Radiation long-term side effect

[Guest guest]

Bill Henderson's latest issue of his online newsletter was especially interesting to me. He had a lot to say about a particular radiation therapy used in the 80's and 90's, for which primary lung cancer is now showing up as a side effect. If you aren't familiar with Bill Henderson, his first wife died from cancer, and Bill was outraged by her painful and useless treatment. He has a passion to learn about alternative cancer treatments, and has developed a protocol which has cured many. He wrote an online book, puts out a free online newsletter and radio show, does phone consults (for a fee).

Here's what he quoted about radiation and it's dangers if you live long enough. " If radiation was used to treat a breast cancer in the early to late 90's, that radiation is likely to cause lung cancer after 10–20 years. That's right. We know radiation is dangerous, but did you know it is this dangerous? (I was not able to ascertain other years. My breast cancer was 1993.)

I discovered that I have metastasized lung cancer, a new primary, not from the breast cancer. It metastasized to the lymph nodes on the neck areas, which is how I discovere.d something was wrong. My neck was swollen. The lung cancer had probably been growing for years.

So, how does this help you? Be aware, be proactive. Take whatever actions feel right to you to monitor your lung on the side of the body that received the radiation originally. Consider getting chest x-rays beginning the tenth year after having radiation for breast cancer.

I know it seems strange to recommend x-rays, more radiation – maybe you know another way to monitor the lung. Even though I worked with a medical intuitive from time-to time, there was no evidence of the cancer until my neck was swollen.

The surgeon I spoke with said he usually doesn't see the lung cancer 'until 20 years after radiation.' The oncologist said he is seeing 'a lot of these cases lately.' Apparently they typically stopped using this 'dangerous' form of radiation around 1996. It could have been used longer in some areas of the country. But since all radiation carries with it a danger, be alert. The only symptom I had over the last several years was needing a lot of sleep. However, that was not atypical for me, and I had no other symptoms. You are in charge of your body. Be alert to changes in breathing, shortness of breath even if very mild, and get yourself checked.

What do I recommend? Stay on or restart a non-toxic treatment after 10 years. Muscle tests for substances such as protocel, would be very helpful. AlternativeCancer.us sells a kit with 12 cancer-fighting agents to test to see which, if any, your body would use effectively. Stay on, or restart, a healthy anti-cancer, sugar-free, gluten-free, eating plan. Get checked for fungus. I use live blood cell analysis and it showed a lot of fungus suddenly -- after, but not before, my diagnosis. Usually dark field scope analysis (another name for it) by an expert, spots illnesses long before we see their outward manifestation.

"

[Guest guest]

Darned criminals! Absolutely appalling. Like the SV40 scandal from the dirty polio vaccine.

Thank heavens for his outrage! - put to good use.--- On Tue, 9/23/08, Rhoda Mead <hummingbird541 wrote:

Rhoda Mead <hummingbird541 Radiation long-term side effectoleander soup Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 10:10 AM

 

 

 

Bill Henderson's latest issue of his online newsletter was especially interesting to me. He had a lot to say about a particular radiation therapy used in the 80's and 90's, for which primary lung cancer is now showing up as a side effect. If you aren't familiar with Bill Henderson, his first wife died from cancer, and Bill was outraged by her painful and useless treatment. He has a passion to learn about alternative cancer treatments, and has developed a protocol which has cured many. He wrote an online book, puts out a free online newsletter and radio show, does phone consults (for a fee). Here's what he quoted about radiation and it's dangers if you live long enough. "If radiation was used to treat a breast cancer in the early to late 90's, that radiation is likely to cause lung cancer after 10–20 years. That's right. We know radiation is dangerous, but did you know it is this

dangerous? (I was not able to ascertain other years. My breast cancer was 1993.) I discovered that I have metastasized lung cancer, a new primary, not from the breast cancer. It metastasized to the lymph nodes on the neck areas, which is how I discovere.d something was wrong. My neck was swollen. The lung cancer had probably been growing for years. So, how does this help you? Be aware, be proactive. Take whatever actions feel right to you to monitor your lung on the side of the body that received the radiation originally. Consider getting chest x-rays beginning the tenth year after having radiation for breast cancer. I know it seems strange to recommend x-rays, more radiation – maybe you know another way to monitor the lung. Even though I worked with a medical intuitive from time-to time, there was no evidence of the cancer until my neck was swollen. The surgeon I

spoke with said he usually doesn't see the lung cancer 'until 20 years after radiation.' The oncologist said he is seeing 'a lot of these cases lately.' Apparently they typically stopped using this 'dangerous' form of radiation around 1996. It could have been used longer in some areas of the country. But since all radiation carries with it a danger, be alert. The only symptom I had over the last several years was needing a lot of sleep. However, that was not atypical for me, and I had no other symptoms. You are in charge of your body. Be alert to changes in breathing, shortness of breath even if very mild, and get yourself checked. What do I recommend? Stay on or restart a non-toxic treatment after 10 years. Muscle tests for substances such as protocel, would be very helpful. AlternativeCancer. us sells a kit with 12 cancer-fighting agents to test to see which, if any, your body would use effectively. Stay on, or restart, a healthy

anti-cancer, sugar-free, gluten-free, eating plan. Get checked for fungus. I use live blood cell analysis and it showed a lot of fungus suddenly -- after, but not before, my diagnosis. Usually dark field scope analysis (another name for it) by an expert, spots illnesses long before we see their outward manifestation. "

[Guest guest]

Good stuff. I am not a fan of Protocel at all (it is pretty much an

all or nothing approach that is not compatible with too many other

good cancer fighters and virtually all immune boosters and

anti-oxidants) and I am more than a little bit weary of the test kits

I have seen marketed to see which cancer fighters would work best.

 

I think a person's best bet to keep cancer at bay after beating it is

to maintain a mostly healthy diet and lifestyle and take a single dose

of oleander every other day.

 

Myself - I have never had cancer, but what I do is take the oleander

most of the time and two or three times a year do a detox, and take

full oleander doses along with full inositol/IP6 and a few other

things for thirty days, and then slack off to smaller amounts again

(and sometimes I skip a month of taking many supplements at all).

 

My idea is that some cancers can take up to eight years to become

large enough to be detectable, and in the unlikely event any slip by

the smaller amounts of oleander I take (and several other things), I

will give them a good heavy duty zapping every four months or so just

to make sure to stop them in their tracks.

 

The reason I sometimes give most supplements a break is to let the

body function properly on it's own and not become dependent on

anything to regulate functions a healthy body should perform.

 

Nothing scientific, just my own thoughts and plan - and I want to

emphasize that I would not recommend giving anything a rest so long as

I were actively battling cancer.

 

Tony