Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 At 01:13 PM 12/7/06, you wrote: >U.S. EPA considers delisting lead as an air pollutant > >That sound you hear? It's jaws dropping everywhere in response to the U.S. >EPA's announcement that it might stop regulating lead as an air pollutant. >Citing the fact that concentrations of the toxic heavy metal in the air >have dropped 90 percent since 1980, and using logic we can only assume was >supplied by EPA administrator Stephen Johnson's six-year-old >granddaughter, the agency says lifting the national standard may be >justified " given the significantly changed circumstances since lead was >listed [as an air pollutant] in 1976. " In other words, listing it worked >so well, we might as well delist it. Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), who's >set to take over the House Committee on Government Reform, told Johnson > " this deregulatory effort cannot be defended " and urged the agency to > " renounce this dangerous proposal immediately. " Meanwhile, the U.S. >Consumer Product Safety Commission is recommending that lead be banned >from children's jewelry. Because. Lead. Is. Poisonous. Now close your mouth. > >[ email | discuss | + digg | + del.icio.us ] > >straight to the source: San Francisco Chronicle, Associated Press, John >Heilprin, 06 Dec 2006 > >straight to the source: Scientific American, Reuters, Timothy Gardner, 06 >Dec 2006 > >straight to the source: The Washington Post, Annys Shin and Juliet >Eilperin, 07 Dec 2006 > >see also, in Gristmill: Ghoul-y jewelry ****** Kraig and Shirley Carroll ... in the woods of SE Kentucky http://www.thehavens.com/ thehavens 606-376-3363 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release 2/14/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 At 01:13 PM 12/7/06, you wrote: >The Good Phyto >Global warming affects ocean's tiny plants, which could affect global warming > >Proving that big things do come in small packages, researchers say global >warming could hobble the teeniest marine organisms, phytoplankton -- which >could, in turn, lead to more warming. Whuh-huh? Well, these wee plants not >only make a tasty sea snack, they provide a vital piece of climate-change >resistance by absorbing carbon dioxide -- more than 100 million metric >tons a day, accounting for about half of the photosynthesis occurring on >the planet. But a decade worth of satellite data analyzed by a team from >Oregon State University shows that the plants' productivity slows when sea >temperatures rise. The data, said lead author Michael Behrenfeld, " clearly >showed that overall ocean productivity decreases when the climate warms. " >Besides worrying about the food chain, researchers fear a vicious climate >cycle: warming leads to less carbon-sucking, which leaves more carbon in >the air, which leads to more warming, which leads to ... less >carbon-sucking. O phytoplankton, we hardly knew ye. > >[ email | discuss | + digg | + del.icio.us ] > >straight to the source: News, LiveScience, Sara Goudarzi, 06 Dec 2006 > >straight to the source: The Guardian, James Randerson, 07 Dec 2006 > >straight to the source: The Independent, Steve Connor, 07 Dec 2006 ****** Kraig and Shirley Carroll ... in the woods of SE Kentucky http://www.thehavens.com/ thehavens 606-376-3363 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release 2/14/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.