Guest guest Posted February 21, 2007 Report Share Posted February 21, 2007 February 21, 2007 Lobbying for Vaccine to Be Halted By ANDREW POLLACK and STEPHANIE SAULhttp://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/business/21merck.html?th & emc=th Reacting to a furor from some parents, advocacy groups and public health experts, Merck said yesterday that it would stop lobbying state legislatures to require the use of its new cervical cancer vaccine. The company said it made the decision after realizing that its lobbying campaign had fueled objections across the country that could undermine adoption of the vaccine. At least 20 states are considering making its use mandatory for schoolgirls, and the governor of Texas, Rick Perry, has already done so by executive order. Part of the states’ rush to embrace the vaccine has been instigated by Merck efforts that began before federal regulators approved the product last year. The vaccine is aimed at a sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer. Critics of the vaccine on moral and other grounds have used Merck’s perceived influence as a weapon in fighting the drug’s use. And some public health officials who favor the vaccine say the movement to make it mandatory has come too fast. Merck acknowledged that opinion yesterday, saying it would stop lobbying specifically for state mandates, many of which would require girls to be vaccinated before they entered sixth grade. But Dr. Haupt said that Merck would continue to provide health officials and legislators with education about the vaccine and would continue to lobby for more financing for vaccines in general. He declined to say how much money or staff resources Merck had expended in its efforts to require use of the cervical cancer vaccine. The vaccine, which costs about $400 for the three-shot regimen, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in June. Later that month, a federal advisory panel recommended that females 11 to 26 years old be vaccinated, although panelists have said that recommendation was not equivalent to recommending mandatory inoculation. But the speed with which legislatures have moved to require use of the vaccine before school entry has galvanized critics. Some say making a vaccine mandatory would pre-empt parental choice; others contend that protection from a sexually transmitted virus would encourage promiscuity. These people were joined by some worried about the influence of pharmaceutical companies. Merck has been a financial backer of Women in Government, a national organization of legislators whose members have sponsored some of the state laws to make the vaccine mandatory. It's here! Your new message!Get new email alerts with the free Toolbar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.