How Effective is Chemotherapy

[Guest guest]

-

" lu5fhp " <lu5fhp

<oleander soup >

Sunday, October 05, 2008 7:03 PM

oleander and chemo

 

 

> Hi My wife is taking chemo after all, somebody

> know if it is ok take OPC with it?

> I am not sure if it is bad or not to take chemo but

> is her choice push by MDs so... I hope take oleander

> with FAC chemo cicles are OK. (she has brest c.)

>

> Thanks for any advice

----------

 

lu,

 

Maybe you missed the article shown below. It is only one of many

documenting the indisputable fact that chemo either doesn't work at all or

only works in very a small number of instances. However, along with a 2%

effective rate one does get a 100% guarantee from chemo which is a

damaged/ruined immune system and lifelong problems due to the chemo.

 

Best Regards,

 

Phil

----------

 

How Effective is Chemotherapy?

Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery are what conventional medicine offers

for cancer treatment in the US. The table below indicates that conventional

cancer treatment is missing the mark. Yet we are told that using

conventional methods is the only way a cancer patient can hope to get well.

Are we being lied to? You be the judge.

 

How Effective is Chemotherapy?

 

The following table was published in the journal Clinical Oncology in

December 2004. The results of this study were astonishing, showing that

chemotherapy has an average 5-year survival success rate of just over 2

percent for ALL cancers!

 

 

 

In the U.S., chemo was most successful in treating testicular cancer and

Hodgkin's disease, where its success rate fell just below 38 percent and

slightly over 40 percent respectively. Still well below the 50/50 mark.

 

A review of chemo on 5-year survival rates in Australia garnered almost

identical results, with a 2.3 percent success rate, compared to the U.S. 2.1

percent rate of success.

 

And this is the best that conventional medicine has to offer for treating

this widespread killer.

[Guest guest]

No Phil, I am aware of all that. Being that his wife has chosen chemo

and he has no control over this matter, I just didn't want to go there.

I'm trying to be as optimistic and supportive as possible.

 

Hugs,

 

 

oleander soup , " Phillip Zachary " <phil wrote:

>

>

>

> lu,

>

> Maybe you missed the article shown below. It is only one of many

> documenting the indisputable fact that chemo either doesn't work at

all or

> only works in very a small number of instances. However, along with

a 2%

> effective rate one does get a 100% guarantee from chemo which is a

> damaged/ruined immune system and lifelong problems due to the chemo.

>

> Best Regards,

>

> Phil

>

------\

----

>

> How Effective is Chemotherapy?

> Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery are what conventional medicine

offers

> for cancer treatment in the US. The table below indicates that

conventional

> cancer treatment is missing the mark. Yet we are told that using

> conventional methods is the only way a cancer patient can hope to get

well.

> Are we being lied to? You be the judge.

>

> How Effective is Chemotherapy?

>

> The following table was published in the journal Clinical Oncology in

> December 2004. The results of this study were astonishing, showing

that

> chemotherapy has an average 5-year survival success rate of just over

2

> percent for ALL cancers!

>

>

>

> In the U.S., chemo was most successful in treating testicular cancer

and

> Hodgkin's disease, where its success rate fell just below 38 percent

and

> slightly over 40 percent respectively. Still well below the 50/50

mark.

>

> A review of chemo on 5-year survival rates in Australia garnered

almost

> identical results, with a 2.3 percent success rate, compared to the

U.S. 2.1

> percent rate of success.

>

> And this is the best that conventional medicine has to offer for

treating

> this widespread killer.

>