Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Lutein best bet for macular degeneration

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I have been taking a supplement called " Eye Protection " which contains

6 mgs of Lutein, along with other neutraceuticals. Bottle sez to take

one cap daily. Any references on what is the maximum safe dose?

 

Alobar

 

On 9/30/07, surpriseshan2 <surpriseshan2 wrote:

>

> Lutein best bet for macular degeneration

>

>

http://www.knowledgeofhealth.com/report.asp?story=Lutein%20best%20bet%20for%20ma\

cular%20degeneration & catagory=Eyes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lutein best

bet for macular degeneration

 

http://www.knowledgeofhealth.com/report.asp?story=Lutein%20best%20bet%20for%20macular%20degeneration & catagory=Eyes

 

 

The Drug & Therapeutics Bulletin in once-Great

Britain took a pot-shot at

lutein dietary supplements this past week, suggesting

they are unproven, and

advising senior adults to avoid wasting their money.

Well, this writer, piqued by

health authorities once again misleading the public,

decided to challenge them

head on. Here´s the email that was sent to the editor of

the Drug and

Therapeutics Bulletin.

 

February 10, 2006

 

Dr. Ike Iheanacho, editor

Drug & Therapeutics Bulletin

London

 

Bill Sardi, Knowledge of Health, Inc., author of

User's Guide to Eye

Health Supplements (Basic Health Publications, Inc.,

2003)

 

Your desire to protect the public from unfounded health

claims made by some

dietary supplement manufacturers requires judicious

consideration of

surrounding facts.

 

You have expressed " concern about `promotional

claims for some nutritional

supplements´ aimed at people worried about macular

degeneration, " that certain

claims " appear to be medicinal " and would

therefore " be in breach of UK

medicines legislation. " From a legal standpoint,

this is true, but from a

scientific standpoint, current law may stand in the way

of adequately serving the

public.

 

While no lutein supplement maker can make a claim their

products prevent

macular degeneration, that doesn´t mean there isn´t a

large body of scientific

evidence to the contrary. Supplement manufacturers must

await long-term

interventional studies before they can make health claims

for their products, but that

certainly doesn´t mean the public will not benefit from

taking supplemental

lutein. Most older adults facing the risk for insidious

loss of central vision

due to macular degeneration haven´t the remaining years

of life to wait for

such long-term studies. They must make decisions based

upon the best available

evidence currently at hand. The public is not foolish or

unwise in taking

lutein supplements.

 

Your article suggests that formulas which provide " a

specific combination of

antioxidant vitamins and zinc (AREDS formula) " can

only be recommended to

specific groups of patients with macular degeneration

with advanced disease in one

eye only. The AREDS formula only addresses the rate of

progression, not the

prevention, of this debilitating eye disease. Millions of

at risk individuals

have been offered nothing in regards to prevention.

 

The AREDS study and dietary supplement formula were

conceived years ago and

did not include lutein. Your DTB bulletin suggests a diet

rich in green

vegetables, which provide lutein in variable and small

amounts, which is somewhat of

a concession that lutein may be of value. However, you

regard lutein

supplements to be of unproven (but certainly not

disproven) value.

 

More than 25 years ago researchers withdrew lutein (also

called xanthophylls)

from the diet of monkeys and the monkey eyes rapidly

exhibited changes in the

retina typical of macular degeneration. (1)

 

It should be noted that great apes that consume from in

the wild have

adequate levels of retinal lutein, while laboratory

monkeys on diets that are similar

to those consumed by many humans eating processed and

pre-prepared foods,

exhibit low retinal and circulating levels of lutein. (4)

 

Dietary studies find the combined intake of foods

containing lutein and

zeaxanthin as the nutritional factor most strongly

related to reduced risk for

age-related macular degeneration. The consumption of 6

milligrams of lutein per

day conferred reduced risk for this sight-threatening eye

disease. (2) An intake

of this amount of lutein from dietary sources requires

near every-day

consumption of foods like spinach and kale, which some

adults cannot consume due to

oxalate content related to kidney stones.

 

Surely, scientific studies have conclusively shown that

dietary shortages of

lutein can result in abnormalities in the back of the

eyes. Studies clearly

show monkeys on normal and supplemented diets exhibit

macular pigment

(xanthophylls-lutein) while lutein is absent in the

retina of animals placed on a

purified diet. (3)

 

Low retinal levels of lutein correlate with macular

degeneration. (4)

Lutein supplementation has been shown to increase

measurable retinal action

potential produced by light stimulation. (5)

It should also be said that the rise in cases of macular

degeneration has not

only come with increased longevity, but also with the

increase in obesity

which plagues well-fed western populations. Greater body

fat increases storage of

lutein in fatty tissues and may deprive the retina of

lutein. (6)

Supplementation may be the only way to provide sufficient

amounts of lutein for adequate

delivery to the retina.

 

Lutein is a filter for toxic ultraviolet and blue-light

in the center of the

retina (macula). Lutein may reduce blue light intensity

by 40-90%. (7)

Although the evidence regarding lutein and macular

degeneration is still associative

in nature, " it is biologically plausible. " (8)

The importance of lutein for ocular health has now been

raised by researchers

who consider lutein a conditionally essential nutrient.

(9)

Your bulletin should have been addressed privately to

supplement makers, not

issued to scare at-risk individuals away from safe

supplements, which was its

likely intent. Lutein supplements are the only reliable

and measured source of

lutein available to prevent macular degeneration, and due

to the problem

posed by oxalates, are safer and likely more effective

than food.

 

References

 

(1) MR Malinow, L Feeney-Burns, LH Peterson, ML Klein and

M Neuringer,

Diet-related macular anomalies in monkeys, Investigative

Ophthalmology & Visual

Science, 19: 857-863, 1980.

 

(2) Seddon JM, et al, Dietary carotenoids, vitamins A, C,

and E, and advanced

age-related macular degeneration. Eye Disease

Case-Control Study Group,

Journal American Medical Assn 272:1413-20, 1994.

 

(3) Martha Neuringer,Marita M. Sandstrom, Elizabeth J.

Johnson, and D. Max

Snodderly, Nutritional Manipulation of Primate Retinas,

I: Effects of Lutein or

Zeaxanthin Supplements on Serum and Macular Pigment in

Xanthophyll-Free Rhesus

Monkeys, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science.

45:3234-3243, 2004.

 

(4) Bone RA, Landrum JT, Mayne ST, Gomez CM, Tibor SE,

Twaroska EE.Macular

pigment in donor eyes with and without AMD: a

case-control study.Investigative

Ophthalmology 42: 235-40, 2001.

 

(5) Falsini B, Piccardi M, Iarossi G, Fadda A, Merendino

E, Valentini P.,

Influence of short-term antioxidant supplementation on

macular function in

age-related maculopathy: a pilot study including

electrophysiologic assessment.

Ophthalmology 110:51-60, 2003]

 

(6) Broekmans WM, Berendschot TT, Klopping-Ketelaars IA,

de Vries AJ,

Goldbohm RA, Tijburg LB, Kardinaal AF, van Poppel G.,

Macular pigment density in

relation to serum and adipose tissue concentrations of

lutein and serum

concentrations of zeaxanthin. American Journal Clinical

Nutrition 76: 595-603, 2002;

Hammond BR Jr, Ciulla TA, Snodderly DM., Macular pigment

density is reduced in

obese subjects. Investigative Ophthalmology Visual

Science 43: 47-50, 2002.

 

(7) Krinsky NI, Landrum JT, Bone RA. Biologic mechanisms

of the protective

role of lutein and zeaxanthin in the eye. Annual Review

Nutrition 23:171-201,

2003.

 

Krinsky NI, Possible biologic mechanisms for a protective

role of

xanthophylls. Journal Nutrition 132: 540-42S, 2002.

 

(9) Semba RD, Dagnelie G, Are lutein and zeaxanthin

conditionally essential

nutrients for eye health? Medical Hypotheses 61:465-72,

2003.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...