Guest guest Posted February 22, 2007 Report Share Posted February 22, 2007 At 02:30 AM 2/22/07, you wrote: >Merck agrees to stop lobbying for HPV vaccine. >Posted by: " Jagannath Chatterjee " jagchat01 jagchat01 >Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:50 pm (PST) > >February 21, 2007 > >Lobbying for Vaccine to Be Halted > >By ANDREW POLLACK and STEPHANIE SAUL >http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/business/21merck.html?th & emc=th > >Reacting to a furor from some parents, advocacy groups and public health >experts, Merck said yesterday that it would stop lobbying state >legislatures to require the use of its new cervical cancer vaccine. > >The company said it made the decision after realizing that its >lobbying campaign had fueled objections across the country that could >undermine adoption of the vaccine. > >At least 20 states are considering making its use mandatory for >schoolgirls, and the governor of Texas, Rick Perry, >has already done so by executive order. Part of the states' rush to >embrace the vaccine has been instigated by Merck efforts that began >before federal regulators approved the product last year. > >The vaccine is aimed at a sexually transmitted virus that causes >cervical cancer. Critics of the vaccine on moral and other grounds have >used Merck's perceived influence as a weapon in fighting the drug's >use. And some public health officials who favor the vaccine say the >movement to make it mandatory has come too fast. > >Merck acknowledged that opinion yesterday, saying it would stop >lobbying specifically for state mandates, many of which would require >girls to be vaccinated before they entered sixth grade. > >But Dr. Haupt said that Merck would continue to provide health >officials and legislators with education about the vaccine and would >continue to lobby for more financing for vaccines in general. > >He declined to say how much money or staff resources Merck had >expended in its efforts to require use of the cervical cancer vaccine. > >The vaccine, which costs about $400 for the three-shot regimen, was >approved by the Food and Drug Administration >in June. Later that month, a federal advisory panel recommended that >females 11 to 26 years old be vaccinated, although panelists have said >that recommendation was not equivalent to recommending mandatory >inoculation. > >But the speed with which legislatures have moved to require use of >the vaccine before school entry has galvanized critics. Some say making >a vaccine mandatory would pre-empt parental choice; others contend that >protection from a sexually transmitted virus would encourage >promiscuity. > >These people were joined by some worried about the influence of >pharmaceutical companies. Merck has been a financial backer of Women in >Government, a national organization of legislators whose members have >sponsored some of the state laws to make the vaccine mandatory. ****** Kraig and Shirley Carroll ... in the woods of SE Kentucky http://www.thehavens.com/ thehavens 606-376-3363 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release 2/14/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.