Guest guest Posted October 8, 2006 Report Share Posted October 8, 2006 At 05:43 PM 10/7/06, you wrote: Source: http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/1004-10.htm FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE OCTOBER 3, 2006 2:16 PM CONTACT: Environmental Working Group (202) 667-6982 When Should You Buy Organic? Free Guide Ranks Pesticide Contamination of Fruits and Vegetables WASHINGTON - October 4 - If you're concerned about food safety, you probably already look for organic produce at the supermarket. But if you can't always buy organic, you can still dramatically lower your family's exposure to chemical pesticides by choosing the least pesticide-contaminated fruits and vegetables with the Shopper's Guide to Pesticides in Produce. The Shopper's Guide is a handy, wallet-size card that lists the " Dirty Dozen " most contaminated fruits and vegetables, as well as the 12 most " Consistently Clean " items. It's available for free download at www.foodnews.org. The newest edition of the Guide comes in both English and Spanish versions for the first time. The Shopper's Guide was developed by Environmental Working Group (EWG), based on the results of nearly 43,000 tests for pesticides on produce by the Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration between 2000 and 2004. EWG's computer analysis found that consumers could cut their pesticide exposure by almost 90 percent by avoiding the most contaminated fruits and vegetables and eating the least contaminated instead. Eating the 12 most contaminated fruits and vegetables will expose a person to about 15 pesticides a day, on average. Eating the 12 least contaminated will expose a person to fewer than two pesticides a day. " Federal produce tests tell us that some fruits and vegetables are so likely to be contaminated with pesticides that you should always buy them organic, " said Richard Wiles, EWG's senior vice president. " Others are so consistently clean that you can eat them with less concern. With the Shopper's Guide in your pocket, it's easy to tell which is which. " EWG's analysis of federal testing data found: Peaches and apples topped the Dirty Dozen list. Almost 97 percent of peaches tested positive for pesticides, and almost 87 percent had two or more pesticide residues. About 92 percent of apples tested positive, and 79 percent had two or more pesticides. The rest of the Dirty Dozen include sweet bell peppers, celery, nectarines, strawberries, cherries, pears, imported grapes, spinach, lettuce, and potatoes. Onions, avocados, and sweet corn headed the Consistently Clean list. For all three foods, more than 90 percent of the samples tested had no detectable pesticide residues. Others on the Consistently Clean list include pineapples, mango, asparagus, sweet peas, kiwi, bananas, cabbage, broccoli, and papaya. There is growing scientific consensus that small doses of pesticides can adversely affect people, especially during vulnerable periods of fetal development and childhood when exposures can have long lasting effects. Because the toxic effects of pesticides are worrisome, not well understood, or in some cases completely unstudied, shoppers are wise to minimize exposure to pesticides whenever possible. While washing and rinsing fresh produce can reduce levels of some pesticides, it does not eliminate them. Peeling also reduces exposures, but valuable nutrients often go down the drain with the peel. The best option is to eat a varied diet, wash all produce, and choose organic when possible to reduce exposure to potentially harmful chemicals. Although the Shopper's Guide only measures pesticide residues on produce, buying organic also makes sense if you're concerned about bacterial contamination. Organic farmers meet all the sanitation standards required of conventional growers and, on, top of that, meet tight restrictions on the use of compost and other organic material that do not apply to conventional fruit and vegetable growers. SunToads....... The above article failed to give a link for the Shopper's Guide to Pesticides in Produce. Here are several links that may help. SunToads was unable to open up the complete printable version. http://www.foodnews.org/walletguide.php http://www.foodnews.org/ http://www.foodnews.org/fulldataset.php Test Results: Complete Data Set Rank (worst to best) Commodity Combined Score Percentage of Samples Tested with Detectable Pesticides Percentage of Samples With Two or More Pesticides Average Number of Pesticides Found on a Sample Average Amount (in ppm*) of All Pesticides Found Maximum Number of Pesticides Found on a Single Sample Number of Pesticides Found on the Commodity in Total 1 Peaches 100 96.6% 86.6% 3.1 1.134 9 42 2 Apples 89 92.1% 78.9% 2.5 0.901 9 37 3 Sweet Bell Peppers 86 81.5% 62.2% 2.4 0.138 11 64 4 Celery 85 94.1% 79.8% 3.0 0.413 9 30 5 Nectarines 84 97.3% 85.3% 3.0 0.576 7 26 6 Strawberries 82 92.1% 69.1% 2.2 0.843 8 35 7 Cherries 75 91.4% 75.8% 2.8 0.290 7 25 8 Pears 65 87.2% 47.4% 1.6 0.544 6 32 9 Grapes - Imported 65 85.3% 53.4% 1.7 0.291 7 32 10 Spinach 60 70.0% 31.2% 1.1 1.240 6 24 11 Lettuce 59 58.9% 33.0% 1.3 0.108 9 49 12 Potatoes 58 81.0% 18.0% 1.0 1.655 4 18 13 Carrots 57 81.7% 48.3% 1.6 0.046 6 31 14 Green Beans 53 65.4% 39.0% 1.3 0.187 6 34 15 Hot Peppers 53 55.0% 27.5% 1.0 0.290 6 51 16 Cucumbers 52 72.5% 31.7% 1.2 0.057 6 40 17 Raspberries 47 47.9% 23.3% 0.9 0.906 6 21 18 Plums 45 56.2% 10.2% 0.7 1.359 4 17 19 Grapes - Domestic 43 61.4% 21.8% 0.9 0.107 6 29 20 Oranges 42 83.3% 28.8% 1.2 0.084 4 15 21 Grapefruit 40 62.3% 22.6% 0.9 0.530 5 9 22 Tangerines 38 66.7% 33.3% 1.2 0.375 3 4 23 Mushrooms 37 60.2% 22.3% 0.9 0.158 5 16 24 Cantaloupe 34 54.9% 20.1% 0.8 0.028 4 21 25 Honeydew Melon 31 59.2% 14.2% 0.8 0.012 4 16 26 Tomatoes 30 46.9% 13.5% 0.6 0.029 5 16 27 Sweet Potatoes 30 58.4% 10.0% 0.7 0.198 3 17 28 Watermelons 28 29.4% 14.0% 0.5 0.028 6 18 29 Winter Squash 27 39.8% 12.6% 0.6 0.019 5 16 30 Cauliflower 27 72.4% 8.1% 0.8 0.004 3 4 31 Blueberries 24 27.5% 10.0% 0.4 0.327 4 11 32 Papaya 21 23.5% 5.0% 0.3 0.053 4 19 33 Broccoli 18 28.1% 3.2% 0.3 0.004 3 19 34 Cabbage 17 17.9% 4.8% 0.2 0.121 3 18 35 Bananas 16 41.7% 2.0% 0.4 0.029 2 7 36 Kiwi 14 15.3% 3.4% 0.2 0.160 3 8 37 Sweet Peas - Frozen 11 22.9% 2.3% 0.3 0.010 2 5 38 Asparagus 11 6.7% 0.6% 0.1 0.026 2 19 39 Mango 9 7.1% 0.5% 0.1 0.057 2 13 40 Pineapples 7 7.7% 0.6% 0.1 0.002 2 7 41 Sweet Corn - Frozen 2 3.8% 0.0% 0.0 0.005 1 3 42 Avocado 1 1.4% 0.0% 0.0 0.001 1 2 43 Onions 1 0.2% 0.0% 0.0 0.000 1 2 Note: We ranked a total of 46 different fruits and vegetables but grapes are listed twice because we looked at both domestic and imported samples. * ppm means parts per million Back to Full Results www.ewg.org is the website for both Environmental Working Group and EWG Action Fund Copyright 2006, Environmental Working Group. . Headquarters 1436 U St. N.W., Suite 100 | Washington, DC 20009 || Contact Us California Office 1904 Franklin St. Suite 703 | Oakland, CA 94612 || Contact Us ******************** The above information has been forwarded to you by SunToads Health News. We write very little of the materials you receive. We do not use a web site. If you cannot open a link just copy it and paste it into a search engine. Please do not fuss at SunToads because a link does not open when you click on it. We would have fixed it if we could have. PLEASE NOTE: Some rs receive only a portion of their email. This is because these rs have chosen email providers/servers that have restrictions, often unknown to you, on email such as size limits, storage time limits, numerical limits, etc. Please check to see if you have restrictions applied to you. AOL has done much to interfere with our emails. We recommend changing from AOL/RoadRunner (Time Warner) if you don't like others dictating what you can read. Some anti-spam programs also interfere. Each time we send out an issue we are overwhelmed with non-delivery notices. At some point, we delete these rs who generate repeat non-delivery notices. If you think you have been deleted, just again, hopefully using a better email provider. Our experience is that AOL does not like truthbringers. Here is a typical message that came to us from them: Your mail to the following recipients could not be delivered because they are not accepting mail from jfeb. The senders address was MAILER-DAEMON. We know that AOL routinely blocks certain senders without your knowledge or consent. If you have friends with AOL, please tell them they do not get what they think they are paying for. Some servers, supposedly because of anti-spam programs, require that SunToads send a separate message to confirm that we are not spam. We don't have the time to deal with this. Perhaps others that send to you don't have the time either. The result is that you may not be getting email that you really want. If you don't receive at least one newsletter during any 60-day period, that could mean that we have lost all our data. You may ask us to confirm your subscription status. Thanks. Many people are now using SPAM-blocking software or junk-mail filters offered by their email providers or purchased programs. These filters may also prevent you from receiving e-letters that you have d to like SunToads Health News. If you are using these filters, you may want to consider adding our e-mail address to your " safe list " : jfeb . We hardly know why we bother to say all this because you likely will not get this email if your email has a problem. You might pass this info to your friends? This newsletter is for those who want to know more about: 1. Current serious health threats even though you may not be sick now. 2. Suppressed cures. 3. Sources of info so you can do further research. 4. Controversial health information, typically non-mainstream. 5. Alternatives. Bits and pieces. Our Archives list can be emailed to you ONLY IF YOU FOLLOW THESE DIRECTIONS exactly because we are not automated. We delete emails when we don't recognize the subject. 1. In the Subject of your email, type: STHN archives requested 2. Then, in the Body of your email (the text area), type in your email address 3. E-mail your request to: jfeb Please send us similar health info you are aware of and include references, if possible, so others can do further research. Since our staff volunteers its time and we do not charge you for our efforts, we are therefore unable to pay money to writers. Feel free to forward this material to those who may have an interest in better health. SunToads Health News emailings are on no particular schedule. We don't claim to be experts or doctors, we just search for suppressed and little known information. Any statements made by SunToads are solely our opinions and in no way constitute medical advice. Opinions expressed in material written by others are their opinions, not necessarily ours. Sometimes other writers may say something we are sure is incorrect. For example the writer may say cow's milk is great and parasites are bad. SunToads happens to think that neither cow's milk nor parasites are great for humans, but we won't torpedo the entire article if the overall information is helpful. We inform you of what we find, we do not practice medicine or guarantee the accuracy of what we find and forward. From the huge amounts of material we review, we select material that we feel is likely to be largely accurate. We do not pretend to be infallible. As more valid research becomes available, today’s best information often goes on tomorrow’s junk pile. We continue to learn just like you do. We are aware that there are often volumes of intentional disinformation and misinformation on many subjects. You too need to be aware that deliberate lies are frequently promulgated (especially by government, politicians, and pharmaceutical interests). Sorting it all out is not always easy. We have seen web sites that claim to expose lies and truths. Some of these sites have a dark agenda and/or are run by poorly informed people. We try to forward info to you that will give you a wider perspective, and will hopefully be mostly true given the current knowledge base. We will NEVER intentionally mislead you. Occasionally we are blasted by a venomous reader shrieking nasty remarks about something he/she doesn't agree with, and always he/she fails to offer evidence or research to help us determine if we have forwarded incorrect information. This behavior is unproductive. It sends a barb to our hearts, and in no way helps anyone. We are pleased when this type person s….. and we may even drop he/she from our list without their requesting it. YOU decide what is credible and if you wish to use the information we forward. We do this newsletter because we have personally had health successes and know of many others who have. We do this because we care about you, not for any personal gain......... well, maybe......... we learn from you guys too. All information is for educational purposes only and is not intended to diagnose, treat, or cure any disease. For clarification and/or professional advice, you should seek the opinion of an appropriate licensed professional. We never rent, loan or sell our e-mailing list to anyone. You may , , or change your email address ONLY IF YOU FOLLOW THESE DIRECTIONS exactly because we are not automated. We delete emails when we don't recognize the subject. UNSUBSCRIBE 1. In the Subject of your email, type: Un STHN 2. Then, in the Body of your email (the text area), type: your email address 3. E-mail your request to: jfeb SUBSCRIBE 1. In the Subject of your email, type: Subscribe STHN 2. Then, in the Body of your email (the text area), type: your email address 3. E-mail your request to: jfeb Change email address 1. In the Subject of your email, type: Change email address STHN 2. Then, in the Body of your email (the text area), type the word " Old " , then type your old email address 3. Then, in the Body of your email (the text area), type the word " New " , then type your new email address 4. E-mail your request to: jfeb All other correspondence 1. In the Subject of your email, type: STHN (plus whatever else is appropriate) Note: When we see STHN in the subject line, we do not consider your email to be spam. --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release 2/14/05 ****** Kraig and Shirley Carroll ... in the woods of SE Kentucky http://www.thehavens.com/ thehavens 606-376-3363 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.859 / Virus Database: 585 - Release 2/14/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.