the way, is that all these treatments are highly profitable

for the cancer industry. That's the real reason why mammograms are pushed so

aggressively onto women. It's not because mammograms detect cancer; it's

because mammograms

make them money.

 

To the breast cancer industry, a woman is nothing more than a piece of meat

with a cash reward attached to it. The push for mammography is a marketing ploy

designed to keep women scared, misinformed and lined up to be poisoned with

chemotherapy while they shell out their life savings for treatments that, for

most of them, aren't even medically justified!

 

That's why I say the breast cancer industry is, by any honest assessment, a crime against women.

In America, husbands who

beat their wives are considered criminals. They're arrested and locked away.

But those very same men, when wearing a doctor's coat, can assault women with

chemicals, slice off their breasts with scalpels and even kill those women...

all with impunity. There's not a single breast cancer doctor who has ever been

arrested for the death of a patient.

The true history

of western medicine's violence

against women

In time, of course, this will change. Medical violence

against women is a crime, regardless of whether the weapon is a fist, a

baseball bat or a syringe full of chemicals that will cause permanent damage to

her vital organs. In time, chemotherapy will be outlawed and breast cancer

doctors will be put out of work or prosecuted for their crimes against women.

Perhaps they'll even be castrated as part of a " fitting " punishment.

 

To all the women reading this, note carefully the history of western medicine

and its numerous assaults on women over the years. Do you know where the term

" hysterectomy " comes from? It comes from the belief by male doctors

that women's emotions were " hysterical, " and they believed the best

way to " cure " women of their hysteria was to violently cut her

reproductive organs out of her body.

 

The procedure was widely adopted by male surgeons and used for well

over a hundred years to treat women who were diagnosed as suffering from

virtually every kind of emotional variance you can imagine. Doctors who didn't

use scalpels to remove these organs from a woman's body often resorted to

so-called " pelvic massages " -- a medicalized raping of the female

patient by the male doctor, of course.

 

Even today, tens of thousands of hysterectomies are performed each year with no

medical justification whatsoever. Doctors continue to view women's bodies as

diseased and abnormal, surgically removing their breasts and reproductive

organs for no justifiable reason whatsoever. It's even being done today as a

cancer prevention

procedure, against women who have no cancer at all!

 

Western medicine's treatment of breast cancer patients today is little more

than an extension of hundreds of years of medical violence against women by the

male-dominated medical establishment.

 

Want proof? Notice that cancer doctors never advise men to surgically remove

their testicles as a way to " prevent " testicular cancer? That's

because the male surgeons performing these operations prefer to maim women, not

men.

 

If you have the stomach for it, read the rest of the truth about how

conventional doctors and surgeons commit outrageous medical violence against

women and children even today: http://www.naturalnews.com/019930.html

Myth

#6: BRCA-positive women should consider mastectomies to prevent cancer

 

The Truth: Cruciferous vegetables target BRCA1

and BRCA2 genes, preventing

cancer with nutrition

 

Women who are BRCA positive are being scared into utterly unnecessary double

mastectomies -- a procedure that benefits no one except the surgeon. What

nobody is telling these women is that cruciferous vegetables

contain anti-cancer nutrients that specifically target BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes,

protecting these women from breast cancer.

 

All it takes is a single ounce of fresh broccoli juice each day, or

fresh sprouts, superfoods

or other nutrient-dense foods or juices consumed daily.

 

Cancer doctors, of course, conveniently forget to tell women about these little

facts. It would hurt their business if women knew how to prevent cancer on

their own, at home, with everyday groceries and simple herbs.

 

Here's text from one study that might interest you. It shows that I3C (from

broccoli) and genistein (from fermented soy) inhibit estrogen-stimulated

receptor activity in a dose-dependent fashion:

 

" ...we showed that

I3C induces BRCA1 expression and that both I3C and BRCA1 inhibit oestrogen

(E2)-stimulated oestrogen receptor (ER-) activity in human breast cancer cells.

We now report that both I3C and genistein induce the expression of both breast

cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) in breast (MCF-7 and T47D) and

prostate (DU-145 and LNCaP) cancer cell types, in a time- and dose-dependent

fashion.

 

http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v94/n...

 

Conventional cancer doctors, of course, refuse to tell women about scientific

evidence like this. If women could prevent breast cancer with I3C, why would

they need cancer doctors? The answer, of course, is that they wouldn't. You can

buy I3C, but the way, right here: http://www.vitacost.com/NSI-I3C-Indole-...

 

The FDA, of course, won't allow companies selling I3C supplements to tell you

the scientifically-validated truth about their anti-cancer benefits. It's all

part of the censorship and oppression that characterizes today's cancer

industry. The U.S. government, of course, is the co-conspirator in this sad

tragedy of misinformation.

 

It is the job of the FDA and the cancer

industry to keep women stupid, uninformed and scared when it comes to breast

cancer. The last thing they want is for women to be

nutritionally literate.

Myth #7: The cancer non-profits

are searching for a cure

for cancer

 

The Truth: Even if one was found, they would never allow a cure

to be publicized: It would destroy the cancer treatment

 

It's the great scam of the cancer industry: We're searching for a cure, they

claim! Never mind the fact that they've been using this same con since the late

60's, when they claimed to be only a few million dollars away from curing

cancer forever.

 

The search for " the cure " is pure deception. It's a clever con to

take money from people for all those silly pink ribbon activities, but the

truth is that the

cancer industry doesn't believe there's such a thing as cure.

Just ask the FDA, the AMA or any state health licensing board: Anyone claiming

to have a cancer " cure " is immediately considered a quack. Over the

last several decades, countless doctors researching genuine cancer cures have

been arrested, imprisoned or run out of the country. Read about Stanislaw

Burzynski to learn about just one example: http://www.cancure.org/burzynski_instit...

 

Finally, even if they actually find a " cure " (which they won't, since

that would destroy the profits of the cancer industry), do you think they would

give it away for free? Of course not! They'd charge hundreds of thousands of

dollars for it, milking the maximum profits out of a terrified population for

their newest wonder drug.

 

Notice, by the way, that not a single conventional breast cancer non-profit

group -- nor any drug company -- has announced that its breakthrough cancer

drugs will be given away for free. And that leads me to this question: If

they're not planning on giving away the cure for free, then why are you giving them money for

free to pay for their R & D?

 

Why should people donate money to the wealthiest corporations in the world (the

drug companies) who are going to take their money and use it to develop a new

wave of drugs that are sold to cancer victims at outrageous price markups

sometimes exceeding 550,000% of the cost of the chemical ingredients?

 

The truth is, anyone who donates money for any such " search for the

cure " is being conned outright. There's a suc*** born every minute, P.T.

Barnum famously said. What he neglected to add is that most of them are now

buying pink products and thinking they're helping find a " cure " for

cancer.

 

Don't be suc***ed. Keep your money, or invest it in vitamin D supplements or

anti-cancer herbs. You want to cure cancer? Cure it in your own body first.

It's a lot less expensive, and you get to keep your hair, too.

industry

Myth #8: There is

no cure for breast cancer

 

The Truth: There are MANY natural cures for

breast cancer available right now

 

Just a few hours of research will turn up numerous natural cures for cancer: Vitamin D, cat's claw

herbs, the Essiac formula, medicinal mushrooms, spirulina, cruciferous

vegetables, green tea, graviola herbs, Chinese medicinal herbs, oxygen therapy,

alkalizing water therapies and much more.

 

All these cures have one thing in common: They are ALL suppressed by the FDA

and FTC. Telling the truth about anti-cancer foods,

herbs or supplements is now a criminal offense in America.

Myth #9: If my

mother had breast cancer, I'll get it too

 

The Truth: Breast Cancer is not caused by bad genes; it's

caused by bad diets

 

This is another common lie told to woman by cancer doctors to scare them into

medically unnecessary cancer " treatments " (which can kill you or harm

you). Did you know that radiation treatment for one breast actually causes cancer in the OTHER breast?

See: http://www.naturalnews.com/News_000366_...

 

Your genes don't control your health, but what you put in your mouth and on

your skin has near-total control over your health! If your parents had cancer,

they were no doubt eating cancer-causing foods (processed meats) and

not using anti-cancer foods, superfoods, herbs and supplements. They were also

likely deficient in vitamin D, and they probably didn't drink fresh anti-cancer

vegetables on a daily basis (www.JuiceFeasting.com). Lastly, they no doubt had regular

exposure to cancer-causing chemicals: Cigarette smoke, chemical solvents,

perfume chemicals, household cleaners, pesticides, skin care products,

conventional cosmetics, etc.

 

Read the truth about processed meats: http://www.naturalnews.com/022288.html

Myth #10:

Sunlight causes cancer

 

The Truth: Sunlight generates Vitamin D in your skin, which

prevents 78% of ALL cancers

 

The disinformation

put out by the cancer industry about sunlight has reached a level of absurdity

that's virtually unmatched in the history of medicine. If you believe what the

American Cancer Society tells you (still being suc***ed?), sunlight causes

cancer!

 

Yes, that's right: Sunlight causes cancer, they claim. According to the entire

cancer industry (and most dermatologists, too), you'd be much better off hiding

in a cave, or living your life under fluorescent lights or smothered in a layer

of toxic sunscreen chemicals (which actually DO cause cancer, by the way).

 

Somehow, the human race has miraculously managed to survived 350,000 years of

natural sunlight without be obliterated. This is nothing short of astonishing,

given that sunlight is so deadly. It sort of makes me wonder how the human race

survived at all, with sunlight striking any given area of the Earth, say, 50%

of the time. Did our ancestors live underground?

 

The ploy here is so obvious that it's child's play to expose their strategy:

Cancer industry authorities know that vitamin D prevents 77% of all cancers. Since

sunlight exposure causes the skin to generate vitamin D in the human body (for

free, no less), the cancer industry has come to the realization that in order

for it to continue surviving (and exploiting cancer patients), it has to scare

people away from anything that might actually prevent or cure cancer.

 

This is the whole reason behind the sunlight scare campaigns, of course. It's

all just a clever profit strategy to keep people sick and diseased by enforcing

widespread vitamin

D deficiency across the human population. Note, too, that this deficiency

is especially prominent in men and women of darker skin color, which means the

cancer industry's whole campaign against sunlight is filled with disturbing

racial overtones that smack of genocide. (Ever wonder why breast cancer is FAR

more aggressive in black women and white women? It's the vitamin D deficiency

caused by the skin color, of course. But cancer docs never tell their black patients

anything about it...)

 

Remember this: Healthy people with abundant vitamin D levels in their blood

don't get cancer and they almost never catch colds. They also don't need vaccines, by the way. These

are three huge profit centers for conventional medicine: Cancer, vaccines and

colds. This is why the industry goes to such great lengths to (hilariously) try

to discredit the sun.

 

It's hilarious because the sun, of course, is the source of ALL life on our

planet. Without the sun, there would be no plants, no bacteria, no animals, no

fish and certainly no humans. The sun is the single most important source of

life on our planet, and without it, we'd all die in a matter of a few hours

(from the cold alone). That the cancer industry would declare war on the sun is

just a disturbing example of how far removed modern medicine is from the real

world.

Why the cancer

industry is dangerous to women

The cancer industry

people are living in a world of self-reinforced fictions, where sunlight is bad and chemotherapy

chemicals are good; where food is useless but pharmaceuticals are essential.

Almost everything said to you by a conventional cancer doctor is the opposite

of what's real, and yet they believe their own delusions only because those

delusions are so widely shared by their colleagues. It is circular logic at its

worst, driven by arrogance and greed, and totally lacking any discernable

degree of intellectual honesty or compassion for the value of a human life.

 

The cancer industry is, in a very real way, a danger to the safety of men and

women alike. It is a kind of home-grown medical terrorism, through which

the application of fear and disinformation results in massive corporate profits

that are only exceeded by the body count of our dead women; our mothers,

daughters, sisters, aunts and nieces who fall victim to conventional cancer treatments.

They are being lost to a medical regime wielding weapons of mass destruction:

Chemical weapons (chemotherapy), radiological weapons (radiation) and weapons

of sharp steel (scalpels).

 

These weapons of medical violence are being directed at our women for one

purpose only: To secure profits that go into the hands of a few wealthy men who

sit at the top of these organizations, raking in fifty-million-dollar salaries

while the cancer treatment centers send women home in body bags.

 

It is the ultimate act of cruelty to promise a woman " treatment " and

then deliver poison.

 

It is the ultimate act of violence to promise a woman " healing " and

then mutilate her body.

 

The cancer industry, as operated today, is ultimately a criminal organization

engaged in acts of medical

violence against women.

Why women should

revolt against the cancer industry

Even worse, it is being staffed by women, cheered by

women and supported by women. In World War II, before the Jews were

exterminated, Nazi soldiers pried the gold fillings out of their mouths. The

fillings were sold off, and the money went to two places: The pockets of the

top Nazi commanders, and the continued funding of the prison camps and

extermination chambers. The Jewish prisoners, in other words, paid for their

own gas chamber treatments using the gold right out of their own mouths.

 

Today, women are paying for their own cancer industry chemical assaults using

the dollars right out of their own pockets. Those who support the conventional

breast cancer non-profits

are feeding the very beast that may someday destroy them and send them home

poisoned, emaciated, or mutilated beyond repair.

 

And you know what the pink ribbon non-profits will do to help these women?

WIGS. They'll give them wigs to cover their hairless heads.

 

 

 

 

 

Chemotherapy victim or concentration camp prisoner? They both produce these

same results. Zyklon B gas, by the way, was manufactured by a pharmaceutical

company.

 

 

 

It is

no coincidence that women who receive chemotherapy visually resemble the women

of the Nazi concentration camps. They become emaciated through dangerous losses

of muscle mass and bone mass. They lose their hair, vomit their food and suffer

the devastating effects of massive nutrient loss.

 

They are, in effect, both prisoners of the same system of control and violence

against women. It is a system that has existed for thousands of years, taking

on new names and new faces as it shifts from one corner of the planet to

another.

 

Today, that system of abuse and violence against women has a corporate logo, a

cute pink symbol and a clever slogan. It has hundreds of offices all across the

country, and thousands of pink products in retail stores. It is a system of

violence against women, painted pink and repackaged as something that cares for

women; and in that disguise, aided by the purchasing dollars of gullible consumers,

it is ensnaring women in a system of such great evil that it can only be

accurately compared to historical events like the Holocaust.

 

May God save our women from the cancer industry, lest we lose four generations

to this modern chemical holocaust

that has been unleashed against our mothers, daughters, grandmothers and

sisters. And if our government will not protect us from this home-grown

terrorism that seeks to turn the bodies of women into corporate profit centers,

I hope that the People of America will one day wake up and take all justified

(non-violent) measures to protect themselves from the cancer industry.

 

It is odd, I think, that women will protest in front of abortion clinics in

order to save the life of an unborn child, and yet that same woman will say

nothing when a cancer doctor destroys the life of her own mother or daughter.

It is time to start protesting the cancer clinics and cancer non-profits. It is

time to end this chemical holocaust

 

Throughout history, women have fought hard for the right to vote, to pursue an

education and to be heard. I believe it is time that women exercised those

rights to protect their freedoms and their lives from the conventional cancer

industry. and this

medical violence against women. The women should be marching against mammograms

and chemotherapy, demanding the arrest and prosecution of cancer surgeons who

perform unjustified double mastectomies.

 

About

the author: Mike Adams is a natural health researcher and author

with a passion for teaching people how to improve their health He is a prolific

writer and has published thousands of articles, interviews, reports and

consumer guides, impacting the lives of millions of readers around the world

who are experiencing phenomenal health benefits from reading his articles.

Adams is an independent journalist with strong ethics who does not get paid to

write articles about any product or company. In 2007, Adams launched EcoLEDs, a

manufacturer of mercury-free,

energy-efficient LED lighting products that save electricity and help

prevent global warming. He also launched an online retailer of

environmentally-friendly products (BetterLifeGoods.com) and uses a portion

of its profits to help fund non-profit endeavors. He's also a successful

software entrepreneur, having founded a well known email marketing software company whose

technology currently powers the NaturalNews email newsletters. Adams also

serves as the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a non-profit

consumer protection group, and pursues hobbies such as Pilates, Capoeira,

nature macrophotography and organic gardening.